Andrew Bolt's Blog,12/10/15; Alarmist Bolt says he'll be made to shut up; Rupert wants an early election;

 

 

 

 

While they talk, another terror alert

Let's call this blog what it is suggestive blame by innuendo and mockery of meetings with Muslims Baird meets with police, Muslim leaders to discuss radicalisation.

 Does Bolt ever publicize  the vandalism the fire bombing the threats of death that have been directed at the Paramatta Mosque? I guess he'd tell us he was protecting it's members by keeping it under the radar. The police are a few 100 meters away and have done nothing. However Bolt suggestively publicizes a a campus threat as an emergency of great concern. Is it any wonder the judge declared him a poor media man who indulges himself and is loose with facts when finding him guilty of racial vilification.

The US can bomb a hospital no complaint from Bolt. He celebrates going and bombing people even if we participate and then mutilate the bodies.  how dare the world suggest it's criminal. Australians have been threatening each with chaos mahyhem murder and death for years In pubs, on the streets at sporting events they have killed each other in gang fights with guns , machetes, kicking and king hits and we've never said we were "unsafe".

 In the past two years a sense of panic has been imported into this country and that panic amplified by hucksters like Andrew Bolt which  statistically  seems to carry  little or no validity or cost benefit for the money spent. Other than an  inconvenience to Australians no significant act of terror has been prevented.  However we are told it's necessary to "keep us safe". History has shown that we participated in killing 1 mill Indonesians "to keep us safe" under the Menzies government. We went to Vietnam "to keep us safe" an killed many more. Who lead us into Iraq "to keep us safe" John Howard and who has lead us back Tony Abbott? He wanted us in the Ukraine as well to shirt front Putin. For a small nation we've killed more people in the activity of keeping "ourselves safe"and are now spending more money being policed and  under surveillance  than we ever have been before  for no statistically successful outcome other than the loss of freedoms . Right Wing Conservative governments have been keeping us safe for their benefit since WW2. They will tell you they saved us  from Communists, in and out of this country and now Muslims. Isn't it strange that history has shown us little more than a narrative of errors that cost people including Australians their lives. If $600 mill was spent on job creation for youths instead of surveillance Andrew Bolt would have something of value to promote.

 

 

 

Tony-Wan Kenobi

Bolt's Butthead Humour  

 

 

 

 

Moves to make it a crime to doubt warming alarmism

Christopher Bookers Denier Hoax turns a Law Conference into a Star Chamber.

It's fine for conferences to be held on Terrorism and the Law, Drugs and the Law, any number of topics and the Law. When conferences are held to discuss Climate Change and the Law opportunity strikes  the Deniers to make as much publicity as they can and bang their victim tin cans. According to Andrew Bolt who must be believed "moves are under way". If they were why didn't he herald the same  hewen  cry when moves were undner way to charge ISIS supporters with a crime  or to stop insider trading and call it a crime. To be fair he does cry when "moves are under way" to introduce Laws to tax the rich which he calls a crime. Lawfare is a crime when used against corporations.

 What Bolt and his cronies are concerned about are the considerations of asking what is the money trail? Who was sponsoring and financing of these anti - scientific ideas not the ideas themselves but the indirect political donations this sponsorship represents. The Law of open debate is the academic concern raised at these conferences. Why was it necessary to sponsor these ideas in secret?

  Political donations need declaring and it has become a major issue in the US since corporations can be seen to act as individuals donations have become easily hidden.  The fact that money talks is not in the best interest of a level playing field. However Bolt is fearful of the regulation of his and News Corp's product "talk" which has become just another commodity in the market place. Why does he want laws to prevent Muslim immigration and wants "moves to make it a crime" it's all relative to ones bank account it would seem.One Quarter Of The World Will Be Powered By Renewable Energy By 2020

 Apple's US operations are now 100 percent powered by renewable energy

Apple's annual responsibility report boasts some serious progress, including the fact that all US operations, all data centers and 87 percent of global operations are now powered by renewable energy

 

 

Column - Why I haven’t backed Turnbull

Does Bolt even know what day it is? His blog today has been posted as if it was yesterday. I always suspected he didn't know whether he was coming or going. He has no principles only his side and that's Rupert Murdoch's. He's totally blind to anything else.

From the day some six weeks ago when Murdoch tweeted that an early election was necessary and Abbott was the best to run it. Bolt has stuck by Rupert's goal. The dinner Murdoch had with Morrison helped cement Abbott's fate. He wasn't any longer the top dog he thought he was. Had Abbott really held his ground he'd have been there to introduce the two of them but he was left out. 

Turnbull may have come to power but Murdoch's want for an early election has held. The extra three years simply gives these media manipulators the time to get their new man Scott Morrison into the drivers seat. Remember Bolt's knee jerk reaction to Morrison being the true traitor in the demise of Abbott, all that's been forgotten. It's purely Turnbull whose the target now not the Turnbull and Morrison government.

It's all about the ABC and Rupert's business model to crush it. Murdoch would turn to Labour if he believed they were his best option to rid us of the ABC. It's Morrison who will because Turnbull wont. Murdoch wants ABC digital and the best of the other parts and is quite happy to dump the non profitable rest. Political influence draws News Corp closer to the real money Murdoch already has us in his palm with sport and entertainment. controling the news and it's narrative puts him in bed with business and politics even more. The ABC stands in the way. He's not interested in serving the country only the most profitable parts of it. His aim is to service us not to provide us service. It's as simple as that and his News Corp opinionators are his tools