Tuesday, 31 March 2015

Andrew Bolt's Blog 31/3/15; Bolt's Fire and Brimstone attack on Rachel Griffiths; Bolt like Monsanto Lobbyist; Media Watch, Science even Medicine Biased thank god for the Telegraph; Climate Change even the Chinese are talking;

 

 

Essendon cleared. So much for the “blackest day” in sport

Any band wagon will do if your the bugle  boy of company Z

 

Essential poll - gap narrows

6 pts is far from 2. We don't seem to bearing much at all from the government which is definitely in their favour. However it won't last and as soon as their usual one sided conversations begin again the polls wi reflect the truth yet again.

 

Tax reform? Forget it

McCrann's comment is as informative as we all are certain of death and taxes. How is it foreign companies pay nothing? How is it Netflix can sell it's product in Aus and not charge GST? How is it they can even use it as an advertising ploy? Lacking an agenda, the Abbott Government’s time is running out

Aboriginal children are trapped by rapists in tiny communities. Can the Abbott-haters now discuss?

Sorry Karl O'Callaghan  writes a great vilification piece rather than an article of fact 39 cases of STI's does not sound high in a population of 250,000. Is he suggesting the diagnosis and treatment is far higher and that medical practitioners have been breaking the law and falsifying evidence? Everything said is anecdotal. He even uses quotes dating back as far as 2007 when the Intervention began. Arguments used then to justify it's implementation. Arguments used back then were proved  false and simply lies to justify the Intervention. Why would O'Callaghan need to refer to quotes from 2007 to make the government case in WA in 2015? Maybe because it worked for Howard back then and it will work for Abbott now?

As for Bolt's call for a discussion Bolt is calling for a media discussion. Aboriginal elders have asked a date a time and place for real discussion and consultation ever since Abbott made his announcement. Where is it? Is Bolt suggesting he's the man to lead a realistic discourse? Give us all a Break. 

This link is all anecdotal heresay of one man with fruit salad epaulettes. I'm Karl does not constitute evidence. One could ask why there were only 39 cases reported in 2013 Who and where were they? Who was involved. Might I suggest the drunk brain damaged and drugged men running amok in remote communities don't have the where with all to use protection. If rape was as frequent as is suggested and STI's prevalent they would have spread like a bush fire. How many unwanted pregnancies were there ? How is it no charges were laid by police against the medical staff? Were any people struck off or fired? All accusations are pointed in one direction none any authorities no forensics nothing. Why? We have to close the communities and we need a shocking excuse. 

Their is one observation that yeilds an element truth when it comes to News Corp and it's close association with Industry groups. It's support of this government is not gratis. There will be a tipping point.

Governments Pay News Networks To FAKE Stories All The Time : “The news isn’t there to tell you what happened. It’s there to tell you what it wants you to hear or what it thinks you want to hear.” – Joss Whedon

 

How did Q&A let a conservative into the audience?

Bolt lies all studies ever made on the audience have shown an excess of Liberal voters to Labour. It's something you will never hear from Andrew Bolt who always cries out for reasoned discussion in a world of pinkos. His Bolt Report is the lowest rated discussion panel on TV fully weighted with conservatives he's lucky to get 50,000 viewers. Q&A is a moderated show with an audience which Bolt couldn't handle unless drugged or all conservatives. Listen to the indignation he put's on it alone tells all.

Murdoch media thrives on on lies to maintain it's interests. News Corp is better named Fiction Corp  Rupert Murdoch’s Media Empire Pushes Baseless Conspiracy Theory That Google “Controls The White House” Fox News, Wall Street Journal, And New York Post Mimic Murdoch By Attacking Google

 

Ted Cruz: why I’m a sceptic

Heaven help us all he must watch the Bolt Report of Fox News. He will not win the nomination. He's got into congress  on the Tea Party ticket. He as not won any issue he's fought since being there other than being as wacky as Sarah Palin. The amusing thing he's even to crazy for the Tea Party and embarrasses them  Ted Cruz’s Biggest Liability Is Probably His Constant Lying

 Scientists: Ted Cruz’s Climate Theories Are a “Load of Claptrap”

 

Frightening. Superstitious catastrophist in charge of US foreign policy

Honestly Bolt there are Pacific Islanders who we will no doubt be happy to accomodate on Nauru if it's not underwater or Manus if: Global sea levels to rise more rapidly as Antarctic ice melt accelerates

However that's the anti- religious warmists message  talking and Kerry preaching. Your faith in science denial hardly bodes well with 127 countries taking climate change issues more seriously.You are losing the political debate you know. China Ramps Up Rhetoric on Climate Change (from @Truthdig)

 

Note to Media Watch; calling out lies isn’t “bias”. And if bias is bad, what of the ABC’s?

86 articles on the NSW election were examined in the Telegraph 3 only said anything pro Labour that's a statement of fact. The Telegraph articles were more comment and opinion than news. Another statement of fact. Sorry this sounds more like research  to me not just biased opinion. Are you suggesting all research is little more than biased opinion? I guess you don't send your kids to the doctor but search out someone at News Corp.

Media Watch charter is to examine the media. That very charter obliges results and should the statistics displease you it reveals your bias not theirs.  Your lack of support for facts is what's biased. Isn't strange just how fervantly biased you are.

 

A party without Ferguson isn’t worth voting for

There are two Fergusons in the Labour Party Bolt brothers .  Is  one hate filled should the other be invited to join the Liberals? Would he be Left or Right of Turnbull who  could be ask to leave. Your admiration for Martin Ferguson has no bounds. I'm sorry, the excess you show is beyond belief.

 

Billy Gordon faces second domestic violence claim. UPDATE:  What did Labor know?

I'll just skip to the end. 

 " All starting to smell like Labor’s defense of Craig Thomson. Power over principle." 

The benefits of this statement is to deflect attention away from Abbott and their continuing failure to get any of their policies passed. One could be reminded however of 10 Liberal MP's who had to resign for their illegal escapades. However distraction seems the best option under the circumstances. Bolt does little or no work in these lengthy cut and paste excercises done for him.

Destroying a church to the cheers of an actress on the ABC

 "It had been the home of priest Ronald Pickering, who was found to be a pedophile by the Catholic church but was never brought to justice before his death."

"It's always been a difficult building for us to drive past because there's been so much tragedy and complicated feelings, I guess.

 "We've all attended many funerals of boys that we now know were abused by [Father Ronald] Pickering ... and other perpetrators in the parish - at the actual church that it occurred in."

Bolt who for the purposes of appearance has always said he's not a "godbotherer rises above us all to " pour out his sanctimonious crap as if he were in the very pulpit itself recieving  God's given word of fire and brimstone. He pours it out and on an ex-parishioner Rachel Griffiths who has more connection to that Brighton building than Bolt ever had and  still does. It's  where she grew up.

Why is there no compassion in Bolt?  It's a media opportunity  a chance to vent and attack the left leaning Rachel Griffiths yes and  the ABC. All this hypocrisy with not an ounce of empathy for those connected to that buildings history and the anguish that took place there 70's and 80's. Anguish that might have caused mental harm to any number of people and possibly resulted in setting the church alight. Bolt shows more venom at the burning of a building that the deaths of 150 passengers at the hands of a mentally distressed co-pilot.

Bolt's  symbolic tirade abuse of Grifiths is more like the orgasms of Fr Ronald Pickering felt while molesting boys, some of whom are now dead. Bolt might as well be castigating those boys for their lack Christian forgiveness of Pickering's sins.  His attitude the past is the past suck it up get on with it.

You are  disgusting Bolt and not too bright. It has nothing to do with  catholics but a lot to do with the church.


 

Can Labor finally kick its deadly Greens habit?

Basically what we have is a denier's rant against  climate change and those who  against the use of fossil fuels or nuclear energy. Bolt is doing his lobbyist rave. A week or so ago he was telling us that radiation levels at Chernobyl and Fukishima were harmless. However I doubt if we gave him a free ticket you'd see Bolt holidaying there. Lobbyists like Bolt don't need to know anything about the science all they want  to do is create an element doubt. Is it strange when cigarette executives were asked if they smoked they all said "don't be stupid we are not idiots"  It's what  Bolt does but you will never see him put his money where his mouth is. This video is a great example of doing a Bolt

Lobbyist Claims Monsanto’s Roundup Is Safe To Drink, Freaks Out When Offered A Glass | Crooks and Liars Bolt claimed Radiation from Chernobyl and Fukashima was safe. We should buy him a ticket.


Billy Gordon faces second domestic violence claim

Here is the pleasure Bolt gets picking at  old scabs his banner is Billy Gordon old  news that all parties agree was wrong and shouldn't have happened. The politics of the situation is really the context of the blog which has nothing to do with Gordon anymore as  it's about the aftermat. Bolt loves to kick dead bodies along the way if there's any opportunity. Never let it be said that that Bolt isn't media's A hole

 

More reform destroyed by a Senate drunk on saying no

 The Link is Blocked the Blog is Unsourced 

However the Senate is what it is because the two major parties provided their preferences in such a way as to create it. The Senate is no accident the Libs traded preferences at all costs to get this result.  It is not the fault of the electorate.  Maybe they should have given far more thought to what would happen if they got into government in the first place. Howling after the fact is jus a distraction it hasn't stood them in good stead it's made them seem incompetent.  However it's a tack Bolt continues to pursue because it shifts blame.

The inability of this government to negotiate with the Senate is a street created by them for the sake of power. The fact that it doesn't work is theirs.

 Universities want a reasoned funding plan a total package  they don't want a potpourri of unintegrated ideas and it's something we should all be grateful for.

No comments: