Tuesday, 28 March 2017

Andrew Bolt's Blog,28/3/17; Killing Islam vs Christianity Bolt's ignorance; Walking hand in hand with Malcolm Roberts; Changing English; Walking without sunshine; Our Defamation laws need to be scrapped too; Reversing the flow of not only arguments;



New Corp trying to run Australia.





TURNBULL'S CHINA DISASTER

TURNBULL'S CHINA DISASTER

Why did Malcolm Turnbull want to sign an extradition deal with China that would have us send China people wanted by their police - when China's courts have had conviction rates of 99.98 per cent? And why did his

More posts Why is it Andrew Bolt twists and distorts anything Malcolm Turnbull does it's as if he's the Spokesmant for the conservative opposition within the Liberal Party. He's Tony Abbott's dummy and Abbott is the ventriloquist. 

1) The treaty was signed by the then Howard government 10 years ago and it needs to be ratified. Abbott was a minister in that government. 

2) Bolt simply makes a statement about 99.9% of Chinese found guilty in a "rigged" court system. He called the Australian court system as "rigged" when he was convicted too. He has pointed to the left bias of the legal system and the judges on so many times I don't have to list them

4) Is Bolt suggesting this was never considered by the Liberal Party previously and the conservatives like Abbott have only just considered it in all it's consequences? 

5) This seems more a political set up than any genuine concern about extradition and it's not a set up by the Chinese.

6) The US has the highest % of the incarcerated persons in the world and we can freely read just how corrupt their privatized system is. Bolt has no qualms about any extradition order with the USA despite the fact that it's openly corrupt. 

7) Watch Bolt's body language and how hard he's trying to appear honest almost whispering a secret for you to hear and nobody else. He sounds worse than any used car salesman I've ever met. He's pitching not reporting and pitching for your ears only. The man is such a pathetic con artist.

8) The deal was signed 10 years ago by conservatives with a vast array of protections included that Bolt makes no reference to and it needs to be ratified. Abbott sees it as an opportunity but because he was a party to it need his dummy to speak for him.


 

Image result for Images of religious killing

ON MY SHOWS - TURNBULL'S CHINA DISASTER, IGNORING MUSLIM DEATH TALK

On The Bolt Report on Sky at 7pm: Did China's threats make Malcolm Turnbull agree to the  extradition treaty that Labor has now blocked? Why is the media ignoring a Muslim group's statement that the punishment for apostates is death? Guests: Senator Cory Bernardi,   Jennifer Westacott, Sharri Markson, Janet Albrechtsen, Graham Richardson.

 Bolt's fake submissions are stand out among the ignorance of self righteous prigs
 Many of the countries most notorious for honour killing are Arab or Muslim countries. This feeds a general impression that honour killing is somehow related to Islam, which feeds into a general xenophobia against Muslims; and the phenomenon is used by racists and xenophobes as yet another stick with which to beat Muslims, attempting to characterise these murders as a 'pious act', approved by Islam. 
 There is, however, no single text in the Quran that justifies these crimes. By contrast, in the Bible, Numbers 26:6-8 show God approving Phineas's public murder of a couple who marry outside tribal boundaries. Most Muslims reject honour killing as a brutal distortion of Islam; discussions of this in terms of the spiritual texts of Islam can be found at the Muslim Women's League, by Dr Mohammed Fadel and at alt.muslim, amongst many others. Many Muslim scholars and clerics have condemned such crimes as a vile and backward distortion of their faith.It goes to show Bolt's ignorance of Islam
Moreover, the of honour killing predates the Islamic faith, and is by no means unique to Muslim cultures; also, there is little evidence of honour crime occurring in other Muslim countries such as Indonesia. The extent of cultures following the 'honour ethic' is more geographical than ideological, comprising the Indian subcontinent, the Middle East, Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean regions. 
 Honour killing also happens in Christian communities in the Mediterranean and other regions. The culture of Ancient Rome allowed the father to kill his children if he deemed necessary. Honour killing was only abolished as a specific category in Italy in 1981, and murders in the name of honour still occur in the country. In 2006, Bruna Morito was shot six times in the face by her brother for bearing a child outside marriage. In Brazil, men could be acquitted for murdering their wives up until 1991, and there have been 800 recorded such murders in a single year. Even in 1991, a lower court ignored the ruling of the Supreme Court and acquitted Joao Lopes for the double homicide of his wife and her lover. In fact, the opposition of the woman as the vessel of familial honour and the man as its protector was widespread throughout the southern European region, although it is not clear how many murders are committed in the name of honour at the present time.
Even within the Middle East, honour killing is not restricted to Muslims. In Yemen, a Jewish father killed his daughter after a rebuke from the rabbi for her extra-marital pregnancy, and in Palestine, in 2005, Faten Habash was beaten to death with an iron bar, wielded by her Christian father because she wanted to marry her Muslim boyfriend.
 While there is no Quranic justification for honour killing, it is unfortunately true that many of the perpetrators believe themselves justified by their faith. All religions are influenced by the patriarchal culture under which they were created and so codify some of the oppressive practises of their time. All religions are interpreted by reactionary elements who wish to defend and retain patriarchal dominance. It is in the name of Christianity that reactionary elements in some American states and European countries restrict abortion rights; it was in the name of Islam that reactionary elements in Jordan and Pakistan blocked legal amendments which would have closed loopholes that allow honour killers to escape with token punishment. As Nilofar Bakhtiar, adviser to Pakistan's prime minister on Women's' Development says, men find it "very convenient to say that what they don't want to do is against Islam and what they want to do is in the name of Islam."http://www.islamawareness.net/HonourKilling/outside.htmlTop Ten Ways Islamic Law forbids Terrorism | Informed Comment
 
  The 712-page Google doc that proves Muslims do condemn terrorism 

 muslimscondemn.com
 ‘I wanted to show how weak the argument is that Muslims don’t care about terrorism’ … Heraa Hashmi.

 

 

  Sky News breaches ACMA rules after The Bolt Report runs pro-marriage equality ad


 Bolt will do anything for $$$ anti- Marriage Equality advocate who happily advertises Marriage Equality. Can anybody believe him?
Sky News has earned a slap on the wrist from the media regulator after a pro-marriage equality ad was aired on The Bolt Report without an appropriate disclosure.

As an Israeli soldier, I played God with Palestinians


The occupation allows us to demand Palestinians show their identification cards at a whim. It allows us to slap, shove, or shoot them if necessary — even if they are the same age as our fathers or young enough to be our children. By Alon Mizrahi Only last night, once I sat down after a long day, did the memories come flooding back. It was probably a video of a police officer beating a middle-aged Palestinian truck driver in East Jerusalem, which had gone viral, that triggered it. A reminder of just one story — one out of millions that reflect the absurdity of the occupation. [tmwinpost]…
Source: As an Israeli soldier, I played God with Palestinians | +972 Magazine







Politicians don’t normally have a handle on the latest science at the best of times, whether they are on the left or the right of the spectrum. However, it’s difficult to argue against the notion that the Conservatives in the Liberal Party  these days are the de facto political organization for anti-scientific rhetoric. As are the Republicans in the US.
If you’re a Conservative the chances are you won’t give a damn about what any scientist says – with some exceptions.
Ultimately, this means that you can throw all the facts you want at certain people, and you can be essentially certain that none of them will change their minds. If that doesn’t scare the living daylights out of you, then we don’t know what will. So here is Andrew Bolt to prove it.







  
Bolt is running away from Global Science hand in hand with Malcolm Roberts

DR KARL DODGES DEBATE

Dr Karl, one of the ABC's  paid climate alarmists, has made claims almost as dodgy as colleague Robyn Williams' prediction of sea rises this century of up to 100 metres. So I'm not surprised he's running from a debate with Senator Malcolm Roberts - a debate which would be a doddle if Roberts really were as silly as warmists claim.

 

 

 

LEFT FASCISTS PERSECUTE CHRISTIANS

The fascist Left - and, it seems, IBM - are dangerously hostile to diversity of opinion: "Two Christian charities have been granted official permission to keep their board members’ names secret on the grounds of “public safety”, after abuse and threats from gay activists forced an IBM executive to sever his links with a Christian education group."    
  Schoolyard bully Andrew Bolt  Mr Agnostic flips the argument again 1) There is no such thing as Christian persecution in Australia unless of course we count Andrew Bolt turning his shoulder to the Christian faith with his agnosticism. What laws, what cultural institutions are biased against Christians? " 2) Gay activists" can be Christian too it seems Bolt assumes they can't. 3) Being pro equality and opposing and restricting the rights of others are diametrically opposed one is liberating the other repressing Bolt seems to have turned them on their heads. 4) Bolt has changed the meaning of Fascism in such a way it no longer has any meaning but then he along with Trump etal he has also changed the meaning of news as well. According to Bolt Mussolini and Hitler were extreme left wing fascists hand in hand with the extreme left wing business community. This is coming from Andrew Bolt the man who insists he's more indigenous than Cathy Freeman, Stan Grant etc. The biggest wonder is News Corp supports this crap
 









More posts

1 - 50
GREEN HYSTERIC ADAM BANDT BLAMES COAL FOR CYCLONE

GREEN HYSTERIC ADAM BANDT BLAMES COAL FOR CYCLONE

Greens MP Adam Bandt is an exploitative fear-monger and wrong, too: "If Malcolm Turnbull uses scarce public money to build a new coal-fired power station he'll have blood on his hands.  Because the more coal we burn, the more extreme weather events like Cyclone Debbie or Cyclone Yasi we will see." In fact, we've had dramatically fewer cyclones.  
  Does anybody but me find strange that Bolt turns to the IPCC an alarmist body of scientists that can't be believed for his evidence against Adam Bandt? Suddenly this body of liars are Bolt's new found truth tellers.  Adam Bandt is saying the continued use of coal for energy will continue to put more pressure on the planet resulting in extreme weather events. Bolt is trying to say it wont with his dinky toy graph that's unreadable. The fact is that the world is listening to whatever is being said by Bandt  much more than what's being said by Bolt who merely sounds like a fraudulent finacial adviser given that Australia's biggest energy producers are calling for a price to be put on Carbon, an ETS in fact.
 Image result for Image of defamation

LAWYERS NOW, WENDY? REALLY?

Mark Latham's satire was brutal. But a fellow broadcaster suing him seems a sinister betrayal of free speech: "Latham faces legal action after calling ABC broadcaster Wendy Harmer a “female with a disability” and a “proven commercial failure”. Solicitors for Ms Harmer sent Sky News a legal letter pointing out the comments were defamatory..."
"(No comments, because our defamation laws are far too strict and lawyers are too pricey.)" Bolt .
Bolt seems to not only want to change government involvement in free speech by scrapping Section 18C and the RDA altogether. He also wants to scrap our defamation laws preventing private actions to be taken against the lies of others. Yet he argues Section 18C isn't necessary because we have defamation laws to protect us. It appears he wants his cake and eat it too. He has been  has been sued under our Defamation Laws and lost found to be a liar and it cost News Corp $250,000. How many other times has he been sued lost or settled in backroom deals? Satire isn't that funny when it's defamation is it. Harmer it appears wants an independent judgement. Latham is OK because News Corp will pick up the tab and probably write the costs off as publicity.




 Bolt is again repeating PLAGIARISING  his own ridiculous post made weeks ago and claiming he works with integrity. The only thing he's changed here is the date and removed the comments to hide the fact that it is a repeat. As for the argument that water has to be pumped "up" rather than collected to pump "down" as is the case with Hydro schemes Bolt produces no evidence  that's even the case.
 









 

 

 Image result for Image of jails

WHY WOULD WE SEND PEOPLE TO CHINA'S RIGGED COURTS?

There is something sinister about the extradition treaty with China that the Turnbull Government wants to ratify.  Why would we send wanted people to courts in China that have a conviction rate of 99.9 per cent? And why should we give in to these threats? UPDATE: Hostage threat from China?

 Bolt hasn't any interest in an extradition agreement between Aus and China he has an enormous interest however if it can negatively impact on Malcolm Turnbull. Why because his 99.9% actually refers to 0.01% of 1.2 billion people. Australia has 0.15% of it's citizens jailed. If he was seriously concerned he'd be arguing against any agreement with the USA which has 25% of the worlds imprisoned population most for the crime of poverty. He talks of respecting sovereignty  as a principle but is happy to illegally cross into other countries and bomb them without any public declaration of war. Had this occurred under Abbott's watch Bolt would be hailing Tony's choice but it's under Malcolm's. If Abbott told Bolt to shut up Bolt would ask "for how long Tony?"
 
" An implied threat by Beijing to stop co-operating with Canberra on basic matters of law enforcement has incensed some Liberals."
They see it as naked intimidation and an extremely dangerous indicator of the future in Beijing-Canberra relations." Bolt's post
"I am not surprised." Bolt
Is Bolt threatening trade relations with China in his bravado posturing? Remember all that's being asked is the ratification of the agreement signed by John Howard the great conservative hero. Who are the Liberals so incensed but unnamed? He doesn't care about jails or the comparing arrests he cares about squeezing Malcolm. If he were at all concerned he'd be applauding the inquiry into Don Dale.






HANSON SURRENDERS ON PENALTY RATES

The only political leader to vigorously back the cuts to Sunday penalty rates for hospitality and retail workers has caved: "One Nation leader Pauline Hanson ... said she had changed her mind after experiencing a backlash from her supporters. 'I’ve listened and this is what you want and I will not support any cut to penalty rates.'”

This Blog isn't about penalty rates at all because Andrew Bolt is all for a cut to those rates. This is about Bolt holding his voodoo doll of our current PM Mal and sticking a pin into it. It's simply playing for Abbott's Team and forgoing any principles involved.
 




"Uh oh. As I warned at the time, why fund an institute that was bound to be captured by the left, like just about every single university politics faculty in the country."Bolt. Adelaide University failure and dropout Andrew Bolt who keeps Adelaide as his Alma Mater on his CV when not entitled to regards all our  institutions of inquiry and learning as nothing other than unprofessional nests of the left.
" Mark Latham has already noted how not one of the academics of Sydney University's United States Studies Centre supported Donald Trump or predicted his win."Bolt's post.
 
It should be pointed out that Andrew Bolt did not support Trump or predict his win. That the most conservatives of conservatives Andrew Bolt media man who claims he has the right to be biased because he is an "opinion journalist" and is not government funded is expected to lie  when he puts out his daily fake news. His audience is fully aware of the biased bullshit he puts out and makes adjustments for it. That news by the way has landed him in court over 3 times so with that knowledge his followers are able to glean the truth which is that Bolt's lying. How complicated is that? As usual Bolt has his back to the wall so anything in front of him is pinko even if founded by John Howard and stacked with conservatives they are of the reddish kind. It seems if Bolt had his way all funds to Australian Universities would be cut even if regarded as one of the countries largest exporters of learning and education in the world Bolt would turn that tap off. He is the political whizz that has coined the phrase the " Fascist Left" which nobody knows what he's talking about but himself. Mussolini & Hitler were lefties according to Bolt. He obviously didn't learn that at Adelaide University.

No comments: