Andrew Bolt's Blog, 8/4/17; New Measures of Hypicrisy; Bolt the media Tease; I'm an Indigenous Australia, But they are "white Fellas"; Bolt's a statistical whizz or just a whizz?

Internal combustion ending

Shutterstock

The market has spoken, and it says electric cars are the future.

Ford had a 100-year head start on Tesla, but Elon Musk’s company has caught up. With a market value of $53 billion, Tesla Motors overtook Ford ($45 billion) on Monday, and then passed up General Motors ($49 billion) on Tuesday.
Of course, the older car companies still sell about 100 times more vehicles than Tesla. They are also profitable, while Tesla loses millions of dollars a year. Even so, investors look to the future, and they’re banking on Tesla eventually taking the world by storm.
Why is Wall Street so smitten with a money-losing car company? Investors believe that electric cars with self-driving capabilities are going to become the norm — especially as Tesla is preparing to roll out its first mass-market car. It also doesn’t hurt that Tesla’s cars look cool, and that stock traders grow wistful and dewy-eyed when they see Musk’s face.
If the Wall Street crowd is correct, it would be good for everybody. A wholesale shift to electric cars would vaporize one of the most formidable barriers in the fight against climate change: getting cars to stop pumping greenhouse gas into the air.
This feels weird, but here’s one instance that it’s in the public interest to root for Wall Street.

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONFUSED: WHICH IDENTITIES CAN WE CHOOSE?

A white woman can identify as a white man, but a white woman can't identify as a black woman. Or, wait: in fact, maybe she now can do that, too. How long, then, before a white woman identifies as a black man, and sues whoever dares say they're not?

 

 Andrew Bolt's like a dog with a bone he won't let go. In fact he repeats himself in the two posts these two consecutive posts. "How long, then, before a white woman identifies as a black man, and sues whoever dares say they're not?"Bolt

Yes Bolt identifies as an Indigenous Australian more so than all indigenous Australians born after September 1959 his birthday.  What do I say to that "bullshit" Andrew Bolt. So will he sue me even with the power of Newscorp's lawyers behind him I hardly think so. He was convicted because he'd broken Section 18D and found to be lying and using a tone intended to insult. He's lying if he denies it. We know what Bolt identifies with White Christian Western Europeand Culture and he denies all other whilst located in a nation that's been in the Pacific for 200 years and is both Multicultural and Multiracial. It's called Australia and he adamently denies it. Simply said Andrew Bolt doesn't belong

  

RACE IS WHAT YOU SAY IT IS

Caroline Overington: "Rachel Dolezal ... identifies as black. But Dolezal isn’t black. She says this doesn’t matter because 'how I feel is more important than how I was born'.  And, amazingly, some people are taking her seriously." Actually, it would be less amazing if we didn't have laws making it dangerous to discuss possible local examples.

 Andrew Bolt Identifies being more Indigenous than Adam Goodes and some nut cases whackos believe he is according to  Bolt it's whatever you feel are. Except for those those White Fellas that sued him and won.
 Bolt's station in life and social location of a white privileged male make him according to Bolt a victim, a victim of racism. We have to assume he's paranoid and genuinely believes it. Is this why Bolt needs to select extremes and exceptions in order to prove his point? No Bolt in your case  you might be the exception but you don't prove the rule because like Dolezal you belong in the " how I feel is more important than how I was born" club. 
Anyway there is wise saying "give me  the boy until 7 and I will show you the man". It is true in Bolt's case. Bolt claims he's Australian socially and psychologically. However he was raised and socialized by Dutch parents straight off the boat in 1959. So he has internalized a Dutch mind which isn't Australian. Furthermore it's ultra right wing Dutch because his parents and family are from Aalsmeer the most notorius right wing Dutch town in the Netherlands. It's also why his way of thinking doesn't fit with Australia. Bolt claims everyone in Australia is equal but he treats everyone differently if your Aboriginal, if African, if Muslim if Australian you are wrong because your not Bolt. The real reason he's selected Dolezal as an example is she's American. She can't sue him or even complain under Section 18C like those White Fellas above did after he thought he was being soooo! smart and he lied and insulted them in print. So hip so cool Mordecai Bromberg didn't think so but he did treat Andrew Bolt equally under the law.
Yesterday or the day before Bolt alluded to 2 teenagers killing a service station attendant as terrorists. He didn't need the facts they were Muslim kids that was enough. The fact they killed another Muslim watered down his Islam did it innuendo and he's steered off it. He turned to Thailand declaring it a religious war a war that's been going on since 1948 when borders were set but has been exacerbated. While analysts say Malay Nationalism is the root dating back to when the Sultanate was taken over. Bolt finds it useful to say it's a religious war over and above it's political economic and social history. He basically is refusing Malays and Thais to even choose their identities. How Hitleresque of him to set up the Bolt bureau of identity it's exactly what the Germans did. "Oh Jacob Ben Simon your name is Arbeitman from now on Jacob Arbeitman ( Workman)... Next."

The New Measure of Hypocrisy is Netanyahus but there are 10 Bolt's to one Netanyahu
 

 

SUSPECTED TERROR ATTACK N SWEDEN: TRUCK KILLS THREE

A Tunisian man drives a truck into a crowd in Sweden, killing at least three people. The Swedish prime minister says it seems a terrorist attack.

