Andrew Bolt's blog,11/2/17; Bolt trying to steal the show; Why is Andrew Bolt a Eunuch? Bolt's social dream is the neutrality and safety of a moot "having little or no practical relevance." example He says he is as indigenous as most Aborigines. Spin; Greens;

Miranda Devine’s clash with Andrew Bolt shows how fickle the approval of the boys’ club is

I’ve always been perplexed by the fervour with which some women rush to denounce feminism and the people who practise it. Clemintine Ford

 

Defenders of free speech must damn Pickering

Defenders of free speech have a special responsibility to damn cartoonist Larry Pickering for his despicable slurs of gays and Muslims. And shame on all the conservatives who did not howl him down when he said the one good thing about Muslims was "they do chuck pillow-biters off buildings".
 

Trump and Bolt on free speech. Shhh, Don't mention "power"

 

Doesn't anybody find it strange for all his verbal ping pong and conceptual flim flam on free speech Bolt can't and never does name a single culture or society in which his notion of free speech was ever put into practice. There is a lot of waffle  by Andrew Bolt. It's the equivalent of trying to insist that all news is fake news and thus carries with it equal weight and the real news floats to the top for the benefit of all.

 "Bad speech, we say, will be driven out by good speech, and there is no need to call the cops, the judges and the whole activist class, so keen to supress views they themselkves do not like. Trust the public. Trust their goodness."Bolt

Bolt denies society, language and socialization the fact that we individuals are preconditioned by what came before as and our ability to rearrange what exists now and reconstruct a future social reality.  That traditional institutions overtly regulate and control our lives. Institutions such as family schools reinforce the dominant ideological forms of thinking onto the populace and force us into becoming obedient and docile beings.^[17] Hence, the dominant ideology  serves the interests of the ruling class, all the while appearing as `neutral`.  In fact Bolt reduces life to a moot.

Tradition needs to be questioned and must not go unchallenged.^[16]That certain aspects of logical thought common to all humans seemed to exist, but that they were products of collective life (thus contradicting the idea of "free speech" and  values are acquired by individual experience alone.  They differ from society to society. Freedom equality and fairness are social arrangements in themselves to be pursued and not just accepted in Bolt's imaginary free market place of ideas. Societies and rules do exist within us and without and are in constant need of examination freedom and equality ensured by written and unwritten rules. Bolt is a regular "cop caller"

"In 2003,^[59] CSIRO senior scientist Graeme Pearman was reprimanded and encouraged to resign after he spoke out on global warming.^[60] The Howard Government was accused of limiting the speech of Pearman and other scientists. In 2010, journalist Andrew Bolt was sued in the Federal Court over two posts on his Herald Sun blog in 2009. Bolt was found guilty of breaching the racial discrimination act in 2011 following comments regarded to be representative of a "eugenic" approach to aboriginal identity.^[61] This prompted the federal government to propose changes to the Racial Discrimination Act but has met with stiff resistance.^[62]
In 2014 the Australian High Court issued a blanket media gag order on the reporting of a high profile international corruption case.^[63][64] The gag order prevents the publishing of articles regarding bribes presented to high-ranking officials of Malaysia, Indonesia and Vietnam by senior executives of the Reserve Bank of Australia in order to secure the adoption of the Australian invented and produced polymer banknote technology.
Derryn Hinch was jailed for freedom of speech and Andrew Bolt was silent.

•  

   

   

  The White House Is Gaslighting The Media (And The Entire Country)

  DAYANITA RAMESH & JOHN KERR

  
  

  https://youtu.be/IcJt-JF1BLQ
  

  
  

  President Donald Trump’s administration is gaslighting America. He lies, reporters fact-check him, then he and his team spin the lies to blame the "biased" and "dishonest" media. Trump's team wants to create a world where no one knows what to believe, where facts and reality are irrelevant, and all that matters is what Trump says matters. Gaslighting reporters is one part of the administration’s war with the press -- just another way for his team to try to make the media's role as truth-tellers obsolete.
  And here’s the kicker: It’s not just the Trump administration. It’s also propaganda outlets tied to Trump. They rush to reinforce Trump’s false narratives with his base, which only puts mainstream outlets in a tougher position.
  Some journalists, like Teen Vogue's Lauren Duca, have already made it clear they won't fall for Trump's ploy. It's important that the rest of the media learn that same lesson. The future of American democracy depends on journalists, reporters, and everyday Americans rising above Trump’s gaslighting and calling the president out on his lies. It’s not the Trump administration’s place to decide what is true or false or set the frame of reference. In America, that role belongs to the free and fair press.
  

  Reporters Roast Sean Spicer’s Breitbart Interview: “Most Awkward Thing Ever,” “Insanely Cringey”

  Spicer Attacks CNN's Multi-Sourced Corroboration Of Dossier On Trump-Russia Ties As "Fake News"

  
  

  Sean Spicer: “This Is More Fake News. It Is About Time CNN Focused On The Success The President Has Had”
  
  
   
  
  

  Poll: One Nation backed by 1 in 4 Queensland voters

  
  

  A new Galaxy poll shows Pauline Hanson's One Nation is surging and could hold the balance of power in Queensland after this year's election: "The new poll, taken this week, shows One Nation’s support has leapt from 16 per cent to 23 per cent over the past three months."

