Andrew Bolt's Blog, 25/10/15; A real Aussie story and then there was Bolt; Bolt logic and helping save Koalas after a bush fire;
The children's show is living history. If 12 year olds have the right to to be killed or jailed by Israelis for up to 20 years minor infractions under the no tolerance laws. Blot seems to be saying they have no right to free speech. Or is he simply saying they are too young? He says nothing!!
Bolt defines a person in 2015 by an episode in 2007. and suggests they haven't changed. Bolt's generosity of spirit only overflows for himself when he feels misunderstood. He didn't define Abbott by any event in his past quite the opposite he kept telling us how different he actually was.. Abbott was charged with bullying and sexual molestation while at uni. Bolt certainly didn't let that stick.
In his mind when younger Bolt was a minder of a belly dancer when in reality he was a kept man. Kept by the dancer to whom he was forced to apologize. Nevertheless most gave him the chance to grow up. However that same generosity isn't given to Malcolm Turnbull by Bolt. In it's place has been Andrew Bolt the whinging, whining, slimer one of the poorest of losers who is in fact little more than a media bench boy in reality. Bolt shames us he is just so un-Australian. Compare and contrast him with a true Aussie and writer the difference will amaze you Hanging with an Islamic 'Dipper' - Sydney Morning Herald
What can you expect from Andrew Bolt he simply doesn't even know what is going on and logic as usual defies him. 2000 koalas could be dying as a result of a bush fire and Liddle and Bolt say there's no problem "we saw 2 that were ok". Why waste resources checking. Simon Schama on the other hand is saying there are 2000 out there maybe more some may not have survived the fire some may need to help and we need process each and everyone of them and not just stop because 2 are ok or have wandered in from elsewhere. There is still a problem that needs to be addressed for humanitarian reasons alone because there are probably many who can't look after themselves.
Liddle is processes the problem by counting a few trees and jumps to the conclusion there is no problem or even a forest. Simon on the other hand is defining as a catasrophe telling us there is a forest of a problem all the trees need to be checked. Liddle and Shama are talking at odds and Bolt has blindly jumped on Liddle's heartless band wagon calling Simon a snob. Typical Bolt he hasn't an effen clue.
Liddle generalizing from a few samples in Calais concludes "they are immigrants not refugees " therefore there is no problem other than genuineness so we are entitled to slam the door shut. As opposed to Simon who is saying there are 500,000 no 4 million displaced Syrians that need our help and need to be given the benefit of the doubt and processed. They need it now and of course there will be some exceptions. There is a big difference between Schama's definition and what is needed and Liddle's. Germany prioritized on the side of Simon Schama, Whereas Liddle & Bolt declare some undeserving therefore all are. Bolt jumps on what Simon called Liddle's suburban band wagon and like Liddle simply prefers to turn his back on the issue. "let them eat cake" they are tourists not people in need.\
One things for sure you wouldn't want to Bolt as a neighbour. He'd tell you you don't have a problem and just walk away before you had time to cry help. When the core of the Western Judeo Christian ethic is to help others Bolt and Liddle only help themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment