Saturday, 21 March 2015

Andrew Bolt's Blog, 21/3/15; No such thing as systemic institutional abuse; Murdoch Press recreates the language of schoolboy bullies; Nina Rosen Wald finances neoconservative advocates; Bolt predicts the past It's his scientific method;

 

 

How did a man with this CV end up doing work for the ABC?

" holding down a job any one of hundreds of unemployed journalists would have loved:"

Bolt simply has  a tin ear but he seems to ignore the fact what journalism isn't. Colvin describes being trained and employed to be a journalist then told not to be.  If an engineer suddenly finds the company he's working for has changed and his now is digging ditches he's be rightfully peeved. Does Bolt expect the engineer to immediately quit. Life is not like that sometimes one hopes that things will return and go back to normality. After all wasn't it Bolt that wrote he worked as a 'minder for a belly dancer in Darwin'. It turned out to be a lie for which he had to apologise. The man lives in a glass house and throws stones. 

So Bolt gets paid to do what Colvin abhorred paid not to be a journalist. However I'm sure Bolt insists he is one to anybody interested in listening. Young Colvin describes what it was like filling  time while his job description changed with  his new position at News.com.au. It seems poor management to me. News.com like most work places doesn't go into private habits of their staff luckily or else quite a few 'journalists' would be given their ticket of leave from the Murdoch stable today. However Bolt yet again reveal she is the Dutch Reform moralist. he seems to insist  Murdoch personnel department should  do just that. 

The fact is Bolt hasn't a clue about the truth or falsity of Colvin's article in the same way we didn't know Bolt had  written a load of bullshit about himself  until he had to make a public apology. The Herald Sun didn't sack him. They employed him to bullshit.

The ABC obviously knew Colvin's journalistic skills were up to the mark and employed him. Little Tattle tale Bolt is lagging. He  just wouldn't cut journalistic mustard at the ABC. As for the ABC not employing conservatives Bolt simply lies for his own convenience. Amanda Vanstone has her own program on RN. The drive time host on RN is ex Murdoch as are others. The problem being is Bolt's loyalty to work friends ends once they have left Murdoch and in particular move to the ABC. That move then automatically makes them leftist.

Bolt is a liar and one it appears who thinks it's an integral part of the profession and he joins Bevis or Tim  Blair his buddy to reveal to the underbelly or the queerer and uglier side of Murdoch's school of advocacy. 

However to cover his arse and for legal reasons Bolt needed to add a clarifier to his innuendo from Colvin's father. Bolt would have preferred not to. 

"My son trained and qualified as a voiceover artist. His occasional employment at Media Watch is nothing to do with me. Nothing."

Shorten? Really? Labor starts the real leadership debate we need

If you've nothing positive to say about your side attack the opposition. Can we find any fact or information in this space filler. Not a bit. However it's good to see Labour allows for far more diversity of thought than the government. That all ideas publically spoken don't need to go through Abbott Central

 

Fraser’s pain. And Fairfax’s playground taunts

Starts with a lie 66% print media is owned by Murdoch along with ownership in Foxtel and Channel 10

"The Left’s criticisms tend to be very personal, very cruel, and very much amplified by its better access to microphones, TV cameras and newspapers." 

 "I can't bat bowl or field I only know how to sledge" Is just one occasion when Abbott admitted to being a good rough house bully. John Faine said nothing that Abbott's denied. 

Bolt just uses omission to substantiate nothing. This whole Saturday blog is devoted to Murdochian theory of play the man and  drag people down sledge. Readers won't bother about the facts. Besides sledging is more Bolt's craft. Bolt on any other day always complains  how the press gallery is full of Abbott haters today on needing to use Henderson a stablemate to fill space he's claims the opposite. That the SMH are using media mirrors to make it look as if there is an overload of press against Abbott when  there isn't. Make up your mind Bolt.

However all of this is a cover for  cut and pasting the biggest idiot in the Murdoch stable  Greg Sheridan  in order to disparage the name of Malcolm Fraser. Sheridan compiles a barrage of lies misinformation and ommittance that Bolt's feeble mind couln't have ever cobbled together in a month of Sundays. 

Firstly Fraser left the Liberal Party when Howard put the SAS on the Tampa. Sheridan conveniently omits that. Secondly Fraser didn't move left Howard and Abbott moved it right  taking over One Nation and Pauline Hanson's position in politics ultra conservative and Fraser remained where he was a Liberal. Fraser was consistent not what Sheridan would love us to believe. He was always anti -racist, anti- Aparthied, Multiculturalist, pro  humane orderly  immigration of Vietnamese refugee asylum seekers arriving by boat.. Land rights for the indigenous and Care Australia.

 Bob Hawke took Labour right not Fraser Left. Fraser stayed where Liberals stand today not where Conservatives do. Bolt and Sheridan can't admit that. They do when they declare Turnbull  is Labour's best gift. They simply remind us what the Liberal Party once was.

 



Michael Smith on his regretful relationship with Kathy Jackson - and her Fair Work partner

The link is an ad for the Australian blocked therefore unsourced. However Kathy Jackson is Abbott's personal Joan D'Arc have we ever heard him say anything negative about her. No he sends Bolt to do that and anything else he can to distance himself from the mess. 

 

Mundine should not look for racism where none exists

Abbott said his "lifestyle comment" is a beginning to a conversation all Bolt seems to be doing is dictating a result. He's not even entertaining a conversation. Mundine agreed a conversation was necessary as have done most Indigenous elders  Bolt has simply ignored that for the sake of giving them all a verbal kicking. A message from Abbott.

In the 70s when Aboriginal stockmen won equal pay right there was wholesale evictions of them and their families off the cattle stations. Whole families were forced to walk 160 miles in the wet season to populated towns. After a 2.5 week trek of biblical proportion to find there was no housing, no work, no room for kids in schools. They were simply not wanted. So they had to set up camps on the outskirts of these towns and fell into toubled ways. The fear is it will  reoccur. Cyclone Olwyn: Aboriginal people denied access to cyclone shelter – ABC North West WA

  Given this story at Carnarven and the treatment these elderly recieved why shouldn't these people be concerned about their future and their future treatment? You will never hear that from Bolt.

Faith Thomas bowls up a truth about the “stolen generations”

  Lots of children went to  homes Mr Bolt not all involuntarily kicking and screaming and not all were abused your right. I went to Catholic boarding school because my migrant parents ran a milk bar from 6am till 11pm.  Some of boys were sexually molested and abused. Some priests had a culture of sexual molestation the others of silence and cover up. Bolt nevertheless praises these institutions and even excuses them why? Because not everyone was abused not everyone suffered look I can prove it.

 Bolt  pours praise on these institutions  where abuse was systemic. Not everyone was abused at Duntroon however there was a systemic culture of molestation there.  These weren't one off occurrences.  According to Bolt the institutions were just as much victims rogues as the victims themselves.  Why accuse the the department of Aboriginal affairs for removing Aboriginal children from their  homes if not all were removed and if not all were abused. They were removed for legitimate reasons look at the record. Just as there was no client abuse at the CBA and NAB just look at the books.

Bolt's argument is what Abbott, Morrison and Dutton  apply to justify the detention centers they created like Manus and Nauru. The Triggs and now the Moss Review only highlights rogue and not systemic events. Banks have rogue advisers yes but there's no systemic  encouragement of such crimes is the conservative argument. Even though 100s of thousnads were ripped off.

What's happening here is simply the conservative instinct to protect the status quo rather than  admit  the system  needs changing. To admit it does  requires ideas of fairness justice equality, so blame the victims.

Some recent quotes as examples. "Women shouldn't walk in parks alone" Police Commissioner. The woman fault for being stabbed and  murdered in a park.

"It was a very difficult environment, I think people need to understand the pressures on the staff, on the Nauruan government, on people within my own department at that time, and in the preceding months and years before that, because the boats had come freely and we had many, many people in held detention."

Peter Duttons response to the Moss review the rapes and sexual molestation of children  in  the detention  center on Nauru. Morrison in fact shat himself but saw himself as the victim rather than sympathise with those assaulted . The Moss review wouldn't have necessary if these hadn't sought asylum in the first place..

Bolt is just doing the same old same old Conservative response to systemic abuse deny it. It's why Malcolm Fraser left the Liberal Party


 A Leftist pleads to the tribe: do not forsake the Jews

Warmism, Islamism, words not found in any dictionary. Words not used in reasoned debate about  the world today. These words don't conjure up a great deal of intellect or information. When used they tend to be used as a form of abuse. Name calling of those that  simply don't agree with you..  

  Those that don't agree with the neoliberal, extreme conservative, Tea Party line. Academics, Politicians and civilized persons, persons of reasoned thought  don't tend to habitually raise this sort of argument. Journalists and professional reporters don't either. This language is akin to raving of nut cases, tent preachers, religious zealots, and fanatics. Spokespersons of cults. Loony tune cretins come to mind when you hear them speak. Spokepersons for IS use them "Infidels""Sinners" Devil's Children" "Turds of Satan" and" Death Cult" come to mind. They are Bolt's and IS's preferred tools of trade. If it's all they were it would be little more than a harmless pie throwing but it's not. It's Murdoch method of advocacyUptick In Ratings Makes Fox News Viewers 4th Largest Cult On Earth: Murdoch is the Grand Master.

 

“Off with his head”? Why are Abbott haters such barbarians?

" I will say it again - the far Left sounds increasingly like the far Islamist Right. Barbarians both:"

Here's the proof of what I just said  the reasoned argument of News Corporation they speak in tongues. It's the prayer of the grand wizard of the KKK . No it's The Bolt Report. The Southern stand cheer squad at the MCG outer.


Britain’s former race commissar repents 

Firstly Bolt's source is The Telegraph UK. What do we know about it?

Political allegiance: In recent decades it has been seen as Conservative through and through - known as "The Torygraph" to readers of Private Eye. Stayed loyal to the Conservatives in the last two elections, when others didn't. Hugely critical of Labour.

His second source is the Gatestone Institute Policy Council 

Which is suprise surprise a extreme Right Wing Neoconservative Advocacy Group based in New York and Europe and tied to other right wing networks. Founded by Sears Roebuck heiress Nina Rosenwald (Jewish) financial backer of anti-Muslim and Arab groups. She financially supports the likes of Gert Wilders the racist neofacist MP in Holland

The Gatestone Institute is a New York-based advocacy organization that is tied to neoconservative and other right-wing networks in the United States and Europe.[1] Chaired by John Bolton, a former Bush administration diplomat and a conservative foreign policy hardliner, Gatestone is a clearinghouse for right-wing commentaries on national security, the Middle East, and Islam, as well as a convener of high-dollar events on security and energy issues. It is an offshoot of the neoconservative Hudson Institute. - See more at: http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/gatestone_institute#sthash.KPiqIv8H.dpuf

  They pull up statistics on Oxfordshire and Rotherham that have been proved to be totally wrong and purely biased for the sake of their anti -Muslim argument. Simply said they lie as much a lies and Bolt repeats lies such as 17 years no warming. Once you arrive at that understanding.You understand the write Murdoch media scripts for the likes of Fox News.

The 400 hundred assaults over 15 years turns out to such a minor statistic when compared with the 10s of thousnds of assaults that occurred in the area over that period of time. Secondly of the 10's of thousands of assaults that did occur none were stereotyped as Catholic and or Protestant. As it turns out the members of these so called "Muslim " gangs weren't all Muslim nor were the non Muslims converts. They happened to be gangs yes but the UK is known for gang culture of all kinds.

So Bolt's blog is just anti Muslim abuse as much as any name calling is. It might be  a more sophisticated  attempt of racism  but racism nevertheless.


Global warming? Fewer tornados this year

Bolt's lack of understanding of scientific reporting brings about this rush of blood and attempt at non scientific hysteria" Global warming was meant to bring us more severe weather events. "This is a prediction based on  scientific fact unlike  the Intergenerational Report which Hockey is  so excited about and wants us to believe is researched economics. Bolt's graphs are all  past historic records. The excited puppy doesn't know or understand that  history can't be used to refute prediction, that the predictions forecast weren't made because of his data.

No comments: