Andrew Bolt's Blog, 15/11/15; Abbott slapped down Andrew Bolt on every point; Bolt has more in common with Anders Brevik Europe's worst terrorist; They were all bar 1 Europeans; Turnbull did not slap Tony Abbott. Bolt is trying to raise Lazarus;

 

 

 

 

Nil Hills-ism

This is a ISIS, Bolt, Mahathir Butthead joke. What's even funnier is Bolt's shock horror faux outrage. 

The French were for the past 5 years the biggest supporters of the Syrian rebels. While they were bombing Isis in Iraq they left them alone in Syria. They changed that. The Russians also started to bomb Isis and Hezbolla supported Assad. Isis suddenly found itself under the hammer in Syria. They have learned to use social networks to their advantage. If Syria was difficult then they simply took their war to their enemy and did it with ease. The change in policies of Hezbollah, Russia and France have resulted in the suicide bombings in Beirut, the downing of the Russian jet and Paris. If Australia puts boots on the ground Bolt will have the war he wants on home soil. You watch he will be gunning for it. That is not a joke.

 

 

 

Mahathir blames Jews for the Paris slaughter

Mahathir is as mad as Bolt both along with ISIS all promote extremism in it's worst form. Bolt would love to see a repetition of Paris here in order to be the center of attention and not just the mad fringe.

" Seriously?  Are these terrorists so utterly without reason that hatred of Israeli Jews makes them slaughter French Christians?" Bolt has no shame if he heard the names of some of those killed in Paris they all weren't French or Christians there were Muslims among them as well. Is Bolt suggesting all Australians are so dumb as to believe any of the nonsense he tells us? He sounds like Mahathir twin. However Mahathir is accurate in as much as the Israelis have a history of terrorist behaviour.

 

 

These tears, tweets and tributes will not stop the terrorists

"A challenge to our leaders: tell us precisely what you plan to do that really will stop the terrorists.

Spare us tears and tributes. Spare us platitudes and sentiment.  Give us plans. Action.

Tell us about reforming Islam, controlling immigration, shutting down hate-preachers and destroying the Islamic State and al Qaeda.

The rest is just flowers at a funeral. It will not stop the next one."

Bolt asks to be excused for speaking like a cunt he doesn't deserve to be .

Straight from the mouth of a right wing war monger who want's troops on the ground as long as they aren't his kids. From the mouth of the man who says moderate Muslims aren't doing anything or saying anything which is a complete lie because they are. From the extremist who like ISIS wants to eliminate the tolerant of the gray zone the zone that most Australians  Australian Muslims occupy. We are like Ed Husic integrated Australians that Andrew Bolt wants to alienate but can't.

 Does he for a moment think National Security or Turnbull are going to tell him their plans. He is the hate monger and the reason why even Abbott says we need the RDA and Section 18C. You were dumped by Abbott Bolt.

After Paris there’s no question: put Peter Dutton back on the National Security Committee

If we are reminded of the series of public errors made by Dutton one  really wonders why he still is a cabinet minister let alone one  recalled to National Security. Remember his big mouth the blunder he made on public TV that brought Abbott's career to an end.

Tony Abbott slapped Bolt down today when he tried to get Abbott to agree  to the fact that of the 12,000 Syrians we are about to admit  should  all be Christians. Australia has no choice it is like every nation we need to accept the most needy not Bolt's choice. Bolt's complaint 2 families of 4 that have arrived are Muslims.

The Syrian passport found has not been confirmed to be genuine Mr Bolt so why are you making out as if it is? If Tony Abbott is supporting the Turnbull government. Why would or should anybody pay attention to you? Weren't you embarrassed enough on the Bolt Report?

" However, the Syrian passport found at the site of the attack might be fake, a US intelligence official told CBS News, pointing out that it did not contain the correct numbers for a legitimate Syrian document and the picture did not match the name."CIA

 

 

 

 

On The Bolt Report today, November 15 - Paris attacked

Well it was interesting to see Tony Abbot slap  Andrew Bolt down. All credit to Tony Abbott.  He did it on every point Bolt tried to raise showing him to be just too too extreme. That the war was against Islam no it wasn't a war against Islam. It was a war against ISIS a very extreme terror group misusing Islam. As Abbott said Devil quotes the scriptures both Muslim and Christian boy was Bolt peeved. 

Bolt wanted Abbott to have Muslim leaders declare a Fatwa. Abbott said he didn't know what that entailed and Bolt appearing the expert couldn't even begin to explain what that even entailed. It  made him sound not only frustrated but stupid and ignorant. Even Albrechtsen knew to stay out of that.

 Bolt could not get Abbott even to support getting rid of the Racial Discrimination Act was wrong. he just couldn't win a trick. So should we toughen our immigration laws or even define the type of refugees we should allow entry to not be Muslim. Basically Janet Albrechtsen his News Corp buddy was the only person on the Bolt Report to even nod at that Abbott definitely said did not agree with Bolt on that either. 

 The only thing Bolt had to offer that made any sense was that you can't account for the children of immigrants accepted in to Australia and he is the perfect example of that fact. He is an extreme right wing Australian who encourages hatred of a faith and not just extremists like himself of any colour or creed. 

 To declare France the UK Belgium and Germany as having the same history in relation to Africa and the Middle East as we do  is to simply show his ignorance. It shows a denial of the success Australia and Canada has had with multiculturalism and the admiration with which we were once held. Bolt showed clearly that like ISIS he is driven by  ideology and not reason . His is extreme right wing and mirrors the same extreme sentiments as ISIS. He wants war and he sees no middle ground Woul he send his kids into battle? No way only yours!!   Propaganda and Islam: What you’re not Being Told

  

 What you will never hear from Bolt or Albrechtsen they demand it as if it doesn't happen however it does and they don't want us to know.

 Top Sunni Muslim cleric condemns 'hateful' Paris attacks

 Iran's Rouhani brands Paris attacks 'crimes against humanity'

https://youtu.be/wfYanI-zJes

 

 

 

The Paris Attacks Were Probably All About the “Grayzone”

Why Andrew Bolt and ISIS are on the same page. They want to rid us of the Gray zone.

As far as Bolt is concerned "we" have imported a war against Islam. Muslim leaders must change. We should turn our backs on the Middle East and adopt a Christian Australia policy as we once had a White Australia policy. Bolt might be the mirror opposite of ISIS but his policies are the same.

November 13, 2015| News | Dan Sanchez

Tragically, with today’s attacks on Paris, the cycle continues apace. As I wrote in March:

“To take a more recent example, as Juan Cole convincingly argued, the unjust violence of the Charlie Hebdo attacks in Paris were meant to polarize or “sharpen the contradictions” between Muslims and non-Muslims in France by provoking unjustly violent oppression:

‘Al-Qaeda wants to mentally colonize French Muslims, but faces a wall of disinterest. But if it can get non-Muslim French to be beastly to ethnic Muslims on the grounds that they are Muslims, it can start creating a common political identity around grievance against discrimination.’ (…)

The neocons and the terrorist leaders, as Justin Raimondo put it, are “funhouse mirror counterparts” of each other. Both “see world events through a Manichean prism,” and seek to more completely realize that severe dualism by polarizing the world into two irreconcilable camps deadlocked in a civilizational Ragnarök. To this end, each pursues innocent-consuming savagery, and each counts on and even hopes for like savagery from the other.”

In fact, as I just learned tonight on Twitter, in one of its own publications following that attack, ISIS wrote of driving to “extinction” the “grayzone” between Islamic extremism and “the crusader coalition.” Again, it’s all about using terrorism to “sharpen the contradictions” and polarize the world.

And now indeed French president Hollande has said, “To all those who have seen these awful things, I want to say we are going to lead a war which will be pitiless.”

And there are even unconfirmed reports of a Calais migrant camp being set on fire.

Enough with this madness. Break the damn cycle. Stop being manipulated by extremists on both sides. This is the only world we have.

Let into Europe to destroy it

So let the hate talk begin from Andrew Bolt. What we have is a mixture of nationalities all young men some from Belgium, some French and maybe a Syrian all however French speakers not Belgian committing an act of terror for political intent on French soil. However in all of this blog there is only one opinion being pushed  and that's Andrew Bolt's. That is these people were "let into Europe" "to destroy it".

Well that's wrong from the get go Bolt only knows 1 might have been an immigrant the others might well have been born in Europe 25% were for certain.  In all probability they were all European citizens and not "let in". Unless Bolt is suggesting second generation and third fall into the same category. In that case I'd agree because Bolt is so un-Australian despite being born here.

Their intent was terror not to "destroy Europe"  They were ready to die for their cause is proof positive they were primarily political terrorists retaliating on behalf of a cause. If they intended to do what Bolt suggests "destroy Europe" then Bolt is simply saying they were insane and not ideologically driven. Basically all Bolt can really say there were 8 radicalized young men who had access to arms. One of which may have been a recent arrival by boat. All were terrorists and extremists.  All may have been Muslims but  none proven to be religious zealots. Their actions weren't moderate.

The notion that they were let into Europe to destroy it is Andrew Bolt's total fantasy.  Don't get me wrong. Bolt is allowed to say what ever he want's but he shouldn't be allowed to irresponsibly be allowed to broadcast it. The Bishops of Tas can say whatever they want but not publish it. Pedophiles can believe what ever they want but not groom children using public media. CEOs can devise methods of insider trading but can't carry them out and publically encourage it. Don't let Bolt's demand to legislate for the right to be able to broadcast and publish hate fool you by framing it as  the equivalent of  an argument for "free speech" it's not. He's arguing for the right to be a racist broadcaster a disparager of Australian communities he's not arguing for  being able to carry out uncivilised actions of broadcasting and publishing which aren't free in a civilised world. He's free to get on his soap box as we all are and go to speakers corner. He's free to shoot his mouth off but not free to use his gun News Corp.Muslims around the world condemn Paris

" However, the Syrian passport found at the site of the attack might be fake, a US intelligence official told CBS News, pointing out that it did not contain the correct numbers for a legitimate Syrian document and the picture did not match the name."CIA Perfect storm: ‘Paris massacre may enflame public opinion on migrant crisis, NATO interventions'

 

 

 

 

Column - Name the faith that inspired this evil

The god of Abraham, is the god of Islam Judaism and Christianity all throughout history have had extremists. All throughout history in the main practiced their faith moderately. So it may well be said the god of Abraham was the inspiration for this evil. He is as the Israeli's claim that's for sure. It could be said that all who follow the god of Abraham are extremists  practicing a faith of their own imagination that inspire these acts. Or it could be said these atrocities were primarily driven by a political ideology. What is for certain they are not the people Andrew Bolt says they are.

Spare us the hate and blame  to be poured out by Andrew Bolt on immigrants whose ethnic origins are widely diverse suspect only because of his hate of their faith.  We could well ask the question how  it was Bolt's  parents  were let into Australia after all they came from Aalsmere  Holland's most notorious Nazi town. This would be the equivalent of the crap we are about to here from Andrew Bolt about Muslims. Yet in Bolt's case I'd agree because how has this most un-Australian person been allowed in?

"This was an utterly inevitable attack by Islamists on the French — indeed the West — for not submitting to their brand of faith."

No it wasn't as they didn't give a rats who or what nationality or religion the people they attacked were.  It was pure act of terror committed on French soil in retaliation for  the French bombing in the Middle East. The rest is Andrew Bolt fantasy even that any of these men had some  religious knowledge or intent.  Bolt has the gall to say their " excuse hardly matters." because he doesn't know. But he goes on that "the target remains the same." The targets weren't they were totally random. All of this is Bolt's personal extreme right wing fantasy. Since  their targets were "random" they could have been any nationality , faith, sex  or age they were carried out in Paris. These attackers had more in common with Anders Brevik  the extreme right wing Christian assasin who  remains the biggest mass murderer in Europe to have carried out an act of terror for political religious hatred . He like Andrew Bolt was fervently anti- Muslim. 

 

 

Turnbull wrong, Abbott right: the boats must be stopped

" Malcolm Turnbull chose the wrong time to rebuke Tony Abbott on border policy - just hours before the French attacks:"

This is the real justification for Bolt's shock and horror message. It is to try like Eric Abetz to raise Tony Abbott from the grave because Bolt without the patronage of  Abbott has been reduced to a media could- a- been in his own mind. It's all about self interest as far as Andrew Bolt is concerned.

Malcolm Turnbull did not rebuke Tony Abbott on border policy that is an outright lie on Andrew Bolt's part. What he said was that every country had a different set of circumstances to deal with and each needed to be treated differently. "“Each country faces very different circumstances, not least of which are geographic...”  Andrew Bolt is abusing his position in the media and is showing us why News Corp ought not  even be regarded as an authentic media organization at all. Put in context however it shows just how stupid Tony Abbott was for trying to undiplomatically lecture the world.

It also goes to show just how different the circumstances of these terror acts were to anything Turnbull was talking about. Firstly they were  carried out in France and not Germany.  Secondly the Germans weren't involved in bombing Syria and Iraq. They weren't committed by "boat people". No doubt Bolt will try to prove the opposite. However It's inconceivable in anybody's imagination how boats traveling between all the Greek Islands could be stopped let alone towed back. Thirdly Europe actually abides by international rules of asylum. Fourthly the passport found proves only that a stage a passport was found nothing more. Stupidity of the Bolt and Abbott is that they believe they could have prevented this act of terror or any other act of terror by stopping boats.