Abbott’s recovery continues, despite all the media’s attempts to deny it
The windsock just keeps telling us all he's the Oracle of Delphi Orifice maybe arse hole for sure.
This Orifice has now adopted Essential Poll as his crystal ball as he no longer trusts the other two. The Essential poll allows Bolt to, as he says, "imagine". The reality the government has just lost the university deregulation policy yet another failed major policy plank. That's the reality Bolt calls success.
Study Finds Fox News Only Tells the Truth 18% of the Time
Here is something you will never see reported by O'Reilly. A
Fact-Checking Website Found That Fox News Murdoch Media Only Tells the Truth 18 Percent of the Time.
It's not exactly breaking news to find out that News Corp is
mostly comprised of misinformation or flat-out lies. Anyone with even a
shred of common sense can read their commentary and see
that their columns are nothing more than a propaganda mechanism for
the Liberal party.
A US survey of Fox News found only 8 percent of what they said was
completely True. The other 10 percent was rated as Mostly True.A staggering 60 percent (50 of 83) of comments were found to be either Mostly False, False, or Pants on Fire.The other 22 percent were rated Half True. So in other words, pretty
much nothing Fox reports on or comments about is 100% true, it's either
spin, half true, partly true, or flat out lies. Only 18 percent has been deemed factual.
Bolt would dismiss the results as liberally biased lies.Because anything that's not approved by Fox News or some other right-wing media source is clearly liberally biased propaganda.
It's how conspiracy theorists manipulate their sheep. They perpetuate
some kind of asinine conspiracy, then when it's completely debunked,
they claim the information debunking it is all a part of the conspiracy. The fact is the other media outlets pay little or no attention to News Corp, Bolt or the otherdolts in the stable. They are too busy being professional.
Hating Abbott to death. UPDATE: Abbott haters are an Irish joke
Attack the media Abbott is surrounded by disloyal Australians who are suppossed to support him not deny him. It's all because the unfair media laws that doesn't allow fair and balanced reporting from Murdoch media . The vicious reporting needs to be stopped in its tracks . Adjectives Bolt applies are disgusting, viciousness & hysterical. He even drags drag Gillard into the mix obviously not referring to Tony was an insult even then. What's the issue? Everybody's speaking about Tony and as the old saying goes any news is good news. However not when it comes to Tony it appears.
But the real subtext the money shot change the media laws give Rupert a chance to save Tony.
"Which is really a fantastic piece of rhetoric, isn't it? Fox News, and other right-wing media sources, can lie as much as they want. Then if any other source debunks the nonsense they're spewing, the conservative media simply dismisses it as lies perpetuated by the liberal media.It's how conspiracy theorists manipulate their sheep. They perpetuate some kind of asinine conspiracy, then when it's completely debunked, they claim the information debunking it is all a part of the conspiracy.And that's exactly what O'Reilly and the rest of the right-wing media does." It's Formulaic Murdoch media
Unions NSW hijack Anzac Day
" Mrs Court said the Trade Union movement organised the first ANZAC parade as a fundraiser to help wounded soldiers in 1915. The PVCU float in this year’s parade will be commemorating that commitment to our diggers."
Bolt wouldn't have a bar of that that the Unions actually organized the first ANZAC parade how dare they! Unionists shouldn't have been allowed to enlist fight or die for this country nor should have indigenous people after all they were only fauna.
Malcolm Turnbull picks a side
It's not what Rupert wants. Everybody is Left from where News Corp sits . The notion of fair and balanced news does not exist outside of the Murdochsphere which is small and only benefits a few. Beware should anybody disagree with him as all morality must fit his business model. The battle of influence now since Turnbull raised the possibility of change and with Abbott still holding the reigns. Rupert and his team will be demanding changes in News Corp's interest. Providing News and Information will only be a secondary occupation to changing the Australian Media Laws. Fairness what's best for Australia play no issue in this task it's a business and only business matters
Aboriginal spokesman agrees: it’s a “lifestyle choice”. So where’s the outrage?
Idiot's abound and they can't distinguish between the outrage over Abbott's language as distinct from the conversation about who, how, when and why communities are to be closed.
Abbott said it was a call to a conversation well whose been invited? When and where is it to be held. Why is it needed as no call seems to be being made about white remote communities. Most elders have acknowledged a conversation is necessary and are prepared so get on with it. However there's silence from Abbott on that.
The Left now sounds just like the Islamist Right
Bolt is away or he is repeating his blogs. However if Islamists are right wing.
Let's hear from the Foreign Minister of Israel Mr Lieberman and what he has to say about 20% of his own people. To be Palestinian "citizens" one must recognise a State. It seems the Foreign Minister of Israel does along with Burnside If they are on the same page what page is Bolt on? He's obviously very confused.
"IBILLIN, Israel — Avigdor Lieberman, Israel’s
nationalist foreign minister, stared coolly at the Arab politician
sitting at the opposite end of a glass table during a televised election
debate.
“Why
did you come to this studio, why not to Gaza, or Ramallah? Why are you
even here?” asked Mr. Lieberman, who frequently calls Israel’s Arab
citizens traitors and suggests that their towns be transferred to Palestinian control. “You are not wanted here; you are a Palestinian citizen.”
" A big difference between our society and an Islamist one is the capacity for self-doubt and open criticism. We believe that doubting something and subjecting it to scrutiny is the best way to get to the truth. That is the scientific method. Some alienated young people might misunderstand that diet of critical analysis as evidence of a weak and corrupt society compared with their idealised “pure” religious society that brooks no criticism and has all the answers." Peter Costello
Imagine Bolt declaring a belief in "scientific method" Climate Change deniers believe in no such thing. Their arguments are entrenched in lies and the denial of 97% of professionals in the field. Costello is more than off the point. Americans and Australians find it easy to find Satan in Islam and promise to defeat him with the support of their god. Historically we stole "science" from the Arabs it was originally their intellectual property when we were running around in animal skins.
The West, slouching to Mecca
" Look at the bitter fruits of the hyper-freedoms we’ve granted ourselves after destroying our own faith and tradition. Can this dysfunction and rootlessness really resist Islam?"
Is Bolt the declared non Christian been hiding in the closet not wanting to reveal his Dutch Reform Origins? Hyper-freedoms have we been allowed too much freedom such as multiculturalism.
" Those are just symptoms of a crisis that was set off two centuries ago when Europeans made a wager on history: that the more they extended human freedom, the happier they would be. For him, that wager has been lost. And so the continent is adrift and susceptible to a much older temptation, to submit to those claiming to speak for God. Who remains as remote and as silent as ever."
What's strange is Bolt advocates the hyper-freed speech his focus. He railles against Section 18C. However whilst declaring himself non religious time and time again for him the individual competing in a free market is the ideal. He can't seriously agree he's wrong. That Islam is not the aggressor but the salvation from the breakdown of Christianity?
Michel Houellebecq is the author of the fiction Soumission Bolt seems to suggests the book praises Islam yet he was taken to court for slandering it Further the book is fiction. Houellebecq said "in court he did not despise Muslims, but held contempt for their religion adding that like Christianity and Judaism it was based on “texts of hate”. The court dismissed the case against him.
Another lifestyle choice you pay for
- 40 per cent of children from jobless households on welfare by age 20
- 39 per cent of children follow parents’ footsteps and live off taxpayer
- 12 per cent of children under 14 are growing up in jobless families
The purpose is to shock and draw attention away from the fact that there are 150,000 jobs and 750,000 unemployed so we have an article here suggesting that it's the fault of the jobless for their unemployment that their position is a "lifestyle choice" I'm sorry that's not a statistical avowl that's reality. 6.3% unemployment is a reality. Government job cuts is a reality. 457 visa rorting is a reality.
Coalition and Murdoch blame for poor lifestyle choice is an excuse.
The Fairfax agenda is plain, but its audience is small
Murdoch Hyena's typically instructed to shoot the messengers and ignore the message the last few weeks of Bolt's blogs have been just that. It must be because Turnbull is leaning Murdoch's way and they are his chorus. It's coming from Andrew Bolt whose Bolt Report has a rating of 62,000 the lowest and totally unprofitable show on Ch10. Why is it there it's produced by Murdoch to simply run down his opposition not to provide any information. Look at this blog what information can be gleaned from it? It's telling Murdoch press readers not to listen to anyone but them as the world , Australia is being invaded by the left. It merely bays at shadows
Why are these politicians protecting this union?
Workers are entitled to associate as is business. Business in terms of dollars and sense costs the community more in terms of any crimes crimes committed yet is never blamed. Rogue Advisers are blamed for Banking's systemic rorting. Rogue Stockbrokers for Ponzi Schemes, Rogue Realtors for shonky development projects. It's billions not millions of dollars loss to ordinary Australians. Yet the focus is on the unions why? Because they just might get workers a $4 pay rise instead of a pay cut.
Hairs stand up on the backs of necks to protect a contractor in a dispute but when thousands of people are ripped of by the banks what is it we here. "Get a lawyer." If severe treatment and examination is to be accorded unions who represents 1000s of workers why isn't the same level of investigation applied to banks,developers and stockbrokers. It's quite simple who needs the most protection.?
Furkan Derya not to laugh
The Bevis and Buttheads of Murdoch media the Fratbrats who snigger away at any discovered humour but cry foul when Germaine Greer tells Julie Bishop to bare her tits. I bet they secretly sniggered at that as well but cried foul for the opportunity it provided to offend feminists
IPCC vultures rush to feed on Cyclone Pam
This blog is completely unsourced as the link to the IPCC statement does not work. However any advice to a nation whose housing has been totally blow away about building better housing shouldn't be mocked. It's common sense. Guess Bolt's worried about the Foreign Aid $5 mill we provided for 250 000 people. He finds it excessive for restoring grass huts.
I'm pretty sure the IPCC did not attach one event to any scientific theory.
" Oh, and the planet’s atmosphere has not actually warmed for some 17 years." Bolt
2010 and 2005 are the two hottest years on record, and the warming trend continueThis outdated claim cherry-picks an unusually hot year -- for a period of time, 1998 was the hottest year on record. But two years have been hotter since then. NASA reported in January 2013: “With the exception of 1998, the nine warmest years in the 132-year record all have occurred since 2000, with 2010 and 2005 ranking as the hottest years on record.” It is also important to remember what NASA reported in 2010: “global warming theory does not posit a linear, year-to-year increase in temperatures.”
Citations:1-http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012-temps.html 2-http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/features/201002_coldsnap/
No comments:
Post a Comment