Andrew Bolt's Blog 3/8/15; Bolt's crocodile tears; Bolt I'm a right wing hero; Bolt I'm a victim of the Australian; The whole Blog is about me Andrew Bolt the Victim;
Link News Corp paywall
No greater racial explanation was whipped up by the denial by Andrew Bolt, the denial that 200 years of internalized history and social psychology hasn't been passed down and contained in some indigenous social psychology. Bolt denies the invasion the race wars the stolen generations is a denial of the indigenous narrative.
However Bolt's feeling of being more a Dutch than Australian even though he was born here is an indication that the internalization of history does exist and is passed from generation to generation . Internalized indigenous history is black and the narrative taught in schools white. Bolt has no place for any recognition of that difference. Assimilation and the total destruction of indigenous culture is his Team Australia. Something that hasn't been possible for the past 220 years.
Indigenous peoples on the other hand see their recognition in the acceptance of differences some requiring changes to both cultures an anathema to Bolt's conservative and white default world. According to Noel Pearson a consensus among the black community is needed to be shown and a body formed that can then negotiate from the bottom up with what he regards is the rest of Australia. However Abbott has rejected funding any such Indigenous conventions to be held pre referendum that's already a decision from the top down.
Bolt's distortion is based on the fact that he claims there is a distinct racial division being requested which isn't the case but rather a distinct body with which to be advised by and negotiated with. Bolt refuses any changes that recognize that a difference exists and it's reflected in internalized social psychological history of some Aboriginal communities who feel different from the rest of Australia. This requires the acceptance of Australia as multicultural society and the recognition that the default position or historic narrative of the current economic and social structure also needs to be changed. That's not just the responsibility of the indigenous population. Bolt fears he just may have to give something away to accommodate this.
" the reconciliation movement does not work for true reconciliation,
where race is irrelevant. It works for permanent division, which race a
permanent wall. Peace is not the goal; only, at best, an armistice." Bolt the Assimilationist and anti- multiculturalist.
Followed by Bolt the egoist it's all du to him
" it now seems to be dawning on the Prime Minister that all I warned of
is coming to pass - and that what he understood as “reconciliation”
looks nothing like what Aboriginal “leaders” have in mind." Bolt claiming to be Abbott's mentor.
Link the Whole Blog is "I'm a hero but have been made the victim"
" Those of us who do dissent should be entitled to have genuinely held views based on experience, evidence and moral principle."Bolt
It's what KKK members believe, it's also anti- Islamists believe however they want laws in place to allow them to act on those beliefs not stop them. Andrew Bolt falls into that class.
When for a second does Bolt believe that commissioners and ex footballers of the AFL agree with him? At worst they might accept his apology. However they are more likely ignore him and it altogether even if they were even made aware of it. Bolt's back down is more likely to be seen as just crocodile tears.
Bolt seems label all his critics and there is a lot far far more than supporters as left wing bullys simply tarring them all with one brush. Yet he advocates people need to be treated as individuals which is quite the reverse of what he actually does. When criticism come from News Corp itself he turns his spite on the editors who he claims fail to take into account News Corp's conservative readers leanings. In other words Bolt labels the News Corp readers as a collective as well. Bolt accuses the editors of not supporting the side. It substantiates the claim he's really not strict on principles.
Bolts prescription for Australia is to be achieved through evolution and the social engineering of values and behaviours from the top down to maintain stability. Any ideas and contradictions found that oppose the inherent in the social structures we have are seen as extremely dangerous and against the national interest. All adjustment to our social fabric need to policed in a manner that basically does not disrupt the status quo. Any disruption to economic harmony is purely cosmetic and fixable.
"
Why have so many people of the Left who would echo every word of the
above not spoken in defence of that principle for one 13-year-old girl
not even charged with breaking the law? "
The moment the girl was found to be 13 by Adam Goodes communicated talked and talked privately a number of times. However not so Andrew Bolt he simply cried for Adam Goodes to be pilloried. In doing so Andrew Bolt ensured his righteousness was heard above others. About a 13 year old, a 13 year old, a 13 year old. could Andrew Bolt have been any louder. He let it be known how he is the great defender of 13 year old girl. The man was just blowing his own bugle.
Sorry your only defending yourself not any principle Bolt. Adam Goodes and the girl are fine your the standout twat.
UPDATE
Here's
the hypocrisy of Bolt. "you'd think Andrew Bolt a graduate from ???
Primary and ??? Secondary School could see a fellow student there as
just another Dutchman and not a member of a separate culture Australia"
Bolt always felt an outsider and more at home in Holland. However he can't accept that others might too have felt that along with their relations going back 220 years and primarily because of their colour and culture. Why didn't Bolt learn empathy from that experience?? Because his default is he's also white.
As a professional misquoter Andrew Bolt knows what Adam Goodes feels like when misquoted but he doesn't care. He knows what the 13 year old feels like that's talked to and reconciled with Adam but Bolt doesn't care. He manipulates peoples arguments words and distorts to serve whatever purpose suits his one trick pony argument. He's been running the same argument for over 10 years whether or not it has any merit or is devoid of truth is of no consequence. The aim is to take any notion of historic and systemic racism out of the debate
Given he has a platform how many times has he declared himself a victim? Today is literally poor man Andrew day? Bolt has access to the technology, resources and platform of News Corp that others don't. How on earth are we meant to believe his voice of bigotry holds any information, truth or discussion applied for our benefit when it's simply divisive and does little more than blame others.
Bolt, in telling Goodes what he should have said simply proves he has never listened to what Goodes actually said and doesn't care. But "oh I'm been victimized" Bolt turns to being pedantic to correct a record when it comes to himself and the Australian with no apology for doing the same to Goodes. Bolt says that the job of News Corp is to do little more than to appeal to it's readership and their values not inform but to act in unison with an ultra conservative minority.
" The Australian has lost its head and its direction. The fact that it is increasingly at serious odds with its readership"
" That would be poor form against anyone, but against a News Corp
colleague? Against a conservative who better represents the newspaper’s
base? Against someone who has brought sense to the debate?"
Link The World Tribune
" The barriers include “fences inside cities to anti-migrant walls and separation barriers to counter-insurgency” barricades,"
The reasons for walls are varied not however according to Bolt it seems. Australia has a natural sea wall that we can "tow back boats" and send Asylum Seekers to our equivalent of Guantanamo. The Jewish wall was the first to try to contain a country and not just a city. However the reasons for walls remain varied the stupidity of Bolt's question is neither journalistic or in any way informative about the use of walls. “I
am just like everyone else here. Muslim, Jew, Christian. We are all
Tunisians,” says one charismatic restaurant owner in a Tunis suburb.
What all supporters of fascism would love to control is Independent and Social Media. They do in one party states. Is there some sort of morality clause that precluded conservatives from standing up in support of Bronny Bishop? Have we seen the poor Bronny banners flying at News Corp or anywhere? Is this just an opportunity to promote some vague self righteousness of News Corp the least trusted media organization in Australia?
Link News Corp paywall. Our PM is back in hiding!!
"
So shut up and pay up, and do not dare even ask “how much?”
That's the problem cost/benefit without informed science and it's ongoing discovery. When that's lost it becomes an argument of vested interest and little more. If the science sceptics are only 3% but want equal time in the debate then all balance is destroyed. Kenny, Peter the Troll, Andrew Bolt decry the call for balanced debate by promoting that voice. They never really define balance? Other than financing Dr Lomborg and giving him academic intergrity undeserved.
Link Andrew Bolt
Bolt's Australia is not by nature a country of differences but one of sameness like Andrew Bolt or at least it should be. Why can't Dandenong be more like Malvern because of the disproportion of sinners immigrants there. Why can't Adam Goodes be more like Andrew Bolt? Why can't Goodes accept the barbs and arrows of vilification as Andrew Bolt does? Why can't he be more Christ like? Like Andrew Bolt.
" I mention that not to get your sympathy, let alone to trivialise racism — a sin against our common humanity." Bolt
From the man who doesn't believe in the collective or understand the the true meaning of victim. From the man who tells us the term "white c@#t" is the same as "black c#$t" that they are simply impolite. Bolt believes that there is no context or 200 year history that differentiates those terms unless we want to believe it. History according to Andrew Bolt is just from individual birth self made and therefore fundamentally equal.
From the man who doesn't believe in the collective is telling us the collective is innately just. It's coming from a man who believes in the goodness of human nature and the necessary policing of sinners and of course we know who they are.
"collectively, we’re not bad, and never have been. And I say that even after being at the wrong end of this public stoning."
" I have an unshakable faith in Australia that comes from growing up in lots of it."
This is the voice of the self righteous prick who declared himself once to feel more Dutch than Australian. That once had a best friend who was indigenous and black. Does he still have that friend today? Does he still feel more Dutch? This feeling of confusion that Bolt felt and acknowledged came from his past and was his internalised history. However Bolt doesn't allow Adam Goodes to have the same and that many indigenous feel that history which was and still is racially defined. A history not of men born free and equal Australians. Bolt has no understanding that his default Australia is white. He denies his internalized social psychology is white. He labours under the false belief he's a self made charitable man who can point out all the sinners and the errors of their ways.
Link Andrew Bolt
" You will find there thoughtful and insightful articles making points virtually no newspapers now dare publish."
Here is the perfect example of Andrew Bolt's extreme bias. He uses it with climate change, on the indigenous on Muslims and even single mothers etc The man is a one trick pony.
If there's 97 % consensus against whatever Bolt has to say he demands 50% media attention to promote his extreme views before he declares there's a fair and balanced debate taking place. Bolt looks for community excepitions the 1% to prove his point. Dallas Scott is held superior in standing and wisdom than the majority of Australians that disagree with him in particular the indigenous.
Let a single Muslim, warmist or indigenous person run an argument counter to Bolt. If they are typical of the 97% majority and then poor Bolt cries victim is just not given a fair hearing & is misunderstood. Because when Andrew Bolt walks on water he is doing it for us all even though deviant on most issues in the same manner. He's one of the righteous few.
Link SBS
" Commentator Andrew Bolt should have been sacked for saying the stolen
generation was a myth, Northern Territory senator Nova Peris said."
Sorry sacking irresponsible commentators who think their journalists is what's being called for. Some editorial responsibility that searches for an element of shared truth. We Australians have a right to demand our history to be shared and not just a perversion by a minority. After all history is a social construction and as such should not be polluted by a racist for the purpose of attention. We don't allow pornography in primary schools and demand standards of decency. There is no "we" or our story in Bolt's telling of the past. Shouldn't we demand reason from our press?
Andrew Bolt has the persona of a religious zealot a belief he's a Christ like figure "
"That is freaky. And worse will be that hardly a single political commentator will attack her for these sinister views."
Just how holy does this man thin he is when he says if " Gillard Government listened instead of threatened - could have saved the lives of another 1000 boat people who later drowned."
"Likewise, listening to my arguments on the “stolen generations” could have actually saved Aboriginal lives, too - the lives of defenceless children left in deadly danger."
The majority of the press, the left, academia, the indigenous are out of step with Bolt. Most of this country seems to be out of step with him. When native children were removed from their parents care because they were deemed by Bolt like figures not to have sufficient means to support them it's not stealing them . However when your getting paid in tea and corned beef and the Native Lands Department withheld your wages and claim the records are lost deeming it necessary for your children to be "saved "by the church the sense of theft becomes real.
When one sees indigenous people jailed today for breaches of law that whites aren't even pulled over for. One has every right to believe there is a systemic imbalance happening. An imbalance that wont be found declared in terms of injustice.
Link Andrew Bolt..Tony Abbott should have stayed hiding
" Abbbott refused to demand his friend and ally resign.That decision, not supported by any of the three big rivals for his job -
frontbenchers Malcolm Turnbull, Julie Bishop and Scott Morrison - has
exposed flaws in Abbott’s judgment.
"
Ally or not she was speaker of the house and Abbott the leader of government knew she was required to be independent his silence or support for he broke that principle the others understood that and acted on principle not side. Abbott's stubbornness almost cost him dearly
No comments:
Post a Comment