Friday, 31 March 2017

Andrew Bolt's Blog; 31/3/17; Rupert Murdoch is an idiot according to Andrew Bolt; Apparently ant's have strict immigration policies; Tony Abbott's MXT; !50 Bill according to Bolt on a conference you have to pay for; Remember the Alfalfa Club lie;









 Image result for Image of a slurrer

HOW THE LEFT HIJACKED U.S. STUDIES CENTRE

I remember warning  that Rupert Murdoch and Frank Lowy donating to the new US Studies Centre came with risks. It would be hijacked by the Left. 
 They say mockery is a reverse form of flattery the only thing to be mocked is drop out of Adelaide Uni Andrew Bolt is trying to tell a Department of US studies what it is it should be teaching and researching "None of the 10 faculty members appear to be engaged in what many outsiders would regard as conventional foreign policy research. Those teaching American studies offer a critical take on US society and history, positions that may appeal to undergraduate students, who bring in lucrative funding." Bolt
Hello the title of the Dept is US studies not US Foreign policy. Nobody seems to be saying what happened to Switzer this is somehow an opportunistic case of sour grapes picked up simply because it can present the Turnbull's in some negative light nothing specific like Abbott's $60,000 scholarship granted he with no other applicants a scholarship discontinued after Ms Abbott recieved it. Nothing as specific as that here. Or the fact the person was taken to court for even revealing what had happened. This is a general besmirching of the Turnbulls an ugly piece of media produced by Andrew Bolt.
It's typical of Bolt isn't it that he said he was Rupert's personal advisor obviously Rupert doesn't think much of Andrew nor his opinions. To say he personally advised me Rupert or anyone that he was going to eventually call any institution left wing is stating the obvious. Anybody that questions Bolt is left wing therefore the liklihood of even Murdoch being called an idiot by Andrew Bolt is in fact a certainty.  He believes he represents my yours and everyone's values but never specifically declares what they are or how they are represented. Obviously the antithesis of reality and a multicultural nation. Obviously not the Dutch model based on Gert Wilders. Andrew Bolt is looking for a nation to hijack and declare a model Bolt's world which might be closer to an ant farm.
Image result for Image of an ant farm

 

 

 THE ENEMIES BEHIND 18C. AND NEW CASE - AGAINST A STATUE

Senator David Leyonhelm gave a great speech identifying and denouncing the tribalists and ethnic warlords defending the Racial Discrimination Act that's being used to silence their critics. UPDATE: Ben Hills says this wicked law is now being used by Japanese nationalists even against a statue to the "comfort women" of World War 2.
  "These largely self-appointed representatives do not subscribe to Australian values. "Bolt 
Values never specified or contrasted with the values held by those here accused by Bolt . That's left to the imagination only as is always the case.  What are the rue blue values Bolt is representative of clearly not a fair go. The bolt image of Australia is not Multicultural that's for sure it's more akin to an
 Image result for Image of an ant farm


100 issues more pressing than 18C | The Monthly

 An incomplete list of the things that should probably be capturing the attention of our politicians




 Image result for Images of Tony Abbott Mr Nope

NBN: $40BN FOR SLOWER SPEEDS

If you really want something stuffed up, get government to do it. The $40 billion NBN has actually given some users slower speeds - and the government bans them from using the faster services of private-sector competitors.


Thank you Tony Abbott for MXT for a cheaper and better service. You prevented Labor's Service going forward Mr Nope Nope Nope. Despite the warnings you forged ahead.

 

  Image result for Images of Andrew Bolt with egg on his face

 $$$$$$$$$$$$ 150,000 bill on a conference claims Andrew Bolt


VIC GOVERNMENT REWARDS GORE FOR KILLING WAYNE'S JOB



  Engie business plan has been the death of coal well before the Vic Gov came into existense.The closure of Hazelwood has been their business plan is some 20 years overdue. Engie is and has been transitioning into renewables and gas for a long time now. Why does Andrew Bolt ignore the opinions of the biggest players in the industry? Because they have wiped his argument for coal off the board and have left him with egg on his face.
 The major energy producers have all been in transition away from coal and declare the government needs a scheme to put a price on carbon to accelerate the change. "Government is run by global warming zealots who killed off the Hazelwood coal-fired power plant - at the jobs of its 700 workers." Bolt's lie is just that. He just doesn't cut it and he demands that Engie's Corporate planning in place when Hazelwood was built should be be changed why because of Daniel Andrews? What has happened to the free market Bolt and Engie's position in it. Bolt seems  to be the one whose extremely totalitarian in his demands and his accusations which according to the producers and distributors are fine. But that's a lie it's easily disporoved just ask the spokespersons from Engie AGL or Origin they are the free enterprise corporations. It's something Bolt never actually does. He  seems intent on freaking everyone out with his bullshit that we will be spending $150,000 bill on a conference for Al Gore. Does Bolt sound as if he knows what he's even talking about? $150,000 billion sounds like the fish he once caught it was this big!!! Maybe as a professional he should improve his english as well so as not to appear so confused.









  Image result for Images of Tony Abbott at the Alfalfa Club 
At the Alfalfa Club "special guest" busted for bullshit








TURNBULL TEAM BETRAYS FEAR: SMEARS ABBOTT

 Two things are obvious and significant in Sharri Markson's account of how Malcolm Turnbull was humiliated in trying to ratify an extradition treaty with China. First, Markson's briefers from the Turnbull camp accept no blame. Second, they rage against Tony Abbott, a peripheral player in this. Conclusion: they are hopeless and fear Abbott's return.

When there's real work to be done Bolt calls in Peter BH his "reader". Reader my arse Peter BH is Bolt's work horse and troll he does what Andrew Bolt hasn't the capacity to do and that's work. However what Peter BH is trying to convince us of 1) Abbott didn't support the treaty signed by John Howard, and 2) He kicked it down the road when he was PM due to "reticence". If that were the case there'd be some record  somewhere of that fact that this wasn't going ahead. Abbott  was all for it but didn't want it raised while Andrew Robb  was dealing with the Chinese. It's well known the Chinese do things one at a time and at their own pace so it was a matter of one step at a time. Then the shit hit the fan and Abbott was in dire straights with a revolution in his ranks so something so trivial only needing rubber stamping went on the back burner. " Scapegoats must be found:" not "scapegoats" but the nest of quizzlings . How many times did these usual suspect conservatives pledge their loyalty on the backbench  only to betray it. You know who opposition is they are in front of you not behind you. When it's from behind you and within the job becomes impossible.
 Turnbull needless to say in the process of cleaning aside Abbott's leftovers responsibilities those Abbott was in support of and was normal to assume he still was.  But these are truly well practiced and old dog conspiritors with Abbott their leader and it should never have been assumed any were on the governments side.
"The president was left with the understanding that it would be ratified. But senior government sources say Abbott never expressed any reticence about the treaty, ­either to his colleagues or to the Chinese." Fact
This coming from Bolt isn't a fact but an entreatment to be believed
"Maybe yes, maybe no. The key point: Abbott did express reticence in the way that counts most: HE MADE NO MOVE TO RATIFY THIS TREATY. Only Turnbull, of the past five Prime Ministers, was so silly as to try." Bolt
It's really a plea to be believed but a plea without  proof and a long winded one with the full cast of News Corp working on it. That hardly constitutes a laydown mizairre of proof. Peter BH's work and effort comes across as desperation more than anything else. Desperation to change the story and keep Tony the turd polished. What is true Abbott was a Minister in the Howard government and for the Treaty that was signed and  Mr "yes", "no", "yes", the man behind this current political shit storm says " no " with a story attached which sounds as convincing as the one he tried on us when he was at the Alfalfa Club with Murdoch and a personal photographer doing a photo shoot for the Telegraph. He said he was a "specially invited guest" when he wasn't. News Corp was participating in a lie. Bolt is pleading yet again for him to be believed this time. Abbott's track record for bullshit is not included here is it? His record totally ignored.
" So the Turnbul team twists the argument. First they'd try to say Abbott had been just as keen as Turnbull on the extradition treaty he now opposed. But now they claim he was actually a twister who misled China:"Bolt 
Who is the most believable Turnbull, Bolt, Bernardi, Abbott and/or any of the other usual suspects? Or the government doing the work it's being paid to do while constantly being white anted? Who are the real opposition to the government here? Who is trying to sink the boat for personal revenge and self gain?
 

BISHOP TEAM SMEARS ABBOTT ON CHINA. ABBOTT NAILS DECEIT



 



Andrew Bolt steals his Troll Peter BH's work and yes he calls it his own. Was he having dinner with Peter BH in Sydney discussing these issues involved here? " I originally blamed the "Turnbull camp" for smearing Tony Abbott after Malcolm Turnbull was humiliatingly blocked from ratifying an extradition treaty with China.  I now understand I should have narrowed this to the "Julie Bishop team" and so have rejigged this post - particularly now Abbott has hit back at the anonymous "sources" in Sharri Markson's account." Bolt
What crazy world Bolt spins.  1) He didn't write the original version Why is he thanking Peter BH claiming he did? 2) He didn't "rejig" the second either. If he did what work has Peter BH the reader done to warrant all the thanks Bolt gives him? Everything from the beginning to the end of this post seems a fiction.  As I said earlier given the crap Abbott has been caught out for in the past and Bolt constantly apologizing for him promising a better performance each time why for one moment is this spin at all believable? After a daisy chain of dismal mistakes ending in eventual silence by Bolt all we can expect is that this is just another Aguirre Wrath of God maniacal effort to drag Abbott up and over the mountain of success again. We know how that story wound up. Bolt needs a story so complicated it can't be denied but the neither can it be proved and it's title is Abbott is deceit.




  They Held Back Hate Speech and Raised Our Flag a Fair Go
TOTALITARIANS ADVANCE: BLOCK FREE SPEECH, PERSECUTE CHRISTIANS

TOTALITARIANS ADVANCE: BLOCK FREE SPEECH, PERSECUTE CHRISTIANS

The barbarians are winning in their campaign to shut up their enemies. Senators of the Left last night banned reforms to the Racial Discrimination Act that has been used to punish critics of the new tribalism. Now Sydney's Anglican Archbishop warns the Left is also persecuting Christians.

What is it you want to say that you can't say now to Cathy Freeman or Stan Grant Andrew Bolt? You have Section 18 D protection. You can't lie is that your problem? It's what you were convicted of last time being a Liar and you tone in lying. Listen to your new mate and Let Mark Latham's Incredibly Passionate Speech About The Importance Of 18C Wash Over You
 

No comments: