Monday 25 March 2019

Andrew Bolt's Blog,25/3/19; Washing Blood off his hands and kidding himself he's innocent; The Jimmy Olsen of News Corpse; Adau isn't an individual to Andrew Bolt;





















26m1
 No, the Greens don't have blood on their hand's Bolt does, and he's trying to wash it off as fast as he can. He's not talking to Dr Di Natale he's talking to a mirror. Bolt made a fool of himself on Sky so to compensate he does what he does best debates, Di Natale, no, he disparages him with his son at home alone by talking into a mirror with his son playing his sidekick.

Like Bolt, Tarrant carried that hatred with him, and it was reinforced not by what he saw in Pakistan but the Far-Right in Europe the gun club in NZ and the friendship groups he made on the internet supported as a backdrop by the voices in the MSM like Andrew Bolt's. News Corp is like Musac in Tarrant's English speaking world. However, his psychopathic and sociopathic hatred was formed like Bolt's long before at an informative age. Bolt's a Europhile he identifies as a Dutchman and admits he never felt and still doesn't feel at home here and hates what he sees as happening. According to him Muslims Africans and Multiculturalism have turned this country from white to rainbow, and he's been actively promoting against it with News Corp's massive technical resources with the backing of the IPA and Conservative politicians and their political use of hate speech. With some, it's just political tactics with Andrew Bolt, it seems to run much deeper as it does with the UPF, Reclaim Australia, One Nation and Fraser Anning the very opposite of the Greens. A hate that's permeated the likes of Brenton Tarrant and accelerated with force on the internet. Tarrant found himself in a country with gun laws that gave him the opportunity that Bolt actually called for after the Barcelona killings. For young committed Christian men to fight back. He asked why didn't young Australian Christians fight back with the conviction of Islamists. Bolt even said he admired the strength of their beliefs and wrote about it.

 To excuse himself Bolt just keeps running the same old Trump cherry in different forms that there is some sort of equivalency between the Far Right and the Far Left. That violence is universal, and therefore there is good and bad on both sides and violence the extreme on both. The problem being that's the Bully declaring his innocence by saying they made me do it is an excuse. In the case of Christchurch, it's the Left the Greens finger pointing at Bolt himself that's supposed to explain the Right-wing they're constant accusations that he was to blame has put blood on their hands,

Bolt claims the Australian shooter can't have been influenced by him because Tarrant hadn't been in Australia for 3 years, therefore, couldn't have internalised or been radicalised here by him.
Bolt was raised in a Dutch migrant family his mother never adjusting to being here in a new country. Bolt said they were a Sattelite family. He was socialised never to feel Australian, and he claimed it wasn't until he was in his 30's with his children did any empathy arise, and even today he seems less one of us than some recently arrived migrants.
The claim being made is the shooter born and raised here in Grafton must have been radicalised outside of the country and not by the Islamophobia Bolt has been spreading in the media for 2 decades. Socialisation and the internalisation of our social psychology is by process of osmosis something that doesn't occur overnight and Bolt's living proof of that being raised in a family and by a mother who resisted being Australian passing that on to Bolt. Tarrant was the opposite didn't he absorbed Australian Culture which the media particularly News Corp Australia's most significant voice in this country raised an atmosphere of Islamophobia from 9% to 33% in the community which the 28-year-old grew up. The Greens certainly never had that power and don't have it today Bolt does he boasts he has a reach of over 3million people kids absorb that public acceptance of hate making expressing white patriotism and nationalism a symbol of defence and loyalty over a reality that didn't exist so openly. Bolt always like people in power project their worst behaviour an blame others. It's that what Bolt helps with the division between "them" and "us" which Bolt claims are typical but the fault of the Greens whose members are democratically elected, unlike Andrew Bolt. 

Bolt supports Fraser Anning's reaction to being egged why is it because he like Fraser Anning had a violent response to being pranked? A reaction that in both instances tended to GBH maybe Anning should have accused the Greens as being Antifa like Bolt does as it that word is sufficient to explain the violence witnessed by both for just being pranked. The one thing you can be sure of Bolt's motives for protecting Anning have nothing to do with Anning; it's all about defending himself. By the way on his podcast Bolt clearly identifies as a Dutchman and not as an Australian.

 

White Nationalism’s Most Powerful Accelerant

All that matters is that this mass murderer, like so many who have preceded him of late, is a young man moved to violence by an international ideology of fascism—exhilarating, purpose-driven, meaningful. Ultimately, intoxicating. This ideology has entered the mainstream over the last decade to a degree unseen in my lifetime, finding adherents at the highest levels of power around the world. And the primary accelerant fueling this inferno is the internet.   However, it's there, and Murdoch media has been supporting it for years. 
 Bolt has been working "as pilot fish for more extreme figures, their efforts, in concord with the YouTube algorithm, rapidly draw viewers toward more extreme fare. And there’s seemingly nothing they fear more than demonetization, deplatforming and an overnight plunge back into obscurity, à la Milo Yiannopoulos and Alex Jones."
The most effective way of stopping him as we have seen by his reactions is to turn his advertisers away; it's what he fears most.

ON THE BOLT REPORT TONIGHT - MARK LATHAM, AND TRUMP VINDICATED


How bothered is Bolt by his yelling match with Di Natale he's been blogging podcasting writing and now back on TV about it? He didn't spend that amount of time on the NZ massacre as he's done on this. It indicates just how badly he thinks he performed and he did perform poorly. Let's just assume somebody including himself is desperately trying to make up ground. Panic is panic and Bolt's punching blindly at thin air. Hope his advertisers are watching just how badly this man performs in the rational world.

