Andrew bolt's Blog,27/4/17; Connecting events 2-3 months apart for the convenience of a lie; Germaine popped Andrew Bolt's thought bubble; Bolt stole a dead soldiers bugle:

CRIKEY TELLS THREE UNTRUTHS ABOUT ME IN ITS FIRST SENTENCE

Don't waste a dollar on Crikey clickbait. The first sentence of its story contains three errors of fact: "Andrew Bolt claims to have obtained a confidential Border Force report and key CCTV footage that backs up Immigration Minister  Peter Dutton's claims about what led to the Good Friday incident in the Manus Island detention centre."

  " I have now had confidential information that reveals the truth."Bolt

Bolt above did say he had "new confidential information" that reveals "the truth". So if this isn't the case and Bolt hasn't received  confidential information why does he say he had and that  it's evidence of the "real" truth. Isn't it up to Bolt to show what he has and where he got otherwise he's just a wind bag. Even here he seems to be saying  no such evidence has been received and his real truth is simply that Dutton's critics are wrong and it's from them the lying is coming.

 Hands up please if anybody understands what it is Andrew Bolt is saying.  1) Apparently he has no new evidence . 2) Dutton has been loose with the alternative facts and refuses to clarify or verify them  but 3) His critics are liars

I repeat Andrew Bolt  has fundamentally said nothing and is simply pretending that he has. Buy Crikey they might be Left but boy are they Right and Bolt well he is nowhere as usual.Insiders- Barry Cassidy vs Peter Dutton and Andrew Bolt Manus story

ON PETER DUTTON'S MANUS CLAIMS

Last week I said Immigration Minister Peter Dutton should apologise or prove he was telling the truth when he said a riot on Manus Island was triggered by male boat people taking a local boy into a detention centre. I have now had confidential information that reveals the truth. My editorial from The Bolt Report:   

 Bolt refuses to listen to the reports out of the PNG by police and the defense force chiefs he favors  "I have now had confidential information that reveals the truth. My editorial from The Bolt Report: " Unrevealed confidential information is a "believe me" which amounts to no information whatsoever. It's evidence of value in a kangaroo court.

Bolt connects a couple of  events 2 or 3 months apart tells us the  police and senior authorities in the PNG  are in a conspiracy of denial that he has the "real" evidence the 'right stuff' that would prove Dutton right. Evidence that would only stand up in a street court but the source of which he can't  reveal.  It's the equivalent of Bolt telling us he got it from  the magic 8 ball or his favored news source  ISIS had told him. The man gets more desperate by the day to save the conservative asses wherever he can  Abbott one day Dutton  the next. 'We didn't do anything wrong': refugees hit back at Peter Dutton 






 

 

 

HOW DARE GERMAINE GREER PLAY DOWN CHILD MARRIAGE

Germaine Greer, famed feminist, now defends marrying off child brides and cutting the genitals of girls. Defending Islam now trumps defending young women. 

Germain Greer didn't say anything on Q&A other than that the practices attributed to Islam are also practices that can be found today among Christian and other communities. That to say they are customs demanded by Islam exclusively is bullshit.
Bolt simply distorts what Greer said to look less of a fool than he is. He's deflecting and distorting her comments. Why didn't he just paste a link to Iview or Youtube instead of  selecting words out of context from an edited transcript.

 Child marriage is practiced among the Romany Hindus Southern Italians and others Greer is right when she says it's not consumated. It's called "arranged marriage" where promises are made. Greer however has  popped Bolt's thought bubble. As for genital mutilation that too is a cultural event that occurs but it too is not exclusive to Islam. Bolt's ignorance is driven by ultra racism and bigotry.

 

ANZAC DAY BETRAYED. HIJACKED BY TRIBALISTS

ANZAC Day is being betrayed, and not just by ABC presenter Yassmin Abdel-Magied. Why did the Canberra parade have Aboriginal veterans march under an Aboriginal flag, rather than with their units under an Australian one? Why did Adelaide’s dawn service start with a Welcome to Country as if our soldiers were mere guests of a land some died defending?  

