Claim: Bishop in on Turnbull plot for seven months
Making a claim doesn't mean you find gold . Andrew Bolt generally thinks making claims is sufficient to win what he calls debates. However there is no debate if there's nobody to debate. Peter Hartcher editor of Fairfax makes a series of claims in a collection of articles entitled "Shirtfronted". This is just one of a series of claims by sources unnamed made by Peter Hartcher Fairfax editor who on any other day Bolt calls a liar as he's done on countless other occasions.
The claim from unnamed sources dates back to February when the failed spill was on and Abbott was put on probation. Given that a successful spill may have occurred party members would have been stupid not to prepare themselves for that possibility. Hardly "a plot" if your part of a team. "Shirtfronted" makes a series of claims. Maybe we can expect Bolt to feed off them for awhile. He doesn't like doing his own research as it's safer to blame others if proven a dead end or a waste of time.
It is Islam, says Frydenberg, and more must be done to fight the Islamic State
So Andrew Bolt says as much as that he's the voice of a Josh Frydenberg who is really on side with Abbott but cant' say as much so Bolt will speak for him.
"And Frydenberg says as much as he can without embarrassing Malcolm Turnbull, who foolishly slapped down Tony Abbott for suggesting special forces help local armies fight the Islamic State:"
" Frydenberg is fast becoming one of the serious voices of the Government. Sorry, in the Government. "
Has any interviewer on the ABC ever been heard to distort the message of the interviewee as Bolt has just done"
They blame Islam and not the rift between Sunnis and Shiia or the need of the US to help Israel rid itself of what was seen as a threat since the 1980s. To eradicate the growing face of Secular-Arab Nationalism from the planet and it's growing face in case it united primarily Gaddaffi, Saddam , Assad and Iran less so but also Egypt.
Frydenberg makes no mention of the political chaos among tribes where the west intentionally involved itself bringing down the governments. Libya, Iraq, and now Syria. These two nations particularly Israel preferred to face the chaos of tribal war than allow the growth and strength of these independent governments. Turkey the Saudis and Israel were allowed to provide clandestine support to topple Assad while the US is waging a proxy war in their support to destroy the Iran backed Shiia crescent that stretches to Lebanon. The lie "It's a war conducted in the name of Islam against the West which has to be stopped"
Meanwhile US lead coalition allows
Allows Turkey to continue to supply ISIS and also allows them to bomb our allies the Kurds 1 Journalist Dead, 3 More Arrested After Exposing Turkey Arming Syrian Extremists
Allows Saudi Arabia to arm and finance ISIS, al-Qeada and groups fighting Assad while they bomb the the Shiia in Yeman and protect the US backed government.
Allows Israel to assist the al-Qaeda backed rebels in Syria by providing medical assistance and bombing Syrian military outposts. Israel is acting as a defacto air force for the Syrian rebels declared terrorists by us. They are assisting those that Zacky Mallah supports and has said so on the ABC. He was pilloried by Bolt the Abbott government for supporting terrorists.
Allows Iraqi government to treat the Sunni tribes and minority as second class citizens who have greater allegiance to clan tribe and territory than the nation of Iraq.
The US allowed and encouraged the Sunnis to get rid of Assad and have turned against ISIS in a soft manner. Had they left well enough alone and let the Sunnis unite to defeat Assad Sunni extremism would have faded away. However now they are facing the realty that ISIS is also putting Assad on the backburner while they do what they can to gain the support of all other Sunnis
But no as far as the west and the neocon hawkes are concerned it's a clash of civilizations Islam vs Christianity the great lie being set as a precurser for an escalation of war. When only 4.6% of terrorist acts have been committed in the west by Muslims and 2.4 % of the deaths. That is never revealed by Bolt nor by Frydenberg it would seem.Carpe Chaos" - ISIS, Israel, Iraq, & Syria: It's All Part Of The
Journalist: “Each War Is Preceded By A Big Media Lie
The above is a French video worth persisting with
What’s hot is the warmists’ scam
Link Excerpt by Garth Paltridge straight from Quadrant
Paltridge disagrees with mainstream scientific opinion. He thinks that the warming will probably be too small to be a threat. Paltridge is one of the 3% of scientists that doesn't wholly believe in Climate Change. He is one of the 3% that Bolt insists should have 50% of media time on the ABC in order that the debate be fair. Quadrant the Conservative magazine would generously them 97% of their time and space to support their case as would Andrew Bolt. Why was Dr Lomborg so important to Abbott if we have Garth Paltridge? I doubt if I've ever seen the case "for" Climate Change ever argued in Quadrant.
The problem is Paltridge accuses scientists of acting like Andrew Bolt and merely 'Cherry Picking facts to prove the point they are after rather than allowing the facts to illuminate our knowledge. Scientists are the equivalent of bent cops fixing up a suspect. When in truth scientists must publish their findings and research work and make it available scientific peer-group review. They must show the conclusions discovered derive from the findings and not just collect findings for a forgone conclusion. A protection which disallows simple biased filled opinion.\
Paltridge seems to suggest the necessity of scientific defence is what Andrew Bolt does as an opinionator and he is as much a research scientist and whose Phd status has been withheld simply for political reasons rather than a bent detective. We the public are all climate scientists or whatever we choose to be there is no such thing as scientific method only opinion. After all Bolt is peer group reviewed daily by his readers as are Medical researchers and Astro physicists their work is just opinion and has no superior foundation in method. In fact Paltridge is claiming that NOOA and NASA are no more believable or no less politically motivated than Andrew Bolt. They only carry a socially created illusion of superiority. So Andrew Bolt could be our chairman on the board of science or Australia's first scientist the overarching supervisor of research, opinion and scientific methodology in the country. In saying that Paltridge has reduced science and it's status to little more than every day knowledge driven by social and political hocus pocus. Remember the world just might be flat if Andrew Bolt says so it's still possibly true as long as Tony Abbott is in power and says so. Rogues or respectable? How climate change sceptics ...
“Refugees” reward us
Link Daily Telegraph
The fact of whether or not someone is accepted to having "refugee" status or not have little or nothing to do with whether or not they might commit a crime at a later date. Bolt obviously supports the want of conservatives to remove Australian citizenship for his selected criminal offenses.
Andrew Bolt son of Dutch immigrants rewarded us when his parents were accepted as immigrants by being convicted of racism under the Racial Discrimination Act. Bolt's anti- immigrant stance beggars belief given 50% of this nation has immigrant connections. Bolt's status is not any more protected or special than anyone accepted as refugees should the commit a crime. However Bolt seems to suggest all Iranians need now be reconsidered as suspicious and therefore unacceptable.
What is more significant isn't their nationality but why they were allowed to fly back to the Middle East and enter ISIS territory under the noses of our National Security at all. Why is it so easy for any Australian to do that? Afterall we have spent $650 million to strengthen Security under Tony Abbott to ensure "we are kept safe". How many blunders have occurred? What has improved?
Don’t mention the war on the Jews
The Body Count
UPDATE: 82 Palestinians Shot and Injured Across oPt on FridayFriday November 27, 2015 - 23:42
At least 82 Palestinians were shot by Israeli military forces, on
Friday, during ongoing clashes across the occupied Palestinian
territories, according to officials and the Palestinian Red Crescent. Full Story
104 Palestinians Killed by Israeli Forces since October 1st (List)Friday November 27, 2015 - 19:00The full list of the 104 Palestinians and 16 Israelis killed since October 1st is below. Full Story
So for the sake of Israel, and since at least 2007, Washington, along with its regional allies, has been waging a broad covert proxy war to undermine the “Shia crescent.” It has involved supporting Sunni Islamist mujahideen in Lebanon, Syria, and Iran.since at least 2012 by heavily sponsoring an insurgency led by jihadists including Al Qaeda and ISIS .Israel has also been contributing to the cause of chaos more directly. Like a prizefighter’s “cutman,” the Israeli military has stood in Al Qaeda’s corner, taking in its wounded terrorist “rebels,” patching them up, and then sending them back into Syria to resume fighting. News Corps Shari Markson has just got into trouble for speaking to them a secret Israel prefered to keep.
" Over 500 Syrians – including wounded fighters battling the Assad regime – have been treated at the Ziv Medical Centre in Safed, near the Syrian border
In a briefing before the tour began, hospital staff told the journalists that the patients could be at risk upon their return to Syria if it became known they had sought treatment in Israel. The hospital uses elaborate methods to secretly transfer the patients in and out of Syria.
The eight journalists were instructed not to record the names of the patients or to take photos that could identify them." SMH Carpe Chaos" - ISIS, Israel, Iraq, & Syria: It's All Part Of The ...
Define “weak”
Wat Bolt Edited Out of This Report and Escorted tour
Todenhofer definition of stupidity
How would you suggest to best counter them?
Todenhofer: We have to treat them [the Muslim world] a fair way, to see them as equal; inside Western countries and societies, Muslims have to be considered as compatriots. Secondly, we should stop our bombardments, we have nothing to gain from bombarding in the Arab world; it is not ours. Thirdly, I think only Sunni Iraqis can defeat the ISIL. They have done this once before. In 2007, they fought them down, but then ISIL was much weaker. But this is the only possibility and way forward.But the Sunnis in Iraq are discriminated against and excluded from society and that is a big mistake made by the old and the new Iraqi government. As long as these Sunnis are not integrated, they will not fight against ISIL, but if the Iraqi government and if the American government would arrange the integration of the Sunni Iraqis in the Iraqi society ... then they would be ready to fight ISIL.
So I say western countries will not defeat ISIL. Only Arabs, only Sunni Iraqis, can defeat them. But this is a long way away.
No comments:
Post a Comment