ANDREW BOLT|Old Dog Thoughts |
News Corporation employs Andrew Bolt and provides him with a platform ensuring the inequality of speech. Bolt's Blog not only advocates conservative, right wing and Tea Party views it moderates out most opposing opinions which he is entitled to do. However Andrew Bolt simply lies when he says he provides an arena for fair and balanced discussion in a no spin zone. He doesn't it's all spin.
Monday 29 May 2017
Andrew Bolt's Blog 29/5/17; Bolting in reverse pointing out Christian Terror
Margret Court went beyond debate in her BDS call against QANTAS. Bolt always said "actions speak louder than words" So the voices he calls bullies are not voices responding to a debate at all they are voices responding to Margret Courts actions and her call to follow. That's not debate nor is Roger Franklins call to blow up the ABC and kill people. If it's Bolt's paradigm for "free action" He reveals himself to be what he is a very dangerous enabler of terror.
America Trumpland has just doubled it's intake of refugees according to the NYT from 110k to what will amount to 240k. There is no evidence that the 4% refugee intake is or has been a danger to this country it's at it's worst in Andrew Bolt's mind. Why does Bolt prove statistically that knows what he's talking about. Bolt conflates refugees with Australians Bolt attributes any crime committed by a migrant and his definition amounts to 50% of us to be a crime committed by a refugee. Then he is a refugee to. The ground that Bolt argues on keeps shifting simply by referring to the changing definitions. One day he's praising the intake of the 12.000 Syrians Christians and Yazidis today he's asking why are we letting them in. He demands the sacking of Yassmin but avoids the words of Roger Franklin. He's however the archetype of the whinging Dutchman not wanted here and not wanted there either.
God is allover this terror spree and guess what the suspect is not Muslim and his name is Godbolt. Despite the fact is god is all over this reported act of terror, the killer prayed to die in a suicide by cop event but god prevented it you won't hear a word from Andrew Bolt because the perp is a Christian. This doesn't fit Bolt's evidence of Muslims running amok with hate'Two people were killed by a white racist in the US defending a Muslim woman from racial abuse for just being in god's own country. You won't hear a word from Bolt about that either. Andrew Bolt prowls the global news looking for crimes committed by the 1.6 billion Muslims against Christians and celebrates his aberrant statistical points with a I hate Muslim narrative. If he simply did a body count he'd be proven ever so wrong and Islamophobic.
Typical of Bolt when his stories and narratives fail he reverses the blame. The experts are conspiratorial in this case the boss of ASIO. The fact is Andrew Bolt is the selective evidence taker and he collects it globally the he stretches the imagination by either delivering his facts like Australia has had more Islamist attacks than the UK or event the authorities in the are hiding the truth. They are hiding it in the the USA as well Orlando being Bolt's example. The FBI has stated it wasn't and Islamist massacre and Bolt maintains it is still today. Note above massacres by Christians are never mentioned because they don't fit his narrative. There is something mentally deficient in Bolt's approach and I'm being polite in saying it's simply a blinkered political and bigoted view proved.
Bolt is amazing isn't he in this statement he tries to say it's not normal to find crime, illness and dysfunction to be multicultural in a multicultural nation. He might as well be blaming parents for not aborting their children who turned out to be criminal. But no he's blaming Immigration which in fact allowed his kind in as well. The UK police have stated they have thwarted 18 terrorist conspiracies in the past 5 years and Bolt of course has to make it look like 27,000 in the UK because his 400 "active" threats here would make us look like the worlds most threatened country. 18 Threats thwarted in the UK in 5 years 400 in less time here. UK has x6 the number of Muslims. The only threat I see clearly is Andrew Bolt and he's allowed to be an enabler of terror.
No mention of One Nations flagging poll ratings in Qld. No mention that MT still remains the preferred leader over Abbott and Shorten. Reading polls like he reads statistics on Muslim dysfunction Bolt fails to mention that Murdoch's favorite sons are falling out of the trees because the advertisers are deserting them. Ailes, OReilly and now Hannity isn't looking safe. Will Murdoch start looking at the Australian ratings and start sacking people? We subsidize News Corp Print media to the tune of 30% and get no National value. We so do rely on the ABC critical vision of politics don't we.
What Bolt fails to mention is it's not only MSNBC that's reported Kushners want to open up covert channels of communication with Russia. It's the whole of MSM. The revelation being that Kushner Trump's son-in law is the man in the White House under investigation. The outrage being shown by Bolt is not outrage but Fox News policy and a PR rescue.MSNBC's Joy Reid debunks right-wing media claim Kushner's approaches to the Russians were "completely normal"
Obviously Bolt is twisting the English Language for distortions sake. Muslims have always said those participating in terrorism aren't Muslims they may have tried to hijack a religion but they aren't in any way a part of it. Bolt has tin ears. Are we to believe Bolt is agnostic simply because he says he is but then insists we are a nation that must abide by Christian values. Well Bolt certainly not any Agnostic I know of. He's not a Muslim but is the first to uphold ISIS media briefs. Like ISIS here he is naming who are and who aren't Muslims as a matter of simple definition you aren't what you do but who you say you are and in the event nobody heard you it's people like Bolt who are enabled to say who you are. If actions speak louder than words Abedi wasn't a Muslim. The "idiotic denier" is self evident here
"Why is the Public Health Association of Australia making an (ignorant)
submission on an issue that has nothing to do with its expertise or
responsibilities?: " Bolt
If there is an "inherent link" between Islam and terror and no "inherent link" between Christianity and Terror or simply No other Religions and Terror. How is it Bolt simply avoids reporting all other cases not involving Muslims. If there is a necessary inherent element that connects Islam and terror it must be Andrew Bolt and his ilk because they simply turn a blind eye to all other terrorist events. Go to the top of todays posts and you will find two,
There is something Bolt fails to consider here if the government fails to raise a large amount of money does that justify not taxing those who have been allowed to make inordinate amounts of profit in a system that's encouraged Corporate routing. Bolt somehow regards tax as a punishment. He seems the punishment should be overlooked because it's not severe enough and if too severe it should also be overlooked. When is it ok to tax people? Well it seems he agrees with the majority of us all that the wealthy are under taxed given their contribution to the productivity of the nation. 20 people are valued at 100 billion dollars what % of tax do they pay whatever Bolt says it's not enough therefore it appears it's not worth taxing them.
No comments:
Post a Comment