“It’s overwhelming when you realise it’s just you, forty News Corp columnists, the Department of Human Services and the Federal Government, up against the might of Australia’s unemployed”
Victim of Robodebt Scheme Finally Heard
Q&A
Liberal Senator for WA Dean Smith says former PM Scroto Moronson should take personal responsibility over Robodebt and is doing the Liberal Party brand damage by not being accountable.
Dutton gets what he asked for- Ablo says YES
Mr Albanese announced the review in Question Time on Monday. It came after Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said he was happy for the National Anti-Corruption Commission to investigate the claims, while blasting the whole allegations as “a stunt”.
Source: (1) “A review… – The Fiberal Party of Australia – Lies & Misdemeanours | Facebook
The constitution is a profoundly racist document, an
expression of White Australia, of settler history, with the concepts of
Australia having been “discovered” by Europeans under the fiction of
terra nullius. Implicit in it is “the passing of the Aborigines”.
The one issue on which all parties in the Australian
colonies agreed in 1901 was White Australia. The Australian Labor Party
was zealous on this. The Australian way of dealing with racism was to
deny it existed.
Failure to recognise the suffering and marginalisation
of First Nations people was the core of what anthropologist W. E. H.
Stanner, in his important Boyer Lectures for the ABC in 1968, called
“the great Australian silence”.
Indian soldiers were invited to the inauguration of the
Commonwealth of Australia in Sydney at 10am on January 1, 1901, but no
Aboriginal Australians. The omission may not have been deliberate –
perhaps it never occurred to the organisers to ask any.
It is egregious cynicism to argue in 2023 that a
positive reference to First Nations people would bring a divisive racist
element into the constitution.
The constitution v the Voice
Source: “The… – The Fiberal Party of Australia – Lies & Misdemeanours | Facebook
AI and Andrew Bolt. Murdoch would have to sack AI in order to maintain his quid pro quo contract with the IPA and LNP
So there we have it. AI could take the place of Andrew Bolt tomorrow but it would probably be sacked due to its ability to consider a counter argument.
No comments:
Post a Comment