Thursday, 1 June 2017

Andrew Bolt's Blog, 1/6/17; Idiotic denial by Andrew Bolt; Abbott's appointed and expanded ASIO & AFP declared incompetant; Bolt declares ridding opression is racism; ASIO is Abbott's Incompetance; Maurice Newman in context; Idiotic Denial by Bolt vs Reasoned correction by Waleed Aly;

ON TONIGHT: THE PLAN TO DIVIDE US BY RACE. THE LESSONS FROM THE MELBOURNE BOMB SCARE

On The Bolt Report on Sky at 7pm: The plan to change the constitution to divide us by race - a debate with Shireen Morris. Plus the bomb scare on a flight from Melbourne: were police too slow, and why can a mentally disturbed man buy a plane ticket? Liberal MP Craig Kelly on why he's glad Donald Trump will (hopefully) scrap a climate deal.


"why can a mentally disturbed man buy a plane ticket?" Andrew Bolt 

1) Does Andrew Bolt hold a sanity certificate? People were once issued them in the Netherlands and we can assume Bolt retains his citizenship for that country.

2) Does Bolt suggest all medical records be made available to Airlines, Trains, Buses and Uber given that 30% of Australians have a mental health issue at some time in their lives.

3) When was or is Bolt mentally ill now because he's often either paranoid and needs to protect his family or he's walking the tightrope of domestic violence by continuing working from home.

4) I was allocating tickets on any transport service I certainly wouldn't be issuing a ticket to Andrew Bolt for a whole lot of reasons his mental health being just one. But if I was found to be traveling with him I'd ask to leave for my mental health

5) Will Bolt support Cate McGregor or Margret Court or remain silent? McGregor shows Bolt up and for what he is turning Margret Court into the innocent victim in all of this.

Cate McGregor a response to Margret Court











Image result for Image of Idiotic denial


SURE THAT CASH IS WASTED. BUT SO'S THE REST


Bolt's argument is on process not principle apparently if thats the best he can do he accepts global warming is real and not alarmist at all. So one might why the struggle well it seems it's all politics. Abbott wanted to spend or did put an enormous effort and money into having Bjorn Lomborg installed as a Climate expert here in Australia. The Koch Bros saw no value in the man and Academics knocked him back on the grounds of his overrated qualifications. Andrew Bolt tries to sell him as a genius he rarely mentions him now. What a fair weather friend he is. As for seeming to be doing something we can give that award to Josh Frydenberg who is about active  as a duck relaxed on the surface but working his butt off under water struggling to convince us there is something called "clean coal"
While claiming a move away from coal is a job killer and “anti-Western,” that it would lead to "economic devastation," or that it  amounts "international regulatory scheme.” that dis advantages us he fails to say just how many oil companies are for it's reduction. Ignoring the climate would only satisfy only a handful of coal and mining interests and the LNP's most biggest funders .Other major oil & gas Companies are happy to see coal go BP, Chevron, Shell AGL and Eugenie believe a concerted push for climate action will give them the opportunity to sell more natural gas, which emits less carbon dioxide (CO2) than coal when burned to produce electricity.
More than 1,000 companies, big and small, signed a letter calling for the U.S. to “realize the Paris Agreement’s commitment of a global economy that limits global temperature rise to well below 2 degrees Celsius.” Altogether, businesses backing the Paris climate agreement represent more than $3.7 trillion in annual revenues and employ nearly 8.6 million workers, that's not just "seeming"
Why is Bolt so different politics gets in the way conservatives are to self interested to be pragmatic like this.   Look to the sun: A conservative’s case for solar energy | TheHill

OPINION | Solar energy is attractive to large swaths of voters across this country.
Source: Image result for Images of incompetence

ASIO BOSS STILL WON'T SAY IT STRAIGHT; WE'VE IMPORTED TERRORISTS



 No the ASIO boss knows we have imported terrorists and have grown more of them at home after all we are a Settler Nation a nation that has imported people since our invasion. We have imported a diversity of  immigrants which by simple logic without evidence means a diversity of crime , innovative success, and even terrorism. To say we've imported terrorism is to say absolutely nothing but only state the obvious. Multiculturalism produces multicultural events Bolt's a genius isn't he?
If the head of our Intelligence Service said what Bolt is saying he would actually be the head of our unintelligent service. Bolt's logic is circular incorrect and "idiotic denial" of the fact that Multiculturalism is Australia. Andrew Bolt and Tony Abbott are simply anti-Australian.
 Both are now calling the organizations Abbott increased funding for ASIO and AFP failures how dumb is that? The security that Abbott strengthened for the safety of the country as being called incompetent.  If that's the case logic dictates that Abbott is calling  himself an  inadequate manager  who got things wrong and Bolt then must be his greatest and loudest critic.
You see the boats have been stopped so that's no longer politically relevant but the invasion of terror still is so now they have turned on legal refugees but to do that they have redefined the meaning of the term to Australians the first born children of people given the status of immigrants. Bolt is one and reading his media outrage he hates this country far more than any refugee immigrants we know. He has nothing but complaints about the nation that 99% of arrivals love. He and Abbott for little more than a grab for power want to establish a climate of fear that would enable a mandate for a drift to undemocratic change and a move to what Mussolini defined as Fascism. 









 Related image

HOW DARE THESE RACISTS DIVIDE US

SAY no to this racism. Last week 250 Aboriginal leaders decided what they wanted from the constitutional referendum promised by  Labor and the Liberals to recognise Aborigines and give them extra legal rights. Their demand: “We call for the establishment of a First Nations Voice.” What they really want is two votes, and everyone else one.
  Bolt's cry of reverse racism is independent of History. History is not only  being ignored but changed and redefined. 200 years of historical evidence shows that systemic racism and oppression was and still is a one way street and that reverse racism doesn't exist. The mouse is trying to swallow the elephant in the room. This cry is no more than a deflection and smokescreen of both cultural, structural and historic denial. When were white colonizers ever told where they could live who they could marry or what jobs they could have? When were  they  kicked from pillar to post? When they were the result was the stand at the Eureka Stockade which was a frontier war of another kind.
When where whites precluded from having bank savings accounts getting loans or having their wages managed and or stolen by government agencies. When they were convicts.  How dare first Australians ask for equal rights which might come at the expense of white privilege and create Bolt's phantom oppression. "How dare" the words themselves don't just sound  aloof of someone fearing a loss a cost that needs paying but they are the words of someone who presumes that a natural inequality exists and that's Andrew Bolt the ultra but not just confused racist, a member of the "elect".

 

 

 Image result for Images of false accusations

ASIO BOSS BACKTRACKS - BUT NOT ENOUGH

ASIO boss Duncan Lewis gets protection from the Turnbull Government for falsely saying there is no connection between refugees and terrorism. But today he walked that claim back a bit .... but not enough. My editorial from The Bolt Report.
31 Duncan Lewis didn't backtrack at all he clarified for the sake of simpletons like Andrew Bolt what he said. There is no evidence whatsoever to conclude a correlation exists between refugees and terrorism. Nor does a correlation exist between terrorism and refugees. In fact evidence suggests the reverse.  It doesn't matter which way Bolt tries to show there is evidence proves he's wrong. So Bolt changes all the definitions to ensure any debate is destroyed and simply reduced to confusion. However there is a correlation between the size of the platform delivering confusion and the message heard and the influence produced by the fake news.

 Image result for Images of Maurice Newman

EX-ABC CHAIRMAN: DO WE NEED THE BIASED ABC ANY MORE?

Former ABC chairman Maurice Newman says the ABC's bias is getting worse and the need for it is getting less. Do we need it any more?
  Maurice Newman ex Chairman of the ABC appointed Mark Scott twice as the CEO of the ABC. Who became the most reviled manager under Tony Abbott's reign as PM so much so Abbott banned his team appearing on Australia's most trusted media organization. Scott in fact was appointed for two terms and both by Newman. What we have here is Bolt filling space promoting his program but with information that when it's historical context is revealed  the message being delivered is totally contradictory to what Maurice Newman actually did when chairman. So basically what information Bolt is providing with Newman's support is bs.
 
WALEED ALY IN FULL DENIAL ON REFUGEES AND TERRORISM

WALEED ALY IN FULL DENIAL ON REFUGEES AND TERRORISM

I have long warned that Waleed Aly, despite his charm, is an apologist for Islam who attacks critics of Islamist extremists, thus providing cover for them. Watch his latest astonishing performance.
Astonishing logic is that of Andrew Bolt. Terrorists come in all shapes sizes and colors Bolt seems to focus that because some refugees may have been involved in terrorism all refugees are therefore suspects but he ignores the same fore those terrorists who aren't refugees and are in the majority. The fact that the majority of refugees aren't involved in terrorism is of no interest to Bolt. Furthermore because so few are involved in radical and extreme violence Bolt changes the very definition of what it means to be a refugee. So much so he defines not just the 4% of Australians that are accepted as refugees but their children as well in order to expand his terms of reference. 
He goes even a step even further by exploring the world for events to fit his categories all logic is thrown out the door. More terrorist activities globally are carried out by non refugees which makes Bolt's appeal to any logic or correlation spurious at best. ASIO, AFP, reasoned logicians and experts of statistics all have proven Bolt to be little more than a fabricator of FEAR for political purpose because political division creates a smoke screen of confusion that distorts the real dysfunction people feel in their lives which basically is economic. That simply divides Australians into two categories those financially privileged and those that aren't. If the electorate actually recognized  their economic positions Bolt would be out of a job. His primary work is to distract and deflect attention away from economic reality and the unity that most Australians share.
So most terrorists aren't refugees and Australian and world Intelligence experts all agree. Nor are most refugees terrorists. Further most aren't Muslim however most victims of terrorism individual or state sponsored are. Charm or no charm Waleed Aly is right and Bolt is a failure of logic 101.







 

 Image result for Image poverty and credit cards

IS THIS THE LIBERALS' MINING TAX?

All pain for less gain: "The federal government’s bank tax numbers “still don’t add up” and the levy will fail to raise the projected $1.6 billion a year without changes, industry experts say. But it will have a significant impact on earnings at the big banks all the same..." Exactly what happened with Labor's mining tax.
  The Subtext is always fear and danger stranger with Bolt. Remember when banks before they were privatized  and the promise of cheaper fees well that was a joke wasn't it. They came around to schools and preached the benefits of savings and now it's the benefits of debt. Banking isn't saving banking is the debt business and Australians are wallowing in it. Yet Bolt is howling poor banks while complaining about personal debt of Australian's "don't punish the banks". Fees Australian banks are second highest in the world no Complaint from Bolt. Most Australians are paying 22% interest that's gouging no complaint from Bolt because that's the asset and cash poor. If your rich you can use the banks money over 50-60 days interest free as long as you treat it as a revolving door you can even make money. No the poor banks have reversed the game they don't want your savings their too expensive they want you debt and you are in fact their bank if you are poor and the rich well they can invest in the business of poverty. Banks don't invest in anything innovative new or productive  unless there's collateral. Has anyone noticed Australia's rich list lately and just how few people there are who got there through innovation?





WHO LEAKED THE $14BN NEWS?

Scott Morrison will hope like hell it wasn't his team: "Staffers for Treasurer Scott Morrison would be quizzed amid lingering speculation details of his tax plan were leaked ahead of Budget night. Investors stripped about $14 billion from the market value of the major banks on May 9 — before the tax was unveiled with the Budget at 7.30pm."
 Bolt's concern bank shareholders and the embarrassment for the MT/SM team "If it got out" . The banks the most profitable in the world that simply in the business of creating debt and when and if in trouble turn to the wider population of Australians to bail them out and pay for their folly don't sell anything but  advise and cross selling of their own products or churning in the business of commissions, interest and charges. Why is Bolt supporting nothing innovative?  Because innovation is dangerous. He does however hate the banks when they they publicly say they are pulling out of coal now that's  too too innovative.

 Image result for Images of reverse racism

DO THE LIBERALS NO LONGER FIGHT RACISM, TRIBALISM?

Liberals don't dare resist the dismemberment of our nation by race politics. Greg Sheridan: "Many members of the government ... are ­extremely unhappy with the proposals for constitutional change but for many reasons have kept ­silent...If Liberals cannot oppose this in principle, it is difficult to know why they exist at all as a political party."
Greg Sheridan and John Stone the spokesmen for a Democratic Nation.  The one that complains about Welfare and handouts to the first peoples of Australia but dreads  the thought of releasing them from their history of oppression. To cry out and ask why you have had your foot planted on our heads on the ladder of life is to be now called the new reverse racist.
 Don't look at history if you have to then just change it and say nope it's not what happened and that's what Bolt does. It's why these conservative male assholes resist the voice of women and only sing that tune why can't ta woman  be more like a man or blacks like a white man or kids more grown up or more attentive to what ultra conservatives are saying. They are the only ones in heaven and think they deserve to be there.
 Image result for Images of braggart

SSSHHH; DON'T MENTION THE WAR

Greg Sheridan: "By far the single weirdest thing the government did this week was announce an additional troop deployment to Afghanistan in an answer by Defence Minister Marise Payne at a Senate estimates committee...  It uses its most anonymous minister in the most inappropriate setting to sneak the announcement out as quietly as possible."   
What Sheridan again doing all Bolt's work for him of course Bolt rides on the backs of others. While attacking the man in this case Ms Payne MP for what? For not yelling from the highest mountain top that we are sending 30 more advisers to Afghanistan to show Donald Trump our bestest we love him.  Bolt is such a limp dick.

 

 Image result for Images of changing definitions to confuse

BLAME THOSE DAMN ROMANS FOR GLOBAL WARMING

The ABC announces: "Australian climate scientists have the clearest evidence yet of their links to human activity." Its guest then says: "The greenhouse gases are rising relentlessly over 2000 years."
  Oh Bolt is not referring to CO2 again we see he's stretching the boundary of definitions to confuse the issue. Refugees are no longer just people that have been accepted as immigrants because of a claim to refuge. Their children are no longer defined as either Australian if born here even though the government and law regard them as such to Bolt they are still refugees or immigrants. Bolt in fact is one as are 50% of the country. So that then enables Bolt to select from a wider group of people the ones he regards as deviants and conclude stranger danger that terrorists all come from this now larger cohort. He doesn't do the same for what he'd regards as non immigrants the mass killers who terrorized Australians like Knight, the Minogues, the Hilton bombers or the Walsh st cop killers non of whom are or were Muslim.
The same process of omission and clarification is going on here where as Paris and the global accord is about CO2 and not "gases" 
 





HORROR AT THE SYDNEY WHITEST FESTIIVAL

Divide people by race and award some victim status and privileges. You've then got the clown show  seen at the Sydney Writers Festival that has the Guardian gasping in horror. Imagine cringing white liberals having the race card pulled on them by a sanctimonious black writer enjoying his power to take offence. Read and laugh.

  "Oh, the guilt, the guilt, of being white."Bolt
Here we have Bolt actually the living proof  that that the word of somebody like Paul Beatty who  he doesn't regard as an equal in any sense " Imagine cringing white liberals having the race card pulled on them by a sanctimonious black writer enjoying his power. Read and laugh."Bolt. You couldn't get more disgusting than that and that's Bolt from the heart.

Related image

No comments: