Andrew Bolt's Blog 24/5/16, Where in the world is hate-speech legislated?; Stating the Delcon effen obvious; The plan for the Obvious; Complaint hurts the feelings of those with their foot on your neck; Oh Bolt is a suffering and indigenous; Wilkie's to blame scoop before the Chilcot Report;

 

Arguments and more arguments - well put, of course

 

Click on Bolt's Neil Mitchell link and you get Italian music can the man get anything right?? 9.45 pm  the man is drunk as well as incompetent. Tino Rossi singing Catari Catari is not a well put argument by either Bolt or Mitchell.

 

 

 

On The Bolt Report and radio tonight 

56 Abbott supporters photos. Is Bolt pushing for a spill? How odd is this man when he calls Bronwyn Bishop, Julie Bishop, Phillip Rudd, Malcolm Turnbull, Arthur Sinodinos and others traitors in the same breath Abbott supporters?

 

 

 

 

Background added

PAYWALL For Bolt

• Bolt's on Facebook who he criticizes

• Bolt's Twitter  who he criticizes

• Bolt's Sky who he criticizes

• Bolt's in Murdoch Media Print many of whom he criticizes

• Bolt's on 2GB and makes out it's his show with Steve Price as guest

• Bolt runs a faux blog which is largely complied by trolls and moderated for criticism it's actually a Paywall for News Corp, Quadrant, The Spectator and the IPA

• Bolt's published a book of lazy Susan repetitious ideas which he advertizes like a cheap set of steak knives

All this seems a truck load of activity which stems from  little or no effort other than a weekly formatted repetition.  Sometimes Bolt posts blogs stamped 10pm  at 8.30pm which shows it's all snake oil selling. Don't buy a book filled with loose facts  and misinformation enabling him to buy a painting which he won't share with others because he's not gregarious. You see Bolt needs to fill the emptiness he feels for not winning awards and being appreciated. Picture him Jim Carrey Mocking Andrew Bolt  and laugh. He does all the way to the bank with the least contribution to our GDP.

" Hate speech, outside the law, is speech that attacks a person or group on the basis of attributes such as gender, ethnic origin, religion, race, disability, or sexual orientation." Andrew Bolt wants laws in place to defend hate speech in a civil society. Our constitution reflects the society we wish to live in. Currently it includes the right to create laws on racial grounds. Currently we are the only country whose constitution does not include a Bill of human rights. These are just two elements lacking that don't reflect qualities we ought be proud of. Bolt's "free speech" makes no attempt to show us any civil society on the planet that caters for hate speech. There is no place in the world that suits Bolt even the USA has section 19c Censorship and a strict moral code. Bolt hasn't been victimized he has been found guilty of being uncivilized for not just saying and believing what he said as an individual but because it was broadcast. I'm sure he's spent 5 years railing about being a victim privately and in public places and hasn't been charged. Andrew Bolt is no Derryn Hinch  or  Peter Greste  that's for sure.

 

 

 

 

Of course Abbott would be a hot tip for Opposition Leader

PAYWALL

" So, with the party reeling from defeat and there being no obvious leadership successor, all eyes will be on the re-elected member for Warringah…" Bramston

Any which way in Abbott's style of politics has never involved the electorate. Even in his uni days it was all about him.

Back to the Future

 

 

 

Who’d vote for any of these Liberals?

Yes what is ungrounded is the persecution of Niki Savva who wrote about the power of a belief in the ACT the power of rumor and opinion the very tools of trade of Andrew Bolt.  Bolt deals in ungrounded and unfounded facts every day but does it so badly. However this isn't a case of neither it's a grounded and founded fact that the Delcons within the Liberal Party have tried and are continuing to try to insure that if they can't wag the dog they will destroy it in order to regain control. Mirnda Devine called it for what it is. John Stone has offered a strategy to put into effect and a minority within the media are actively promoting the self destruct cause and as Bolt says in the blog above Of course Abbott would be a hot tip for Opposition Leader

 

 

  

What jail did the Greens have in mind for Christians?

 

Reverse Racism, Reverse Generism Reverse Cultural bigotry does not exist where there is a power differential between people of different race, gender, or religious bigotry. Only mono - culturalists  divide and distinguish "Notice how quick the Greens are to persecute tolerant Christians, but how slow to even mention intolerant Muslims?" Does Bolt deem himself to be a victim a tolerant Christian? He's proud of our institutional tolerance in the face of global intolerance. We promised to take 12,000 Syrians 9 months ago and we will keep that promise one day.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Should race matter as much as it does in the career of Peris Nova?

 

 "I suspect many Australians have had it with race-based hirings. They seem awfully like the racism we oppose." Bolt

There is no such thing as "reverse racism" so Andrew Bolt ultra -racist can stop playing  the 'we are persecuted heroes card".  The distinctions are quite clear in the comments I made below. Positive discrimination is all around us but Bolt denies it's necessary. It exists for women some say not enough. It exists for the handicapped but some say not enough. It exists for children and some say not enough. Bolt denies it exists on some levels and calls it natural free market competition.  He denies that governments should interfere in the natural order of things which  evolution and tradition have provided and proved to be the best.

 German company boards require 50% of workers to be on them. Look how more advanced we are than Germany. Iceland require no more than 60% of any gender be on company boards. Look how more advanced we are they threw we don't jail our top corporate bankers. Finland has no private schools no grading of schools or classes and have the best education system in the world. Tunisia has guaranteed the equal rights of women in their constitution look how better we are in principle. Bolt's no on positive discrimination stance is their because it's dangerous. It threatens his 'Me" society if it just  becomes a little more "WE ".

  Need one ask whether or not James Bolt's job at the IPA was advertised widely or was  it  a case of positive discrimination? Guess Bolt ought to consider whether his son should get the sack. Will the same level of discrimination be offered his other children? Oh so there was no government interference just bias carried by "who you know rather than what you know"

 

 

 

I refuse to say whether Andrew Wilkie leaked to me

 

This is not officially a Blog it's a PAYWALL

 

Yet again this simply goes to show Andrew Bolt didn't get a scoop in 2003 something he always hopes for one day and pretends he gets everyday. The content of this report was to show that no weapons of mass destruction existed in Iraq and that John Howard was lying and determined to assist Bush and Blair in a war against Saddam Hussein. The world today acknowledges that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction. John Howard acknowledges no such weapons were found  and the intel was misleading but not fabricated. CIA officers have declared otherwise.  Tony Blair is probably going to be savaged in the 'brutal' Iraq war inquiry verdict

Yet Andrew Bolt believes war is justified on hypotheticals alone and that that was sufficient to kill 1 million Iraqis and rather than putting the blame on John Howard it was Andrew Wilkie's fault for standing up and saying my report was a hypothetical based on no evidence.   John Howard is not going to look to good

What do we know about the Chilcot inquiry report, and when will it ...

New Statesman-9 May 2016

The report will be published on July 6th, a letter from John Chilcot to the Prime Minister has announced. The report is 2.6 million words long, ...

Chilcot report: Everything we know about the Iraq War inquiry so far
The Independent-10 May 2016

Sir John Chilcot's Iraq War inquiry report to be published on July 6 ...
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Racism “intellectually challenged” by, er, racist

 

There is one thing certain Andrew Bolt  wasn't racism's intellectual challenge so he must be the intellectually challenged racist. Racism describes a social structure whose social relationships are defined by race. A racist is a person within that structure that has the power to not only define others by race but can act over them. Sth Africa with it's apartheid system was a racist country and white Sth Africans whether they actively did or didn't participate in that relationship were racist. America was a racist country and white Americans that still pursue that tradition and psychology of behavior towards Afro-Americans are racist.

 Australia with the systemic constitutional right to enact laws against people according to their race is a racist country and ergo yes Andrew Bolt is a racist. Andrew Bolt is an ultra- racist because he actively encourages Australians to take actions of power against persons because of their race. 

 Prejudice is an attitude internalized, reflected and supported more often than not by a dominant racist culture. Reverse prejudice might exist reverse racism doesn't. Boutain Azzabi isn't racist she is however mirroring the psychology of racist bigots. Andrew Bolt is an ultra-racist. I'm racist  simply because I'm Australian how much I reflect that racism and how much I've  psychologically internalized is best told me by Indigenous Australians who still suffer it and today it seems by Australian Africans those persons who experience it daily.

 History does define us Andrew Bolt and Germans whether black white or brindle Muslim or Jew male or female are taught that from primary school so that history tradition won't repeat and yes Germans are taught to be sorry for and to resent that aspect of their past today and take responsibility for it. Finlanders don't have private schools children of all classes and ethnic groups mix. Nobody asks which is the best school because all schools are equal and all the kids learn that to to friendship is a equality taught as children and as such realized in adulthood more so than the born to rule bigotry found between kids from private schools here or even those schools graded by constant testing. As a result the Fins have the worlds best education system not in theory but reality with no racism.Michael Moore on Where to Invade Next: Reel Pieces with Annette ...