 Bolt & Media

 One might well ask why is this a case when Andrew Bolt the pied piper of terror has turned to the word "suspected" here when on any other occasion he's the first to jump in and call it "terrorist" even if by innuendo. It gets one thinking does Bolt gets some sexual pleasure from reporting these events. He's quick to release the news isn't he!

 He's quick to accuse and call it terrorism when the facts aren't clear. He was insistent about Orlando when the FBI said it wasn't.  But then when the probability is high  he holds back and politely says "suspected" sweet as a media angel. As I've always said it's a very rare moment that Bolt adds anything to the mix as a commentator or journalist . Bolt  seems to love being a euphemism for a teaser a toy boy in media and loving it.

 

 

 

FOUR CORNERS STILL SILENT ON PROOF OF BIAS

Four Corners made Pauline Hanson seem a bigot by interviewing drinkers at a pub who supported her and said they wanted foreigners and "Pakistanians" kept out. I've since shown that it did not show a second of film it shot over two days of her candidate Tshung Chang, a Malaysian-born ratings analyst. The reporter still won't explain this bias.

Statistics is the science of probability exceptions to statistical probabilities are outliers they don't disprove the established rules Tshung  Chang is just such an outlier and the demographic probability as shown by Four Corners is correct and not biased. Bolt on the other hand has pulled Chang out of One Nations hat like a magician. The reality is One Nation needed Chang more than he needed them to prove they weren't bigoted however it fooled nobody. Didn't they have a Chinese woman there for a second that proved to be a liability and the dumped her? Did they try to enforce the franchise and make her pay $250,000 for leaving?

Having pulled the rabbit out of the hat to try to disprove  a statistical reality Bolt reveals the real reason for his magic outlier trick.

" The ABC is out of control. This was a gross misuse of state power and a clear breach of the ABC's duty, being state-funded, to be balanced and impartial.What action has the ABC taken to pull Four Corners into line? Or is any low trick OK if the target is One Nation?" Bolt


 

 

XENOPHON SACKS MATE WHO SAYS 50% RENEWABLES IS MAD

Nick Xenophon has sacked his top South Australian candidate for correctly saying Labor's plans for a 50 per cent renewable energy target is "f...ing mad" and will destroy the state.  Xenophon's party seems hijacked by irrational greens, with fellow Xenophon MP Rebekha Sharkie calling it "my team".

 

"  The Australian and the ABC, that high renewable energy targets were reckless and hurt business." Bolt agrees

The three big banks must have been taken over by the left as well hey Bolt? They are in the process of reviewing their leveraged risk in coal. Engie the owners of Hazelwood AGL and Origin all want a price on Carbon because they are in transition to renewables. Peter Humphries is preaching the direct opposite to the banks and big business and Bolt ignores that.

 Australian banks review exposure to fossil fuels | SBS News

 Doesn't Bolt sound as if he's a child of the 50s and being told that reds were under every bed and had taken over the country. War was necessary because of the domino effect so we watched while our Muslim neighbours in Indonesia killed 1 million atheist lefties. Bolt so wishes he wasn't so young he'd have gone to Vietnam and killed for the pleasure of it.

Banks and big business are sick of politics interfering in the jobs and growth of the renewables industry with the political uncertainty brought into the market making investors stay out. World's Largest Beer Maker to Ditch Fossil Fuels, Go 100% Renewables

  Now, you can sip that ice cold brew without feeling guilty. The world's largest beer manufacturer, Anheuser-Busch InBev NV, has vowed to completely shift from fossil fuels by 2025, including investing in their own renewable energy sources.

 

 

 

 

 

BOMB ATTACKS IN THAILAND. MUSLIMS SUSPECTED

More bomb attacks in a country once thought safe: "Suspected Muslim insurgents have set off dozens of bombs in southern Thailand, bringing down power lines and setting tires on fire to block roads. Security officials said there were no reports of deaths or injuries." The frontiers of Islam are drawn in red.

 There has been a war going on in Thailand for over 20 years. Andrew Bolt never paid any attention to it and the politics involved. He suddenly found it useful because Muslims are involved. There has been one in the Rakhine State in Myanmar one in the Philippines and one in Bangladesh. Bolt's only interest is not in the history the whys or wherefores of these conflicts but to expose them now because Muslims are involved. If he were anti- Buddhist he'd be focusing on Thailand Nepal and Tibet. If anti Christian he'd be exposing over 150 countries. because of religion and bugger the politics  and history of the region. If there's a crime committed and the perp was a non practicing Muslim Bolt would be reporting it. It's an obsession that drives his business.   Why is Bolt there whenever a Muslim is mentioned in a negative way? No news is bad news good news doesn't rate Bolt is a front runner for and in the anti- Islam Industry, the anti-Renewables Industry, the anti- Same sex Marriage Industry and if he wasn't sponsored by Tony Abbott's sponsor who sponsors the IPA and the Business Council Rupert Murdoch we would never know the name Andrew Bolt in any capacity if we did he'd just be another Mark Latham. So it's better to talk about these things than the real economic woes facing the country that can't be fixed by lowering wages and revealing real truths that will effect us. Bolt avoids this reality and prefers one he knows nothing about.

Posted on April 8, 2017 by peterimrich

ACTU secretary Sally McManus has a surprising ally in one of the world’s most powerful bankers in her fight against pay cuts
Source: JPMorgan boss says depressing wages for low-paid workers is not good for business – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)


In a rare public intervention, Bernie Fraser has told Fairfax Media that Australia is approaching a "danger point".
Source: Former RBA governor Bernie Fraser says penalty rate cut will produce inequality, not jobs