Monday, 5 September 2016

Andrew Bolt's Blog,5/9/16 Bolt's Ego Madness Was a Herzog film; Why Bolt scapegoats Australians; Bolt's porno mind; Images of Australia the ABC shouldn't show; What you won't hear from Bolt;

 Image result for Images of Aguirre the wrath of god

I make Left vomit

 Andrew Bolt riding the Ego Express to Cost Co  towing  a  carousel of stale ideas he calls a book on Fathers Day  reminds  me of Aguirre the Wrath of God challenging the Amazon rain forrest slowly going mad in his attempt to find his pot of gold. The Left are Bolt's invisible Australians he believes he somehow at war with.
" On a raft the group of slowly starving, feverish men begin disbelieving everything they see,  In a series of final attacks by unseen assailants, the remaining survivors including Aguirre’s daughter are killed by arrows. Aguirre alone remains alive on the slowly drifting raft. The raft becomes overrun by monkeys. The crazed Aguirre tells them: "I, the Wrath of God, will marry my own daughter and with her I will found the purest dynasty the world has ever seen. Together, we shall rule this entire continent. We shall endure. I am the Wrath of God! Who else is with me?"


 Fitzcrraldo Bolt's Opera House bringing Culture to a  pagon Australia should be subsidized. Pity it's just a photoshopped image from his crazy Europhile brain . Could you imagine if Australia adopted Bolt's narrative of the world how boring would it be? Bolt repeats the his narrative over and over  again expecting a different outcome isn't that Einstein definition of madness. But then Bolt believes Einstein was little more than another religious leader of another religion as are all believers in scientific methodology.
However he listens to opera but doesn't speak the languages in which it's sung. We subsidize opera as we do many diverse forms of Art forms worth maintaining however only those Bolt approves of. However he resists doing the same for Indigenous culture and believes it has offered nothing to the Australian identity so simply said  if it can't stand alone in a privatized world why bother even if it has survived for over 40,000 years? Here is a man who hounds the world of antiques looking for value in $$  not truth in history.


book broken hill 1



Image result for Images of a war on the poor

Who let her in?



Yes Bolt searches for these  individual cases, cases that represent the varying trials of all Australians.  Our stresses and social problems are multicultural and when coupled economic tension they reveal themselves in diverse ways. It's the difference that Bolt tries to highlight not the diversity. The difference and not the commonality of economics that Bolt amplifies. The growing reality of a harsher economic landscape is what Bolt hides because conservatives need to sell us the tale of the Lucky Country being spoiled by "them".
 We could ask the favored  Andrew Bolt question  "Who let them in?"  of  our multinational Corporations who hid their profits off shore and avoided taxation. We could ask why our Banks , Insurance Companies and Financial advisers have been destroying Australian families and have been getting away with it for years causing downward economic pressure on the  rest of us. Then the question Who let them in? makes fare more sense .
However Andrew Bolt doesn't want to highlight the common problems we all face he wants to hde those in favour of pointing out the selective differences among us.  They need have 2-3 things in common  to be included in his stereotyped list of unwanted Australians.  They must have a reportable  seemingly unique problem and the must be Muslim so they can in some way appear "a trend"
 Australia is a multicultural country with multicultural issues and  multicultural social problems. Bolt only selects the few individual cases in order for it to appear to be not diverse but a trend. He focuses on Muslims it's this Europhile's pet hate of those presumed to be most culturally different  Muslims even though they are not. Bolt hates it when we see the reality of Islam in Waleed Aly because it make what Bolt is saying look farcical. Bolt is a modern day Senator  Joseph McCarthy who selected American citizens only to call them Communists and ask "who let them in?" Individuals to name and shame and  club  together to suggest they are a group "Reds under beds" with a common aim to do us harm extremely deviant and dysfunctional to our "real culture" as defined by Bolt.
Bolt is simply importing Fascism to the Australian landscape as Mc Carthy did the USA as Goebbels did in Germany as Netanyahu is doing in Israel as we speak the technique is not new and is intended to divide us. In fact Bolt is simply importing the simplistic ideas of past Fascists and applying them to a diverse Australian landscape of which we  are all a part .
The same question "Who let him in?" might be better asked of Andrew Bolt. Who let him in?  because he is the most intolerant and atypical of Australians. Bolt's intent is to destroy harmony among us. The pity in this case he uses the economic and mental stress a mother suffers when raising her children in poverty.  Bolt doesn't give much thought them unless of course they are babies and black or children of single mums then he supports stealing them and giving them to the wealthy. He calls that responsible adoption as opposed to just fostering. Bolt has  certainly advocated a no child policy for single mothers on Welfare and in poverty. Bolt isn't waging a War on Poverty. He's waging a War on the Poor

Image result for Images of a pornographer

Bolt's context of Polygamy

A date with polygamy

Yes  Bolt's warning is the very reason LGBTI's don't want a plebiscite  the hysterics that Bolt, Bernardi and Abetz bring to the table  is totally misguided.When talking of polygamy, beastiality  rather than  equality they are talking entirely different values. However it does show they are prepared to bring the pornographic minds  to the table to simply try to divide Australia by raising issues of morals rather than , social justice and fairness. Look at Bolt's photo and it tells the tale of distortion.

Polygamy in Islam actually fits  Bolt's concept of a  non welfare state not a misogynistic one. It required a duty of the wealthy  to marry single women, widows, and those with children and to take care of them if they were at financial risk. This structure protected women in danger where no welfare system was available to do so. Bolt however  has turned it into some perverted  form of sexual slavery and yes coupled it with Bernardi's imaginative thoughts of bestiality the two are pretty sick compared with those who only have equality in mind.  It shows the gutter mentality of these conservative letchers.   Cory Bernardi is more dangerous than One Nation –



A date with polygamy

 

 

ABC-style diversity

 

Australia is Multiracial but Bolt doesn't want that reflected anywhere diversity promoted on this grand scale is a threat to power and the current dominant white male power structure. It wasn't that long ago when Catholics and Jews were  persona non gratis in the top eschalons of Australia's hierarchy. The ABC is their to show the diversity of ideas that exist not preach them In fact it will soon show a program of Andrew Bolt's unrepresentative ideas included. What place cries Bolt would his ideas those of a minority have in the wider context of the ABC quote "And what concessions will be made to unreason to hype the very small "contribution of ... " None really but unfortunately he is also a tiny part of our landscape and the ABC has had him on more frequently than others.

There are Muslims on the beach Bolt and Indigenous people Oh Dear the ABC shows these biased images don't they

 
Image result for Images of ABC Aus diversity

 

 

 

   

What you wont hear from Bolt

Australia’s biggest emitters say Coalition’s Direct Action is ineffective

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Chris Hedges: The Most Brazen Corporate Power Grab in American History – Chris Hedges 

A new Order  over riding the power of Govenments

" “It allows corporations to bypass our three branches of government to impose enforceable sanctions by secret tribunals. These tribunals can declare our labor, consumer and environmental protections [to be] unlawful, non-tariff barriers subject to fines for noncompliance. The TPP establishes a transnational, autocratic system of enforceable governance in defiance of our domestic laws.” 

 

Ann Coulter tonight! 
 " Coulter has described herself as a polemicist who likes to "stir up the pot", and does not "pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do", drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right." Show me the money Anne Coulter
Coulter's syndicated column for Universal Press Syndicate appears in newspapers, and is featured on major conservative websites.
Andrew Bolt is paying her in order to boost his ratings by riding her coat tails. He has wet dreams about her success as a professional pot stirrer. Neither of these two add anything to help inform a Democratic electorate and both have however improved the lives of comedians Unfortunately there are none on the Bolt Report. Will he have anything to say about Richard Neville who helped blow the cobwebs off Australia?



 









 

 

 

No comments: