Andrew Bolt's Blog,26/6/15; How come we wound up with Andrew Bolt?; Tony Abbott needs to be charged under the RDA Section 18C; Bolt calls for State funded comedy to be vetted by GeorgeBrandis; Two convictees Abbott and Bolt point fingers at another breaking UNHCR rules; Bolt's illusory smoke screen
According to Bolt you shouldn't judge a community by exceptions. He applies it to the Nazi clad bogans in Reclaim Australia. Bill O"Reilly Fox News repeats the same argument commenting on 9 blacks killed in Charleston. It's a Newscorp mantra but only on selected issues. There are some racists in America and even here but America and Australia are not racist is there claim. The problems we see are inherent in the deviant cultures of these communities and not the systemic nature of our history or social structure. However is a 5 year old indigenous child taken to court for stealing a $3 chocolate the norm. Wouldn't it be front page news if she were white and an indictment on the system that put her there?
Oh Oh Bolt is contrdicting himself again because his rule of exception doesn't apply to Muslims. When it comes to Muslims he looks for exceptions to prove a generalization that a definite and extreme Islamist movement exists in France and one is growing in Australia. How is it Bolt hasn't told us about the extremist Jewish anti-Christian movement growing in Israel that burnt down an ancient Christian church. No that's an exception. Selective perception of a rightsplanation from a bigot bounces wherever it wants and is never an analysis looking for truth.
Remember when a coroners inquiry denied Bolt's explanation of events and that Monis was not the radical Islamist Bolt wanted him to be.
In Abbott's words our PM heads must roll!!!!
The government: " It does not want the ABC to be Liberal but balanced." Bolt calling Abbott who asked"whose side are you on" a liar.
All on one page Labour for the ABC. The ABC is against Shorten. The ABC is against Abbott. LNP sides against the ABC. The ABC helps the LNP Shorten, crumbling, loses key votes in the ABC. Bolt seems more than confused
Look how balanced the Bolt Report is in search of truth or just preaching their. How confused is this jerk???
How come we wound up with Andrew Bolt?
" When a Labor leader has lost even the ABC, he’s lost all hope:" Bolt spends so much effort blaming the ABC for it's left wing bias and here he's declaring himself an idiot saying that the ABC has turned on Shorten.
I believe Abbott's Boss Hog scatter gun approach to political point scoring is the LNP order of the day. It's calculated every time he opens his mouth it was merely done to mask the lack of any real policy principles. Currently there are none. So Abbott just keeps contradicting himself confident anything he says will be supported by a Newscorp smoke screen.
Basically the bruh ha today is there to disguise the real issues Australia is currently facing and not the fluff being promoted. 1) High Unemployment and growing. Australia Post declared 2000 jobs lost 2) Higher numbers of working poor 3) Increased casualisation of work 60 hours a week. People are not lazy and they can't plan or save. 4 ) Increasing personal debt $33 billion at 20% Bank levels of interest and charges are at loan sharking levels 5) depressing wages and shrinking the middle class 6) Corporate welfare and perks for the wealthy and on it goes. Where is Joe Hockey always in hiding.
All the cultural side issues Bolt goes on about are political distractions to take attention away from the main game that this government is insuring the income and wealth gap of Australians gets wider while the LNP are successfully driving this economy into recession.Wait till the housing bubble bursts and the real pain reveals itself. What will be their excuse?
Yesterday's call by Bolt was for Gina's Indian style regulation free economy in which a whole country politicians and judiciary are all in the control of Industrial mega-moghuls who do whatever they want and we pay. We pay for their mistakes in greater proportion to their loss and share in their profits in lesser proportion. It's why 1 man could build his family home in Mumbai for $1.3 billion some 10 years ago and CEO's can command salaries of above $15 mill even in the worst of times.
Andrew Bolt discredits Gerard Henderson's ability to be a suitable guest to defend the conservative position on Lateline. He's right in that often Henderson doesn't know what he's talking about. University of Sydney Professor of Public Health Simon Chapman hits back at his fan in The Australian."Chapman: sorry, Gerard, I actually am an authority on health"
However Bolt would have refused to take the seat offered to Henderson on Lateline himself.
" Henderson was right to say those words suggested approval of joining the
Islamic State, however they were intended, and Alberici was wrong."
Bolt overlooks the fact that Mallah has constantly and publicly declared his opposition to ISIS. Bolt can't accept that because Tony Abbott as part of the US lead coalition that supports the Nusra Front. We in coalition with the US and Turkey are giving them assistance. Mallah is in sympathy with the FSA and Jabat al Nusra. They are on the same page. However Abbott's verballing and demeaning Mallah for a ten year past guilty plea for which he's paid and sympathy for the same terrorists as Abbott. Abbott is breaking UNHCR International laws on discrimination of rights when he himself is a convicted criminal and he's breaking our RDA Section 18C. Abbott has no policies he's simply boss hog from the Dukes of Hazzard. Imagine if a concerted campaign was run on checking the criminal and chequered pasts of the leading members of Abbott's and Bolt's leading Australians, their "groupthinkers"
Satire is out Buttheads ability to think. He only involves himself with it when he feels in safe territory and he can post it from Bevis Blair's blog. Bolt would feel more comfortable with a Marie Antoinette style gags "let them eat cake"or more so Abbott style "heads must roll". What about Steve Ciobo's "Julia should have throat slit" Humour from the top down is what Bolt gets off on he doesn't know why but it works for him." How did the Imam find the boy in the long grass?....Delicious" just does it for him.
Link of course a paywall
Bolt would be a jibberring mess if
Mallah was a black, indigenous, transgender, warmist and articulate
Muslim , who arrived by boat. Bolt's brain couldn't handle being ultra racist,
white supremacist, homophobic, denier, Islamophobic anti-asylumist
bigotry all at once and thinking at the same time. But then again I could be wrong he does have the
historic genes that originated from Aalesmere Hollands most Nazi nest.
Oh back to the question on hand. The
ABC is an independant public not government funded body and as such
represents each of the people not just some of the people and definitely
not the government all of the time.
"To add to the insult, Scott
is so clueless that he offensively implies that Abbott and other ABC
critics want the ABC to be a mouthpiece of the Government - or to be
as overwhelmingly pro-Liberal as it is now- pro-Labor and pro-Greens -
when the critic’s real demand is that the ABC simply honour its legal
obligation to be balanced:
"Bolt the critics being Newscorp want it to do nothing but at best
don't want it there at all. There's is a desire for an Orwellian press.
What Bolt doesn't seem to understand Mallah and Abbott are on the same
page. However because of how he has treated him Abbott needs to be
examined under Section 18C of the RDA
The hypocrisy caravan rolls on . It's
banners and rhetoric little more than lies and posturing. Convicted
criminals shouldn't even be given a public platform by publicly funded
independent media. Any wonder recidivism is so high with attitudes like
Abbott's allowed in our the community. Professor Triggs is absolutely
correct. Tony Abbott is a convicted criminal himself who used his
cultural capital to overcome his deserved criminal life time of guilt
which
he thinks others should carry.
PM called Mullah a convicted
criminal and
terrorist sympathizer with no elaboration with whom his sympathies lie.
Abbott has declared us members of the
US lead coalition and as such we have been assisting in the Syrian war.
This coalition is anti-Assad and anti ISIS. It supports the
FSA and are now also sympathetic to Jabat al Nusra an affiliate of Al
Qaeda
in Syria. Their sympathy lies in as much as the American coalition are
about to
train Jabat al Nusra fighters in Turkey. In other words we are
terrorist sympathisers and even more active than Mallah. By association
and as a member of the coalition fighting in Syria Tony Abbott is a
terrorist
sympathizer by any definition of the term.
Zacky Mullah has publicly declared
his opposition to Assad and ISIS. His sympathy and support appears to be
with the alliance of FSA and Jabat al Nusra. Am I missing something?
Abbott and Mallah are on the same page. So
by Abbott's own admission he is a traitor to this country
and a terrorist sympathizer as is the USA and the whole western coalition. You can't be a little bit pregnant Mr Abbott.
Apart from this Abbott's ignorance needs examination. He uses ex criminal as an insult,
to humiliate and discriminate against Mullah. That's against UNHCR recommendations. Combine that with the
threat to remove Mullah's sole Australian citizenship and I believe Abbott needs examining
under Section 18C of RDA for vilification.
No comments:
Post a Comment