ABC DENIES ITS PELL WITCHHUNT. THEN PROVES IT
HYPOCRITES
Can anyone believe the ABC's claim that it didn't vilify the innocent
George Pell? It protests: "Some of the language thrown around in the
aftermath of the High Court ruling about 'prejudice' and a 'witch-hunt'
against George Pell seems to ignore the first principles of journalism
and the facts." Bullshit. Let me pull apart its pathetic defence.
Andrew Bolt from his bolthole has spent years telling Australians what they should be, never exactly dealing with who and what we are. His energy has been directed at telling us who aren't Australians and shouldn't be here. This week the News Corp vigilante doesn't mention his Herald Sun was ordered to apologise to ex ALP MP Melissa Parke for accusing her of being an anti-Semite. The same can't be said of the ABC. News Corp apologised for something Bolt doubt said and if he wasn't the only defamer he certainly was one of a group.
Andrew Bolt claims to be a traditionalist but one who claims all our Institutions have been captured by the radical left and need to rid themselves of these un-Australian disrupters His his wild generalisations are generally evidenced by the behaviour of some individuals rarely from the broad behaviour of the majority. From a selected few Lebanese individuals, Bolt develops fictional stereotypes to abuse divide and separate them from us all. Lebanese Muslims, Africans and Chinese have all suffered his bigoted abuse which like a stone tossed into a pond spreads and ripples wider and wider. More often with the protection of News Crop, he gets away with it.
Individuals can be unpredictable and dangerous and some are. However statistical data collected on the majority of us in our multicultural shows trends that are quite the opposite. We are predictable and unlike Bolt want to peacefully live here.
Bolt's very existence depends on dividing and fabricating false stereotypes in a narrative confining us to his idea and a fake Australia. He's an aloof, elitist, isolate who claims to be a role model for the real Australia. In this case, it's our Justice System to which George Pell was required to face as all men are if the DPP see the need. Bolt's over imagined conspiracy theories have nothing to do with our legal system which he claims was totally influenced by the ABC Australia's most trusted news service.
While the ABC informs Bolt lectures. If you vote ALP you can't be professional because tradition and truth lie right of centre and support fundamental power and authority structures that have naturally evolved over time. To disrupt them is inviting chaos and societal collapse. In Bolt's mind's eye, he saw institutional corruption in the treatment of George Pell rather than due process.
"Can anyone believe the ABC's claim that it didn't vilify the innocent George Pell and help hound him into jail? " (Bolt). Quite simply Yes! Bolt claims the police brought the charges against Pell, not true. The police investigate an provide their evidence to the DPP that decides whether or not there's a case to answer.
Pell was released on appeal to the highest court in the land. He wasn't declared innocent rather the legal process was found in technical error nothing else matters."the High Court found that the evidence did not meet the required
standard of proof and there was "a significant risk that an innocent person has been convicted" is a statement of principle not what Gerrard Henderson tried to infer on the Bolt Report was a specific statement of Pells innocence, Bullshit back at you Mr Bolt.
Bolt crowing about the ABC without whom he can't exist. His is totally irrelevant posturing and has absolutely nothing to do with the due process of the justice system that ran its course.