Link Bolt on Bolt as I predicted below coupled with Murdoch's Telegraph. Everybody working to protect Abbott
However in reality It's Abbott whose taken an almighty leap to the Left to look like the Turnbull party. The long term Morrison booster knows that and it's why he's preening Morrison notice he gave Hockey the flick. The Abbott Morrison double is being sold for the next election rather than the Turnbull Morrison team. Turnbull doesn't need to change or be sold Abbott however does. The question is always how do you make a silk purse from a sows ear. Abbott will have to go into hiding for more than 12 months and at the end of it MP's aren't gamblers.
Link Restricted Pay to Read Murdoch Judith Sloan, Chris Kenny and Sinclair Davidson IPA, Catallaxy files the right wing fuselliers.
Firstly the Minister for Women Tony Abbott has no qualms in calling those of his constituent mothers crooks and rip off merchants double dippers. When he can take retirement get a job with Rupert Murdoch and collect his ministerial pension and other entitlements on top. This just shows the bastardry of the man.
However this blog is really to do with Bolt the ego and "what I've often said" Why has this not been addressed? Why have government MPs entitlements remained a closed book? Remember how they all scurried to return monies wrongfully claimed but double dipped. If you going to be transparent then be fully so.‘Double dipping’ public servants will lose out twice
Link Gerard Henderson Via Troll from Bellvue Hill Nobody actually reads Hendo
Yes a little bit of trivia. Is a government meant to invest in it's citizenry or just profit from them which this government seems to want. It want's education privatised running at a profit. Whereas Shorten wants an investment model free of HECS shackles.
Should Shorten be laughed at for holding multinationals to account while Andrew Robb is secretly negotiating a TTP that will allow these Corporations to sue us for lost profit. If they can't be trusted to be good citizens when it comes to tax why the hell do we believe they'll be honourable when it comes to business? What is our safety net?
The wealthy were given incentives with SMSF's which promised so many perks that these funds only operate in their favour. There is a whole accounting industry devoted to increasing and getting the maximum benefits for SMSFs,Family Trusts designed not only for gain but minimising the tax of the top 5%. So anything Shorten does to even out irregularities in the wealth gap should be praised. Most Super goes into funds commanding huge fees no matter the investment cycle. With interest rates at 2% these fees are taken and the funds run at high risk. Financial advisers don't care it's not their money.
If a government is running a surplus it simply means we are being either over taxed or under serviced after all it's our money. Governments shouldn't aim for surplus but maximum service. If politicians are skimming off for their own entitlement then they don't deserve to be there either. This one refuses to show us those accounts.Taxation by stealth: bracket creep and the budget
Link Herald Sun
" What do we do with immigrants who believe their faith compels them to attack Australians? We can’t lock them up forever."
Sounds great but given most of the kids that are locked up are Australians where is back other than home? That's the problem Bolt was born here. He definitely fits the bill " if found to be acting against the interests of Australia…" He is one of if not the biggest IS recruiters in the country. However given Scott Morrison made it perfectly clear that babies born here don't automatically gain citizenship maybe there still hope.
I'm sure Aalsmere Holland would take him back like a prodigal son. Gert Wilders would definitely support his return. It would cost the government nothing as it could be crowd funded and fully costed in less than a minute so let's not give up.
"But [the chairman of Parliament’s powerful Joint Committee on
Intelligence and Security, Dan Tehan,] has gone further, writing in the
Herald Sun that Australia should follow Britain in cracking down on
citizens who betray the country that has bestowed citizenship upon them." George Orwell’s Final Warning
Link Murdoch's Courier Mail
When we went into Iraq it was 'our' war against the 'death cult'. Now that it's not going so well it's the 'Obama's US lead war'. Bolt has disclaimed ownership of our actions altogether. It's the unaccountable $1.2 billion we are spending p.a there and at home that needs explaining. "Our " troops have been over run 110km from Baghdad. They are the troops we have no doubt trained and on who we are spending our money but hear nothing about. When will we come to the conclusion that the Sunni revolution was a life or death one simply because they have little to lose.
Link Restricted Pay to Read Murdoch
Why does the Abbott/Lomborg Australian Consensus Center need to be forced onto a university campus? Can't this thin tank be run from the ACT? Bolt talks about a center that has been shut down but sorry it's one that has never got started. It's a concept or should I say a $ 4 mill 'franchise' like Starbucks looking for a home.
The amusing thing is if it's suggested location was Bolt's kitchen he'd be rubbing his hands together dreaming of the rent. However if his wife and kids argued that it was inappropriate he'd no doubt be applying these very same lame arguments . You see he couldn't if wanting to appear democratic as Abbott does.
The university on consideration has found the Consensus Center to be too political and insufficiently academic for their campus. Most others would simply say fair enough and look for an alternative. What makes UWA so essential is never explained? Were they the only campus to have been duped by the $$$?
When actually investigated Dr Lomborg's peer-reviewed works have been found lacking in substance and filled with errors. His actual writings are few and far between and his one book published a decade ago no longer relevant in view of todays scientific research. In other words when closely examined he was notoriously out of date and the whole excercise proved to be a sham.
Bolt's defense of Lomborg is really a defence of Tony Abbott whose office proposed the idea in the first place initially lying that it was an UWA proposal. Really as far as UWA is concerned it's a thank you but no thank you situation and tell Tony he can put it up..... or anywhere else he wants. The rest is all sour grapes and another flop. Juan Cole: Hawaii Goes Green and Other Big Renewables Stories – Juan Cole – Truthdig
Link Restricted Pay to Read Murdoch
So basically Bolt is saying he's elitist the public stupid the opposition strong and the budget pathetically leftist. However Abbott in the circumstance needs to apply rat cunning. Bolt agrees with Paul Kelly who on any other day he'd have put down for being too old and decrepit for what he said about Bolt and his ideas on the constitution recently.
"Abbott’s point, however, is that he didn’t feel an obligation to
commit political suicide, a position being criticised as unreasonable
and selfish."
" The Government needs as much time as possible to make its case,
establish trust, expose Labor as bankrupt and let crossbenchers like
Lambie and Muir flame and burn. That won’t happen overnight."
Bolt's back giving bleacher instructions so if one actuall works some time in the future he can say "I told them"
Link Restricted Pay to Read Murdoch
Following on from the last blog as "I had predicted " the man from the bleachers is advising us all of his powers of prediction and advice.
Just follow the bouncing "I", "I","I" in this song "Ego Is Not a Dirty Word"
" As I’ve argued from the start,"
" The Abbott Government this year is infinitely better than that of last year, when I warned the Government had to ”change or die”."
How do we Murdochian's influence from the right wing
"The Australian may now ease up on what seemed a campaign to drive her out, now that changes have been made."
Bolt argues to develop a moral case for stronger control it should use children a tried and true past Intervention by the Howard government to garner votes.
From the last blog RAT CUNNING is Bolt's advice quietly quietly
Link Mattias Corman
How to lie with figures and words :
"
"The Coalition on Friday attacked Labor’s estimated cost of $45 million
over four years to wipe the HECS debts of 100,000 STEM graduates,
arguing the true cost of the policy would be at least $2.25 billion
[$22,500 per student, at $562 million a year]…"
"Recent figures from Graduate Careers Australia showed the
under-employment rate for recent life science graduates was over 50 per
cent – the second worst only to the visual and performing arts."
1) Shorten proposal was for Science,Engineering and Mathamatics. Bolt for his convenience changed that to "Life Sciences" the are not even comparable. It shows either his rat cunning or simply his ignorance.
2) As for the math for with regard the HECS investment in 100,000 graduates no mention is made of the revenue generated from the income tax derived from these professionals. With incomes averaging $120k pa and rising for life a return on $2.25 billion would be upward of $4 billion a year for some 30 + years. Is Bolt some commercial moron suggesting it's a bad investment? He somehow turns to Denis Shanahan Motors for support.
If these to lies don't convince that Bolt and Corman are financial advisers of the rogue kind then heaven help the Australian economy. Shorten's HECS plan is totally funded and if it where a public investment a boom 30year + return on the $2.25 bill investment. $120 bill ++ and these screwballs say it's a bust.
