Andrew Bolt's Blog,28/9/18; There's really only been one song in the Murdochian songbook and Bolt is still playing it and it's not Turnbull; The next stage in a grand plan;

TURNBULL'S DEADLY TOUCH: NOW SACK ABC BOARD

It's the Turnbull kiss of death. Malcolm Turnbull, sacked as PM, leaned on his mate Justin Milne, who's just sacked himself as ABC chairman, who last Sunday sacked ABC managing director Michelle Guthrie, after she didn't sack some ABC staff who Turnbull hated. But now the ABC board should be sacked, too. My editorial from The Bolt Report.

3m
" It's the Turnbull kiss of death. Malcolm Turnbull sacked as PM, leaned on his mate Justin Milne, who's just sacked himself as ABC chairman, who last Sunday sacked ABC managing director Michelle Guthrie after she didn't sack some ABC staff who Turnbull hated. 
But now the ABC board should be sacked, too."Bolt
 Andrew Bolt's little fantasy play is constantly about the boorish undemocratic minority in the Liberal Party that refuses to accept the consensus of the majority. Murdoch and Tony Abbott made their pact that News Corp would support little Tony well over 5 years ago.  If the Mad Monk destroyed the ABC the kingdom would be his. It was Rupert's father's business model and plan as far back as 1939  and it worked a treat in the US so why not keep trying here and in the UK.
Well, Murdoch didn't count on the majority of the Liberals voting Abbott out, did he? The plan, however, was never short term it was a dynastic ambition even if his horizon was in the far distance. Turnbull was an interloper never really Murdoch's man. Murdoch is well known for telling others that Turnbull must go and the message clear in News Corp's never-ending effort to get rid of Turnbull.  Their persistent attack on Turnbull dated back to when he was the opposition leader the plan and long-term business goal was ridding Australia of it's most trusted media source the ABC in the and so diminishing Australian Democracy and running the country with a Corporate Coalition.
That ambition was accelerated with when Australia's version of Fox News, Sky News after dark was born. Rid Australia of the ABC and there'd be a long-term profitable cabal of News Corp, the IPA, and any extreme Liberal ready to jump on board, Mussolini's dream of the ideal Fascist State. However, the ABC that practised sceptical and critical journalism and represented the people stood in their way.
With Guthrie and Milne gone all that's left is to get rid of the board and then Morrison, a Cultural conservative might just have the balls to smother the ABC's flame further. It doesn't even matter if he loses the next election because the plan then would be to restore Abbott in place as opposition leader. If Morrison won with the help of News Corp Abbott will be put back into a cabinet position and Murdoch's version of a media run Nation would continue and Democracy a very distant memory. We have to remember Murdoch's dad Kieth tried to rid Australia of the ABC as far back as 80 years ago.
As for Andrew Bolt well, he's just one of Murdoch's sock puppets and a member of the IPA. However, he has no interest in Australia and has done nothing of merit just ensured he mixed with the right crowd since a boy and ensured he'd be used by the Australian elite but who certainly don't regard him as one of their own. Merely someone that's been a gun for hire and not a very good but one with the mindset that makes a loyal drone.
The corporatisation of the Anglosphere may have become Murdoch's business model only after he became an American but the realisation that he was in the business of influence has never really left him that was handed down. After all his father established the IPA as far back as the forties and Murdoch has assisted that slumbering giant to waken in modern times. Is it any coincidence he was here to witness the fall of Turnbull? Don't forget his efforts to boost Abbott that went awry at the Alfalfa Club as well. No matter the mistakes the plan keeps rolling on.

ABC

ABC turmoil: Push for entire  board to be forced out

A chorus of angry voices want more heads to roll at the national broadcaster amid questions about the board's conduct over demands to sack two high-profile journalists.

Independance defined by the LNP and now being invetigated by the LNP

  ABC board members appointed by Fifield despite being rejected by merit-based panel | Media | The Guardian

 Almost all the directors of the ABC’s eight-member board were appointed directly by the minister for communications, Mitch Fifield, and some were appointed after being rejected by the merit-based nominations panel, documents obtained by the Guardian show.


“It is also important that the ABC maintain a very unbiased approach to how it reports things. That it gets it right and gets the facts right and Australians, I think, rightly have high expectations of the ABC and it is up to the board to make sure that they deliver.”Morrison

This sounds more like a warning to me  without any admission about how the government refuses to act at "arm's length"

Morrison defended the process of board appointments, which have come under renewed scrutiny this week, but Labor says appointments need to be made “at arm’s length”. Guardian

A plague on democracy — Murdoch, Turnbull and demagoguery

Turnbull’s own detractors from within his own party did not receive generous dollops of encouragement from the News Corp fraternity and those with a traditional fixation nourished by the world view of Rupert Murdoch.
Murdoch is in the business of backing, moulding and overthrowing governments. Some do it by the power of the gun backed by foreign finance, others prefer a battalion of editors and self-entitled opinion makers to do what amounts to much the same thing. The blood quotient might be less, but the impact is still impressively devastating.
Australia’s own national broadcaster has been wading in these troubled waters of late, taking the view that the country’s media moguls, supported by a phalanx of populist brutes gathered at Sky News and Radio 2GB, played a decisive part in forcing the hand that signed the death warrant in the Liberal party room.
‘Few executives are as synonymous with their companies as Rupert Murdoch is with his. News Corp, he had said in the past, “for better or worse, is a reflection of my thinking, my character and my values”.’  Richard Cooke


 

How The Trumps Screwed Palestine

Deconstructed — May. 18  Podcast

 On Monday, Jared Kushner, Ivanka Trump, and other members of the Trump administration celebrated the opening of a new U.S. embassy in Jerusalem, while at the same time and just a few miles away, Israeli snipers shot at hundreds of unarmed Palestinian protesters in Gaza. More than 60 people were killed in a single day, including children. Predictably, the U.S. media went into pro-Israeli propaganda mode, blaming all of the violence and killing on Hamas, which for all its many sins, didn’t actually kill anyone this week. On this week’s episode of Deconstructed, two Palestinians join Mehdi Hasan to discuss U.S. coverage of Palestine and how to get prominent Democratic politicians to take the Palestinian struggle for freedom seriously.

Andrew Bolt's blog, 5/6/18; Lawbet is a product when shares in legal cases are offered for sale the clients always pay; The big Con: We the real poor of Australia are being mis represented and misunderstood says Gina; Fifield's attack on the ABC finds an audience reaction that would have him booted from office;

National

Fifield and the ABC: This attack is not the best form of defence

The attacks on the ABC by Communications Minister Mitch Fifield have irked readers.

Andrew Bolt does the same when he purports to attack the ABC in the name of "fair and objective media commentary. The ABC charter is to provide balanced news coverage and it does its panels are set up in the format of a debate whereas Sky News is set up in the format of promoting a side for the purpose of influence its audience isn't offered any choice.

The law seems in recent times to have found an alternate economic niche in the market. What would appear to be working class or left-wing law once ignored by legal business models? To be labelled a left-wing lawyer was to be seen as a legal aid advocate or poor. It seems that that's not so much any more since the financial structure behind legal cases has changed. It seems to have become an area of investment wagering on contingent cases in which the lawyers no longer put up the bulk of the money and clients forward pay by guaranteeing a substantial portion should they win. Investors do the rest. It Sounds like LAWBET to me where investors can take part for a share. Capitalism is surely an inventive system in taking workers surplus even when disguised as aid.
My daughter couldn't afford a lawyer when injured but she could come up with the premium on an insurance policy that guaranteed the legal fees. She was awarded an $85,000 settlement plus costs in the case and received $50,000 1) shouldn't she have been returned her $2000 and got the full $85,000? After all, she was awarded the costs or 2) was that the investor's profits? 3) The narrative was totally controlled the business model in which justice "seemed" to have been charged. (ODT)

Two multimillion-dollar wage theft group actions will be filed in the Federal Court on Monday on behalf of hundreds of Australian door-to-door and direct sales workers.
The young workers were allegedly paid well below the legal minimum wage for sales and charity fundraising for international direct marketing companies AIDA and Credico.

 The big con: how neoliberals convinced us there wasn't enough to go around | Richard Denniss | Australia news | The Guardian

 Like Joe Hockey, Rinehart saw the problem of inequality as having more to do with the character of the poor than with the rules of the game: “If you’re jealous of those with more money, don’t just sit there and complain. Do something to make more money yourself – spend less time drinking or smoking and socialising, and more time to work.  https://youtu.be/Pj0P6BAHNb4

Andrew Bolt's Blog,22/5/16; Wog's would turn the backs on Bolt who hasn't the inner fortitude to be called a wog; The AFP screwing the election; Dancing on the misfortunes of the left didn't stop Cuba being admired worldwide; Bosses and neighbours recruits of the thought police;

 

I’m a wog and still support Dutton, Phil

" Well, that sure rules out me and most other conservative commentators, who - as you see on this blog, at least - don’t trust Malcolm Turnbull and are not impressed."Bolt is a one eyed conservative so don't let this conservative's bullshit distract you with his "who is Coorey talking about I'm a migrant too"

What a deflection any criticism of a Delcon and Bolt is a komikazi protector hitting out at anybody he declares to be left of center. Today that's  90% of Australians and 80% of MPs.

 Bolt's proud of being what he calls "acceptable ethnic background" When Illiteracy is only socially relevant  Dutton who is mono lingual is more illiterate than most of the refugees he's referring to.Dutton's claims out of step with evidence

 Bolt  is typical of wogs of the past he's more critical of newcomers than those who are of second and third generation Anglo-saxon backgrounds. However unlike most migrants Bolt hasn't improved on his parents education standards and in the longer term will in fact be the least educated  person in his family. Yet among them  he is the most critical. He is  hardest stone thrower of them all. Yes he's  like the fundamentalist Muslims he condemns who he criticizes for their intolerance. What can be said of this migrant who makes nothing of refugees in detention killing themselves for Bolt they are worth little more than a shrug his shoulders their deaths  only important  in as much as they are a warning to others. Bolt would  not have given it a second thought of lighting the match himself. Yet this and this man considers himself of "acceptable ethnic background".

 

 

 

 

 

Fifield never told Turnbull the police were onto his tormentor?

 

" I am struggling to believe everyone." Bolt's effort in his Troll Peter BH's work.

If Fifield and Turnbull's office aren't suspicious enough.  Why was an NBN Co  employee allowed to attend participate in  a formal police raid and allowed  to photograph ALP documentation not relevant to their investigation. ? Further why was he allowed to transmit what was photographed  to persons as yet unknown? Why did the AFP even allow this to happen? These arefar more relevant questions because these actions have occurred during a time when we have no government only an election.

 

 

 

 

 

Will Phillip Adams now say sorry for hailing yet another false socialist god?

Lets be reminded that back in 2013 a collective of paid pundits for Abbott symbolically thought they were awarded a Tony. A god who was going to change no save the landscape of their politically singular Capitalist environment for years to come. It lasted approximately 6 months before they realized they had a real problem on their hands. Bolt is such a dimwit  declaring that an  the oxymoron  "socialist god " even has a meaning for true socialists. But then he also claims to be  a conservative rational humanist agnostic who believes Science is a religion and in the absolute given hierarchy of Western Capitalist Culture as it's evolved and the natural inequalities that have accompanied it's evolution. 

 

Here we have Bolt singing his international anthem it's all about "me " and not about "we"  This anthem justifies 50 people controlling over 50% of global wealth. An elite living life as if in a Hunger Games World seeking out any rebels they feel are not in their interest. Why else has the US a military presence in 154 countries? 

 Given that like Cuba the Capitalist world turned it's back on Venezuela so that when it's only currency for trade was oil is it any surprise that Venezuelans are suffering because countries like the US weren't about to support any transition. Just as they didn't support Cuba  for over 50 years.

 All Bolt is doing is celebrating the "me " culture and dancing on the pain felt by people. Bolt never laughs at Uruguay he stays silent on the politics of Colombia and Chile but no doubt he celebrates the occasion when of a gang of thieves impeached the president of Brazil.  Bolt is just Rumpelstiltskin. If it was the 60s he would have partied at the slaughter of a million Indonesians as well.

 

Surely this is a decision for the boss

 

Bolt supports employers becoming modern day thought police. Remember the days when religion and politics where topics not spoken about in social situations. When doing so was the height of bad manners. Andrew Bolt wants those traditions ended . Thought police in his Australia are  necessary to keep us safe from immigrant thoughts. It just might be a the job of a boss if Australian boards were required to have 50% of it's members to be workers as Germany has done  for years. One can hardly say German Companies are a ship of fools compared to Australian ones could they? Maybe we should go the way of Iceland and  declare boards can't have more than 60% of women or males sitting on them.

Bolt's demand  is for an Orwellian world  policing not only bad  behavior  but  thoughts as well a Trueman Show mono-culture  looked out for from the top down by a free system of neighbors dobbing each other in  a true internalized one party state.  More Nth Korean than Australian. 

Boltism came to Australia in the 1950s withe the Cold War and reds under beds fear mongering by conservatives. Australia became a very different place  then when the  CPA The Communist Party of Australia became persecuted by our then thought police ASIO in the 1950s.  That sort of fear mongering which we see today led us into the 60s and justified us  to assist in the killing of 1mill Indonesians whose politics differed from ours. It then took us to Vietnam .  The 60s were a decade of shame we have forgotten about.