With the cost of updating signage, business names, sporting
merchandise and tourism infrastructure expected to stretch into the tens
of billions of dollars, Queenslanders are questioning the wisdom of
changing the state’s name to Kingsland, as is required by Australia’s
complex royal protocol.
The Irish simply thought of all English a Third consideration
Scotland is about to take back Balmoral Castle and then there’s Australia
Mr Dutton has been suggesting that it’s inappropriate for
King Charles to be against the destruction of the Earth because our
monarch is meant to be politically neutral, but the first Charles lost
his head and insisted that he didn’t need to listen to the British
Parliament, although not in that order. So with a name like Charles, who
knows what this Charles will do?
What will the monarchists do if Charles doesn’t become the
silent figurehead who just cuts the odd ribbon and opens the odd fete
and puts his name to the odd charity? (Although not so odd that it won’t have an office, a website or a plan before getting $18million from the government…)
What if he feels that he has a role to play in loudly encouraging the
move toward net zero? Which, after all, in Australia, is a bipartisan
policy so it’s hardly controversial.
I mean, it’s not like they can demand we elect a new king.
Although it is possible that Scott Morrison had himself secretly sworn in as an alternative king in case something happened.
The passing of Queen Elizabeth was met by a singular
narrative of the mainstream media, eager to shower her with praise and
forgo criticism, writes Dr Tim Dunlop.
No comments:
Post a Comment