Monday 19 November 2018

Andrew Bolt's Blog,19/11/18; In less than 70 years China has become a miracle of Social Engineering. The CIA is Trump's enemy; Israel and isolation,





 Related image
33m






1
In less 70 years China has proved to be a modern miracle of social engineering. Why is China progressing where America is failing on all social indicators? Is it because they have been ready to embrace change? Why has the US a military presence in 154 countries and China only an economic one? China is developing a meritocracy where America's has really become an out priced dream. The question that might be asked is why should China fail given it's watched and learnt from the failings of other Marxist States and observed the successes of other Social Democratic states. China has focused on change and has supported the success of economies such as Australia's that constantly resists change.


 Cold Water Bolt is very anti-China

A PRESENT FOR YOUR MARXIST LECTURER

OUR MARXISTS LISTED Got a lecturer who still praises Marxism? Send them Jordan Peterson's preface to Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago: "No political ­experi­ment has ever been tried so widely, with so many disparate people, in so many different countries (with such different histories) and failed so absolutely and so catastrophically." The toll: 87 million.

5m Link


Andrew Bolt doesn't seem to explain why a book that's had as much influence on the planet as the Bible is so wrong. When it continues to influence the world so much that its study should be stopped? He doesn't ask how it is and who drew the line in the sand as to when and what deaths can be put down to Marxism and Marxism alone. Bolt certainly doesn't suggest any lives were saved, does he? The deaths before during and after revolutions are never just a single consequence but a result of a clash and transition between resistance and change.
Deaths aren't attributed to the Bible in the same way but large swathes occurred due to that good book. People were dying prior to Marxist uprisings, in fact, they were often the catalyst for a revolution in the first place along with resistance to these transformations as well. 
The fact that Marx's ideas have even had the influence they have in just a century is a reason for studying the ideas themselves. That Bolt claims they shouldn't or should be protested seems blinkered to the extreme. Marxists theories should be studied and be an essential item of review in any university course that doesn't mean they are promoted in the course of study. It doesn't suggest a want for a Marxist degree course to be developed either.
As for protesting outside the conference, Right-wing true believers are entitled in fact are welcome to protest. If they have Bolt's conviction, however, they won't be seen. He is welcome to protest but because there are so few Bolt followers it seems they will allow Bolt to wh. That's a sign of the lack of numbers, you won't see Bolt there but is he praising or berating the right-wing for not protesting?



2h
Should we be surprised after 5 years of anti-Muslim sentiment being promoted by News Corp a lot false and yet not challenged in the MSM? False by ommission, false by fact, false by descriptives have portrayed Muslims a  potential threat no matter their standing in the community colour or popularity Bolt always lets us know they all are enablers of radical Islam where the most popular ISIS supporter and recruiter in Australia has always been Andrew Bolt. 
 A special Fairfax-Ipsos survey finds only 14 per cent of voters support an increase in the number of immigrants from Muslim countries while 35 per cent believe the intake should stay the same. IPSOS  That is a total of 49% Andrew Bolt ignores that truth because he wants us to think only one thought 46% want less. Further, the poll was taken just after Bourke St so Bolt's  46% will fall. Before Abbott became PM anti- Muslim sentiment was only 9%


1h3
Because the parole board is subject to our laws as well. Imagine if our Judges and parole boards were subject to the political populism that Matthew Guy is advocating rating judges on their decisions by popular vote. Isn't that vigilante justice?

 

DID DISLOYAL CIA LEAK AGAIN?

15m
The Media, The FBI and now the CIA are Institutions against Trump or the American Institution of the Presidency. It seems Donald Trump has personally created a divided administration that's caused constant leaks about what he wants to be kept secret. This isn't a sign of a "deep state" nor is it a sign of badly managed agencies what it is clearly a sign of is the worst leadership in America's history with Trump creating disloyalty where there wasn't any. Mind you Bolt links us to Powerline for an opinion that seems so paranoid it's calling Juan Cole a subversive radical professor. When do the left and right agree well here and it's about Trump. Trump tries to counter CIA Leak on Bin Salman complicity in Khashoggi Murder

"It is not entirely clear to me why the CIA has it in for Prince Mohammed. The agency usually does what the president tells it to do and seldom has had independent policies like this one. In the past, it has often valued authoritarian allies over principles such as human rights or democracy. But the reason could be as simple as an assessment by agency analysts that Bin Salman is such a loose canon that he is damaging US interests in the region. He roped the US into giving logistical and planning support to the ruinous Saudi war on Yemen. He kidnapped and tried to push from office the prime minister of Lebanon. He kidnapped a whole slew of other princes and held them at the Ritz Carlton in Riyadh until they coughed up money (allegedly $100 bin)."Ann Arbor







28m
Bolt's cry to prove we are independent really shows just how isolated we are not from just the Muslim world but the Western world as well and how much we appear to be the puppets of the Trump government and it's pro-Israeli backers. So not only is Bolt's call isolationist in terms of Israel, Climate, and China it's becoming increasingly like other fascist states once were South Africa for one comes to mind. How is it that since the arrival of Abbott this country has become increasingly isolationist not giving countries in our region a second thought not acting as leaders but bullies as to quote Abbott we always knew our neighbours wouldn't be happy but then Israel is more important to us than our neighbours why one might well ask?

If World Could Vote, it would Slam Illegal Israeli Occupation of Palestine… Oh Wait

Check out just how Isolationist Australia is.

 

 

BINDI SUED ME AS AN ABORIGINE. NOW SAYS "ALSO WHITE"

Column Artist Bindi Cole gave evidence against me as an Aborigine. Now - courageously -  she says she is “also white”, and I ask again whether the Federal Court got it wrong in saying race is not a question of choice for such fair-skinned Aborigines.

4h25 Link

 

 Bolt is anti- Chinese why? Because it's good for News Corp business. It's only a tactic that will immediately be reversed if the Liberals win the forthcoming elections. Remember how pro-Chinese Abbott was when he was elected 2013. He was made Pivot of the Pacific but did nothing to upset them and focused all his fearmongering on the Middle East and Putin. However today Fox/Trump News is anti-China and Bolt their lapdog down under just follows.
 However, he tortures us with his constant repetition which was called Chinese water torture back in the day.
1) Bindi Cole gave evidence against me as an Aborigine.
Bolt keeps telling us he's indigenous and more so than Bindi Cole, and any Aborigine born after him. He never got his Uni Degree and there's no reason to even begin to wonder why?
2)  Bindi Cole courageously says she's white
Bindi Cole admits to being raised Australian a multicultural nation and as such has internalised the history and social psychology of white colonial culture and left her with a duality psychologically. Andrew Bolt's grabbed that and with every ounce of colonial spirit appropriated that form Bindi Cole as proof of his innocence. However Bindi's reflection on realising she has both elements of the psychology of her Colonial oppressors and her Aboriginality. Doesn't discount the statements made in court.
3) Bolt's semantics don't change Mordecai Bromberg's judgement that because Bolt was loose with his facts a polite way of saying he wasn't just wrong but lied and that his tone constituted what could be legally regarded a vilification he had no defence under Section 18D and was therefore guilty under the Act.
4) Why didn't Bolt's platinum News Corp legal team defend Andrew Bolt in an appeal? Why aren't they assisting him now to have the verdict quashed? Because they know they lost and have moved on.

 


12m
 Problem with Bolt he drives his arguments on an evidence-based one-way street. He pulls a rabbit out of a hat and then tries to convince us all rabbits live in hats. His array of individual accounts turn into the broadest of generalisations that in reality are in fact statistically insignificant but adds them to the emotional manipulation and fearmongering of anyother right-wing media persuader. The fact is the same is never applied to radicalised Christian extremists popping up like cockroaches these days. When and if they come to the public's attention they are deemed outliers, exceptions from which generalisations can't be made. The personal statements of mass murderers justifying the carnage they have wraught aren't applied by Bolt or often by the authorities in the same way. However the fact is  right-wing hate crimes have increased 800% in America in 2017.
Currently, the politics of race and religion are raised grim relief and being used without shyness by the conservative side of politics and the media that supports them and it's really been enabled with the coming of Trump,  the Australian government aping their politics and conservative media  encouraging commentaries doing the same.

No comments: