Andrew Bolt's Blog,25/3/19; Washing Blood off his hands and kidding himself he's innocent; The Jimmy Olsen of News Corpse; Adau isn't an individual to Andrew Bolt;

 

 

CHRISTCHURCH: DO THE GREENS HAVE BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS?

COLUMN The massacre of Muslims in Christchurch by a white Australian racist should make the Greens ask themselves: do they have blood on their hands?  Didn’t they see that encouraging migrants, Aborigines, Muslims and others to identify by their “race” would force some threatened white losers to identify by their own? Then there's the violence...

26m1
 No, the Greens don't have blood on their hand's Bolt does, and he's trying to wash it off as fast as he can. He's not talking to Dr Di Natale he's talking to a mirror. Bolt made a fool of himself on Sky so to compensate he does what he does best debates, Di Natale, no, he disparages him with his son at home alone by talking into a mirror with his son playing his sidekick.

Like Bolt, Tarrant carried that hatred with him, and it was reinforced not by what he saw in Pakistan but the Far-Right in Europe the gun club in NZ and the friendship groups he made on the internet supported as a backdrop by the voices in the MSM like Andrew Bolt's. News Corp is like Musac in Tarrant's English speaking world. However, his psychopathic and sociopathic hatred was formed like Bolt's long before at an informative age. Bolt's a Europhile he identifies as a Dutchman and admits he never felt and still doesn't feel at home here and hates what he sees as happening. According to him Muslims Africans and Multiculturalism have turned this country from white to rainbow, and he's been actively promoting against it with News Corp's massive technical resources with the backing of the IPA and Conservative politicians and their political use of hate speech. With some, it's just political tactics with Andrew Bolt, it seems to run much deeper as it does with the UPF, Reclaim Australia, One Nation and Fraser Anning the very opposite of the Greens. A hate that's permeated the likes of Brenton Tarrant and accelerated with force on the internet. Tarrant found himself in a country with gun laws that gave him the opportunity that Bolt actually called for after the Barcelona killings. For young committed Christian men to fight back. He asked why didn't young Australian Christians fight back with the conviction of Islamists. Bolt even said he admired the strength of their beliefs and wrote about it.

 To excuse himself Bolt just keeps running the same old Trump cherry in different forms that there is some sort of equivalency between the Far Right and the Far Left. That violence is universal, and therefore there is good and bad on both sides and violence the extreme on both. The problem being that's the Bully declaring his innocence by saying they made me do it is an excuse. In the case of Christchurch, it's the Left the Greens finger pointing at Bolt himself that's supposed to explain the Right-wing they're constant accusations that he was to blame has put blood on their hands,

Bolt claims the Australian shooter can't have been influenced by him because Tarrant hadn't been in Australia for 3 years, therefore, couldn't have internalised or been radicalised here by him.
Bolt was raised in a Dutch migrant family his mother never adjusting to being here in a new country. Bolt said they were a Sattelite family. He was socialised never to feel Australian, and he claimed it wasn't until he was in his 30's with his children did any empathy arise, and even today he seems less one of us than some recently arrived migrants.
The claim being made is the shooter born and raised here in Grafton must have been radicalised outside of the country and not by the Islamophobia Bolt has been spreading in the media for 2 decades. Socialisation and the internalisation of our social psychology is by process of osmosis something that doesn't occur overnight and Bolt's living proof of that being raised in a family and by a mother who resisted being Australian passing that on to Bolt. Tarrant was the opposite didn't he absorbed Australian Culture which the media particularly News Corp Australia's most significant voice in this country raised an atmosphere of Islamophobia from 9% to 33% in the community which the 28-year-old grew up. The Greens certainly never had that power and don't have it today Bolt does he boasts he has a reach of over 3million people kids absorb that public acceptance of hate making expressing white patriotism and nationalism a symbol of defence and loyalty over a reality that didn't exist so openly. Bolt always like people in power project their worst behaviour an blame others. It's that what Bolt helps with the division between "them" and "us" which Bolt claims are typical but the fault of the Greens whose members are democratically elected, unlike Andrew Bolt. 

Bolt supports Fraser Anning's reaction to being egged why is it because he like Fraser Anning had a violent response to being pranked? A reaction that in both instances tended to GBH maybe Anning should have accused the Greens as being Antifa like Bolt does as it that word is sufficient to explain the violence witnessed by both for just being pranked. The one thing you can be sure of Bolt's motives for protecting Anning have nothing to do with Anning; it's all about defending himself. By the way on his podcast Bolt clearly identifies as a Dutchman and not as an Australian.

 

White Nationalism’s Most Powerful Accelerant

All that matters is that this mass murderer, like so many who have preceded him of late, is a young man moved to violence by an international ideology of fascism—exhilarating, purpose-driven, meaningful. Ultimately, intoxicating. This ideology has entered the mainstream over the last decade to a degree unseen in my lifetime, finding adherents at the highest levels of power around the world. And the primary accelerant fueling this inferno is the internet.   However, it's there, and Murdoch media has been supporting it for years. 

 Bolt has been working "as pilot fish for more extreme figures, their efforts, in concord with the YouTube algorithm, rapidly draw viewers toward more extreme fare. And there’s seemingly nothing they fear more than demonetization, deplatforming and an overnight plunge back into obscurity, à la Milo Yiannopoulos and Alex Jones."

The most effective way of stopping him as we have seen by his reactions is to turn his advertisers away; it's what he fears most.

ON THE BOLT REPORT TONIGHT - MARK LATHAM, AND TRUMP VINDICATED

How bothered is Bolt by his yelling match with Di Natale he's been blogging podcasting writing and now back on TV about it? He didn't spend that amount of time on the NZ massacre as he's done on this. It indicates just how badly he thinks he performed and he did perform poorly. Let's just assume somebody including himself is desperately trying to make up ground. Panic is panic and Bolt's punching blindly at thin air. Hope his advertisers are watching just how badly this man performs in the rational world.

MASSIVE FAKE NEWS FAIL: TRUMP CLEARED OF COLLUSION

The greatest Fake News story of this century just blew up. It’s official: no, Donald Trump did not collude with Russia to steal the election to become US president. Special prosecutor Robert Mueller recommends no further indictments. The Deep State attempt by Democrat loyalists - backed by the media - to have Trump sacked has failed. 

1m

Removing Trump won't remove the infrastructure of the party that embraced him; the dark money that funded him; the online radicalisation that drummed his army; nor the racism he amplified and reanimated. Trump is a symptom, not the cause.

What we know:

• Special counsel Robert Mueller turned over his long-awaited final report on the contentious Russia investigation
• Attorney-General William Barr has now issued his four-page summary of the report
• That summary said the report did not find that President Donald Trump committed a crime, but also did not exonerate him
• Read our full story here or read the four-page summary here

Again we can take as read Bolt is just being the ventriloquist's dummy for FOX News here.
Two questions were asked of the Mueller Investigation.
 1) Was there attempted Russian interference in the 2016 election?  The principal subject of the inquiry.
 The investigation found YES, and it was intended to negatively influence the prospects of Hilary Clinton.
 Bolt ignores that in its entirety. 

2) Was there any collusion found with the Trump campaign?
The answer no none was found.
However, that didn't mean he was exonerated nothing was found on Trump and his family and while Mueller made no further recommendation of indictments to the DOJ he did deliver what was found however to various other jurisdictions to follow up and decide.
It's not over yet, and the fake crowing won't stop those further investigations from proceeding.  

  It's Mueller time but don't forget: Trump has undermined the very idea of America | Robert Reich | Opinion | The Guardian

MODEL BEHAVIOUR

Then: "Adau Mornyang has called for South Sudanese community leaders and parents to take control of the teens who have been involved in violent crime." Now: "A prominent model... faces a possible 21 years in an American jail after drunkenly attacking an attendant on a flight from Melbourne... Adau Mornyang, 24, will be sentenced in June."

40mLink

PAYWALL
 If your South Sudanese then Andrew Bolt is watching you what you say and your behaviour anywhere and everywhere if you live in Melbourne and put a foot wrong then the heat is on. You represent the whole community of South Sudanese in this country and at times all Africans.

 Why is Bolt tribalizing Adau when two days ago he insisted we are just all individuals, and every one of us can make errors of judgement and commit offences. After all, Bolt did, and his accusers could have sought further compensatory justice and didn't. His lawyers didn't appeal the guilty verdict suggesting they too didn't believe his claim of innocence.
 Why is Bolt electing to shine his heavy light on this young girl? Because Adau is South Sudanese, she's black and possibly a refugee but mainly because she's Bolt's unwanted immigrant. Bolt wouldn't have brought her up had she been white middle class and Dutch. They too commit crimes some much more violent than Adau's and Bolt never mentions them because they are regarded as misdemeanours.

 Yes, white upper-class girls also commit crimes which more often are more severe and are let off. Adau isn't representative of her class community or family as Bolt hints. He's certainly not representative of journalism.
 Here what's different for a change is Andrew Bolt's not yelling "who let them in" too embarrassing at the moment I guess because it makes him out to be what he says he isn't a racist, a tribalist and a bigot.
 However, it's not strange Sky News was the only media group blocked from NZ during the Christchurch mass shooting. NZ didn't group all media as a class represented by Sky News ethics, but they may as well have been prewarned had they taken Andrew Bolt as representative of the media group. Jacinda Adern could well have said much earlier no "you're not one of us". When she just took Sky off the air. It's about time advertisers, and Australians one and all said that of Murdoch Media and Andrew Bolt "your not one of us. Who let you in?" not because they are typical of all media corporations but because they are just unethical in what they do and what they do is part and parcel of an unethical global business model whose practice diminishes who we are and our Democracy. Maybe the US Justice system will be more lenient to Adau we know Andrew Bolt wouldn't be if he were the judge yet he's implicitly a kerbside one here.
By the way, Bolt suggested the stabbing of a priest in Montreal was terrorist-related last week yet police said it wasn't will Bolt admit he was wrong he never does.
 

PM wanted Stan Grant as his man to fill empty seat

Peter FitzSimons

Nine days ago, the TV journo and now university professor received a very curious phone call from the PM.

As I have said more than once is all that Andrew Bolt does is follow articles in Fairfax and the ABC and nothing original? No, he possibly gets ideas printed in Murdoch's global media as well. Bolt rarely if ever originates any news or information himself. Extrapolate that fact to his columns and what he calls books, and you will discover. Bolt does just a little or nothing original. He's a signpost to various topics posted by others. 

He dared criticise Fitzsimmons for his English while his own is riddled with mistakes as shown in his banner. He thinks of himself as Superman but after 30 years remains less than Jimmy Olsen.
As for Stan Grant Bolt actually has whined that Stan Grant has been made a professor and that no university would make him one
" He is currently the ABC's Indigenous and International Affairs Analyst and Professor of Global Affairs at Griffith University in Queensland, Australia. Wikipedia"
Bolt the opinionator with no qualifications versus Grant who has a degree is an author of 2 books not just a collection of articles like Bolt and a respected journalist on global affairs was unfairly picked to be a professor in his specialty at Griffith's university. While Bolt the white victim would never get his foot in the door for that simple reason. What a pathetic creature and role model to his son that man is.

Andrew Bolt's Blog,19/3/19; First Dog on Old Dog; Not in the Interests of the Nation; Remember Bolt's cry of debt debt debt ALP debt. Abbott doubled it and now? Nothing now; Murdoch the snaeky bastard;

ON THE EXPLOITATION OF CHURSTCHURCH

Janet Albrechtsen: "Aly has seemingly ducked for cover about mentioning Islam when Muslim terrorists [murdered] innocent people... In 2013 he told us that 'terrorism is a perpetual irritant'... When a white supremacist killed Muslims in Christchurch, Aly couldn’t mention Islam enough." Brendan O'Neill also nails the exploitation of the tragedy.

7m
PAYWALL 
Bolt's definitely in hiding. He's been calling for a halt to the Muslim 'invasion' of Europe and Australia for years. That piece of Fake News has turned into hard reality with Brenton Tarrant. The resulting outcome now has him requiring to do even more to deny any responsibility. New Corp exploited Muslim immigration for years enthusiastically writing negative 2850 negative articles in 12 months, and Bolt was their lead opinion writer. Exploitation, it was nothing less. 
He's now "ducked for cover" shrunk flipped and is pretending to be a choir boy innocent of any charges. But we know he's not and just as Bolt called the altar boy who accused Pell, a liar. The Australian public will call him one, surely?  He can't stand up and deny his exploitation of Muslims Africans and Lebanese for politics. If he is saying now violence exits universally in Australia on both sides of the political landscape that's not what he's been preaching all these years Putting on a Dorian Gray face won't hide what lies beneath, someone whose lower than a snake's belly.  
Waleed Aly according to Albrechtsen "ducked for cover" because he said "terrorism is a perpetual irritant" Isn't that what Bolt's trying to now say as is Trump and Morrison? "We aren't to blame violence exists on all sides. Nothing to do with us" Waleed said it's no surprise what happened because our government has exploited Islamophobia for years and Morrison has since the Cronulla riots. Aly's comments called moronic by Albrectsen were never as intense regular or hate-filled as were her colleagues at News Corp nor was he suggesting they were the same on both sides as she's dutifully trying to do. The problem being what Waleed Aly was saying and what Bolt is aren't the same. Bolt pathetically posting her article as a smoke screen fails badly. Aly if you listen is defining Conservatives and their tactics for what they are provocateurs dividing the nation for the personal gains on votes the other sheckels.

CHRISTCHURCH: NO, I REJECT BOTH TRIBES AND THEIR VIOLENCE

I have a message by the tribalists trying to force us to pick sides after the Christchurch massacre. No, I reject both sides. I reject violence. I reject the enemies of civility and debate. And I stand - we all stand with the victims of Christchurch, and the victims of all preachers of hatred. My editorial on The Bolt Report.

4m
" I have a message by the tribalists trying to force us to pick sides after the Christchurch massacre. No, I reject both sides. I reject violence. I reject the enemies of civility and debate. And I stand - we all stand with the victims of Christchurch, and the victims of all preachers of hatred."Andrew Bolt

Here lies the proof that Bolt is "ducking for cover" and turning Trump. " I Won't be part of this exploitive disgusting fake media I stand alone"  However twenty years have to be put aside before Bolt can say that with conviction today? Not that he's changed or is in any way sorry it's an attempted deflection. If it walks like a duck quacks like a duck, it's Andrew Bolt. If he walks like a liar......
 Suddenly the violence is 'universal' it exists on 'both sides'. It's what Trump said after a neo-nazi drove his car into the crowd at Charlottesville. Trump was lampooned because he refused to call out the alt-right for what they were. Bolt is doing just that now backing away from the political and media attention and his blatant racism for the past 20 years calling Muslims an 'invasion' of our land and culture. What, suddenly Bolt's a man of peace, not a tribalist and 'we' all of us are now to blame? It doesn't wash when he's crying out 'we are all responsible' now instead of the catch cry we know him for 'Who let them in?"
Good faith is the man who says "do unto others as you would have them do to you."
Bolt says                                      " Blame others lest any negative attention falls on you."

Bolt knows he has control of the media. It's 24/7 cycle, and it won't be long before he's back doing what he's always done racially and culturally dividing the country risking yet another violent event supporting Dutton, Hanson and Morrison who are all expected to take it down a notch.? Bolt won't be reasoned he'll be making his wild generalisations on insufficient evidence and will continue to be the ultra-right racist we know him to be. Calling Milo, UPF Reclaim Australia victims of black racism and Christianophobia. He is a Gollum an excessively corrupt creature. Who can't look people in the eye and afraid to walk the streets of one of the worlds most livable cities?  He's worse than a liar who if he's acting in good faith expects to be lied to by others Bolt doesn't.
You will not find a greater hypocrite among our media faker or a two-faced commentator than Andrew Bolt who in the past 2 days has become a weather vane as if in the past 19 years he hasn't shown us who and what he really is.
 An example of how twisted Bolt is is his complaint about Maoris doing the Hakka as a sign of respect for those that had died in Christchurch. It brings back memories of Bolt doing a similar thing when Adam Goodes did his dance at the AFL match celebrating the Aboriginal week. Bolt exploited the moment for his use to yet again divide us. However, he paid the price for his racism, and most Australians howled Bolt down no matter how many days he tried to justify himself.
Australia stop advertising with this man, Sky and News Corp.

Now for the Sky after Dark edition of First dog on Old Dog Thoughts

 Welcome to the latest edition of It's Never Ever White People's Fault | First Dog on the Moon | Global | The Guardian

USING CHRISTCHURCH TO ATTACK AUSTRALIA, THE WEST AND "WHITENESS"

The Left's exploitation of Christchurch is sinister. Nick Riemer, an academic who wants Israel boycotted, says Western civilisation courses cause "murderous civilisational hatred": "There is a clear analogy between thinking that European books belong together and thinking that European people do too." And the hatred on the ABC last night was worse.

10m Link

 PAYWALL

 Bolt's back the "we" has gone and it's back to "them", and it's all happened on one day. The "left", the ABC is playing dirty they want Israel boycotted their hatred "worse" than Nick Riemers. The ABC unlike Bolt presents the differing views of others and allows them to express those views which The Bolt Report doesn't it tells you what they are. 

Andrew Bolt refuses to say that Israel 1) Has a history sponsoring State Terrorism supporting AlQaeda. Assassinating some 240 Palestinians shot dead by snipers 40 of them children. Further, thousands were injured and medical supplies blockaded from hospitals. 2) The IDF alone is totally against free speech banning some 3000 news publications since 2011 3) It interferes with MSM globally and with party politics to keep what it does out of the papers, politics and spending billions to do so  4) Israel is totally a tribal-state despite 25% of its citizens not Jewish allowing discrimination to be institutionalised. 5) It illegally occupies the lands of "others Palestine and Syria. And 5) Is alienating the Jewish diaspora so much they are publicly demonstrating against it.

 Didn't we hear Andrew Bolt just yesterday declare he was against violence, for free-speech, against interference of the press, anti- tribalism and ignorance fake news? Well, he falsely conflates Israel a self -declared apartheid state politics with religion Judaism.

Bolt not only shows his ignorance of Judaism and Israel but his anti-Muslim bias his tribalism and his Western white prejudice is back in relief just in his banner to a Paywall. Sensationalism his bent to draw people in a huckster at work. 

His belief that the history included in those Great Books on Western Civilisations are the most important gift to the planet actually ignore the truth and inspire freaks like Brenton Tarrant to protect us from the invasion. The intended consequence some might think hoped for by broadcasters like Bolt. The company that helps produce his work  Murdoch's News Corp and Sky can't all be that dumb or just irresponsible. As for Western Civilisation Colonialism benefited no one but a minority of investors in the most Inglorious manner creating the slave industry and indentured labour and stifling the development of countries for hundreds of years.

As for Christchurch being used to "attack" Australia, I doubt it the shooter was born and raised here and like Bolt who was brought up Dutch and never really felt Australian for some 30 years and in all probability still doesn't today. Tarrant is very much Australian socialised here and brought up in a culture that in his informative years was becoming increasingly Islamophobic. Politically Nationally and encouraged calling for action with voices like Bolts emphasising "invasion".

Tony Abbott Says 'Islamophobia Hasn't Killed Anyone'. He's Wrong ...

Lest we forget dehumanisation kills us all. 

Tony Abbott hasn't apologised for making that statement in 2017 agreed it was right then, but "might" be wrong today.  The fact is in the past decade in the USA right-wing mass shootings have killed 75% of deaths, but that simply haven't called the 'white' perpetrators "terrorist".

 There was contemporaneous evidence that Mr Abbott's 2017 assertion was inaccurate. The previous week, a self-described white nationalist was arrested in the US city of Portland and charged with fatally stabbing two people who confronted him while he abused two teenage Muslim girls. 

Earlier that year, six people were killed at a mosque in Canada when set upon by far-right nationalist Alexandre Bissonnette. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau described the event as a terrorist attack, although Bissonnette was not convicted under terrorism laws.

  Andrew Bolt doesn't believe Muslims have mental health issues like White Christians do purely ideological ones. In response, we have heard Bolt yelling that and listened to him scream "Who let them in". Today these disingenuous politicians and media persons are now shrinking talking Trump in whispers that extremism is an issue on both sides but never admitting their involvement in amplifying Islamophobia.

Scott Morrison is well known to have raised wedge and divisive politics as an opportunity, a tactic to use after he saw Cronulla riots in 2005. Scott Morrison like Bolt is now doing a Trump both declaring all sides are at fault, as if they never, never used race or religion in politics. Morrison was totally behind Abbott's Team Australia as was Bolt. They were totally up for pointing out immigrants who failed to integrate. Saying the people of the most livable city were too frightened to go out at night. Wedge politics has been part and parcel of this governments politics since 2001. No backstepping no denial now can hide their record. These guys ran Yassmin Abdel Magied out of the country and allowed Milo, Summers Spencer and others in and Andrew Bolt was very central to both.

Vote them out and Stop advertising in Newscorp and on Sky. Show them who we are Australia, a Fair Go Nation that stopped when Tony Abbott cast a shadow over the country and put his foot on the brake of the fairness. Something we believed in and the world recognised us as.

"Now activists are misusing this ghastly tragedy to demonise their ideological enemies and force us into competing sides. " Andrew Bolt

He's been practising division full tilt boogie since the beginning of this century and backed Abbott, Hanson, all the way with his divisive rhetoric.

 

PM warns 'hate, blame and contempt are the staples of tribalism' following Christchurch attack

 Tribalism advice sounds odd coming from the PM whose party is itself tribally divided. Conservatives/Moderates/Women none of whom show any unity to any cause. Climate, Immigration, Education, Marriage Equality are just some of the issues Morrisson can't unify. Abbott flipped on Climate but does that make him a moderate now? We don't think so. In Warringah he's back to his old "Ditch the Bitch" tactics he was with Gillard now against Zali. Everyone's talking 'tribalism' today particularly those who keep talking about their 'base' and those against it. Recognise Abbott, Dutton, and the coup against Turnbull and Andrew Bolt echoing Turnbull wasn't a true Liberal?

Prime Minister Scott Morrison called for a calmer approach to the public debate to counter the “shouting from the fringes". Who was he talking to when he kept Milo out/in/out this past two weeks? Bolt advertised he'd be speaking about Milo on his podcast but never did. He was just too hot to handle coupled with a plea to take things down a notch because as Trump has said things are good and bad on both sides. Suggesting there's some equivalency between the anger of a minority Australians told they aren't wanted and the hatred of a racist right-wing minority group who know they are disliked, are bigots, don't give a shit and are crying victimhood. Convoluted yes, reasoned no, a means to a political end yes, with an unintended yet predictable outcome we saw in Christchurch. What these idiots are now trying to say is " Oops, we didn't mean it. We are all to blame, aren't we? Let's not change anything forget and move on."

 

New Zealand Suspect’s Actions Are Logical Conclusion of Calling Immigrants “Invaders”

I felt compelled to analyze his words at length because as a nonwhite Westerner — a Muslim no less — I’m one of the “invaders” that he speaks about.

Tarrant’s words are both lucid and chillingly familiar. His references to immigrants as invaders find echoes in the language used by the president of the United States and far-right leaders across Europe. And that is why it would be a mistake to dismiss them as the incoherent ravings of a madman.

 Poisoning the Well: Liberal spending splurge to bury Labor in debt - Michael West

In the future interests of the Liberal Party and the LNP but not in the interests of the Nation. Simply follow history, and you will see this ruling class government has done it time and time again leaving the hard yards to the ALP.  (ODT)

The explosion in government spending which suddenly ramped up last May will leave the incoming government buried in debt but worse, it will leave whoever wins the impending federal election tied to billions of dollars in spending commitments which never went to tender.
There have been $153 billion in “amended contracts”, or untendered contracts struck by the government between March 2016 and February this year, the bulk of it in the past ten months, and the vast bulk of that in Defence spending.

What Rupert Murdoch really wants from Google and Facebook

So, what are Murdoch and News Corp really up to then? 

Murdoch’s Australian publishing house, News Corp, created global headlines when it provocatively called for search advertising giant Google to be broken up. The suggestion - made in a submission to the Australian competition regulator's inquiry into digital platforms - surfaced just days after Warren unveiled her own plan to break up Google (and fellow internet giants Facebook and Amazon) at the high-profile South by Southwest conference in Texas.

  a system where Google (and presumably Facebook) could pay "licence fees" to publishers to compensate them for the benefit they derived from their content.

One thing, however, is sure he wants to break up the ABC.