Monday 18 March 2019

Andrew Bolt's Blog,18/3/19; Bolt's disguise is a disguise; Bolt is very Pro-Israel Pro Censorship; Stop Advertising at SKY; Right-wing terror was constantly denied but encouraged; Morrison encouraged division as a political too; Howard used it as far back as 2001;

















22m
9
Like Trump listen to Bolt appear to play 2 sides but is still playing one. Toning it down a notc today will he still be toning it down the rest of the year?
Bolt's podcast: Here we have Andrew Bolt whose anti-moderate politics, tribalises anyone daring to call for moderation as a "lefty" or anyone saying 'we' in politics a centre-left whoos. Any group complaining about not getting a fair go is tribal. Conservatives included However, who he claims are the real victims in his reality.
 All Andrew Bolt desperately trying to do here is defend himself from a mass murderer whose manifesto sounded more Bolt than anything on the left. What's rattled Bolt is that this mass murderer had a Manifesto and it was alt-right. In short, we have Bolt doing a Trump after Charlottesville saying there is good and bad on both sides, and this was the misguided act of an individual. "I,m really a good guy because all I want is to talk."
Firstly remember when after Barcelona Bolt spoke of how he admired the conviction of the young Jihadis' beliefs that brought them to fight in what they believed. Back then he said he wished Westerners had that same conviction in their's, and it was time they showed it instead of showing their cowardice? Well, Bolt revealed that to be either bullshit or what it is he's saying in his podcast is. It sounded very much an attempt to radicalise some White Christians to fight back. Some only because it's not meant to apply to his sons. Now he doesn't want Dom caught in the "crossfire".
Bolt has made so many indications he'd gladly put on a uniform and fight for this country and expect the kids of today to do so.  Another Gallipoli or another Vietnam was in order but not "his" kids of course. That's the sort of hypocrite Andrew Bolt is. However, let's make a reasoned guess about his son Dom whose, not part of this disgusting hardly reasoned or apologetic podcast He is still the dad's tech on it.

Bolt's deflecting trying to seem calm on the surface like a duck on water but paddling like hell underneath. Bolt doesn't just talk about Immigration he's not the misunderstood victim of anything. If anyone has listened to him and remembered Cronulla, he's Alan Jones.
They aren't misinterpreted victims but provocateurs. The danger is that they want to be seen as free speech martyrs in a Democratic Agora where everyone including corporations is meant to be seen as equal, but they're not. Bolt's not on a fruit box he works for those who own the Agora.
Jacinda Adern was right in a true Democracy the Agora is the nation and al citizens "us". Andrew Bolt still insists it's not but a political divide at war. Did he say Abbott shouldn't have sent troops to the Middle East to bomb the crap out of families no he cheered? He was for the lies that excused the invasion of Iraq from where ISIS resulted. Is that his form of political discussion? He's totally against Multilateralism the UN and that forum of debate, and he runs the Bolt Report as an antithesis to debate. He was never for or wanted reasoned discussion then and since Abbott never wanted our parliamentary democracy to work. He wanted and still wants a takeover by an extreme right of this country again lead by Tony Abbott.
For Bolt, anyone against that is "tribalist' Aborigines calling for the Bolt-shiviks to get their foot off their neck are just 'tribalists'. Waleed Aly is a" tribalist " outspoken women are "tribalists". How often have we heard Bolt call them that yet he doesn't say that of himself? Aborigines want justice, not for themselves but all of us, Waleed wants justice for all of us. Bolt alt-right don't want that because it just may mean the loss of privileges. So no need to do anything but policing these complainers or those he sees as complainers who step out of line, structurally, institutionally and culturally guard against and drive them out of existence. That's the soft sounding Bolt the snake who resides among us. He's standing naked for all to see.
Ultimately Bolt like Howard, like Morrison, like Abbott all saw the political opportunity in a division between "them"  and "us "  However that politics also encouraged the UPF, Reclaim Australia and Brenton Tarrant We have seen the increase of these groups since 2013 and Tony Abbott's Team Australia, and promoted by Andrew Bolt defining those not good enough all this time.  However today he's playing Trump after Charlottesville saying "There is good and bad on both sides." but never when a Muslim does, it or Africans do it.
Will Bolt be finally banned or charged under our RDA laws again instead of allowing him to point to Jane Carrow for what Bolt has been doing daily for years he's not the victim of racism and never has been. Ignorance is no excuse under the law. Australians are asking how did we get here? Well, Islamophobia is practically enshrined as public policy | Jason Wilson | Opinion | The Guardian

Why wasn't  Sky Channel charged?



Rupert Murdoch’s Fox postpones Pirro, as his Sky Channel is Pulled from NZ Airwaves for airing Shooter’s Video




 Al Jazeera's Mehdi Hasan Blasts The Media For Lopsided Coverage Of Islamic Terrorism | Crooks and Liars

Will the real Andrew Bolt please stand up? (ODT)

“it is easy to condemn the far right nut case,” but dealing with the “soil and what's been created, the culture of demonization, of fear, of incitement from main stream columnists, pundits, TV hosts, and politicians” is another matter entirely.
We have been conditioned to believe that a terrorist attack is only an attack carried out by a brown dude with a beard shouting something in Arabic.
Of course, statistics show otherwise. The ADL says three-quarters of terrorist deaths in the United States over the past decade were carried out by far right domestic white nationalist terrorists, a quarter by Muslims.
Can we say that the media coverage of terrorism in this country is 75 percent white nationalists, 25 percent Islamic terrorists? In face, Georgia State University did a study. They found that a Muslim terrorist gets four and a half times as much coverage of his crimes as a non-Muslim terrorist. Four and a half times.
a non-Muslim terrorist has to kill, on average, seven people more than a Muslim terrorist to get equal coverage, as a Muslim terrorist. That's a hashtag media fail. And I'm always reminded of that old viral tweet that terrorism is one of the only areas where white people do most of the work and get none of the credit.

An Israeli soldier attempts to block the view of a photographer as soldiers body search Palestinian men in the West Bank city of Hebron on June 22, 2017. (Wisam Hashlamoun/Flash90)

 A spike in censorship: Israel censored on average one news piece a day in 2018 | +972 Magazine

Andrew Bolt is Pro Israel and says he's pro-free speech he's joking, isn't he?

The IDF Censor prohibited the publication of more news reports last year than in almost any other year this decade. While fewer articles were submitted for review than in previous years, the percentage of stories that were partially or fully censored was significantly higher.
Beyond the direct harm to freedom of the press – with 22,371 stories over the past eight years that were disqualified entirely or in part – it is likely to assume that the mere existence of a censor creates a chilling effect. Israeli journalists know what issues they cannot report on, and often simply avoid them to begin with.
 


















Far Right

Christchurch Mosque Shootings must End Unconcern with Right-wing Terrorism

No comments: