Post-truth is staring Julia Baird in the mirror
Julia Baird, of the ABC Left, complains
about "not just about the abandonment of fact, but how ... trust in the
media is the lowest it has been since 1972". Baird blames Trump for her
"post-truth" glums, but let me hand her a mirror.
"So who are these misogynists - these women-haters - whose
"visceral sexism" and "anxieties about women and power" were exposed by
the rise of our first Prime Minister?
Let's take Baird's examples in order." Bolt
This is the quality of work you can expect from gender hater Andrew
Bolt who conflates sexism with the simplicity of gender -ism and the
clear cut distinction of both. Women apparently can't be sexists even
when they wrote a book like the Female Eunuch. Bolt the dumb C he is
sets about naming Women and Leftists trying to respond to answering Baird's issues.
He lists a number of women and men who have made disparaging
remarks against Julia Gillard proving Baird right not wrong about Australian Culture. When even the
people on the list get things so wrong Australia culturally does remain a
backwater compared to the USA. Dumb gets dumber when Bolt says "Few readers of the New York Times would have known just who
the examples Baird gave were that smeared Gillard but New Yorkers didn't need to know. Baird was talking about us all.
Bolt who thinks he's an intellectual legend in his own lunch time can't
see what it is Baird is actually saying that we are culturally lagging behind on
the issue after so many years. DUH
"Had they realized those examples of "misogyny" in fact came from a
veteran feminist, a female ex-unionist, a female journalist, a
speech-coach writing for a far-Left newspaper and a Liberal Senator
speaking three years before Gillard actually rose to power, would they
have accepted Baird's thesis that women-haters destroyed Gillard?" Bolt Yes if they understood the article which presumably the did more than Andrew Bolt.
"Julia Baird, former ABC journalist and voted one of Australia’s Top
100 Intellectuals, has no trouble fooling the New York Times about the
women-hatred she alleges brought down Julia Gillard."Bolt
I think Bolt has an issue with Baird being described as an intellectual on a list where he isn't. However
that's just a guess on my part but knowing Bolt I'm happy believing
I've hit the bull's eye. But then he is as thick as a brick and believes
he's on the mark when it comes to logic and clear thinking.Given
Julia Baird is seriously ill Bolt realizes that smearing her won't
bring on a rapid come back any time soon. One can only ask is that his
nature, nurture or a mixture of both. It's living proof however that
Julia Baird's argument is right and Bolt not only fails the logic test but the empathy and understanding one as well. He does however pass the public idiot test with flying colors.
As for media distrust Andrew Bolt & News Corp have taken the Herald Sun and anything Andrew Bolt has to do with to the least trusted or believed media source in the country. Well don Andrew Bolt. News Corp have now taken full control of Sky News no doubt it will mirror Fox News and take it to the least trusted audio and visual broadcaster in the country. It's ratings are a closely guarded secret. I wonder why?
Who lets them in?
The evidence is overwhelming that out
refugee program puts Australians in danger. There was the Muslim
Lebanese intake, and, more recently, the Sudanese. But then there's also
the Afghans - like violent gang leader Farhad Qaumi.
Bolt is like a head master in a Catholic Boarding school walking around picking out the bad seeds bad behavior he see's in the kids ordering them to confession to repent and be punished for their sins. Train and don't spare the rod his philosophy. He's got his black book in hand and his list which he attends to daily. His garden of weeds.
He just can't figure out why some kids don't seem to fit in. It would never occur to Fr Bolt that the school has active group of pedophile staff and that the very school was the enabler of far greater crimes that have gone unlisted simply because of it's very existense. Or that Bolt a devotee of Western Christian values is trying to run his school in China, India or the Middle East . Bolt is a living example of the saying" he can't see the forest for the trees." But then Bolt doesn't believe in the notion of a forest in the first place so he says it's just a nation of trees or individuals. That is total bullshit. However concept of forestry management is beyond him. He's got his book and his list and it tells him which trees need the chop. However every tree has faults so when does he stop only he knows. Farhad Qaumi is in Bolt's book he's a great example for Bolt's narrative of chop.
Muslim Lebanese, Sudanese Afghan individuals are examples Bolt searches for because Bolt does not want to prove his case studies are just exceptions to the rule but are in fact the rule and that ethnic integration is in fact the exception it doesn't exist. Bolt wants us to believe Ethnicity and Creed are the triggers and explanation for his little book of deviance. However the statistics simply prove him wrong so he often calls the the Social scientists, the police and record collectors wrong and even conspiratorial. Isn't that what the extreme Left do?
" Other Afghan refugees: Mohammad Ali Baryalei, who became a leading recruiter for the Islamic State before joining it in Syria, and Numan Haider, the Islamic State follower who stabbed two police in Melbourne. Add to them the rapist who told the court his background was to blame, and the teenager accused to trying to buy a suicide vest."
Andrew Bolt demands that of himself and says it's wrong when he so easily gets stereotyped. Well what's he doing here if not stereotyping these 3. Bolt switches and changes he's a weather cock, the misguided researcher trying to fit his collection of examples into his singular theory to prove a rule when in fact these 3 are exceptions and their Ethnicity and Creed are not the primary reasons to explain their behavior. History tells us that there are thousands of integrated Afghanis in Australia and that Bolt's wrong.
That the statistics change over the years and that Afghanis Sudanese and Lebanese aren't just what Bolt want's them to be bad seeds. In fact Bolt is living proof of why we need Section 18C he is a person charged and found guilty of Vilification, and defamation 2-3 times a multiple serial offender and we can be sure a target of multiple complaints like Haron Monis. Complaints by Australians of better standing. Bolt his is a living example of his own question who let him in. He is a convicted pest.
We did because multiculturalism and diversity is a plus even when we hear Bolt born here offend us. He told us he's never felt Australian for over 30 years. That's over half his life. He says he does now but then we know what monkey says this monkey doesn't do. He'd chop down the forest of the Aussie "fair go " if he was forestry manager that's for sure.
Try beating this anti-Trump insanity
Tim Blair has detected peak ani-Trump
insanity: a Democrat fundraiser who checked himself into a psychiatric
unit for three days to cope with his grief over Trump's win. And he actually wrote it up.
Racism banned, except the legal kind
Which of these two Victorian Government
advertisements in the Pakenham Gazette is correct? The one saying it is
"unlawful for an advertiser to show any intention to discriminate on
the basis of sex, pregnancy, race"? Or the one advertising a job for
"Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander applicants only"?
Hinch says Turnbull suggested his ABCC sabotage
Derryn Hinch was attacked as a CFMEU stooge
for telling the Turnbull Government to add a two-year delay in making
the anti-union provisions binding on companies in exchange for his vote.
Now he says it was Malcolm Turnbull who suggested it to him.
No comments:
Post a Comment