1951
The NO voters seem to fall into four camps:1). The Duttonistas, who don’t give a fuck about the country but just want to inflict a defeat on Albo.2). Racists.3). The jealous and bitter, kicking down.4). FuckwitsNot one of the white folks advocating a NO vote has a copy of his/her dad or granddad’s “General Certificate of Exemption”? What, they didn’t need one to walk to work! Well that’s why I’m voting Yes. Yes. Yes! This won't be seen on the front pages of our mainstream news but But Dutton, Price Howard and Abbott will...Why?
So pleased to hear that global financial revenue stream has been diminished. Alternative support is being directed elsewhere in America UK and Australia and cutting labor costs and AI we hope won't save Lachlan's arse.
The US-listed media group — which owns News Corp Australia, mastheads in the US and UK, book publishers and real estate advertising assets — recorded $US187 million ($287 million) in profit for the financial year, down from the previous year’s $US760 million record.
The US-listed media group — which owns News Corp Australia, mastheads in the US and UK, book publishers and real estate advertising assets — recorded $US187 million ($287 million) in profit for the financial year, down from the previous year’s $US760 million record.
The US-listed media group — which owns News Corp Australia, mastheads in the US and UK, book publishers and real estate advertising assets — recorded $US187 million ($287 million) in profit for the financial year, down from the previous year’s $US760 million record.
Source: Murdoch’s News Corp suffers sharp decline in profit
Facts don’t matter as far as Murdoch's media is concerned the
conclusion wanted is what supports their revenues. That conclusion that
climate change is a hoax is no longer believed. They might be turning to
AI infrastructure to lower costs telling us that once established it
won’t need to be costed up
again and again like human labor. However, they don’t share the same
logic for the storage and
delivery structure of power generated by renewables. They claim those
costs repeat and scale upwards
continuously as well. Fact Check = Pants on Fire and total Bullshit
The Australian double dipped, producing another article from the same commentator that claimed that Graham had provided proof that CSIRO was confirming that its costings did not take into account transmission and storage. Graham says this is nonsense.
“If you are building a new wind and solar farm now, it will take advantage of infrastructure that already exists, Graham told RenewEconomy. As it would for new coal and gas. “There’s no point building or costing it again. It’s already there.”
Source: AEMO slams Murdoch media campaign that claims renewables are not low cost – Pearls and Irritations
Arts washing, Sports Washing, Fossil Fuel use of soft power has never been totally rejected
While Victorian netballers refused money from Gina Rinehart, and Cricket Australia dropped Alinta Energy as sponsors, fossil fuel companies are still spending millions with the arts around Australia. A report released today outlines the extent of the arts washing, Callum Foote reports.
No comments:
Post a Comment