News Corporation employs Andrew Bolt and provides him with a platform ensuring the inequality of speech. Bolt's Blog not only advocates conservative, right wing and Tea Party views it moderates out most opposing opinions which he is entitled to do. However Andrew Bolt simply lies when he says he provides an arena for fair and balanced discussion in a no spin zone. He doesn't it's all spin.
Wednesday, 19 April 2017
Andrew bolt's Blog,20/4/17; Is Andrew Bolt's job safe?; Bolt is trying to suck our faces; Red Hill and Free Speech in action; Turnbull did save Abbott he won; The truth about Berkley isn't Bolt's; Are you religiously pornographic or a wife beater? Man is the only creature worth defending; Abbott was worse;
Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly has helped set the bar for the
normalization and dissemination of right-wing hatred, offering
incendiary commentary about sexual harassment and assault, gender, race
and ethnicity, low-income people, the LGBTQ community, Muslims and
refugees, immigrants, and reproductive rights. Now that O'Reilly has
been forced to step down from The O'Reilly Factor after an advertiser
revolt over revelations that Fox News’ parent company, 21st Century Fox,
paid $13 million in settlements to women who came forward with reports
that O’Reilly was a sexual predator, Media Matters takes a look back at
some of the lowlights of his career, including his history of inaccurate
and embellished reporting.
" “This is just the beginning,” wrote a member of the neo-Nazi website
the Daily Stormer. “This is a sign that we have moved into a new era in
the Nazification of America. Normie Trump supporters are becoming
racially aware and Jew wise. They are willing to stick up for themselves
side by side with Nazis without being adverse to violence.” Trumpster " local police have an official policy of not
intervening in small physical conflicts between citizens since doing so
could increase the risk of injury. Mother Jones reporter Shane
Bauer was on the scene and asked several police officers why they were
doing nothing in response to the widespread violence:" Below one of Bolt's boys smashing a girl in the face
Bolt failed to mention the
arrests made of the Alt Right when they came to battle the students on
the Berkley campus. They came en mass and with weapons and the police
did nothing It wasn't the left that got the publicity it was the violent
right that made the headlines in the American papers. Bolt imports his
own version. Coulter, Milo weren't banned from Berkley at all it closed
down and did so because the police did nothing the right invaded the
campus ground and brought weapons. Bolt as usual selects his facts to
suit his version of the events. Notice Milo has been replaced by Coulter
they are just "provocateurs" White Right and Respectable. Had the been
Blacks for ISIS or Muslims for Sharia what sort of reception would they
have got in the Bolt's ideal Land of free speech and The First
This is a PaywallTrash to attract you to subscribe to the Australian But this reveals a lot about
Bolt he prefers a fantasist and a liar over and above a truth teller as a
leader who can advise. Bolt is the minder to a belly dancer the real
cool legend in is own lunch time that tried to impress us with his opera
art and antiques. He tried to impress us all with a Baron Von Munchhausen fantastic lie and the things he owns to convince us he's an adviser and leader to be listened to. Listened to over and above Senator Scott Ludlam who could only offer us the truth of his life's experiences and other genuine qualities
on his CV. Unlike Bolt Scott doesn't have a false claim like Bolt
educated at Adelaide University. Scott didn't lie about his drug taking
but Bolt lied when he was sprung by his ex fiance he called her out for
bullshit until she came up whith undeniable proof. Bolt's walking on
eggshells when it comes to attacking the man. He flopped when he did it
to Adam Goodes and Waleed Aly. It's look of a very ugly Australian who promotes himself a holder of true Aussie values Boozer
Values are best discussed when defined something Bolt never does other than saying "I'm Indigenous" "I'm not a Christian" "I'm a victim" What are Australian values in a Multicultural country. If he can't define them other than by pointing to people to others why doesn't he allow others to do the same. He defines them speaks about and for them harrangs us about them like an old fish wife who is entirely dissatisfied with Australia. Now he hand balls the undefined job to Turnbull knowing fully well he can't either it's a poison challis only because it doesn't exist and it simply brings Australia down rather than up What are Australian values? | NITV
It seems Bolt has run out os topics so much so he's shown this interview 3 times why? At the core is his pet propaganda 'free speech'. Bolt doesn't debate never has and never will. He is never seen on a platform where the space time and format is equal to all parties and the questions being asked have a representatives to argue against Andrew Bolt without their hands tied. Bolt chooses "his set". The majority of his time is taken up attacking the men or women with whom he disagrees either personally or by him telling us their point of view. He's neither the Drum, Q&A or the Insiders on the ABC. He is Fox News USA.
He presents false facts, under whelming facts, skewed statistics and even quotes from yesteryear to prove his points rather than gain an understanding which isn't his goal. It's watching Bolt trying to squeeze marshmallows into a money box. Most of his time is trying to promote or defend ultra conservative values not middle of the road conservative ones but Australia's own extreme right ones and overseas guests of even greater extreme and notoriety are his guests Milo an example. Bolt is always 'right' in the moment and even 'right' when wrong. If wrong he never apologizes but just moves on public apologies spell death in a 24/7 media cycle and moving on is to forget. So when Milo got ostricized by the right Bolt just left his favorite boy behind as if he were road kill. Even Bolt's dearest 'free speech' arguments weren't used to defend Milo. If Bolt is forced to legally apologize it's only offered in writing and deals are done in secret. Basically Bolt is the media's sewer rat.
'Free speech' is Bolt's favorite topic he defends it when he has something to say and pretends he can't even when he can that's how twisted he is. 'Free lies', 'false facts', 'vilification', 'rudeness' are all allowed and are tools of the trade along with redefining terms, flipping in order to reduce arguments to nonsense if possible like 'I'm an Indigenous Australian". The goal to make a noise with access to the power of a global corporate resource News Corp. A space and platform that loses money from Bolt's activities but nevertheless sells influence and does it globally.
So in Bolt's definition of 'free speech' individual and private opinion shouldn't be restricted by government or law as is the case of our RDA. Yet that's not the only area it is legally accountable. The work place is another environment where restrictions exist. MPs are exempted and protected from slander when sitting in Parliament. In the case of Red Hill the Student Union at Sydney Uni can be deemed private as it's a totally voluntary organization one the conservatives wanted. Dendy Cinemas are private as are all the other organizations not wishing to show Red Hill. There are no restrictions on Andrew Bolt showing it but he's not is he? He could as a special event on The Bolt Report but he won't. Everybody it seems is in the arena of 'freedom' non government and according to Bolt can do what they will. It seems that the product being sold however 'reverse sexism' and the attempt to redefine our history and social reality of a male 'rape culture and domestic violence is not one believable. Men simply aren't victims.
Redhill is out there for public consumption and it's allowed to be out there there are no laws preventing it to be out there but it's statistically irrelevant a fairy tale, a distortion of what life is and like the The Bolt Report without News Corp can only find a limited audience. Like Mark Latham without the patronage Andrew Bolt gets from Rupert it's dead in the water. At some time or place in history it may get a hearing in some social science class about how a misconstrued view of the social construction of our reality found difficulty in getting traction even when it had the support of Andrew Bolt and News Corp who could but wouldn't show it. There is no debate here just promotion disguised as whinging..
"And we're supposed to believe that Turnbull - who was so uninspiring
that he lost 14 seats - somehow managed to turn Abbott's potential
landslide loss into a landslide win?"BoltYou won't convince Bolt however Turnbull won the Party's approval Abbott lost it and Australia relaxed including Warringah. The rest is "I think" "You think" Well they thought they had an ice blocks chance in hell with Abbott didn't they!!!
But how many immigrants would confess to being a wife-beater or to marrying off their young children?" Bolt
If Bolt wanted to immigrate to Australia today would he put on his passport "convicted vilifier and liar"? Should all the Dutch applicants be judged on being exceptions like Bolt?Marrying children off at a young age is a cultural practice among Hindus, Christians and Buddhists and yes even Agnostics it's cultural so which of these faiths should be banned?Selling children off in the sex trade seems to be very much practice in Western culture and it's promoted on the internet. Pornography seems to be more in demand in the West among Christians. Given these are all cultural practices and not religious ones and practices actively practiced in the West. Why is Bolt even suggesting they aren't and are exclusive to others. Yes what we have here is Bolt's piggy bank of conclusions he wants you to believe and he's trying to shove marshmallows of evidence of his making into his pig to make it all seem real.
Bolt's attitude is
typical of a colonial invader discover the USA dislike the Indian
population and commit genocide slaughter millions. Enter the world of
the shark kill them because it's territory you want. The world of the
tiger, koalas whatever legitimately belongs to man to do what he will
with. Bolt's like a pandemic disease ready to attach itself to a
population feed off it and if need be destroy it if that's the most
useful and profitable path for him and his kind to take. Self interest
benefits mankind fuck the shark it's just flake. Don't bother to just
understand them like a Green Left wing tree hugger who like the shark
need to be moved out of Bolt's way
Yes Abbott supports what Turnbull does but Abbott did nothing about the rort it became all Bolt is doing is actually not saying Abbott's approach did nothing. He's mocking Turnbull why? Because he's Turnbull of course but not mentioning that Tony Abbott was an enabler of activities that allowed visa holders be sold into slavery. Bolt doesn't give a rats about 457 visas it's Turnbull he wants disparaged and Abbott lifted but he can't all of that here because Abbott was worse.