  What relationship has Andrew Bolt to Anzacs? He is the son of migrants who came from a town in Holland notorius for supporting Hitler. Now Bolt has become little more than a camp follower a gatecrasher of day to which he has no connection but is banging a patriotic drum. Isn't that lack of humbleness that bellowing suspicious? Is Bolt the unconnected voice of the Anzacs? If Anzac day represents all Australians why is Bolt so anti-Muslim, anti- Lebanese, Anti-Turk? Bolt has stolen a dead man's bugle and another's drum and has made out it's his party and we should all be grateful. How effen un-Australian is that!!!!
 

ABDEL-MAGIED'S DEFENDERS ARE BRAINLESS ON FREE SPEECH

Yassmin Abdel-Magied is the pet Muslim of politicians trying to show their own tolerance and to sell Islam. But her defenders now show their ignorance of what free speech means. Memo to the Greens: conservatives are attacking Abdel-Magied's Anzac Day comment but not using the law to have it banned. The first is free speech, the second is not.

 

 

ABDEL-MAGIED'S DEFENDERS ARE BRAINLESS ON FREE SPEECH

Yassmin Abdel-Magied is the pet Muslim of politicians trying to show their own tolerance and to sell Islam. But her defenders now show their ignorance of what free speech means. Memo to the Greens: conservatives are attacking Abdel-Magied's Anzac Day comment but not using the law to have it banned. The first is free speech, the second is not.

1 Using criticism of "what she said" from a News Corp platform isn't debate it's cat calling and name calling over a fence. Calling for Yasmin to be sacked from the ABC is also not debate but a demand. A demand for consequences for what she said. Bolt seems to deny that's what conservatives are saying.

 Debate is sharing the same platform and comes in the shape of programs like the Drum and Q&A and not The Bolt Report. Andrew Bolt never places himself in such an open format his preference is an over the fence yelling match as witnessed at a street fight or an over produced program that is controlled by him.

 

2 Second nobody is seeking to have comments banned that is Andrew Bolt's lie. What specific comments and truths have been banned?  The consequences of what has been said are tested much the same as the new immigration tests which Bolt seems to demand and support. They are tested in this case just by a bureaucrat but by a qualified and respected judge who represents the nation. So it seems Bolt's just dog whistling. What's actually happening is that  speech is free it's consequences are  not  and can be tested. "No conservative I know is trying to have Abdel-Magied taken to court or the Human Rights Commission." Bolt . May be not Bolt but they are crying for her to be sacked by the ABC are they also free to call for her to be shot?

 

 3 "The only question that comes close to an infringement of her free speech is whether she really should keep her job as presenter at the ABC.But the issue there is really whether using taxpayers' money to employ her (given not just her views but her rank inexperience) is actually a misuse of that funding."

No the only issue is why shouldn't free speech be universal in all sections of society? Why is  Bolt qualifying "free" with an "except"  so he's a tax payer the argument is not what rights taxpayers have 85% support the ABC so yes your an outlier

 Besides the ABC is not a government run body it's independent of government  it's tax payer funded and not controlled by 10% or even 15% of taxpayers but by and independently appointed board who happens to have been in the main chaired by conservatives like Maurice Newman has conservatives on the board from News Corp  who appoint  the CEOs to manage it and in the main they too have been  conservatives like ex News Corp exec Guthrie. So no Bolt 85% of Australians approve of and trust the ABC and we are all it's shareholders. We vote each election to keep it. We get lied to by the likes of Abbott who pre election promised no cuts but cut anyway. We aren't beholden to one man's opinion Bolt's entitled to have his opinion and he too can vote.

4  We subsidizing the ABC is not an individual choice but then I subsidize Andrew  Bolt as well by way of News Corp's allowed tax deductions that the government passed on my behalf along with  the laws that allow him on air. I don't get a choice or can't declare that I don't wish to be a participant in that subsidized support. Why is Bolt employed by sections of companies that fail to make any profit  for News Corp and are hemorrhaging money?  I allow a 30% on Bolt's wages?

 If there isn't a demand for Yasmin to be sacked what is Bolt defending? Oh Abetz, Joyce and Abbott are free to make opinions about sacking and are then free of the consequences of those opinions as well.  Bolt is free to say we should drop a bomb on Nth Korea but he's free of the consequences of that.

What actually needs judging is what relevance has free speech  to truth. Bolt was judged to be a liar and as a consequence of lying was found guilty because he had no defense. Relevance and consequences seem to be a better yardstick than freedom which is do abstract as to have no meaning . Better than having the cover of a book declaring Bolt Australia's foremost expert on Climate Change. That's a lie but also has consequences due to the misinformation it allows.

 

TRUMP RUINS MEDIA DINNER. HOW WE LAUGHED

Donald Trump declined an invitation to be jeered by people who hate him at the annual White House correspondents dinner. Even better, he's staged a rally of his own on the same day, forcing some journalists to skip their dinner to cover his rally instead. Worse, without Trump, their dinner looks an even more pathetic Left-fest. Trump wins.

Obviously Bolt pays no respect to tradition that he keeps talking about and nor does Trump for that matter. But then it's fine then that the media don't respect Trump another complaint bolt holds. He's all complaints isn't he.

 

WHO LET THEM IN? MELBOURNE AS BEIRUT

Our immigration policies at work: "[Lebanese-born] Mohammed Oueida, 41, left the Comancheros shortly before he was ambushed and shot in the stomach as he left lunchtime prayers at a mosque in Coburg... Oueida had been out of prison for four months." Police suspect one of Melbourne's Lebanese  crime families is behind the shooting.

I will call Bolt the Dutchman because he doesn't hesitate to call Lebanese born here in Australia Lebanese that's equality and that's multicultural. So Bolt the Dutchman  declares the Lebanese born here to have a Beirut mentality to crime. Well than it can equally be said that Bolt the Dutchman has a Nazi mentality as the notorious town his family comes from Aalsmeer in the Netherlands. Given that how is he qualified to tell us what it is we can and can't do on Anzac Day when the Bolt's came from a town that in fact supported the enemy. The the Lebanese are just fighting among themselves but Bolt the Dutchman is firing verbal bullets at Australia and not just Dutch Australians. Who let him in his abuse is far wider and more public than some Lebanese crims fighting each other or Italian Crims or Vietnamese crims or Chinese crims. The aren't abusing the country by pretending they were on the Australian side during the war.
 

 

TURNBULL'S ROYAL COMMISSION CENSORS CRITICISM OF ABC

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull called a $50 million royal commission into juvenile justice in the Northern Territory after watching a disgracefully biased, emotive and misleading ABC Four Corners report. Now the royal commission has censored a statement by the main target of that report which exposes just how biased that report was.

MOST OUTSTANDING PUBLIC AFFAIRS REPORT
Australia’s Shame, Four Corners, ABC


"Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull called a $50 million royal commission into juvenile justice in the Northern Territory after watching a disgracefully biased, emotive and misleading ABC Four Corners report. "Bolt

It's no surprise is it that Bolt fails to mention  that the report was voted the 1917 Logie  for best Public Affairs Report!  The Royal Commission is investigating the Juvenile System and would censor any statements trying to influence that investigation. If they weren't they just might have called Andrew Bolt in for an opinion because he has various means to evidence which he more  often than not can't name. John Effernick is being questioned by the Commission and not because of what the ABC claimed. Imagine if in Bolt's case judge Bromberg paid attention to only evidence presented by Andrew Bolt.

The ABC may have triggered a Royal Commission but the ABC isn't being called in for evidence and as far as the Commission is concerned the report is irrelevant. That tells you when Bolt says "
"Yet it was by editing out such information that Four Corners triggered the calling of her royal commission. Heads it wins, tails we lose." it's only a loose because they were caught and are now being investigated. Had it been a Documentary on a Union that brought about an investigation there'd be no argument from Bolt. Bravo the ABC and congratulations on your Logie win which was well deserved.

TURNBULL'S ROYAL COMMISSION CENSORS CRITICISM OF ABC

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull called a $50 million royal commission into juvenile justice in the Northern Territory after watching a disgracefully biased, emotive and misleading ABC Four Corners report. Now the royal commission has censored a statement by the main target of that report which exposes just how biased that report was.