Andrew Bolt's Blog,9/7/16; When push comes to shove Newton's Laws Apply. Words are actions; Gays are just a leftist figment of imagination; The Liberal Party doesn't poll;

Andrew Bolt says he has moved children out of family home after death threats | 


Without Predjudice
It's not Zen and the Art of Mororbike Maintenance but Karma and the art of book selling. Ideas might be free but speech is an action like any other it carries responsibilities. Is it any surprise after years of irresponsible hate preaching that Newton's Laws haven't come into effect before. To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Bolt's rants aren't just a matter of free speech  just as Klansman speeches aren't the simple expression of ideas or verbal abuse in the home isn't a matter of domestic violence. In fact One wonders why Bolt isn't protecting his wife. Putting her in the frame  at this time might also be considered a form of domestic violence on the part of Andrew Bolt  given the irresponsibility of his actions. One needs to ask why our vilification laws haven't been applied to News Corp  and Bolt more often after all is their agent. By no means should Bolt become a martyr to this foul and prejudicial division of Australia. Let it be said Bolt can only blame himself.
It might also be pointed out that Bolt's white middle class privilege allows him and his family to move in comfort without cries of send him back. That doesn't apply to refugee Asylum Seekers when  they are threatened with death. Nor is it so simple for poor Australians they don't have the financial luxury of movement that Bolt does. They generally have to wear the threats and are in some cases found dead. Yet Bolt no doubt thinks he's living the life of an asylum seeker whose just trying to find a better life style. Empathy Bolt is only given to those that give it. You reap what you sow.
Bolt is little more than an attention seeker currently trying to sell a book for $29.99 which can be bought for $17.50 but he's silent on that.
 

 

 

More US police shot

 ? 

 "Too many in the general public who aren't criminals, but have a big mouth, are creating situations like we saw last night."the second most powerful official in Texas said. Had Andrew Bolt been in the USA that official would have been speaking directly to him.

Guess you feel it's your lucky day hey Bolt that you live in Australia and not a country where 42% of the world's handguns are in private hands.  Bolt may represent a tiny minority but when push comes to shove he has a wide impact on a broad population. Every action can generate an equal and opposite reaction or even one of greater magnitude. Bolt's words can't just be considered ideas but but must be viewed as actions. They wouldn't be tolerated in the work place. They  would be judged as bullying and harassment. In the home they'd constitute domestic violence. One needs to ask why this is not regarded a form of public abuse, pollution of our environment and incitement to violence. If Bolt was a billboard he'd be ordered down. It's not a matter of freedom to speak. One thing is for certain anybody who regards Andrew Bolt as a friend has no place or justification to claim Australia's top job Bolt has destroyed the notion of what it means to debate.  As I have said his in as much as what he says and does impacts on his family it's a case of domestic abuse. If his children were younger there should be an intervention by Social Services to put his children in a safer enviroment he might just feel even more Indigenous. 

 A Drone Was Used to Blow up a US Citizen Without Trial Yesterday

 

 

Dallas is a warning: the anti-white race hatred is lethal

 

Andrew Bolt even sounds like a Klansman I wonder why Afro-Americans might just hate white police no police no matter the color Bolt doesn't seem to specify that the shootins weren't randomly made out as his banner suggests. However he shows the ignorance that ensures racism continues. Firstly racism is a structural term refering to the power and the structure of opportunity in a society anthe way in which people are deferentially treated. By that  definition Australia's racism is seen in the differential treatment of Australians by color and ethnicity and the fact that Andrew Bolt automatically distinguishes people of color to be treated differently. Couple that with hatred you truly have a racist society. However reverse racism simply does not exist. Hatred may exist  and it's normal for those feeling a boot on their throats to hate the person with the boot no matter their colour and that's why Bolt's banner is simply ignorant. The hatred shown in Dallas was the hatred of police not exclusively white but even if the shooter hated whites the action was not racist

Bolt throws statistical mud at the issue to support his racial bias when the fact remains

• 1134 deaths were recorded in 2015 at the hands of police despite being only 2% of the population this was 15% of the deaths logged.

  That's 5 times higher than whites of the same age 15-34 What's more 25% were unarmed compared to 17% in the case of white deaths.

  "This disparity has narrowed since the database was first published on 1 June, at which point black people killed were found to be twice as likely to not have a weapon."

   Black people were killed by police at more than twice the rate of white people in 2015Despite the higher total number of white people killed, black people were more likely to die at the hands of law enforcement when adjusting for population (per one million).Per millionTotal 

  7.13 Black3.48 Hispanic/Latino3.4 Native American2.91 White

  Only 13% came after someone committed a violent crime which also shows Bolt's ignorance.

  Young black men killed by US police at highest rate in year of 1,134 ...

   

   

   

 

 

 

 

 

No, more gay marriage would not have saved the Liberals

Gerrard Hendersons image of Tas, and Qld

 

The essence of the DelCon delusion stems from this, that they owned the Party. The party is not a Democratic Party and Abbott wasn't warned. Hijack means surprise there was no surprise if there was then Abbott was just dumb had no support. He was warned to change and that is the opposite of a hijack.

" The Left still claims that Malcolm Turnbull’s real problem was not pushing the party he’d hijacked even more to the Left." Bolt

So gay marriage is a leftist agenda it has no relevance to gays who it seems aren't real people to Henderson. Of course there are none  in Tassie. Bob Katter's brother is a liar as is Tony Abbott's sister. The issue is purely a leftist one. Yep that's Gerrard Henderson for you. By the way you can find him on the ABC that leftist organization too. When Bolt and Henderson use the term leftist they mean Australian.

 

 

 

Polling confirms: Turnbull’s super tax grab killed the Liberals

 

Polling also confirmed MT was preferred leader over TA 61:38 post election let's avoid talking about that polling shall we Peter BH. Tony Nutt Bolt's once hero of yesteryear didn't do any polling I don't believe that. They had more interest in the truth of polls than Bolt does. He's selectively has Peter BH looking for polls that disfavor MT. However "The Weekend Australian understands that former leader Tony Abbott was asked to speak individually to high-net-worth donors to try to explain the merits of the changes and “win over” angry Liberals." Note he failed people have had the historic experience of TA lies before and they simply didn't believe him or was he intentionally unconvincing his heart not in it? Abbott certainly cost the Liberals support some 54 of them. Bitch'n is easy expected and obvious from particular sources. All foul no favor when searching for evidence. That's what Peter BH does with all the resources at hand he methodically selects those as evidence to support his bias. He throws so much crap at us that we who have no access to resources with which to fire back are meant to be stunned. Problem is his main arguments don't hold water.  Liberal Party Polling wasn't done or Abbott hadn't had a history of lying.

 

 

Turnbull now blames a woman for his own failures

 

So how long can Peter BH be just regarded as Bolt's "Reader" when he posts 30% of Bolt's blogs and get's little or no credit other than his 'reader' 'troll' or sycophant. Does he write Bolt's column as well? I will concede Peter is a much harder than Bolt to reply to because he actually researches the the topics and writes far mor convincingly than Bolt who tends to be all over the shop in every which way even though he has all the resources needed at his fingertips.

Liberals make a habit of blaming everyone but themselves. Bolt blames Muslims for his current predicament if we are to believe him. He is such an attention seeker and he is trying to scam the public with his book of many prices.

Yes John Howard is a perfect example of blaming the public service for sending us to a war that resulted in the deaths of 500,000 Iraqis. Some even put the figure at 1 million. Tony Abbott blames a treacherous conspiracy that brought him undone despite having been issued a warning six months earlier and told he needed to change. He didn't gosh golly gee look what happened. It had nothing to do with him.

One question needs to be asked that's never addressed by Bolt or other conservative commentators why hasn't Tony Nutt the National Campaign Director suffered a shellacking because he more than anyone directed Turnbull's campaign. Bolt was a great supporter of Nutt and believed he was the one to turn Abbott's fortunes around but he was a no show, MIA, waiting for Nutt was like waiting for Godot. The teflon coated Nutt is it seems totally exonerated from the Liberal failure.

As for Ley Turnbull isn't giving her a roasting Bolt's team are yet again she 's one of 'them' that did Tony in and she deserves all the witch hunting she can get. Who are the "party hard-heads" that have the knowledge? They remain unnamed. They always remain unnamed isn't that what conspirators are unnamed backroom whisperers, not team players like the majority of the party. 

I give credit to Bolt for writing this sentence just try and read it what the f@#k would his book be like to read?

"Liberal MPs who go along with this fraud of blaming Ley are party to a dishonourble act and will themselves deserve no support of Turnbull one day blames them, too, for his own failures."