Andrew Bolt's Blog 26/3/15; Bolt and NSW lies; Budgets and memory lane forgotten; Bevis Butthead and Hyla; IS recruiting and lies in print; Bolt tries to use Dr Dennis's work to scare monger what does Dennis say;Cockshit of a Churnalist;

There is no source offered for Bolt's graph however we all agree that turning to the IPA is not going to provide a reasoned answer.
" Whipping up a good crisis has become the foundation on which every case for every reform is now built."
" Of course, what the crisis mongers hate to admit is that Australia is
not only one of the richest countries in the world, but that it is one
of the lowest taxed countries in the developed world. And as one of the
richest nations the world has ever known we can afford to do almost
anything we want. We can't do everything we want, but we can do
virtually anything. What defines us as a nation are the choices we make
about what we want most."
Dropping interest rates the rumour that foreign investment will dry up in the third richest country in the world is just a justification for creating a housing bubble by forcing savings into not only into the housing market but shysters like Henry Kay. Also into the hands where we know only a few "rogues" lie according to Corman, Financial Advisers. Capitalism in the modern era is "churning" of money never allowing it to rest. Lack of confidence has been allowed to let spin take control. It's a bit like walking down Swanston st with the spruikers running wild. eg INVEST in coal there's no better time now , now, now. It's a money opportunity carousel and it's encouraged by our current government to create schemes not real ideas because it's a rogues gaming house. Sorry in this game only where rich get richer. WHERE HAVE THIS CABINET INVESTED PROPERTY NOT COAL
Bolt love thrillers however he and the Murdoch Hive in the UK, USA, here are asking the same question at the moment because they have spent so much energy trying to prove to the world as we know it the Anglosphere that we are not just at risk to a destructive cult but to a world wide religious belief Islam. It really is a Mills and Boon thriller where you are asked to guess the answer they want you to. Their reason is specifically political advantage.
WHY WAS THE COCKPIT DOOR LOCKED?
It's a valid question in the hands of a forensic investigative team but not in the hands of a CHURNALIST whose blogs are never random.
Bolt's Lies:
1 Questioning the sale of Public Utilities to Foreign Governments is Racist. Raising issues of security on our levels of association with differing governments is responsible any way you look at it.
2 Privatisation will lower prices. When it does little more than create a monopoly is no guarantee of lowering prices. As competition hasn't been created.
Let the public vote. Liberals will lose seats and it will be Abbott's doing as much as their own.
Remember Hockey and his privately audited unrevealed budget before the election. "we'll tell you when we are ready to tell you" Remember the book that was printed at our cost to sell the new wonderful budget we were to get the book that told us nothing. Remember our reaction. How could we forget. We are still talking about the last budget. The most discussed in history
Butthead Bolt thrills at Bevis Blair's anti-Feminist post about jazz hands. They say bears do it with a slap but only if their friendly these guys go home with closed fists dragging on the ground. The caliber of Blair was highlighted in his article on Lakemba hiding in the public bar of the only and lonely hotel. These lads are bleacher comics they do everything from a distance.
What makes sense is Hyla and Bevis Blair are sidekicks while Butthead Bolt watches on in delight. It's blokey thing and all three get off giving women the "show me your tits" line when they can. However when he told Cate "he'd brought the beer" he folded. Abbott wants to make Cate an Aussie dame because the these Murdoch men treat her like a broad. Ugly Australians what can you say other than News Corp. I wonder who is the ventriloqist and who is the dummy Blair or Hyla I think they take turns on each others lap. This time it was Hyla's

When the truth is not in the telling. Hoopla is changing and supporting a successful format Feminism failed in the market. Next the competition from larger players required deep pockets as they paid their writers. The ABC did too under licence however news.com Murdoch's business model didn't. Wil Colvin employed as a journalist found news.com's business model changed from journalism to Churnalism. That's the act of taking stories from others rewriting them and posting them as their own. This brought about a united frontal attack on young Colvin's reputation by guess who Bevis and Butthead not for revealing new.com's business model but his personal habits. In other words they slagged him to deflect attention to the lack of professionalism at news.com. He was suspended from Media Watch instantly.
Churnalism suffocated Hoopla not the ABC, and Colvin got maligned by News Corp for revealing it. You won't hear that from Bolt.
Labour may not win but the Liberals won't have the numbers they once had. Abbott has already been blamed for that. How has he benefited Baird? If Foley has an increase in seats how would that impact on Shorten? Sorry Bolt you are struggling to convince anybody.
Andrew Bolt is scare mongering and making a case with an article by Dr Richard Dennis executive director of the Australian Institute. Let me also quote Dr Dennis when he astutely comments on the likes of Andrew Bolt and our current government. Something you won't hear from Bolt.
Dr Richard Dennis
" Whipping up a good crisis has become the foundation on which every case for every reform is now built."
"Of course, what the crisis mongers hate to admit is that Australia is
not only one of the richest countries in the world, but that it is one
of the lowest taxed countries in the developed world. And as one of the
richest nations the world has ever known we can afford to do almost
anything we want. We can't do everything we want, but we can do
virtually anything. What defines us as a nation are the choices we make
about what we want most."
"But of course our current
leaders would simply prefer to scare us into thinking we have no choices
than to engage us in conversation about why their vision for the
country is the the right one."
"A grown-up government would treat
the public like grown-ups. It would come clean about the options we
have, the trade-offs we face, and admit that countries who collect far
more tax than us have no problem attracting foreign investment or
retaining their greatest minds. Like most Australians, most companies
want to work in a community that is healthy, happy and cohesive"
Bolt lies: "Al-Taqwa
College principal Omar Hallak told The Age he believed IS was a scheme
by Israel and America to control oil in the Middle East. But he said
he did not explicitly mention these countries to students, instead
telling them some Western countries were behind IS. "
Bolt simply ignores the above facts and says
" That’s it? Teaching children that Israel and the US created and armed
the Islamic State just to control Arab oil is merely unhelpful, at most ”wrong-headed”, but we should “appreciate” the principal’s “sentiment”?"
Bolt would have you believe the college is not a place of learning but a training camp "teaching"
However what he's not saying he believes ASIO and the AFP with an extra $650mill are not doing their job as well as he is. They are totally blind to this public event and incompetent. Most journalists in MSM get things wrong and Bolt is happy when he can support his argument quietly denigrating our security forces.
Hallak is not saying anything more than was said after Paris " Je Suis Hedbo" except Israel's Likud can say Je Suis IS. Why are so many Jews against Zionism and supporting the JVP are they also anti-Semitic? As one of Australias top recruiters Bolt also can also say Je Suis IS. If he lived in Darebin he'd be called out for it.
Bolt is not a Libertarian. His call to unite is a hypocritical pretense. You choose who he really is!
Labour usually embrace freedom of choice in personal matters, but
tend to support significant government control of the economy. They
generally support a government-funded "safety net" to help the
disadvantaged, and advocate strict regulation of business. Liberals tend
to favor environmental regulations, defend civil liberties and free
expression, support government action to promote equality, and tolerate
diverse lifestyles.
Conservatives tend to favor economic freedom, but frequently support
laws to restrict personal behavior that violates "traditional values."
They oppose excessive government control of business, while endorsing
government action to defend morality and the traditional family
structure. Conservatives usually support a strong military, oppose
bureaucracy and high taxes, favor a free-market economy, and endorse
strong law enforcement.
Libertarians support maximum liberty in both personal and economic
matters. They advocate a much smaller government; one that is limited to
protecting individuals from coercion and violence. Libertarians tend to
embrace individual responsibility, oppose government bureaucracy and
taxes, promote private charity, tolerate diverse lifestyles, support the
free market, and defend civil liberties.
No comments:
Post a Comment