   

   

  What's Bolt telling us that the Conservatives have been actively fragmenting the government? Tony Abbott should have left the Liberal Party? If he was leader they would form a coalition? The fact is why should Australia  even listen to politicians that make no attempt to solve real problems but make every attempt to create imaginary ones. What we do see however the mobilization of the global conservative media network manufacturing political issues to help install governments obliged to serve them and the private interests they are paid to represent. Hanson would be nowhere today without the Courier Mail

   

   

  Greens eat their own

  No surprise that the Greens can't be trusted even with their own finances. More interesting is that they're leaking against each other: "The finances of the NSW Greens 'cannot really be described as ­anything short of disastrous from   ­a ­financial management/compliance perspective', according to internal documents..."

   If the Greens are as ineffective as Andrew Bolt generally says they are Why is paying them the attention he generally says is unwarranted. It's hardly a choice of topic when so much other issues seem worthy of attention. The Royal Commission into child molestation has evaded him. The Greens can't be trusted with their finances seems hardly a topic for Bolt to take up when the Victorian branch of the Liberal Party were ripped off to the tune of $1.5mill by somebody that had already done the same to the Tassie Branch. Eric Abetz wanted it to be kept hush hush and so suckered him off to the unsuspecting Victorians. The recent exposure of Liberal MP entitlements Bob Day all would suggest that Bolt is merely in the business of distracting rather than informing. So is Bolt suggesting Pauline Hanson is a cleanskin Tony Abbott is as well

  Susan Ley did nothing and Bronwyn Bishop was poorly treated?

  
  

  
  
  

  

  Police let violent Leftists attack peaceful conservatives

  Victoria's police now lets violent Leftists physically stop peaceful conservatives from going to hear two members of Australia's parliament. Why is this mob rule by the new fascists condoned?

    As said earlier today Bolt sells the  freedom of speech  in a social context where speech in fact is neither free nor neutral but is an organized and a network that actively promotes actions that result in active protest. What Bolt is upset about  is our police are allowing protest to happen. In fact he's so excited about it it's almost as if  he is demanding actions we  have seen In South Africa, Chile and Argentina where protestors  were simply disappeared. "Peaceful Conservatives" is an oxymoron. These are the very people who support the peaceful bombing of nations other nations and then declare that the refugee created aren't their responsibility. These are the Bolt's that fury when our institutions don't dance to their tune. These are the peaceful conservatives who claim our institutions are dominated by a hostile and aggressive left that's sexist, racist, uncivil these are the Australians Andrew Bolt moderates of his News Corp sponsored diary and doesn't give space to on his Bolt Report. These are the people that are fully aware that speech isn't just a moot and is hard fought for not always for themselves. These are the people Bolt would if he could have defined as medically insane he often uses psychiatric language to boost these arguments while supporting his beliefs as the only healthy ones.

   Yes Andrew Bolt keeps a little black book on protest as evidence if only he could reinstall the McCarthy and make Australia Great Again. Unfortunately Bolt never tells us if and when that was. He never tells us when or where 'free speech' ever existed other than in the caverns of his fantasies. 
  
  

   

   

  Paul Kelly claims there's no Laboral party

  Paul Kelly continues to rage against nameless conservatives: "The populist conservatives like spinning the line of no real policy differences between Turnbull and Shorten — like most of their polemic it is nonsense..." Oh, really? Let's play spot-the-difference.
  

  
   We aren't invited to the Kelly Bolt show as it's a Paywall to the Australian
  
  
  In typical fashion I don't believe Bolt even bothered to read what Paul Kelly said.  If he has he doesn't explain it. Maybe because you have to buy it to find out!! 
  Bolt was too eager to tell us 1 million people have become conservatives that's not the case That is as convincing  as saying The Donald is a Republican and therefore those that voted for him must be there is no truth in any of that and it doesn't follow.  It seems to me Kelly is talking about two opposing ideologies and not particular policies. However since we only have Bolt's word for what it is Kelly is saying there is no guarantee he's even slightly right.
    " Let's go through some of the big policy issues that have helped to drive more than a million conservatives away from the Liberals (and Labor). Let's play spot-the-difference with the Labor and Liberal policies:" Bolt suggests they aren't even on the same page.Paul Kelly quite clearly isn't a bean counter like Bolt. 
  
   Kelly isn't refering to his little policy list as Bolt is  he is on about  "systems of ideas and ideals, especially ones which form the basis of economic or political theory and policy."
  What's Bolt talking about policies:
  a)  indoctrinate children into thinking gender is a social construct, but it has left much of that scheme intact.  Wow, the primative notion that gender was an absolute has been trashed by Anthropoligists and Social Biologists since before the 1900s
  b)  global warming that is probably not a big menace anyway. Bolt should ask the people of Sydney about the fact the planet was cooling
  c) when our gross debt is about to smash past $500 billion. Tony Abbott lifted the debt ceiling and even he has declared it was his worst economic management decision.
   Bolt simply seems to be arguing in an entirely different arena to Paul Kelly and even the points he's raising are simply wrong so much so he doesn't quite make sense but that's not unusual for Bolt. 
  Like the US there is a major ideological difference between Democrats and Republicans that difference and that battleground wasn't defined by the election of Donald Trump. It seems Bolt believes it is and everyone that voted for him is ideologically in tune with him. The problem here is Bolt obviously fails to elucidate  Kelly  and given the above points make little sense why should we believe anything he has to say?. We don't seem to have been invited to the argument.