This television series was released in 2011 and resulted in extreme reaction of Zionist Jews in Australia then almost as extreme as today. Should anyone reveal the historic truths about Zionist Terrori in the takeover of Palestine by the Jews in the reality of the birth of Israel not according to Zionists it needs to be censored. We stand witness in 23/24 to the continuance of a historical context & truth that Israel & their Lobby continue to deny and don’t want told today. Australia’s Jewery as far back as 2011 were able to threaten SBS funding at government levels for showing this film then and those attitudes are even more amplified today. Their objections have been echoed here have been seemingly reduced to little more than trope claiming the true story of Israel remains untold. That the Ashkenazis were only defending themselves in 1945 and the Israelis are still defending themselves today.
How seriously should the ECAJ’s complaint – or feeling in the Jewish community that the series is anti-Semitic and grossly insulting to Holocaust survivors – be taken?
They also object that SBS marketed a fictional account as a historical truth.
The principal objection from the Executive Council of Australian Jewry to the series – as explained in a strongly worded and detailed complaint to SBS – is that the “insidious” series involves a collective group libel that:
“Unrelentingly portrays the entire Jewish presence throughout the country, including modern-day Israel, as an act of usurpation by Jews who, without exception, are aliens, predators and thieves and who enforce their usurpation by brutal, racist policies akin to those inflicted by the Nazis upon the Jewish people.”
This is an extraordinary charge. In addition the ECAJ’s concerns are going to be raised via political allies at Senate Estimates hearings in mid-February, to which SBS director Michael Ebeid has been summoned. There is an implied threat to SBS funding.
The Promise: controversy rages, understanding lost
Despite this year’s election setback, Narendra Modi’s Hindu-chauvinist government still holds power in India. The journalism of Neha Dixit has shone a light on the human impact of Hindutva bigotry and authoritarianism, especially for India’s Muslims.
India’s Muslims Still Bear the Brunt of Hindutva Chauvinism
Ultimately the corruption lies between the developer and the unions. So why is it the unions are the only ones blamed? History shows money doesn't only flow in one direction there are no billionaires among the unions. The LNP held a Royal Commission into the unions and it found no obvious institutional corruption. Being a "bikie" and a staunch unionist is hardly criminal but reputationally easily negatively publicized.
Australia is a swamp of antiquated adversarial relationships as the one between Capital and Labor. We watched other nations race ahead particularly where corporate boards like Germany's and others that chose to adopt a more cooperative and even distribution of shareholder and labor reps along with a greater balance of men and women sitting on them .
Union whistleblower Andrew Quirk questions the clean-up of corruption in the building industry and foreshadows a further decline in building standards if this is not achieved.
No comments:
Post a Comment