ABC defames Abetz
Bolt spends his time offering nothing or very little. He spends most of his time watching all the media he regards as not worth paying attention to. Then he draws attention to and amplifies their opinions drawing our attention to their possible validity. His opinion might be the reverse of theirs however he's far from convincing. Defending Eric Abetz is a case in point. Abetz is old he is unaware of the modern world and obviously does little to acquaint himself with it. He showed that with his stupid correlation between abortion and cancer. You'd expect that as a politician he or his office would have brought him up to scratch. However that's not the case and he just ploughed ahead into a fools paradise of his own making. He did it again with his 'negro' reference which Bolt energetically defends as ignorance. Had either of these remarks been made by Malcolm Turnbull what would Bolt be saying now?
"Yes, that term is now very loaded, a fact Abetz did not know."
The fact that Abetz didn't know is his and his office's incompetence. He was after all a Cabinet Minister for god's sake. Clumsy is that a quality comparable to his ex leader. Bolt also defended Abbott on countless occasions for being simply a clumsy leader and look what happened to him.
"Clumsy, maybe. But ‘racist”? That is false, "
If ignorance of the law is no excuse for Australian citizens why is ignorance of the facts be an excuse for a politician. Bolt was found guilty in our courts for being lose with the facts. You can get away with it of course if your a member of a fascist government or Joe Bjelke-Petersen
Well said and to the point.
JB replied to JB
Fri 30 Oct 15 (09:38am)
Reply to MattR:
So you’re saying that this blog doesn’t constantly re-hash the same few topics (’warmists’/Islam/indigenous Australians/refugees/the ABC/’leftists’) in order to generate controversy/scaremonger whilst relying on information provided almost solely by regular contributors to the same blog (that’s cherry-picking one very small sample size of the population if ever I’ve seen it). This is why Andrew is referred to as a ‘columnist’ not a reporter. No new info, no investigation and no alternatives are ever suggested here.
Media vs Republicans
It's the Media that is out of control according to Andrew Bolt. The Media Terrorist.For conservatives, 'left media bias' represents the ultimate comfort blanket.Fox has a long history of guiding the Republican party on policy positions and influencing the GOP primary process, and several of the candidates' debate remarks were conspicuously similar to narratives that have originated on or been promoted by the Fox News Channel.
Source: Speaking Of Media Bias...
A GOP Debate Scripted By Fox News
Something will turn up. Malcolm, the media and just talking up a recovery
Like the US Republicans and Fox News Andrew Bolt has only on bullet and it has no content. Repitition by slime is the name of his game.
Bolt's efforts at humor aren't his own because he simply has no jokes in his bag. But he certainly isn't a Goon who he admires. If he sees this blog as funny then he is just merely a goon.
What I have noticed over the year of watching AB is that he has a team, does minimal work but labours over it for hours. He's formulaic and developed hi singular approach to topics years ago. He relies on repetition and others for support because he really isn't a standup he'd be a terrible one trick pony. So in order to do what he does his blogs become the centre of his weeks work, the core of his columns, the footnote ideas to his report and radio much of which aren't his anyway. He runs on parallel lines. On Q&A he'd be a rabbit in the spotlight. a fish out of water and not at all missed if not here. News Corp wouldn't lose readers Channell 10s rating would go up because of the petrol heads and Radio might be worth listening to. Since Abbott has gone Bolt has lost his mojo.
Climate change policies: it’s how you sell it that matters |
No comments:
Post a Comment