Monday, 6 April 2015

Andrew Bolt's Blog,6/4/15; Kiss a crucifix first; Moral elitism destroying Auatralia; Bolt's free speech lie; Bolt's against coulreds;Hawk of Hawks wants war and collective punishment; Christy and Spencer who? Fracking

 

 

 

On 2GB tonight - Abbott kisses a crucifix, NRL shame and violence against Reclaim Australia

How cultish is this. Abbott kisses the crucifix,sends troops to destroy a death cult, closes remote communities and keeps children in detention.

 

Column - Sneering at Reclaim Australia is easy, fixing Islam is hard

Where does Bolt's moral high ground  and presumed authority come from? Simply having a paid voice in the public space provided by Murdoch doesn't? He talks of free speech yet denies the same to those that might disagree with him. In reality his ear can only accommodate uniform speech.Those who don't have the privileged voice this hack has don't get heard they are even moderated out of his blog. To be heard is privileged.

He supports and claims a higher authority even over the beliefs of 1.7 billion people simply because a minority group have hijacked their faith Islam. He gives more authority and voice to this extreme minority and as such elevates them and acknowledges their representative right  to speak for all the believers of that faith. In other words Bolt and the media deem themselves to be the king makers and supporters of radicals over and above the majority of Islam.

He also believes in 'collective punishment' those who deny any association with IS or other radicals in Islam the majority the deniers of these extremists are all tarred with the same brush and are according to Bolt in need of correction as well. They need to show  real change supplicate, kow tow or be punished. They according to Bolt reform their faith as well.

Bolt"s  position is divisive, uncomplicated  singular with  only one  resolution and that's change yourselves on my terms, or forever become  unwanted pariahs in Australia. It Bolt disgraces us as we see ourselves  as a multicultural nation.  Reclaim Australia, Australia First, Australian Defense League and Bolt's public voice threatens two of our largest export industries Tourism and Education. They are certainly  not  putting out the welcome mat for migrants nor  indicating a  desire for friendship in our region.

Combine this with their denial of any persons expressing an opposite view to this  offensive Hansonite division  and  your left with is a clash of values between elitists and those who wish to see an Australia as a multicultural whole. We have seen  and identified  as a  true rainbow nation which these Aholes now deny.  They Came, They Swore, They Reclaimed Australia 

Reclaim Australia rallies would have caused distress among migrants, supporters of multiculturalism say – Andrew Bolt couldn’t give a shit about our Education Industry, Tourism International Reputation


 

Column - The Left’s war on free speech

  Bolt declares an attack on Reclaim Australia is an attack on Free Speech. He  the issue of the content of that speech. We don't have free speech anyway and we never did. Speech is censored in every aspect of our lives. If lines are crossed  in some circumstances it's domestic abuse, child abuse, disrespect, heresy, or any other number of reasons to keep our mouths shut. Bolt's demand for 'Free Speech' is usually a demand for the justification of offensive speech. In this case it's a claim for the right to be divisive and bigoted against a faith. It divides a nation who sees itself as unified. Bolt is calling for the 'collective punishment' of groups in Australia for the transgression of a few individuals. If you committ a crme  Bolt's believes your family your community as defined by him also deserves to be punished. Furthermore Bolt and his elite class are the definers of is right and wrong.  Rule number one we create the rules.  Any disagreement is breaks that rule number one.

 

Refugee intake at work.  Police warn Dandenong locals to run away

 "Dreyfus, incidentally, lives in Malvern, a safe suburb miles from his electorate, and too expensive for refugee accommodation."

  Bolt I've heard lives in Malvern as well however why does he make it sound like an insult when he says  Dreyfus does? I'm sure his parents like Bolt's when they first arrived as immigrants didn't live there.

  Gangs are a new phenomena in this city? The city's history has seen a lot of gang related violence just read Frank Hardy. Fitzroy and Collingwood  were once heralded as  places not for proper people to go and not because they were migrants  but because they were Catholic. The migrants 'wogs'  defined by their ethnicity came later in the 40's and 50s. Australian gangs however were shooting each other on a daily basis until recently 30  odd killings. These shootings were brazen public in defiance of any policing and not ethnic. If you applied statistical analyses  to these events the way Bolt does Dandenong, Melbourne would never have been regarded as the most livable city onthe planet. Bolt  the one who  seems to hate the place.

  Bolt  suggests his figures are "'evidence that refugee programs have in fact helped make parts of Dandenong less safe for its residents:' 

With no evidence no identification of any specific programs he feels free  to blame  all  programs. His uses anecdotes and suggests they are statistical evidence of there being more ethnic crime in Dandenong than Malvern ? Might that be because  the ethnic population is greater in Dandenong than Malvern. Because that's where affordable government housing is along with jobs.  It's  been a beginng for migrants for a very long time. It's not the failure of housing programs nor job programs nor has it resulted in this violence? 

Did you know there  more violent assaults in  Melborne center than Dandenong particularly in the King street area. That the city center is the most violent part of Melbourne.  It's simply overlooked by Bolt it doesn't suit his radar of racism..Bolt is a racist twat singling out coloured kids.


Or maybe Bill Shorten doesn’t stand for anything at all, except immunisation, tax and slogans

Pure omission and name calling, Bolt harangues the opposition media  when they highlight Abbott's gaffes. Abbott t was the 3 word sloganeer. He still is but he's in government now and needs to do better. Shorten is not running the show. Oops we got that wrong  according to Bolt  he is.

 

 Obama paves way for Iranian nuclear bomb

There is no indication by any of  Bolt's sources about what needs to be done.  Mind you the sources  are  Greg Sheridan Murdoch's king  fantasist, Bill Kristoll Power Line ultra conservative and supporter of the Tea Party  and The Times of Israel a right wing Israeli  newspaper. Three of the usual suspects for an unfair and unbalanced opinion on  bombing Iran. Their approach is to increase sanctions or go to war against Iran, bomb them and cause further death and mayhem. Guarantee retaliation sometime in the future. Iran at the moment is doing more to rid Iraq of IS than the USA are and are allies.  How would you like an American freind.

What we have here is the same rhetoric Cheney,Rumsfeld,Bush offered to invade Iraq. Non existent WMDs  guaranteed the invasion and produced a massive death toll and   escallated a refugee crisis. We now have a repeat by the Republicans  against Iran who have shown no aggression in the region but are accused of every evil.Juan Cole: What If U.S. and U.N. Sanctioned Israel Over Its Nukes as They Did Iran Over Its Enrichment Program?

 Saudi king hopes final Iran deal will boost security – How is it that only Israel is against this deal surely the Sunni Saudi’s would be against it but it seems not.

 Tweets, car horns and hope in Iran after nuclear deal – Republicans Israel are ready to bomb them.

 The Iranian Nuclear Deal: What the Experts Are Saying:Ignore the right-wing politicians and pundits. Here’s what nonproliferation wonks think about the accord.


Too good an ABC policy for a joke

You got that right Bolt I hope Abbott has the balls to run with it. It will ensure his loss

 

 John Christy and Roy Spencer: 25 years as sceptical climate scientists

 Quoting John Christy On Climate Change Is Like Quoting Dick Cheney On Iraq

They have simply been wrong for decades. Climate-science contrarian Roy Spencer's oil-industry ties. They have been peer group reviewed and by-passed for more than 20 years. So much so their even seldom referred to by deniers

 Fracking fearmongering

 Why the Scientific Case Against Fracking Keeps Getting ...

 

No comments: