Andrew Bolt's Blog,9/7/16; When push comes to shove Newton's Laws Apply. Words are actions; Gays are just a leftist figment of imagination; The Liberal Party doesn't poll;

Andrew Bolt says he has moved children out of family home after death threats | 


Without Predjudice
It's not Zen and the Art of Mororbike Maintenance but Karma and the art of book selling. Ideas might be free but speech is an action like any other it carries responsibilities. Is it any surprise after years of irresponsible hate preaching that Newton's Laws haven't come into effect before. To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Bolt's rants aren't just a matter of free speech  just as Klansman speeches aren't the simple expression of ideas or verbal abuse in the home isn't a matter of domestic violence. In fact One wonders why Bolt isn't protecting his wife. Putting her in the frame  at this time might also be considered a form of domestic violence on the part of Andrew Bolt  given the irresponsibility of his actions. One needs to ask why our vilification laws haven't been applied to News Corp  and Bolt more often after all is their agent. By no means should Bolt become a martyr to this foul and prejudicial division of Australia. Let it be said Bolt can only blame himself.
It might also be pointed out that Bolt's white middle class privilege allows him and his family to move in comfort without cries of send him back. That doesn't apply to refugee Asylum Seekers when  they are threatened with death. Nor is it so simple for poor Australians they don't have the financial luxury of movement that Bolt does. They generally have to wear the threats and are in some cases found dead. Yet Bolt no doubt thinks he's living the life of an asylum seeker whose just trying to find a better life style. Empathy Bolt is only given to those that give it. You reap what you sow.
Bolt is little more than an attention seeker currently trying to sell a book for $29.99 which can be bought for $17.50 but he's silent on that.
 

 

 

More US police shot

 ? 

 "Too many in the general public who aren't criminals, but have a big mouth, are creating situations like we saw last night."the second most powerful official in Texas said. Had Andrew Bolt been in the USA that official would have been speaking directly to him.

Guess you feel it's your lucky day hey Bolt that you live in Australia and not a country where 42% of the world's handguns are in private hands.  Bolt may represent a tiny minority but when push comes to shove he has a wide impact on a broad population. Every action can generate an equal and opposite reaction or even one of greater magnitude. Bolt's words can't just be considered ideas but but must be viewed as actions. They wouldn't be tolerated in the work place. They  would be judged as bullying and harassment. In the home they'd constitute domestic violence. One needs to ask why this is not regarded a form of public abuse, pollution of our environment and incitement to violence. If Bolt was a billboard he'd be ordered down. It's not a matter of freedom to speak. One thing is for certain anybody who regards Andrew Bolt as a friend has no place or justification to claim Australia's top job Bolt has destroyed the notion of what it means to debate.  As I have said his in as much as what he says and does impacts on his family it's a case of domestic abuse. If his children were younger there should be an intervention by Social Services to put his children in a safer enviroment he might just feel even more Indigenous. 

 A Drone Was Used to Blow up a US Citizen Without Trial Yesterday

 

 

Dallas is a warning: the anti-white race hatred is lethal

 

Andrew Bolt even sounds like a Klansman I wonder why Afro-Americans might just hate white police no police no matter the color Bolt doesn't seem to specify that the shootins weren't randomly made out as his banner suggests. However he shows the ignorance that ensures racism continues. Firstly racism is a structural term refering to the power and the structure of opportunity in a society anthe way in which people are deferentially treated. By that  definition Australia's racism is seen in the differential treatment of Australians by color and ethnicity and the fact that Andrew Bolt automatically distinguishes people of color to be treated differently. Couple that with hatred you truly have a racist society. However reverse racism simply does not exist. Hatred may exist  and it's normal for those feeling a boot on their throats to hate the person with the boot no matter their colour and that's why Bolt's banner is simply ignorant. The hatred shown in Dallas was the hatred of police not exclusively white but even if the shooter hated whites the action was not racist

Bolt throws statistical mud at the issue to support his racial bias when the fact remains

• 1134 deaths were recorded in 2015 at the hands of police despite being only 2% of the population this was 15% of the deaths logged.

  That's 5 times higher than whites of the same age 15-34 What's more 25% were unarmed compared to 17% in the case of white deaths.

  "This disparity has narrowed since the database was first published on 1 June, at which point black people killed were found to be twice as likely to not have a weapon."

   Black people were killed by police at more than twice the rate of white people in 2015Despite the higher total number of white people killed, black people were more likely to die at the hands of law enforcement when adjusting for population (per one million).Per millionTotal 

  7.13 Black3.48 Hispanic/Latino3.4 Native American2.91 White

  Only 13% came after someone committed a violent crime which also shows Bolt's ignorance.

  Young black men killed by US police at highest rate in year of 1,134 ...

   

   

   

 

 

 

 

 

No, more gay marriage would not have saved the Liberals

Gerrard Hendersons image of Tas, and Qld

 

The essence of the DelCon delusion stems from this, that they owned the Party. The party is not a Democratic Party and Abbott wasn't warned. Hijack means surprise there was no surprise if there was then Abbott was just dumb had no support. He was warned to change and that is the opposite of a hijack.

" The Left still claims that Malcolm Turnbull’s real problem was not pushing the party he’d hijacked even more to the Left." Bolt

So gay marriage is a leftist agenda it has no relevance to gays who it seems aren't real people to Henderson. Of course there are none  in Tassie. Bob Katter's brother is a liar as is Tony Abbott's sister. The issue is purely a leftist one. Yep that's Gerrard Henderson for you. By the way you can find him on the ABC that leftist organization too. When Bolt and Henderson use the term leftist they mean Australian.

 

 

 

Polling confirms: Turnbull’s super tax grab killed the Liberals

 

Polling also confirmed MT was preferred leader over TA 61:38 post election let's avoid talking about that polling shall we Peter BH. Tony Nutt Bolt's once hero of yesteryear didn't do any polling I don't believe that. They had more interest in the truth of polls than Bolt does. He's selectively has Peter BH looking for polls that disfavor MT. However "The Weekend Australian understands that former leader Tony Abbott was asked to speak individually to high-net-worth donors to try to explain the merits of the changes and “win over” angry Liberals." Note he failed people have had the historic experience of TA lies before and they simply didn't believe him or was he intentionally unconvincing his heart not in it? Abbott certainly cost the Liberals support some 54 of them. Bitch'n is easy expected and obvious from particular sources. All foul no favor when searching for evidence. That's what Peter BH does with all the resources at hand he methodically selects those as evidence to support his bias. He throws so much crap at us that we who have no access to resources with which to fire back are meant to be stunned. Problem is his main arguments don't hold water.  Liberal Party Polling wasn't done or Abbott hadn't had a history of lying.

 

 

Turnbull now blames a woman for his own failures

 

So how long can Peter BH be just regarded as Bolt's "Reader" when he posts 30% of Bolt's blogs and get's little or no credit other than his 'reader' 'troll' or sycophant. Does he write Bolt's column as well? I will concede Peter is a much harder than Bolt to reply to because he actually researches the the topics and writes far mor convincingly than Bolt who tends to be all over the shop in every which way even though he has all the resources needed at his fingertips.

Liberals make a habit of blaming everyone but themselves. Bolt blames Muslims for his current predicament if we are to believe him. He is such an attention seeker and he is trying to scam the public with his book of many prices.

Yes John Howard is a perfect example of blaming the public service for sending us to a war that resulted in the deaths of 500,000 Iraqis. Some even put the figure at 1 million. Tony Abbott blames a treacherous conspiracy that brought him undone despite having been issued a warning six months earlier and told he needed to change. He didn't gosh golly gee look what happened. It had nothing to do with him.

One question needs to be asked that's never addressed by Bolt or other conservative commentators why hasn't Tony Nutt the National Campaign Director suffered a shellacking because he more than anyone directed Turnbull's campaign. Bolt was a great supporter of Nutt and believed he was the one to turn Abbott's fortunes around but he was a no show, MIA, waiting for Nutt was like waiting for Godot. The teflon coated Nutt is it seems totally exonerated from the Liberal failure.

As for Ley Turnbull isn't giving her a roasting Bolt's team are yet again she 's one of 'them' that did Tony in and she deserves all the witch hunting she can get. Who are the "party hard-heads" that have the knowledge? They remain unnamed. They always remain unnamed isn't that what conspirators are unnamed backroom whisperers, not team players like the majority of the party. 

I give credit to Bolt for writing this sentence just try and read it what the f@#k would his book be like to read?

"Liberal MPs who go along with this fraud of blaming Ley are party to a dishonourble act and will themselves deserve no support of Turnbull one day blames them, too, for his own failures."

 

Andrew Bolt's Blog 28/10/15; It's just so hard defending the indefesible; Bolt accuses Fairfax of poor spelling; Stones and glass houses; Bolt reestablishes his love of the church of science; Universities; Fighting in a free world; Invasion panic from the man calling for the invasion of Iraq; Abbott was a liar according to Bolt; Pell for Pope;

 

 

 

 

The media Abbott haters unleash again

When Andrew Bolt has no logical or reasoned argument he turns to emotional and irrational rants for  an explanations as a foundation for his argument that other than Cory Bernardi's praise Abbott's Margret Thatcher address fell flat.

Yes Tony Abbott gave an underwhelming speech with just a few of the audience politely clapping when it ended. By and large it was regarded as an inappropriate place and time to give it as it was in the main little more than an obvious self ingratiating speech. Abbott was shirt fronting the conservatives of Europe and they weren't impressed.

For anyone to suggest that reporting  two Catholic Priests criticized Abbott's speech is not journalism but hate motivated is ludicrous. Any professional journalist worth his salt would have reported it.

"It’s incredible. Tony Abbott gives an important speech on the asylum seeker crisis engulfing Europe and the media Left go into paroxysms of scorn and hatred.

Very little of the reaction goes to the substance of his speech, which suggests the hatred exists before cause is given."  Obviously quotes from the bible contradicting Abbott's argument is of little consequence to Bolt.

" Just Abbott giving a speech in London drives one Age contributor mad with malice:"

Any paroxysms of scorn and hatred are simply evident in Bolt's reaction. When the issue of double dipping has been discussed  so much recently Bolt now  declares MPs are entitled to seek  extra sources if  they want. Obviously the job of a back bencher is really that serious.

" What a joke of an argument Bolt put's forward without any evidence. All malice and no substance."

Bolt's evidence being "I talked to Tony" That going on the speech circuit is of benefit to the country. That it's not double dipping because staying on the back bench he's sacrificed  his income and  his electorate whether happy or not aren't losing out by him not being there. All this sounds like Bolt is making up excuses for a situation that has been questioned. 

However it's not just Fairfax and the ABC that have been critical of Abbott but News Corp as well and Bolt backs off declaring them as Abbott haters. They are just using him for click bait. However how is it they are using the negative aspects and not the positive? If they are only Churnalising that is reporting what other media have to say why is it all negative?

Bolt seems to be back exhausting himself in trying to make Tony Abbott look what he isn't, believable.

 

Dalls Scott on his brother

Funny how Bolt can accuse Fairfax of poor proof reading but not himself. Yet another case of poor spelling on Bolt's part which is a regular feature of this professional's work.

By the way Church guided social welfare can also get things wrong Andrew Bolt particularly in cases of systemic poverty which has a tendency to blame those being serviced but being given service. The powerful have no trouble in justifying their actions and even writing history in a want to shine a positive light on themselves. It's why the expression "the pen is mightier than the sword" has such bearing. It's why right wingers can make themselves seem bigger than they are.

 

A curious omission

Bolt's glass house stone throwing

ABC rewards vandal

Bolt nonsense

 

Chief Scientist: fracking is safe. But will politicians listen?

" New Chief Scientist Alan Finkel says fracking is safe. Now will the politicians finally listen to the science, or will they keep pandering to populist fears?" The science of Global Warming is according to Bolt a Religion practiced by or in the temples of the IPCC, NASA and NOAA. It's strange when science is actually a method  of enqiry, explanation and information gathering. How can it be two totally different approaches to discovery when faith and science are total opposites. On whose side is Bolt on as no principle seems to be involved.

" We can’t have more of the fear-mongering that causes such panic and stress" Bolt

There seems to be some major act of hypocrisy here when 97% of scientists accept global warming.

 

 

 

Want a “safe space”? Then stay at home. Don’t turn your uni into a nursery

" A university is not a ‘safe space’.  If you need a safe space, leave, go home, hug your teddy & suck your thumb until ready for university."

How is it Andrew Bolt supports this in universities but not in the wider community it just seems it depends on which side your on at the time. British academics announce Israeli universities boycott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

These few bombs won’t defeat the Islamic State

" TONY Abbott has warned that special forces soldiers may need to be sent into combat in Syria and Iraq, with an escalation of strategic and tactical air strikes, if the terrorist armies of ISIS are to be defeated…"

The verdict about Abbott's speech to a meeting of Conservatives in the UK was greeted with polite clapping. It was as unimpressive response to an unimpressive performance protecting a legacy that was totally underwhelming to Europeans.Thank god Abbott's not our PM he'd would  be for sending us back to yet another Iraq invasion. Whose sons would he have conscripted to do the job? When push comes to shove Bolt simply refuses to acknowledge that we along with the USA created Islamic State, armed Islamic State and  gave them their reason for being in Iraq in the first place. As they are disenfranchised Sunnis. Having done that we the coalition then assisted them in Syria. Currently we have declared the Syrian government and IS  both our enemies even though they are fighting each other. Bolt shows a significant lack of IQ when  despite the Middle East yes it is a witches brew of complexity where we really have no reliable friends. Our ground intel is extremely limited yet Bolt says  escalation is necessary.Doctors Without Borders Hospital in Yemen Is Bombed by U.S.-Backed Coalition

“Yet as Margaret Thatcher so clearly understood over the Falklands, those that won’t use decisive force, where needed, end up being dictated to by those who will.”

The situation is entirely different to the Falklands It was a war against a clearly identifiable enemy.  Bolt doesn't really acknowledge that or the fact were  wanted in the Falklands. Bolt  offers no strategy other than send in the troops simply because Obama wont and conservatives oppose everything he does. The man is truly a moron because along with increasing the bombing and sending in ground troops he also wants the fleeing Syrian refugees stopped and pushed out of Europe. In the meantime he's also looking for stronger action domestically as well. Policing seems to be his solution to everything.

 

 

 

 

Of course not

If war was the central media issue of the day you'd see headlines showing police dealing with conscientious objectors, Anti war protests battling patriots in the streets. When long hair first became a fashion people were beaten for having long hair and homophobia was rife. When Islam has recently been declared a world wide threat all sorts of people have crawled out of the wood work. On each of these occasions there'd be a Bolt somewhere in the media disparaging the left for trying to create events that inspired a national division. So course  this man was an Islamist and of course the left leaning authorities are irresponsible for not calling him out as a Muslim. In other words neutrality is too left wing..

 

 

 

Most invasions don’t end peacefully

" The Dutch Freedom Party has also soared to the top of the polls; its leader, Geert Wilders, decries “an invasion threatening our prosperity, our security, our culture and identity”."

" Politicians are mad if they think they can allow their countries to be invaded by hundreds of thousands of people from a very different culture without some of their citizens fighting back - and viciously. They are playing with fire." 

If these statements by Bolt don't exemplify how a threat can be manufactured by a minority for political gain and how that in turn can generate a violent backlash to an event incorrectly described as  "invasion of Europe" then heaven help humanity. Switzerland's panic is that 1.9% of refugees constitutes an 'invasion' that needs defending. Bolt totally understands and is sympathetic to those neo nazis who were caught preparing for war. Bolt's  loving it because he wants violence so he can say "I told you so". However it's coming from the extreme right. When have we seen the Right offer anything to the debate other than a threats.

Tony Abbott is over there also demanding stricter moves and controls and it it results in violence then so be it. He never one to back away from a fight even if he has to start it.

 

 

 

Hoping Turnbull will use his power for good. Hope away

Bolt really is fishing for Turnbull haters but he really has difficulty finding a crowd. What he has found are those that want to legislate hate speech in a society claiming it to be a right and a freedom in any civil society. That hate speech enhances the mental cohesion of our social fabric.

 

 

Now he’s a believer

' The ingredients are now in place. They begin with Turnbull’s credentials as a climate change believer, unlike the sceptical Abbott.'

Abbott may have once been a sceptic on Climate change but he certainly wasn't in Government he always said that Climate Change was a legitimate issue but it could be addressed bu Direct Action. So what we have here is Bolt distorting Abbott's position simply to contrast it with Abbott's. In doing that he believes he has a licence to bull shit. Because without emphasizing a difference he has no argument and in truth he has no argument.

The  last line he reveals his hoax which to any reasonable person is obvious. He's calling Abbott a liar. Who out of political necessity hid his scepticism. "  The ingredients are now in place. They begin with Turnbull’s credentials as a climate change believer, unlike the sceptical Abbott. This Could Be the Worst Climate Crisis in the World Right Now | Mother Jones

 

 

Confronting the green Pope

This is little more than an ad for the promotion of an IPA sponsored promotion of coal "The Encylical Letter of Pope Francis Laudato Si “care for our common home” was influenced by atheists, communists and green activists."

Like most conservatives there was once a cry that the reds were under our beds it justified our support of  the brutal slaughter of 1 million Indonesians and our participation in the war in Vietnam. That's a history that remains rarely taught in our schools. That mind set remains with us and provides the justification today of interfering in the Middle East and crying out for an escalation of that war. Why is Tony Blair saying sorry? Bolt really ignores the apology.

 The notion of 3rd world remaining poor because of the demand for coal dropping is as ludicrous as telling us the money spent on war is necessary to protect the poor bad guys and that's more important than feeding them. If the money we spent on war was directed to renewables and food there wouldn't be this need for a manufactured problem or even the need for this book.