MASSIVE FAKE NEWS FAIL: TRUMP CLEARED OF COLLUSION

1m

Removing Trump won't remove the infrastructure of the party that embraced him; the dark money that funded him; the online radicalisation that drummed his army; nor the racism he amplified and reanimated. Trump is a symptom, not the cause.

What we know:

  • Special counsel Robert Mueller turned over his long-awaited final report on the contentious Russia investigation
  • Attorney-General William Barr has now issued his four-page summary of the report
  • That summary said the report did not find that President Donald Trump committed a crime, but also did not exonerate him
  • Read our full story here or read the four-page summary here

Again we can take as read Bolt is just being the ventriloquist's dummy for FOX News here.
Two questions were asked of the Mueller Investigation.
 1) Was there attempted Russian interference in the 2016 election?  The principal subject of the inquiry.
 The investigation found YES, and it was intended to negatively influence the prospects of Hilary Clinton.
 Bolt ignores that in its entirety. 

2) Was there any collusion found with the Trump campaign?
The answer no none was found.
However, that didn't mean he was exonerated nothing was found on Trump and his family and while Mueller made no further recommendation of indictments to the DOJ he did deliver what was found however to various other jurisdictions to follow up and decide.
It's not over yet, and the fake crowing won't stop those further investigations from proceeding.  

  It's Mueller time but don't forget: Trump has undermined the very idea of America | Robert Reich | Opinion | The Guardian








MODEL BEHAVIOUR

Then: "Adau Mornyang has called for South Sudanese community leaders and parents to take control of the teens who have been involved in violent crime." Now: "A prominent model... faces a possible 21 years in an American jail after drunkenly attacking an attendant on a flight from Melbourne... Adau Mornyang, 24, will be sentenced in June."

40mLink


PAYWALL
 If your South Sudanese then Andrew Bolt is watching you what you say and your behaviour anywhere and everywhere if you live in Melbourne and put a foot wrong then the heat is on. You represent the whole community of South Sudanese in this country and at times all Africans.

 Why is Bolt tribalizing Adau when two days ago he insisted we are just all individuals, and every one of us can make errors of judgement and commit offences. After all, Bolt did, and his accusers could have sought further compensatory justice and didn't. His lawyers didn't appeal the guilty verdict suggesting they too didn't believe his claim of innocence.
 Why is Bolt electing to shine his heavy light on this young girl? Because Adau is South Sudanese, she's black and possibly a refugee but mainly because she's Bolt's unwanted immigrant. Bolt wouldn't have brought her up had she been white middle class and Dutch. They too commit crimes some much more violent than Adau's and Bolt never mentions them because they are regarded as misdemeanours.

 Yes, white upper-class girls also commit crimes which more often are more severe and are let off. Adau isn't representative of her class community or family as Bolt hints. He's certainly not representative of journalism.
 Here what's different for a change is Andrew Bolt's not yelling "who let them in" too embarrassing at the moment I guess because it makes him out to be what he says he isn't a racist, a tribalist and a bigot.
 However, it's not strange Sky News was the only media group blocked from NZ during the Christchurch mass shooting. NZ didn't group all media as a class represented by Sky News ethics, but they may as well have been prewarned had they taken Andrew Bolt as representative of the media group. Jacinda Adern could well have said much earlier no "you're not one of us". When she just took Sky off the air. It's about time advertisers, and Australians one and all said that of Murdoch Media and Andrew Bolt "your not one of us. Who let you in?" not because they are typical of all media corporations but because they are just unethical in what they do and what they do is part and parcel of an unethical global business model whose practice diminishes who we are and our Democracy. Maybe the US Justice system will be more lenient to Adau we know Andrew Bolt wouldn't be if he were the judge yet he's implicitly a kerbside one here.
By the way, Bolt suggested the stabbing of a priest in Montreal was terrorist-related last week yet police said it wasn't will Bolt admit he was wrong he never does.
 Australia’s racist image and the communities of faith

PM wanted Stan Grant as his man to fill empty seat

Peter FitzSimons
Peter FitzSimons
Nine days ago, the TV journo and now university professor received a very curious phone call from the PM.
As I have said more than once is all that Andrew Bolt does is follow articles in Fairfax and the ABC and nothing original? No, he possibly gets ideas printed in Murdoch's global media as well. Bolt rarely if ever originates any news or information himself. Extrapolate that fact to his columns and what he calls books, and you will discover. Bolt does just a little or nothing original. He's a signpost to various topics posted by others. 
He dared criticise Fitzsimmons for his English while his own is riddled with mistakes as shown in his banner. He thinks of himself as Superman but after 30 years remains less than Jimmy Olsen.
As for Stan Grant Bolt actually has whined that Stan Grant has been made a professor and that no university would make him one
" He is currently the ABC's Indigenous and International Affairs Analyst and Professor of Global Affairs at Griffith University in Queensland, Australia. Wikipedia"
Bolt the opinionator with no qualifications versus Grant who has a degree is an author of 2 books not just a collection of articles like Bolt and a respected journalist on global affairs was unfairly picked to be a professor in his specialty at Griffith's university. While Bolt the white victim would never get his foot in the door for that simple reason. What a pathetic creature and role model to his son that man is.


No comments: