Andrew Bolt's Blog,22/7/16; Just as crazy as Bolt; Bolt's Cruz Control failed; Abetz and Bolt do the Trump and tell us they were great; Newman and Bolt have just discovered the rest of the world; Sonia Hanson and Bolt certainly would have been consolidated by Abbott;
Obviously being read by a garden gnome. A very lost one.
Yes Bolt 2 sheep don't make a herd 2 Austrians don't make a nation nor do 2 Catholics make a Religion so yes it's a reasonable question just as two priests don't make a gang of pedophiles. However Bolt always seems to insist Muslims are all representatives of Isam. That alone puts him in the category of over eager to accuse without reason. It might take 2 eggs to make an omelette but it takes far more to make 1.6 billion people guilty of the same thing Islamic terror.
”Here is a thought for you all to ponder, There are roughly 1.6
Billion Muslims in the world, if they all wanted you dead, guess what,
you would be. That is the absurdity of the argument. It’s true that a
few might want you dead even quite a few but the chances of it actually
happening are slim – too remote. Deliberately putting yourself in harm’s
way different matter altogether, but harm’s way is not Bourke Street at
4 O’clock in the afternoon. It is time we had a little perspective
about this situation. Since 9/11 there have been 2 people killed in
terror attacks carried out in the name of Islam. Since January this year
36 women have died, due to domestic violence. I ask what the greater
terror threat is.” Russel Green
As Barnaby Joyce said you can find crazies and ratbags anywhere and Bolt is a living example of that in the media. Facts are irrelevant whether dated or untrue and Bolt calls that fair debating. Simply because he is entitled to his opinion whether unreasoned or not as long as he has the privilege of a bullhorn. Let's hope the sacking of Roger Ailes in the USA brings about a reform in the business model of Fox News because they have ensured American news is running on empty. Bolt was so eager to meet Ailes and his mentors are Hannity and O'Reilly. Hannity admits he's neither a commentator or opinionator that in fact he's a campaigner for one and only one side and as such facts don't matter.
Can I say anything in public and will Bolt defend my right to say it no! Can Bolt say anything in public and defend his right to say it yes! Well then we must be grateful for the law which reminds what is appropriate behavior in a civilized country. Bolt certainly doesn't go out of his way to defend Peter Foster. What is the equality Bolt talks so fondly about? What is Bolt actually doing here other than spreading fear through speculation and division. When facts are laid on the table we find some truth in "”Interesting stats. The government has spent over $33 billion on
counter terrorism measures in Australia since 9/11. In that time 2
people have died in Australia from terrorism.” Tim Leeder
Even in the case of those 2 deaths the OIC in the Lindt siege blames himself for the two deaths that occurred. They could have been avoided if he had greater information. Bolt simply refuses to listen to any explanations other than his own fact-less narratives even if totally different to ones delivered by experts with far greater access to detailed information than Bolt has. It's why Bolt like Hannity is little more than a propagandist a campaigner and not an analyst. However we saw the danger in that simplicity he drew Sonia Kruger into his fantasy of terror. It's why he's a recruiter for cranks ratbags and non thinkers.
Bolt's just what Bolt is, just a fair weather friend. Cruz was Bolt's number one pick for GOP's Presidential Nominee. Cruz was a Conservative Christian and Trump is neither Conservative or Christian and unlike Turnbull Bolt is defending him. It's because principles don't count?
Best interview in many years given by Abetz to the best interviewer Andrew Bolt has been reported here by Andrew Bolt because it involves freedom of speech as opposed to any moral responsibility it imposes in a civilized world. Bolt never speaks of any examples of it nor does he defend others unless they agree with him. As Brandis said bigots should be allowed to be bigots in public and should be allowed to express their opinions with whatever technology is on hand. What an ugly world it would be. However Sonia Kruger was defended for taking Andrew Bolt's lies, misinformation and logic to incite divisiveness the same diviseiveness that saw the push back by the Jews in Germany to Hitlers right of "free speech".
Abetz and Bolt know only too well what their form of Nationalism breeds anger, division and resistance and so it should in young minds because these old farts are defining a world in which thay are told they have no place. What we have are two advocates of global apartheid quite happy to allow the economy to shrink for most of us as it provides easier political and economic control by the major corporate oligarchs and industries of the nation. Strange isn't it that one a of German and the other of Dutch heritage understand each other so well but fail to understand Australians. They deny that neither the Liberal Party nor Australia are a broad Church and make every effort to define just how narrow it is.
Maurice Newman warns us about nothing. He's simply repeating what has been predicted as a global event coming as far back as Wayne Swan. However and event Abbott kept saying was simply an Australian, Gillard and Labor problem. Remember when Abbott said "he fixed the economy".
Even Rupert Murdoch was wise enough to say the biggest problem the West faced is the growing wealth gap and increasing poverty which needs to be addressed and not just Bolt's antiquated drivel about welfare and bludging. Murdoch, Buffet and other billionaires are in agreement on this. Even Trump put it in his speech that social mobility has been blocked for far too long. If they understand how is it Bolt, Newman and members of Australia's IPA don't. "At the heart of this looming disaster is the juvenile irresponsibility
of modern Western culture. Pampered peoples demanded social security and
services they could not afford and did not want to pay for - and which
sapped their will to work and to build. The bill will soon be presented." Bolt This is the diametric opposite of what Buffett and Murdoch have been saying.
The problem is every profession has it's fair share of ratbags and cranks the media has Andrew Bolt who has no respect for the reality of data and facts. Sonia Kruger was stupid enough to to insist that what Bolt was saying was correct when patently false. France neither has the the highest concentration of Muslims in Europe which Bolt claims to be 10% but it's not it's almost 25% less 7.8% nor does it have the most concentration of Muslims in Europe Bulgaria does at 13.7%. Germany has that honor of the most. So Bolt's statistic that where there are most Muslims there is the most terrorism is crap yet Sonia Kruger took it upon herself to quote this bullshit as truth.
Bulgaria has no terrorism Germany next to none. So what Bolt saying is wrong. If he's saying there there is no Muslim crime where there are no Muslims it's not a truth it's a self evident tautology.
It's Bolt's freedom to print this bullshit which he claims is just a path to open discussion and debate. It's amoral and is further from the open and civilized society Australians want. He has put Sonia Kruger in the cross hairs because she was stupid enough to trust what he was saying. She never stopped to think before she opened her mouth and never asked is Andrew Bolt an Australian worth trusting or just a ratbag. Bolt simply led Kurger into his Munchhausen nightmare.
As for Japan every foreigner is a foreigner there is no alienation. Unlike France every French citizen is regarded as French in the Republic however is not treated as such their religion isn't the primary cause to the sense of alienation some French feel. Wealth work housing and education leave few options to feeling included when the Republic insists they need to be. How on earth can idiots use words they don't seem to even understand such as meaningful correlations in non comparable environments. So they are ignorant ratbags one excusable why because she is a woman?Where to Invade Next Official Trailer 1
Grow up Sonia
No comments:
Post a Comment