Wouldn't it be easier to just scrap lots of the laws that have people suing each other? " Bolt. Bolt, of course, has never needed to employ lawyers himself he's been protected by the News Corp guardians numerous times. In Bolt's ideal world the elite could sue each other. However, currently the wealth gap protects them from that action by the masses and as such ensures that their privileges aren't threatened by any court-ordered downward redistribution of money. Bolt has always felt unjustly set upon and blamed the AHRC for having him in an Australian courtroom charged and tried under the RDA's Sections 18 C&D. If the judge was sooo wrong why didn't his corporate lawyers appeal?
Bolt claims to be a "debater" "indigenous" and that boat people aren't asylum seekers but are "illegals" where is the debate? It takes two people with a common language and understanding to debate. Debating has rules, it's why we have courts and tribunals. Bolt simply prefers to walk into the debating arena change the terms of reference talk gobblygook past his so-called opponent debaters and declares himself the winner. If there's any protest he transforms himself and says he's the victim. Reality facts and a search for truth become only incidental or accidental winners in the event. It's the Trump and Fox Bolt's nonsensical tag team that Bolt wants. The control of opinion to rule.
However, when someone holds more authority than Bolt the voice he folds like a cheap deck of cards. We saw that when he tried to convince ex-NZ PM James Bolger that was an Indigenous Australian unfairly treated and was laughed at. Bolt melted to silence on ABC TV's program Recognition Yes or No. The same occurred with the Fijian/Australian Constitutional lawyer. The KO when it comes to Andrew Bolt seems to be laughter. It's his glass jaw.
Has anybody noticed that Andrew Bolt has an overwhelming disrespect for all of Australia's Institutions? He used to say he was shy rather than remote, secluded. He felt more an alien in this country than the newly arrived and diverse in religion, language, colour gender and race immigrants glad and thankful to be here. He's not out for debate but vigilante bully boy justice why? Because persuaders given the resources in most circumstances believe they hold the power over facts data truth and so real justice can be set aside. Bolt, for instance, has preached Islam is dangerous not that we should debate it but that we ought to keep these potential terrorist Muslims out. He's been banging on about it since Abbott became PM and Muslim hatred has escalated from 9% to 33%, why? Not because of any raw data but with the help of News Corp's campaign that in 2017 wrote 2850 anti-Muslim articles add Bolt's constant hate-speech which he calls "debate" along with Sky News and 2GB and you have an echo chamber of hatred spread across the country for the hope of a political pay off. However, that blew up in their conservative politician's faces didn't it?. However, at the same time, it denigrated shamed and told 3% of Australia they weren't wanted but we saw just how much energy is being poured into it. How many millions spent and invested in an effort to create a pushback that has been so minimal but ever so destructive.
Christians are victims Heterosexuals are victims, white males are victims, now what relevance to reality and facts does Bolt provide, none. None that are statistically relevant and not just cherry-picked yet what Bolt wants is "opinion" to be the arbiter, vigilante-style justice. However, Bolt needs to be careful because past records have shown him to be a shit poor influencer not well respected trusted and his opinion model of better justice just might come and bite him on the arse. He doesn't like the ABC, can't control social media and hates and feels threatened by the Sleeping Giants because they are focusing on changing Bolt's opinions by focusing on his and Skys advertisers while he cries foul.
Imagine the AFL Grand Final being umpired by the crowd of 100,000 that's Bolt's better game Bolt's madness his Democracy is it any wonder James Bolger laughed at his nonsense? We all should.
Trump says Cohen pleaded guilty 'to embarrass the President'
The Game without Rules and the tag team Trump and Fox News
Trump claimed that Cohen bore responsibility for any violations of criminal law but also asserted that Cohen "probably was not guilty" of even civil violations related to the payments to former Playboy playmate Karen McDougal and adult-film star Stormy Daniels - a view at odds with that of many lawyers who specialise in campaign finance law.
"Those charges were just agreed to by him in order to embarrass the president and get a much reduced prison sentence, which he did," Trump alleged.
Andrew Bolt has another Yassmin to run out of the country
When asylum seekers looked to an affluent Australia for hope, it was disappointing to see some were treated with "hatred" and weren't even allowed to set foot on its shores, said activist Malala Yousafzai.
Yet when the Taliban came for Ms Yousafzai's family in Pakistan, her family was given sanctuary by friends, family, strangers, true to the country's culture of welcoming those in need.
"Australia is a welcoming and warm country. And when you look at the immigration policies, they do not actually represent the people of Australia," she said.
"[Refugees] want safety, they want homes, they want somebody to give them protection, and then suddenly you welcome them with hatred," she said.
"You do not even allow them to land or step their feet on Australia," she said referring to the offshore processing of asylum seekers. "So I think it is disappointing and I hope that the people of Australia do stand up for refugees and show their true human-side."
No comments:
Post a Comment