Sunday, 20 March 2016

Andrew Bolt's Blog,20/3/16; Bolt's claim "one day borrowers will want their money back" WTF? ; When Bolt lies he spits in your face; Karl Popper was right Bolt cetainly isn't; Trump promised violence; We can have Credlin for the night too; Bolt & Blair blowing raspberries; James Patterson is a Turnbull Liberal;

 

 

5Column - The Left and the natural home of the bully

The very notion of Terra Nullis the invasion and take over of this country  was and still is  the quintessential act of brutal bullying  that's gone on for 220 years. Once done it has continued  unnoticed because there has never been a time when racist culture  hasn't dominated the ether of the country. Bolt talks of a reverse racism  which simply does not exsist. White culture has had it's foot on the throat of the indigenous population since landing and has been the natural state of open and subliminal bullying in this country since.

Male heterosexual culture arrive with the first ships and has been with us before arrival it reveals itself not just in domestic violence and marriage laws and laws of inherited debt.But in the mindset of those that fear giving LGBTis any sense of equality and equal protection under the law. Any demonstration for change is decried as reverse bigotry and a danger to the natural order and social fabric. It simply doesn't exist 

Bullying is part of what Bolt calls the natural order it's neither left or right and can be found where the voice of injustice is heard and ignored. It's in our relationships and language. When Bolt talks about himself all the time and says I'm taking my family to dinner, I'm having a guest over, I'm thinking about my future, I don't like Muslim. That's the natural home of the bully so much so he refuses to even notice there's no we in his language.


 

Left uses force against Trump

Bolt describes to a tee just how this protester used force against Trump supporters .

" There was an apparent replay of the escalating Trump rally violence at a rally in Tucson this afternoon. We're still trying to piece together what happened. But one incident seems oddly reminiscent of the incident in Fayetteville, North Carolina where a Trump supporter sucker punched a protestor as he was being escorted out of the arena. This time another protestor was being escorted out of the arena when a Trump supporter punched him, knocking him to the ground, and then repeatedly kicked him before being restrained by police and himself being escorted out of the arena."Stuff Gets Ugly at Trump Tucson Rally This report suggests Lewandowski Bolt's black rally organizer and head of security was the Black American involved in the beating and it asks what was he doing in the exact location where the event took place in a stadium of people.  Why was it Trump was the first to call the guy out? The story is quite different to Bolt's

Trump sticks to his word and said there would be violence. Bolt who claims he doesn't distinguish people by colour is certainly pointing out the black from white so he isn't as colour blind as he makes out. All his posturing it seems  in  Trump's defence of him being called a racist. Bolt actually seems to believe that  all of Trump's supporters a symbolic transmogrification of Trump. How weird is that does Bolt think he's Abbott? There is something very odd about this whole affair. How is it this one not two so called protester with a KKK hood on was allowed to stay unnoticed until  berated by Trump. How is it Trump could pick him out before he was jumped on and removed? How is it Lewandowski was there? Given the theatrics of Trump's rallies you have to have doubts and believe this was all part of the show and it was quite normal. It seems even Bolt has his suspicions. The fact is he doesn't know yet finds it so easy to jump to unwarranted conclusions.

 "Frankly, it’s beyond idiotic to walk around in a Ku Klux Klan hood in front of black Americans, and not least black Amercians who support Donald Trump." 

Does Trump have any connection to the KKK yes he does. Trumps father was arrested in a KKK brawl and DonaldTrump knows David Duke ex head of the KKK but denies it. He has played dumb when endorsed by Duke and the KKK but has certainly has not gone out of his way  to repudiate them. Bolt is a simpleton his negative stereotypes never really seem to fit his stories.Why Won't Donald Trump Repudiate the Ku Klux Klan .

 Donald trump's dangerous KKK game (opinion) - CNN.com



 

 

Explaining Turnbull’s hunger for your cash

" The superannuation pot is ... around $2 trillion, and of course growing every year, thanks to the mandatory inflows and, hopefully, investment returns…" McCrann

That's overstatement if ever there was one the pot certainly didn't grow during the GFC. Nor does the pot of individuals when handed to various corrupt fun managers and there's lot's of them working for themselves, banks and other managers who not only make the money managing but getting trailing commissions fro those they invest with.

Secondly Mc Crann doesn't mention the fact that in 2000 the quote for a fast rail was 4 billion and now it's over 10 times that. Why does McCrann there's such eager attention given to tollways. They make a profit. McCrann simply makes no mention of any returns made by government or the private economy in these infrastucture investments why?

"One day a lot of borrowers will want their money back, or taxpayers will revolt against the cost of the interest."

But here is the nonsense

I always thought in any transaction there's a lender and a borrower and well drawn up contract clear as daylight. However what on earth does Bolt even mean when he says one day "borrowers will want their money back when they aren't "lenders" they are debtors in the deal. What sort of explanation is this Andrew Bolt one that makes no sense. Furthermore it pays no attention to the revenue the infrastructure makes over it's life time for the government and commerce? The argument seems to be little more than a political hood wink, It's only objective is to obfuscate. VOTE LABOR Wayne Swan was the world's best treasurer who we had when needed. We got Joe Hockey who Bolt scoffs at and now we have Morrison who is just as confused.

 

It’s election year, so I’d better get cracking

Such a liar here is the man who declared lack of interest He called Abbott a dog and said he was no longer in the race.  He got that right. He also said the dropping of the Bolt Report wasn't true. He also said he was considering his options Private Social Welfare at the behest of News Corp being his only one.

 

Margaret Throsby’s friendliest interviews

There is only one truth established here Rupert Murdoch and a very small minority want the ABC sold . Margret Throsby is the unfortunate target or should I say vehicle to make his point. By the way Karl Popper was one of Andrew Bolt's permanent lefties when he said " The growth of knowledge depends entirely on disagreement" an ideology opposed to Bolt's conservatism. Obviously Aitkin stole it to give a false impression that he's a scientist of sorts. However not the Popper kind.

"No one should be surprised that the more annoyed listeners want it sold."

 

Left uses force against Trump

Trump promised riots and violence in the streets not just protest.


 

Credlin returns

How exciting she's been signed for "election night" and then?? What a huge contract. Will Connie Wells be contracted on the same panel? Bolt's busting his balls to get on Sky in the hope of an international profile. However his celebrity stops on our foreshore.More Interesting is Andrew Bolt's little suck up to Sky"Good outfit, Sky News.". Unfortunately they just might be more interested in news people with more integrity than what Bolt has to offer as they go international. Sky is part of Foxtel 50% owned by Telstra and 50% by Murdoch. Telstra  want's to sell why?

 

 

Sell those 6843 people another subscription instead

This is coming from Bevis Blair of course it's why Butthead Bolt has stolen it oops referenced it. This criticism comes from two non journalists who simply have the fortune to be on a private stream of social welfare. They aren't in and never have been in a profit making business or branch of News Corp. That's not intelligence, or journalism that's simply luck. Neither are talented or award winning writers recognized for any standard of excellence. They are however members of a protected business for now that's running at a loss. That alone makes them more like two fat arsed public school boys blowing raspberries over the  fence. There is nothing meritorious in what they do and neither will ever venture out into the real world because they both know they lack the skill. They might be forced to work

 

 

Jane Caro welcomes James Paterson to politics with a crude and fact-free personal attack

From Mr spiteful comes a cheap and nasty personal attack on Jane Caro. Bolt has been doing this on a regular basis lately attacking Connie Wells and her right to free speech while always defending his own of course. Yesterday he derided a young 17 year old girl disregarding anything she had to say in order to  put himself on the anti feminist center stage.

So calling Caro a Labor shill is as witty as calling Rowan Dean a fountain of wisdom. The one outstanding fact that comes to light here is Andrew Bolt knows nothing "about evidence-based reasoning and good-faith argument.". That is evidenced in all  the subjects he attends to. He's unbalanced  Don Quixote on a horse without a Sancho Panza to steady him. Myth and faith are what drives him 

 The amount of drugs and alcohol consumed by these wonderful private school boys and girls is far greater than in any government schools why? Simply because these kids  have the money to do so. Bolt seems to have conveniently forgotten the violent drug wars that occurred between Scotch and Melbourne Grammar a few years back. Totally criminal acts that some kids have yet to recover from all these years later. They weren't made as public as he makes the Apex gang to be. One school was particularly noted for the number of hedge burners it produced. There's  plaque in a Kew car park where a boy was stabbed to death.

Has Bolt done the rounds of the Melbourne Clinic and the private rehab centers lately to see just how many of these poor little rich kids are under treatment. Cultural capital not only keeps the schools 'private' but just about everything else. The only urban myth here is "such schools are “better at conveying the values of a good work ethic, caring for your community and your neighbours and being raised in a way that is socially conservative”. Amazing that Bolt's younger brother Richard didn't confront Andrew the social climber with some of these facts given he was Secretary of the Education Department.

What James Patterson did convey in his maiden speech was that the diversity of choice ought be allowed in a varied education system that reflects the varied and diverse value systems. Bolt's warrior was expressing a Liberal thought that is in fact totally counter to what Conservative Liberals have just denied us in tearing the Safe Schools program apart. The current conservatives don't accept sexual diversity but a single minded belief in hetrosexuality. Given  they believe that sexuality is more nurture than nature bullying is more preferable as a teaching aid to set the LGBTIs straight.  That's the predominance of ignorance. What Bolt never really speaks about is that Tim Wilson was a supporter of the Safe Schools program so he tends to be extremely selective about what what he will mention.

As for Bolt's he has a misguided belief that we live in a meritocracy because of what he believes he's achieved "But, probably like Paterson, I also realise that coming from a state school I developed a self-discipline and self-reliance - an urge to teach myself - that some more pampered private school alumni miss." Obviously he's a miguided braggart of his own achievements. He has a constant need to tell his  public of what he's  achieved. Which is little if anything. He's a worker whose paid well a consumer of art and what money can buy but like most other employees he doesn't even produce a profit for News Corp print or TV. It's what Bolt decries the unproductive in our society he is and has been unproductive most of his life rewarded by an unproductive organization called News Corp. News Corps ethic isn't caring neither for the community, neighbours or excellence of work. 

Bolt writes is he good or even on the road to excellence no. If he declares he is he's a liar. Is he ambitious to be excellent no. He makes money and with that money consumes everything he believes will make him appear intelligent but tthe truth he's as hollow as an Easter egg. His praise of Patterson is not because he listened because if he had listened his praise would be less glowing.

No comments: