If they’re so keen that he go, it tells me Abbott should stay
" Funny how obsessed the pollsters of the Left are to have Abbott gone. The union-linked Essential Report asked similar questions, but their poll found that 52 per cent of Coalition voters wanted Abbott to stay and only 32 per cent wanted him gone. (Overall figure: stay 33 per cent to go 47 per cent, much closer than the Australia Institute’s suspect figures.)"
Bolt declares polls especially Essential is left wing. Only the Murdoch Newspoll we can assume is unbiased. The word professionalism has no use in Bolt's lexicon everything is value based for or against his values. Even the physical sciences are value based pseudo religious if they don't agree with the Bolt view of the world. So given that Bolt can only view the world in single minded terms those for and those against. However 47% want Abbott to go. However the question is he wanted as leader is always avoided I wonder why? I'm sure it's been asked and I'm sure Bolt has seen results but he doesn't mention them. His interpretation of statistics is primitive to say the least. Does Australia want Abbott back as leader isn't exactly the same as should he be allowed to stay in the Liberal Party. After all Aussies do believe we are still a democracy and that choice is up to Abbott's electorate. Ask a more valid question Bolt and cut to the chase next time. Which in fact is to let the 100 voting Liberals know Abbott's staying for a reason his own and it has nothing at all to do with polls.
The crowd in his pocket
If only the Bolt Report could rate as well but then what Bolt has, isn't skill just position.When did he ever have a scoop as big as Unaoil and Corporate crime, never! He gets fed propaganda and is shackled by News Corp to be a public relations front for the neocons. Real news never crosses his desk if it did he'd ignore it. It's why he's only a two bit con man trying to create an illusion of no real substance.The bribe factory: getting the story
Black lives matter, too
This is hypocrisy from Bolt. " Can you imagine a government withholding a report on sexual abuse of any other group of children for three years? Over this period a Royal Commission has heard evidence of sex offenses ignored and covered up by some of Australia’s most influential institutions." I can imagine reports not even being done on state home run sexual abuse. Sexual abuse was a common practice and it hasn't been revealed today. It's not just an aboriginal crime. When was there ever a report on under age prostitution ever been done let alone released. Who are the participants involved today? I can assure you they aren't in the main black.
The problem is Andrew Bolt takes this evidence and then blames the victims when maybe he needs to ask why successive protective services failed? As far as he's concerned it's part of "aboriginal culture" and aboriginal culture needs to be eradicated. It ignores why it's no coincidence that aboriginies are to be found among all the lowest social indices of Australians. They are blamed because they are aborigines and Andrew Bolt has always said dysfunction is a part of their culture. If that were the case why had they lasted 40,000 years if so dysfunctional?
This social dysfunction is recent development of over 226 years of racial discrimination something Andrew Bolt denies. There was no genocide, or stolen children. There was no disadvantage or systemic lack of opportunity they were and always were Australians. They could go to banks and open accounts borrow money if they simply denied who they were and weren't black. One might well ask why have successive government institutions have failed to deliver the protective services we all deserve? Simple in Bolt's mind they aren't necessary they are just an indulgence. Governments lost years of stockman's wages and have refused to do anything about it. That's ok it's not a crime. Were did the millions of dollars stolen by government run white agencies go. How did the white man's superior accounting system lose such vast amounts of money? Why did it only happen to this particular and identifiable group with little resources to fight back. Why are aborigines scared of police are they all criminals? However are they simply allergic to jails where they tend to die. Why is that. Bolt's not worried about things. Why do they trust social welfare agencies only for their money. Why is it that's really the only thing Bolt cares about the money spent. All the points he raises is to highlight the failure of the cost of welfare.
What over 226 years has occurred to people to have built up this distance this division this psychological separation among a group of Australians. Bolt's answer Aboriginal Culture and not European Culture and its attitudes to difference. How is it the Stan Grants Noel Pearsons Mick Dodsons Bolt's stereotypes. Oh these are the ones Bolt calls white and not indigenous that he's more indigenous than they are an he also allowed his Dutchness as well.
Will Turnbull stop spending?
Bolt is so inconsistent read his bit on Education 'stop spending' but make it better. However shred the CSIRO and science in this country so the better education hnowhere to go. Sydney University has plans to cut 100 of it's 122 degrees why? Innovation and Research. It attracts more money than the production of an ever increasing number of unemployed indebted graduates. Who it seems will be forced to begin paying their debt off as soon as they start earning $35k instead of $50k well well below the average wage.
What Bolt refuses to really tell you
The problem is the shrinking Middle Class and the three trillion dollars of uncollected tax off the wealthy world wide. It's well and good to say the wealthy pay too much tax in theory but in reality it's outstanding debt. They get $438k, you get just $48k: figures show the uber-rich are earning more and more
Malcolm Turnbull has promised to spend “at least” $1 billion helping vulnerable nations cope with climate change… if they find themselves in a state of emergency. It's a promise Bolt like we will resettle 12,000 Syrian refugees and have taken 30. So it's an indictment of an if and when situation. Bolt is happy about promises of spending on war if and when. In fact he's saying we aren't spending enough now.
The Federal Government will spend almost $1.1 billion in the next four years to promote business-based research, development and innovation. Sydney University is certainly happy with the idea. Why is Bolt talking up Education but cheering the massacre of scientists in this country. Close labs in areas we are the worlds best.
The Turnbull Government will invest more-than $1 billion to give all Australians with Hepatitis C access to breakthrough cures. So if Bolt's children contracted Hep C he wouldn't mind being a treatment laggard. Fuck the neighbors it's there fault for getting sick. That's the caring and sharing Bolt.
The Turnbull government will spend $28 million on a taxpayer-funded advertising blitz to spruik its innovation agenda and trigger a “cultural shift” in the economy. I guess Bolt does regard science as just another religion why put money into it. Better to put it into flags and uniforms like Abbott did.
Malcolm Turnbull has announced a $1 billion clean energy fund, saying it is a vital part of his plan to boost innovation and create jobs beyond the mining boom. To anybody with any sense other than Bolt we need to stop investing in sunset industries and invest in sunrise ones. Didn't he see the mess left behind by bankrupt coal mines. Whose paying for the clean up on indigenous land?
The budget is expected to post a $38 billion deficit this year and isn’t scheduled to return to surplus until at least 2021. Ask Bolt what what his household debt is and if it's expected to be paid off by 2036. Compared with the personal debt of Australians the government is not doing badly particularly as governments don't die as do individuals.
Morrison cuts loose from Turnbull’s wreckage
A long blog must be by troll Peter BH who we are sold as just another reader.
"Morrison represents the Liberals’ future. He cannot afford to be stained with Turnbull’s mistakes and if that comes at the cost of the appearance of disunity then blame the boss."
As I've said create division where division doesn't exist. Has anybody heard of the cabinet MPs in recent times are they as isolated as Bolt makes them out to be or simply ignored by him. The exercise is to create seemingly division where division doesn't exist without saying VOTE LABOR because even that would be going just too far. However the dissension Bolt says is there isn't heard not at least like the thunderous rumble that surrounded Abbott. It wound up with a six month warning change or you will be told to go. No such rumble or warning here other than the sound of the News Corp grumblers But then they are not the cabinet. Who are their target the weakest swingers in the Liberal Party.
Just four second to go. So don’t talk to me about football
Just a fair weather friend
In defence of Mark Latham
" I have been cross at times" Bolt That's an understatement verging on hypocrisy if ever there was one. "Moreover, I can’t stand some of the abuse of him by people - usually women - who then squeal when repaid in kind:
" Bolt
It's one area however you agree in the disdain you show for 'fright
bats' like Clementine Ford. You don't liken her to a Latham or a Blair.
Any way would or has Sally Morrel ever written a tribute to her husband
Andrew Bolt?
Computers don’t teach. Teachers do
" Don’t measure education reform by the extra dollars. Measure it by better teaching that’s proposed - and by the results."Bolt
Very easy for Bolt the promoter of free market competition to say. I na country where teachers aren't based on skills and aren't guaranteed tenure. All cost based ideas. Bolt is the loudest voice calling to stop spending but then demanding solutions that require spending. He is the opposite of the "whatever it takes" attitude to teaching kids in Finland.Why Are Finland's Schools Successful?
Notice Bolt the success is high despite the multiculturalism and disadvantaged kids being in the same class. Teachers
come
from the top 10% of graduate pool. They are valued and paid
accordingly. They aren't regarded as second rate left wing ideologues
that you make them out to be. The difference between your
misguided belief that you can buy a better education for your kids in
Finland that doesn't exist. What have you don't want is to spend more
money on education. But are happy to spend the fees on a private one for
your kids under the mis-belief it's better.
The money spent is not really shown in the results obtained. Ask your
Brother Richard Bolt. He'd tell you it would have been smarter
investing your kids private school fees for 12 years and giving them
$300,000 + when they turned 21 to get into the property market with less
hex debt. Government education here is fine but not as good as
Finland's where the kids know 3 languages before uni and are taught how
to learn and not just trained which seems to be what you want in
history,social science,and other humanities subjects.Yes Bolt taught to
question everything and problem solve not just be delivered answers from
the top down.
“Whatever it takes” is an attitude that
drives not just Kirkkojarvi’s 30 teachers, but most of Finland’s 62,000
educators in 3,500 schools from Lapland to Turku—professionals selected
from the top 10 percent of the nation’s graduates to earn a required
master’s degree in education. Many schools are small enough so that
teachers know every student. If one method fails, teachers consult with
colleagues to try something else. They seem to relish the challenges.
Nearly 30 percent of Finland’s children receive some kind of special
help during their first nine years of school. The school where
Louhivuori teaches served 240 first through ninth graders last year; and
in contrast with Finland’s reputation for ethnic homogeneity, more than
half of its 150 elementary-level students are immigrants—from Somalia,
Iraq, Russia, Bangladesh, Estonia and Ethiopia, among other nations.
“Children from wealthy families with lots of education can be taught by
stupid teachers,” Louhivuori said, smiling. “We try to catch the weak
students. It’s deep in our thinking.”
The transformation of the Finns’ education system began some 40 years ago as the key propellent of the country’s economic recovery plan. Educators had little idea it was so successful until 2000, when the first results from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), a standardized test given to 15-year-olds in more than 40 global venues, revealed Finnish youth to be the best young readers in the world. Three years later, they led in math. By 2006, Finland was first out of 57 countries (and a few cities) in science. In the 2009 PISA scores released last year, the nation came in second in science, third in reading and sixth in math among nearly half a million students worldwide. “I’m still surprised,” said Arjariita Heikkinen, principal of a Helsinki comprehensive school. “I didn’t realize we were that good.”
Bolt's ideal education model is very Hitler like. A format to glorify Australian history as Western European Christian and Capitalist and extremely connected to the British empire. Any other perspectives removed from the system. It's what Hitler wanted and he promoted those academics that could or would prove Aryan Germany had direct connections to the Roman Empire. Bolt would no doubt be silent if books were burnt that didn't support that view. Where would that place Australia's education system in the wider world? For Bolt it's no matter what history was it's what people think it to be and that starts with educational training rather than learning and the very concept Hitler held.
ISRAEL TODAY... http://www.imemc.org/
Soldier Behind Hebron Execution to be Released, Tried for Manslaughter
No comments:
Post a Comment