Sunday, 5 November 2017

Andrew Bolt's Blog 5/11/17; When you believe you're "Born to Rule" and your shit doesn't stink. The backroom fails it's job;


7m
 "I don’t know what’s worse — than they haven’t done an internal audit so they have no way of knowing whether the government is even legitimate anymore, or they have done an audit, and are sitting on any findings hoping the media will get sick of the issue and move on."Peta Credlin
Pointing the finger of blame in every direction but her own and her husbands Peta Credlin is trying to blame the politicians when in fact the job of auditing suitable Liberal parliamentary representatives is a back room job when candidates nominate for an electorate. It's the job of the party administration to also check that their coalition partners are kosher. Parry was illegitimate for the whole time he sat as a member 12 years. Peta Credlin's husband was president of the party and head of its Organizational wing and Credlin was right there next to him running the PMO for Tony Abbott. We saw just how dependent MPs were on these apparatchiks watching Credlin direct Abbott as if he were a marionette and he hung on to her for dear life. They were the judges and supervisors of the Pre-selection process and they are now ducking for cover. This occurs when you are either very small as are the Greens or you believe you are born to rule and are made of Teflon.


The Organisational Wing ( the hidden faces who won't be accused)

The Organizational wing is based on the Party’s paid membership of supporters. Across Australia, the Liberal Party has more than 80,000 members in more than 2000 branches which are governed by their respective State Liberal Party structure - known as 'Divisions'. It is responsible for:
Party’s Platform - the broad statement of Liberal fundamental beliefs and intention  
Pre-selection of the Party’s candidates for elections
Management and conduct of election campaigns

  Image result for Image of Adam Bandt




7m
 "If the definition of terror is to use violence and threaten people's lives for political purposes, then Peter Dutton is a terrorist." Adam Bandt
Andrew Bolt calls Bandt dangerous because he asks a very legitimate question regarding the official definition of terrorism which fits Peter Dutton like a second skin. Bolt on the other hand called the terrorists in Barcelona "brave young men" while denouncing young Australian Christians as cowards. He hangs on to the words of IS media for his truth and denounces our Security forces such as the AFP and our police as "liars" and he claims that the Greens are being inflammatory. Dutton's claiming the danger asylum seekers are facing no food water medicine or guarantee of safety is to embarass him is more than an act of Pontious Pilate but one that fits the definition of  terrorism.
22m
Bolt searches the world for criminal cases  to prosecute is argument that Muslim refugees are the most criminally active people in the country. Asylum seekers constitute 3% of the migrants resettled  into Australia  and not all are Muslim. That 3% is a subset of the 0.9% of migrants that came to live here. The figures are no much different in the UK.  Bolt's link the UK's  The Daily Mail and equivalent of the Herald Sun here Their mode of operation is the same as Bolt's is to create fear in the eyes of the public  by making broad anti- refugee generalizations from single events. Bolt does it here with the South Sudanese but has a problem he can't call them Muslim their not they are in the main Christians. However he doesn't mention that as he doesn't mention that Indigenous Australians are also Christians why? Because he wants to shame and blame Muslims wherever the 1.6 billion might be found. To mention that a large percentage of refugees are Christians and they to get involved in criminal activity defeats his purpose vilifying Muslims. He'd have to then admit Christian Australians are in fact the most criminal of any groups in either the UK or here.
Basically you can historically go back to before WW2 and see Nazi media doing the very same as Andrew Bolt to the Jews and Romany in the media of the day dividing Germany to stir up a Cultural Nationalist White Supremacist state of mind. Yes Australia does have a Goebellian media and Andrew Bolt is very much in front ot that pack.

Criticisms of the Daily Mail

Racism accusations

Homophobia accusations

Sexism

Other criticisms

The Mail's medical and science journalism has been criticised by some doctors and scientists, accusing it of using minor studies to generate scare stories.[13][14][12]
Other criticisms include the extent of coverage of celebrities,[146][147] the children of celebrities,[148] property prices,[149] and the depiction of asylum seekers,[150] the latter of which was discussed in the Parliament's Joint Committee on Human Rights in 2007.[151][152]
In February 2017, the English Wikipedia community decided that the Daily Mail was "generally unreliable" to use as a reference in Wikipedia.

Related image

WILL BURNSIDE CORRECT HIS CLAIM OF POLICE HARASSMENT?

Julian Burnside QC treats an unlikely (and, it turns out, false) allegation of police harassment as true. Will he now correct it or resist as the Sunday Age did for so long?

40m Link

PAYWALL
Bolt it seems doesn't want anybody reading the Herald Sun not the poor any way only those who can afford to subscribe. When has Andrew Bolt corrected anything he says he doesn't even apologize publicly for calling his family lazy baggage that he has to look after. He had to "take them to Bali". He's forced to go to PTA meetings. He's the only one in the family who brings home the bacon etc. Is that the sign of a sharing family man?
As for the Police and the AFP they are conspiratorial liars  paid to hide the facts from the public they are there to confuse. Isn't that Bolt agreeing with Burnside. Bolt really does show his no principled inconsistencies doesn't he?
45m
PAYWALL 
Bolt it seems doesn't want anybody reading the Herald Sun not the poor any way only those who can afford to subscribe 
As I stated earlier this isn't an MP issue it's a systemic problem of a Party who believes it's born to rule and the backroom on which it's supported. Pta Credlin and her husband are the party failures. Calling for a general audit as Bolt is doing is trying to hide that issue.

No comments: