I think more than nit picking is required before this report is put to
rest. With a history of lies, loose sources and facts Bolt has to do a
lot more work to put this one to bed. He hasn't come up anything new in
this blog. He then reverts to past reports as if they a re the same.
Hundreds of intergovernmental scientists were involved in this report.
That certainly doesn't come anywhere near what he does to throw water on
it. At the moment he stands alone the none expert of denial. He
certainly won't come up with an equivalent No of intergovernmental
bodies or sources.
"By endorsing the IPCC reports, governments acknowledge the authority of
their scientific content. The work of the organisation is therefore policy-relevant and
yet policy-neutral, never policy-prescriptive."
All Andrew Bolt's nit picking amounts to is
"it's
the ABC and it's 1 IPCC representative I need to talk to the hundreds
of accredited scientists to be convinced the ABC aren't doing my job"
No
Andrew Bolt nobody is doing your job and a scientists aren't trained to
be Kardashians of media. However she did have far less makeup than what
you wear...a fact overlooked.
No comments:
Post a Comment