Old Dog Thoughts |
News Corporation employs Right-Wing Broadcasters providing them with a platform ensuring the inequality of speech. Their Social Media Platforms not only advocate conservative, and extreme right-wing wing views. They monitor out most opposing opinions which they are entitled to do. However, they also simply lie when they say they provide an arena for fair and balanced discussion in a no-spin zone. They don't it's all spin.
If the buck doesn't stop with him on aged care, border security or pandemics, what is the point of this Prime Minister?
Scott Morrison says all Australians in Liberal-held electorates on a margin of less than 2% can look forward to free vaccinations when they become available, possibly as early as next year. The Prime Minister said while he hoped to eventually provide vaccinations to all Australians, it was important to prioritise those most in need.
PROF. GEOFFREY BLAINEY: BRUCE PASCOE'S ABORIGINAL HISTORY IS FAKE
Bruce Pascoe, author of the best-seller Dark Emu, is
promoted to schools by the ABC as an "Aboriginal" author, teaching that
Aborigines were actually farmers, living in "houses" in "towns" of more
than "1000 people", with animal "pens. But Australia's greatest
historian, Professor Geoffrey Blainey, says there is no evidence for his
claims. Watch.
6m ago
Andrew Bolt has no credibility or arguments of his own so he turns to Blainey who built his career on white man's history and white man's definition of "evidence. Pascoe didn't say Aborigines were "only" farmers but were "also" who lived in large communities and evidence exists they practised what white men call "farming techniques".
"No evidence" however for Bolt and Blainey simply that there is 40,000 years of no written evidence, 200 years of destruction of language guaranteed evidence isn't as readily available as they demand but hard evidence has been found. But then, there is no definitive evidence that Blainey or Bolt are right other than "in their opinion" and their criteria of proof.
As for teaching history in schools as an immutable fact rather than controversial realities would have the Dutch teaching their children for 40 years post WW2 that they saved rather than persecuted Jews. If that was the case then teaching history would be reduced to an exercise in training rather than learning and that then is an ideological demand. Even Blainey wouldn't dare fail Pascoe on that level only disagree with him. Something Bolt doesn't do. However, he failed to complete his first year at Adelaide University has done very little to research Pascoe and calls in others to attempt to do what he can't. Bolt fails Pascoe Blainey doesn't. (ODT)
BLAINEY ON BRUCE PASCOE'S HISTORY: 'NO EVIDENCE'
COLUMN
Geoffrey Blainey, Australia’s greatest historian, is just as astonished
as I am by the Bruce Pascoe scandal. Why has the fake history of this
“Aboriginal” writer been repeatedly promoted on the ABC and in schools,
even winning a NSW Premier’s literary award?
It's all been said above. Bolt has pet hates and when he's working to rule and lost for anything current to say he drags is pet topics out Bruce being an example. Blainey is a historian but a very poor social scientist and a racist to boot. Social cohesian to Blainey was threatened by "too many Asians allowed into the is country".
neither side is saying what the other
side claims it is saying. John Howard and Geoffrey Blainey are not
seeking to whitewash Australian history, just as Don Watson and
Manning Clark were not seeking to denigrate Australian achievement.
The argument is not about content-it is about emphasis. It is not
so much concerned with the nature of history as it is with the use
of history. As a people, we are trying to come to terms with the
fact that 'Australian' history is no longer written purely from the
perspective of the majority.
In a spirit of reconciliation, some Aboriginal
leaders such as Noel Pearson have also sought to find common ground
by emphasising 'the complexity of the past' and the value of some
transplanted colonial institutions such as (perhaps somewhat
pointedly) the common law.
Andrew Bolt is certainly unlike Stan Grant, for instance, a protagonist for a white man's history of Australia. To say he's he's not seeking to whitewash Australian history is being in denial of what it is he is saying and to think Blainey isn't a Europhile and an Assimilationist is to view his past through some very apologist glasses.
Andrew Bolt simply refuses the fact that Australian history today isn't immutable and any effort in rewriting it is base on the fact and need that it's clearly a history of once-powerful Colonials and a minorities effort to hold onto something they believe they once had and deserved. It's a celebration of power rather than a want to search for any better understanding of the past. (ODT)
CORONAVIRUS TURNS GOVERNMENTS INTO BULLIES
COLUMN
The last straw was police warning I couldn’t even drive my arthritic
dog to his leash-free park, less than a kilometre from my home. Even
more than the ban on leaving Australia, this ban on giving your dog a
lift showed a dangerous shift. This was one of many new virus bans that
are simply meant to make life easier for police and our politicians.
7m ago
Bolt
seems to have ignored the fact that when this unintended issue was pointed out it was immediately changed and what he's describing doesn't exist. Mordy Bromberg was right Bolt's simply a lazy writer loose with his facts who says " I always admit when I was wrong". When were the many occasions we have seen that happen?
Bolt has constantly told us this virus isn't a danger to people under 40 has he talked or will he talk to the 30-year-old doctor that spent days on a ventilator and will he tell him that?
Why is their a photo of Bolt and his only friends accompanying this photo which is so posed unlike the natural one showing him at the tennis? The man is a very lonely egoist. Go drive your dog, Mr Bolt, you're free to But apologise for your kneejerk stupidity.
Government is cramming 15 simultaneous campaigns across television, radio and print in the lead-up to the federal election and the independents are furious at the blow out in cost.
Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has sensationally demanded his successor Scott Morrison deal with "very troubling" allegations about Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton's links to Communist Party-aligned billionaire Huang Xiangmo and Liberal lobbyists.
25m" There was nothing suspicious about the lunch, and Turnbull met Huang more often." Bolt Whacking Turnbull to deflect from Dutton. It may only have been one lunch, but it broke records in the speed it took to issue visas for the family of a man that ASIO had informed Dutton was up close and personal to the CCP. It's a further deflection away from Tony Abbott who had several fundraising at the function rooms of a Chinese man who had the reputation in the whole Pacific Region as being an equivalent of a triad boss. Where any of the donations or expense free offerings ever declared by the Liberal Party on these occasions? Revenge or not of an Australian citizen pales in the face of the fact that both the men seeking to bring Turnbull down were as close to the Chinese as Sam Dastyari was and was pressured to resign from parliament. Bolt's a standing joke when he says "Dutton only did it once". Since when has that been a defence? "I only raped her once" "I only consorted once" and "I had my fingers crossed doing it." Bolt plays the equivalence card as well "everyone does it" that lobbyists take money to arrange meetings Bolt brushes it aside and certainly doesn't want to go down that path. Sam Dastyari had an airfare paid for. Who it might be asked then paid for that lunch? After all, Abbott almost killed his friend Peter Slipper over $900 of cab charges. So why is this so unimportant?
Wow, how good does and powerful does Malcolm Turnbull seem today he's behind everyone whose opposing the Liberals everywhere and they are just his puppets. When your backs to the wall invent a conspiracy, the public is just dumb, dumb enough to buy it. Wasn't Turnbull the ineffective politician that Dutton, Abbott and Murdoch said had to go? The loser, too weak a politician, that was incapable of organising anything whose now towering over the LNP?
WHY ONLY CANCER, BILL?
Good question: Why is Labor leader Bill Shorten offering no-cost treatment for only cancer, and not other more deadly diseases? And why does he forget to say that cancer treatments in public hospitals are actually free, and he cannot guarantee that specialists offering private care bulk-bill?
Pretty hard to comment on an ad for a subscription. However, rest assured the topic it's too technical for Bolt. So it's, yes, a Paywall which will not have a satisfactory answer if subscribed to either. Cancer treatment isn't free if it were our public hospitals would be inundated with long term patients. The population of Australia is aging, and cancers tend to be an aging and very costly disease. What are the other "more deadly" diseases Andrew Bolt refers to, we can only guess? Would they get as much loving support and political heft from a group of otherwise conservative aging voters? Shorten's promise along with Climate Change ought to be a great hit in Flinders and Warringah wouldn't you think strongholds of once traditional thinking let alone in the rural areas of Australia? Far more of an impact than Bolt's cynical criticism of an excellent policy move. Who will stand and cheer him for his wowserism?
The Health Minister has his numbers right on bulk-billing — but that doesn't necessarily mean fewer patients are facing out-of-pocket costs when they see a GP. RMIT ABC Fact Check investigates.
For 6 years the LNP were niggards of Infrastructure with Abbott not just not doing anything but blocking Labor states from doing anything, and when finally we see things getting done you have Andrew Bolt crying stop the works their not that urgent while complaining about overcrowding at the same time. The "free speech" advocate who has called supporters of Blair Cotteral good folks displaying their concerns when on the street can't abide the same when the left and in particular the workers of this state unite to demonstrate the unity of their interests. The Melbourne Union Rally will shut down several city roads, and very few people will be inconvenienced. More people than not standing-by are workers who will support this demonstration. Wages have been stagnant but the income and wealth gaps keep widening and Andrew Bolt never addresses that does he? He complains about the inconvenience and the manners. Style is more important than meaning when enforced and even promoted is just another form of oppression. https://www.facebook.com/AustralianUnions/videos/593460651132691/
The combination of massive education debt, little or no prospect of working in your chosen field, minimal job security and depressed wages doesn't augur well for our future, writes Ian Verrender.
Ann Arbor (Informed Comment) – Electric cars are coming on like gangbusters, as ranges increase and prices fall dramatically. Here are 6 headlines pointing to […]
13m Bolt's body of bullshit "I work 80 hours a week" is based on repetition week after week and it's often bullying dumb and racist. There aren't two sides to bigotry. When have their backs to the wall and lose any sense of perspective they turn to name calling and smearing their opponents and that's KAK Kennerly did. She was responding in a very KKK sort of way to Indigenous Australians protesting Australia Day as a day of mourning and Invasion Day. Back to a wall unable to respond to their complaint, Kennerly attacked like KKK racism was second nature to her and Andrew Bolt immediately lined up behind her and began racist abuse of Aborigines and their children citing child molestation as a specific characteristic and trait of the Aboriginal Community. Bolt even went on to claim reverse racism and unfair thuggishness when the world exploded and called these bullies for what they were. White elitist racists on their back foot. Firstly stats it seems haven't been kept on child molestation over the years. However, until the Royal Commission, they have been hidden. More than 10% of priests were found to be molesters and white. History shows this activity has been in fact going on for over 200 years and Indigenous children were their soft targets. Various Institutions were a recruiting ground for child molesters why because they were known and hidden. Our airports are queued up with middle-class white men boarding planes on sexcapades to screw colored children in poor countries it's at industry levels. Videos and photos are available on subscription to these low life white men and when found out they are more often than not men of Kennerly's and Bolt's respective respectable class. White drug addicts alcoholics have been known to pimp their children out for prostitution yet Bolt and Kenerly make no mention of it and the statistics remain hidden. Parents of all creeds and colours care for their kids no more than Indigenous families the fact that Australian Indigenous people are the loudest and the stats open and not hidden might just show they care more for their children than white people do. Child molestation is a problem however racists declare it to be a racial one when they don't want to face the fact that it's their problem too. There are only two racist broadcasters here KAK and here KKK attack using child molestation as a weapon against Indigenous Australia and Andrew Bolt lining up behind here with his pathetic appeal to the myth of reverse racism when the light of day is shone squarely on them for what they are.
YUMI WHINGES, BUT THE WOMAN SHE SMEARED SUFFERS
Yumi Stynes has no sense of proportion. She complains she's being "silenced" because a press photographer snapped her at her home. Meanwhile the woman she falsely smeared as a "racist" has angry protesters at her home. Jacinta Price, who backed her, has had vile and threatening abuse, but Facebook suspended her account when she tried to show it.
Kennerly if she's suffering can only be suffering for her own stupidity hit by the fact she was racist. If what she calls suffering is really anger at when push came to shove and those victimized screamed we won't take it anymore then she's still the racist she was and I suspect she is the bully who now claims she's the victim and doing it with the assistance of Andrew Bolt whose laying into the thick of it with his Murdoch hammer trying to impress his side.
Jacinta Price well she's missed the point and got caught up in the whole affair not by accident but for self-interest. Yes she's right child molestation is a problem and indigenous communities fear for their kids. However not less than whites. Her political ambitions are based on the white racists of Alice giving her the nod so she's chosen a side and deserves all she gets as well.
Yumi Stynes doesn't have to buy into an argument at all as she was right in the first place when she told KAK every time she opened her mouth she was sounding more racist as she was not just smearing Australia Day protesters but she was doing it racially and using racist remarks to put them down. She has a full grasp of the "sense of proportion" and the molotov cocktail KAK threw.
" I will show you as much of that abuse as I dare on The Bolt Report tonight. You need to know just what savagery Price regularly must endure. Yumi Stynes has no idea what really pressure looks like." Bolt
Yes, Bolt will take up the cry of a victim and reverse racism by savages angered by what their mob has had to deal with for over 200 years. Back then Bolt would support shooting them in his opinion column. After all, they are just savages that know no better.
THE KORAN: EXPLOSIVE NEW BOOK QUESTIONS HOW IT WAS WRITTEN
COLUMN It is often said by people who want to believe it: Christians and Muslims worship the same God. But an academic's much-praised new book on Islam’s most sacred text says the God in the Koran reflects Arab society and treats worshippers as slaves. What's more, it was not written when, where and how most Muslims believe. Was Muhammed even its author?
Wasn't the bible written by a countless number of propagandists and when it became a money making organization it was buying and selling tickets to heaven and issuing Sharia laws by the way of the Catechism? All of this dictated by infallible men who were nominated others to collect wealth and do what they wanted. All of it was recorded but on the charge of death if caught.
You have to laugh don't you "explosive" books about Christian relics like the Shroud of Turin and how the Bible was really written have been published in record numbers and Andrew Bolt ignores them while he keeps demanding he's "not" a Christian but an agnostic as if to give him some level of objectivity and justification for attacking Islam. Like Kerry Anne Kennerly the author of this new explosive book is not only wise but daring.
Bolt speaks as if he were the super-agnostic that walks on water. Now his agnosticism supports beliefs promoted in this new book that advocates One God is really two.
It's a miracle of numbers that defies any logic when one says 1=2 that Andrew Bolt doesn't believe he runs afoul of. The basic tenet of Abrahamic religions Islam, Judaism, and Christianity, is One God and only One. The word one conceptually in religion, math and logic is one. Bolt now in Christ-like fashion has multiplied God in two wow he too does walk on water in his own wet dream. If it were just a matter of interpretation then the Hindus are right there are seven billion gods but even they say all are just aspects of one.
LIBERALS PAY FOR SAYING ME-TOO ON WARMING
The last two Liberal environment ministers pushed global warming and now reap what they helped to sow. Both are being challenged by warming crusaders - Greg Hunt by Liberal deserter Julia Banks, and Josh Frydenberg by Oliver Yates. Lesson: the Liberals can never outflank the Left on warming, and should have challenged this scare instead.
Is Bolt double-crossing his hero Ayn Rand? He sounds more like Trotsky who said any means justifies the end just win at all costs. When political strategy becomes more important than national and global interest and issues investigated it has lead countries to war. It's not strange that the history of Conservative political strategies has done just that and the ALP has saved us from them. the LNP post- WW2 have been no different. They have, lead us to Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria all losing wars and all for the sake of expedient political strategy to win in their small minds. They have cost the lives of countless Australians and rather than say sorry have built monuments and myths about these follies to blunt and hide the shameful facts.
The same can be said of Climate Change and here's Bolt advice "Both are being challenged by warming crusaders - Greg Hunt by Liberal deserter Julia Banks, and Josh Frydenberg by Oliver Yates. Lesson: the Liberals can never outflank the Left on warming, and should have challenged this scare instead."Bolt. Rather than acknowledge data, science, facts, and truth he's advocating the Liberals should have gone to war on it like Trump just denied it and legislate against the reporting of the scientific truths no matter where in the world they come from. It sounds very Nth Korean of Bolt. "And the Liberals will pay double for dogging yet another fight - the one to make the ABC obey the law that says it should be unbiased. Listen today to the ABC. Yet again it is in full flight to promote these challenges against Liberals and push their global warming faith." Bolt
When will the Liberals learn that addressing reality isn't the worst thing any Conservatives can do. They don't need to invest in an protect a single-minded opposing spin of everything progressive as Sky after Dark would like. It only costs them votes like the $220k invested in Warren Mundine's show and the $30 mill given by Turnbull to Murdoch for who knows what? The Murdoch cry to get rid of the ABC is a cry to go to war.
20m Bolt's PAYWALL "Mob Rule" Sensationalism the carrot to draw you into subscribing only to find the mob was a few protesters at a public press conference. Democracy for Bolt is the power of the Press broadcasting behind locked doors to a format unlike the Drum on the ABC but like Bolt on Sky and calling that debating the invisible opposition. Shadow boxing is an Olympic Sport in Bolt's mind.
11mFord resigned any wonder Nine have taken over Fairfax and now with News Corp, Nine, and 2GB, we have a policy of manners, no angry women, no angry commentary by any underprivileged, and respect for PMs even if undeserved. Australians one and all are being suppressed in every way culturally and being prevented from calling a cunt a cunt. Mike Carlton was and Bolt yelled sack him he resigned. Bolt has simply taken on himself to do some Ford bashing and has devoted considerable time to pleasure himself while doing it given the length of his blog post but with shortness of expression doing it. If only he could get rid of Miranda Devine he'd be on top of the world but media poorer for it. He hates women who call him out or show him to be what he is but he hates them just as much for ignoring him and not engaging with him. So much so you come to realize what a limited space he obliges them with. Eventually, it becomes clear he hates women as people and prefers them as objects he controls in his life while complaining about reverse sexism.
He's the only breadwinner in his family. He has to take them on holiday. He has no problem "telling" his daughter what to wear or "telling" Muslim women what to wear. Women to Bolt and Blair his mate are "frightbats" if they adopt the style of men, particularly working-class men or sound like unionists they instantly become the enemy. Transgender persons like Cate McGregor started out with sympathy or disguised pity only to be thrown in the gutter because more than any of us they reveal our inhumanity. Bolt then raises his shackles as did the men of the Melbourne Club in the 50s and 60s and wants them banned for destroying his egocentric Dorian Gray image and hold a mirror to his vicious social stupidity.
We simply cannot let Neocons sink the ABC, Democracy or this country will be poorer for it. Watch the DRUM at 6pm starting next week wish it was at 7pm. DEBATE WITHOUT THE SPIN, UNSCRIPTED CHAT BROUGHT TO US. The reverse of the BOLT REPORT a platform to a oneway rosd.
Peter Dutton Blew It Again and Again and Again. (ODT)
The Department has admitted it did not seek any advice from experts in Fijian citizenship law before cancelling the citizenship of terrorist Neil Prakash
Beijing's clear message to US allies such as Australia is that they will pay a steep price for siding with the Americans in the standoff over Huawei, part of a wider struggle between the superpowers for tech dominance writes Adam N