Sunday, 2 August 2015

Andrew Bolt's Blog,2/8/15; History is what I say it was, Bolt says any historic revision is racist;

 

 

 

 

Bronwyn Bishop resigns

Link None But where is Tony Abbott?

" This should force Tony Abbott to reassess his media advice or his willingness to accept it. " 

Bolt is suggesting Abbott listen to and watch the ABC more often. He's not getting the appropriate value out of News Corp.

Just go

Link many and varied. But where is Tony Abbott?

While everybody is telling Bronwyn Bishop it's time to go the PM has apparently put out a memo requesting his MPs to stop talking about Bishop. To bunker down and pretend nothing untoward occurred."Liberal cabinet ministers were delighted to receive a personal text message from Tony Abbott this week only to learn the content included a prime ministerial instruction to stop talking about Bronwyn Bishop… " 

 Has Bronwyn Bishop got something on Tony Abbott that he doesn't want revealed? Will it soon become an "on the land matter" not to be spoken of?

Why isn't Andrew Bolt running his Stolen Generation Argument on this? If the Finance Department paid these expenses they must be legitimate because it's the official record. Bolt could demand  a list of 10 expenses the Finance Department said weren't legitimate and weren't paid back. Go on , go on show me!!!!! 

Bring the LNP to task Bronwyn Bishop has resigned as speaker of the house. Will it become any fairer?

 

A sinister attempt to gag debate on the “stolen generations”

Link Andrew Bolt, "Rabbitts" Link SMH, Where is Tony Abbott

Before Addressing this blog let me point just how convenient the editing on the Bolt Report was to ensure we didn't hear what Adam Goodes had to say about the 13 year old girl only to hear what Bolt suggests he said. Let me remind everybody it was Andrew Bolt who was found guilty of racial vilification in in our courts not Adam Goodes. It was Andrew Bolt who was found guilty of being untruthful and loose with facts and not Adam Goodes. But lastly it was Adam Goodes who rang and spoke to the 13 year old girl that Andrew Bolt spends so much time defending  not Andrew Bolt. The girl's and Adam Goode's  relationship is fine. What's Andrew Bolt's relationship with that girl she's nothing more than a prop for Andrew Bolt's racist rant a tool to ensure he's noticed.     https://youtu.be/xeBu735nFYw

 Mr Bolt was provided with a list of 260 names of Indigenous Australians taken away by Australian colonial governments in 2006, by Robert Manne:

Bolt's defense "name 10 cases where athorities admitted to taking children because of their aboriginality. Is simply defining history as that provided by institutional authorities. There are no innocent people in jail is a Bolt argument. As a result the 260 cases presented by Robert Manne do not fit Andrew Bolt's definition of the historic record which has little to do with arguing for the true record. It's that insistence and defense that allows some historians to be holocaust deniers. It allows Bolt to argue no unwed  single mothers had their children removed from them unwillingly because signatures were obtained in all cases. Bolt simply insists a perversion of history is the only true history he accepts. In the extreme Bolt has publicly said that no person was here in Australia before his birth and nobody can prove to him otherwise.

What Andrew Bolt denies is possible.“I am just like everyone else here. Muslim, Jew, Christian. We are all Tunisians,” says one charismatic restaurant owner in a Tunis suburb.

No comments: