Wednesday, 7 September 2016

Andrew Bolt's Blog, 7/9/16; Bolt's opinion is all about himself; ABC is biased it has Bolt on x2 this month; Bolt and banning Shakespeare; Polls show Turnbull's approval rating is up; China Paranoia; Attacking a woman because she works for the ABC; State Insurance; It's a fracking disaster; Australia's Cultural Reveloution;

  

No, Ann Coulter didn't leave me speechless

Just how many times is the center of attention in Bolt's blog himself , his image, how he looks to his audience. News what news? Opinion what opinion? Oh I was in full control of that interview I was great and that's my opinion and yours , well yours doesn't count.  The fact is as an interviewer Bolt stinks he's over produced and more often than not looks out of control. There must be a delay between what his producer is saying, his ear phone and his brain because Bolt certainly seems he's a pilot of a plane who doesn't know where he's going or how to get there

No, Ann Coulter didn't leave me speechlessImage result for Images of a stage hog

Adams weeps: the left-wing Andrew Bolt



This blog isn't about Phillip Adams it's about Andrew Bolt

Bolt Right ,Left or in-between it really doesn't matter he is the media's greatest greatest attention seeker because he says he's an introvert seeking attention. Bolt  really hates work but loves the celebrity it  incidentally brings to him. Most of his blogs center about him he talks quietly but writes loudly and like a thug from Clockwork Orange. He must spend so much time searching for himself in the news.

 He calls the ABC biased yet this month he will be invited on the ABC at least twice so maybe he's right they are. The problem is in One on One he promoted himself but in such a way that Bolt demonstrated he really doesn't know who he in fact is. He denies he's right wing claims he's rational and says he's a humanist but in fact he none of these. He's irrational he denies science the most rational methodology we have to investigate our external world. Being a simplistic doubter doesn't make him a skeptic it just makes him a non believer. There is no logic in doubting with no regard to data. He hates researching data and openly says he's not a scientist He's not a humanist simply because he actually believes in a moral hierarchy an absolute order and power structure that's evolved and it  shouldn't be messed with. Bolt's opinions  his version of culture according to Bolt is superior to yours if he decides it is. 

The man hates to be stereotyped says he can't be defined by a single statement of definition such as Conservative he's is many things yet  he defines others in the same way hates to be defined himself. He is simply a walking talking hypocrite who has an image of himself that nobody else can see other than an ego in a Peter Jacksons suit





Image result for Images of a subversive Shakespeare

 

Bolt's Abridged version of Shakespeare

Spitters must die

 

Yes John Bell did make an error and Bolt the pedant has jumped on it. Germaine Greer however pointed out the fact that Shakespeare was what Bolt calls a Leftie simply because he made you "think" and it was most obvious in the Merchant of Venice a play about persecuted and despised minorities. Yes Bell said Shylock could well have been a Muslim and if treated as badly as Shylock it would be as "understandable" as Shylock was in demanding a pound of flesh. What Bolt the pedant does is jump on Bell to cover up the fact that he is represented by Shakespeare as a vilifier of minorities and is the cause of any push back that might ensue. Bell and Greer were simply making that Shakespearean  point and  the play made it quite understandable. Bolt  the villan has hidden himself behind his usual veil of victimhood without offering the context The Merchant of Venice does.

" The Islamic State has issued a vicious and detailed call to "lone wolf" followers to stab, shoot, poison and run over Australians at iconic attractions including Bondi Beach and the MCG …" Bolt

Bolt in turn has called for the increased bombing of areas in Syria where ISIS might be found. Escalation of the war is Bolt's answer to peace which makes ISIS's call  to retaliate understandable as is calling Bolt the cause

 What's less understandable because it's hidden is why Israel or Shylock in this case supports  ISIS. Why does Bolt actually remain silent whenever Israel is accused of this ISIS support?  It is understandable because Bolt actually supports ISIS too because any friend of my friend is not my enemy. No Bolt Shylock wouldn't be up against a wall as it's clear Israel isn't up against the ISIS wall it has never been bombed or even declared the enemy of ISIS. Israel wants Assad out of Syria as much as the Turks, the Saudis ,ISIS and all the others called terrorists by you do. Bolt doesn't want to see peace in Syria until Assad has been removed so he's happy to do what ISIS wants here and that's to provoke  Muslims as Shylock was.  Bolt's in a bind he dare not say Shakespeare is  a load of leftist crock or the ABC because he's a corner stone of Western Culture nevertheless he is saying it indirectly.






 

Labor lead grows

Malcom Turnbull's approval rating has improved


 

Great shot, bad lesson as student sinks shot

What pray tell can Andrew Bolt teach us about education he hasn't completed one. His work doesn't require one.What a knee jerk reaction from Bolt about the activity of learning made from the other side of the globe. Only the ignorant could call a lesson bad from the other side of the planet. Once again Bolt failed if that's all he can say about Learning and the context of the particular relationship a professor has with his students. Bolt it seems was never around the Adelaide campus to get any understanding of what his courses were about. Opinion isn't knowledge Andrew Bolt and you prove that time and time again. 

Image result for Images  Fear of China

Carr's China cash

Bolt's continuing to tear down any relationships we may or may not have with China. As a public broadcaster he's joined Clive Palmer in the loudest anti- China stance ever heard why because he'd be only too happy to see our economy trashed in the short term. China is a Communist country and of course all of it's Companies have government connections it would be stupid to think otherwise. Is Bolt simply trying to revive the 1950s Cold War? It would seem so. "Why is one of our university's accepting so a large donation from a representative of a communist tyranny - a donation clearly designed to influence the instruction of a generation of Australians? What a sell-out of our values." Bolt. Who was Andrew Robb the much praised minister in the Abbott government when he wasn't in China bringing home a sack full of promises the conservatives no longer want anything to do with.  It seems the banning and deportation of Chinese students is soon to be on the cards as an National Security issue.

 


Image result for Images  of attacking the man

ABC compo claim for jogging fall

I wouldn't be too quick to laugh Bolt Insurance companies have a very easy out now from people making workers comp claims when working from home. Working from home has become  an increasingly common practice. The value of your policy has  decreased while I'm sure your premiums haven't. Yet there you are praising this corporate con rather than reporting it.

 Bolt seems more obsessed by the fact  that the lady making the claim worked for the ABC than any principle about the degree of reduced insurance value people are getting now simply because the nature of work has changed. But then it's all about sides as far as Bolt is concerned and never principles and in this case it seems attacking the the woman is the way to go.

 

 Image result for Images  of insurance scams

 

Has Bolt actually considered the size of State payouts required to be made because volunteer fire fighters start fires. Whatever private insurance was had before these fires were started is reduced by the fact they were started by the CFA a body of volunteers rather reducing the level of that risk by professionalizing fire protection in this state. Andrews is reducing risk while Bolt is doing little more than playing politics

 

 

 


 I argue with a Green. It got heated

I argue with a Green. It got heated

This is all about Bolt nothing to do with fracking  Bolt however is simply not listening to his Green guest . Strange that he turns to science here the CSIRO when he generally turns against them declaring the are simply doing research that will attract grants and are therefore corrupt. Yes Bolt argues that 97% of Climate scientists are just grant whores who simply produce results for grants. They are generally wrong and  are corrupt. Yes that's when they are arguing against  coal and fossil fuels. However in the case of fracking Bolt turns to them as the current experts. How dare his Green guest say otherwise.

Fracking has destroyed cattle farms in Qld  rendering them useless to graze cattle on. However that's not what Bolt wants to reveal What was once green pasture is now a useless desert  and that has been proven. One has to remember Andrew Bolt is the one with the ear plug in  and his producer talking when he's having a hard time. It's as if Bolt is battling the voice in his head just watch the interview and watch him struggle. 60 Minutes Australia - Fracking - The Coal Seam Gas Land Grab ...

 Fracking Shaleionares The Good, Bad and Ugly by 60 Minutes ...

Now watch just how incompetant and overproduced Bolt's  interview is he's shocking.


 

 

Replace Triggs with Albrechtsen

Of course this isn't reall Bolt's Blog it's Peter BH's

Why is Andrew Bolt calling for a Maoist Cultural revolution not based on any principles but sides. All our institutions need purging of left wing thinkers or better put purged of those that might be considered left wing thinkers. They need to be replaced by persons with solid right wing values capable of reeducating and transforming the corrupt culture that exists today. Even Independently funded institutions like the UN's HRC and the ABC need to be either scrapped or brought into line. This thinking apparently fits with Bolt's belief in Evolution not Revolution. Why does it sound so Pinochet, Pol Pot or Australia's own Cultural Revolution . Shakespeare's radical books could be done away with by burning or editing by Bolt. No lawyers need apply because that too needs to be worked over.


 


 

No comments: