Andrew Bolt's Blog, 16/11/15; Bolt tries to disparage Waleed Aly but really gets egg on his face; Bolt rushes to politicze Paris here; Bolt doesn't want to think just bomb; Abbott denied everything Bolt wanted him to say; Abbott says we need Section 18C; Politicizing Paris in Melbourne;

 

 

 

Mitchell about to leave Australian

How genuine does Bolt sound as tasteful as  unleavened bread. News Corp's National masthead has been running at a loss for 8 years. So profit is not it's business model influence can't be either as Malcolm Turnbull is our PM. In a country of 24 mill 73k digital subscriptions and 100,000 papers over a quarter sounds pathetic why would you advertise with them? The Herald -Sun is even less and the papers circulation is down 9%.

 SMH and The Age are double them. It shows why Murdoch so desperately needs  to break up the ABC. 

Here are the figures

 ABCs: Fairfax's digital subscribers drop while print subscriptions continue downward trajectory - mUmBRELLA

 

 

 

 

On Waleed Aly’s explanation of the Paris massacre - and picking on Pauline Hanson

 How is it andrew Bolt didn't get a gig on The Project where he could have debated Aly on the issue. We rarely see Bolt on that program where as Steve Price is a regular. If ratings are anything to go by Aly is a far more credible spokesperson than Andrew Bolt. What on earth makes  Andrew Bolt Channel  10's in house expert on Islam? What makes him Channel 10's expert on anything in fact? He certainly doesn't seem to be held in high regard given his show gets kicked from pillar to post whenever Ch 10 wants.

Did anyone notice that Tony Abbott actually slapped Bolt down on just about every subject Bolt tried to get him excited about. Abbott  treated Bolt as an over excited puppy and was exceptionally polite. However  he certainly showed they weren't on the same page on any subject. Bolt, well he seemed rather agitated and peeved at his reception. All  Bolt was trying to do was get him to agree with his extreme right wing perspective on his nonsense and it seemed Abbott did as well.  Bolt tried  to cover himself today. He did the biggest cut and paste job on Abbott going back weeks  trying to show the opposite of what Abbott actually said to him on Sunday and make out that Abbott agreed with him. Who needs enemies when you have a friend like Bolt?

So given that duplicitous cut and paste on Abbott why should we believe Bolt's list of points  on Aly? Had it been exactly as Bolt makes out he could have posted the video . But no he summarized Aly. So back to credibility, believability and credentials Aly stands head and shoulders above Bolt when it comes to Islam and terrorism. Why does Bolt go out of his way to  promote ISIS? He always treats what they say as gospel and if anybody suggests different Bolt goes on the attack. He amplifies all ISIS propaganda as if he were being paid. Bolt has criticized police, politicians, the military he simply goes on the attack if anybody doubts them.

The greatest threat to Australia domestically isn't ISIS it's their representative here, Andrew Bolt who spends so much time and effort doing what they do. He's trying to destroy the Gray Zone that area where moderate Australia lives in integrated harmony  without reference to colour, faith, gender, sexuality, ethnicity or any other difference that Bolt tries so hard to highlight to tell people they don't belong.

Why Bolt didn't play Aly's Video

Paris terror: Waleed's plea 

 

 

 

Sack the Mufti now. No, the Paris massacre wasn’t the fault of the West

 " The statement is a disgrace. Worse, it is dangerous and ominous."

Of course Paris was the fault of France. France had been supporting the rebels against Assad for 5 years. They were trying to help the majority of Syrians to liberate themselves from Assad's Tyrannical regime which France created when they decolonized. Then all of a sudden they have done an about turn and started bombing the rebels and have started supporting Assad.  The resentment and retaliation stems directly from that turn around. The refugees into Europe were  just that refugees. France has enough French youth to be radicalized. Foreigners could never have done the job only Frenchmen. The Paris massacre was carried out by Westerners Europeans and not people born in the Middle East. You reap what you sow.

It's General Bolt's attitude that has and continues to create and recreate Jihadism in all it 's forms for over 30 years. We( USA)  created and supported Jihadism in Afghanistan to get rid of the Russians didn't any one see Charlie's War? Then fought against them without success. We took them on in Iraq and failed they only became stronger because we invaded the country. Everywhere we have taken  the Jihadis on in a military capacity has been a failure yet General Bolt  with all his lack of military experience calls for more of the same. History has shown us that the man is on a fools mission. A general in his own mind Bolt wants to send young Australians off to fight battles that have never been and can't be won.  In each case in Afghanistan and in Syria  the West has supported, armed, then turned against the Jihadis and have been comprehensively beaten. According to Bolt it's not the case yet he can't come up with a single situation of a victory. Yet he cries out for more of the same it's Freud's definition of insanity.

Paris  is an apartheid city where two worlds don't meet it's a city that over the years has bread a second and third generation of French citizen, youth that feel French but are told in no uncertain terms their not. Unlike Australia there are two distinct cultures in Paris and   every social indicator in Paris shows Muslims to be at the bottom of the heap. That alone encourages alienation, not integration and makes French Arab youth ripe for radicalization. Andrew Bolt promotes that  view of Muslims here however our multicultural past has insured that hate mongers like Bolt are wrong. We have a very different history from that of France and even the UK. So all Bolt  does is exaggerate and amplify his false reality in the media in complete Gobellian style and I believe in defiance of Section 18C

 Australian Muslims mainly Turks have always felt at home here as have the Lebanese who Bolt tends to run down the most simply because they have a visible presance in Lakemba Sydney. Bolt in every way assures Muslim Australians and new immigrants they aren't welcome  and he does it as loudly and as robustly as he can.  He tells them he knows the Koran better than they do. He knows their religious practices better than they do and pays no attention when their National Council has anything to say.

The Grand Mufti was addressing Andrew Bolt directly and his words extremely perceptive when contrasting him with others.

"Credit must go to those who have called for calm and responsibility. We call on all people of goodwill to stand against fear-mongering and injustice" Bolt's response "The statement is a disgrace. Worse, it is dangerous and ominous."

Bolt's language is of war, disparagement and condemnation. His tone is of hatred and  mirrors that of ISIS. Even Tony Abbott denied Bolt's intolerance when he said we are sorely in need of the RAD and Section 18C to stave off "hate-mongering" by Australian extremists.

So General Bolt were do you suggest our troops be sent to begin your fight. The one you've been wanting to see. The fight that will yet again go down in history as another Australian failure. Paris attacks: Australia stands against terror, Ed Husic says

" "The fact that a very small minority of fanatics defy the teachings of the Islamic religion by engaging in terrorist crime whether overseas or, as we've seen on three instances now in the last year, in Australia, should not reflect upon the Australian Muslim community,"  The fact that a small minority of the press defies what Australia represents by engaging in hate-mongering and vilification encouraging the radicalization of young Australian men needs to be addressed men. If Catholic Bishops in TAS can be deemed accountable how is it people like Andrew Bolt are not?

 

 

 

  

France strikes back at the Islamic State

 "Why did it take the massacre in Paris for France to get this serious about the Islamic State?"

The French colony was given to the Assad family who were a minority Shiia group to rule and they ruled with an iron fist. A Sunni revolution began after a six year drought when rather than provide help the Assads killed Sunni demonstrators. For 5 years the French supported the rebels for the over throw of the Assad Government.  Recently President Holland began bombing ISIS a reversal of policy which has resulted in the retaliation of the reign of terror in Paris the heart of France. It hasn't been directed at Europe as Bolt keeps saying it has been exclusive to France. This is not strange given France's colonial past terror has been common on the streets of Paris. There is a war of independence going on in Syria and it's not just ISIS that's fueling it. The French involvement and the coalitions assistance being given to Assad has significantly changed the scenario. One might ask whether or not the Sunnis of Syria might unite against a common enemy. Bolt wants us to send troops in to fight who? The only troops on the ground have to be Syrians ask Turnbull and Abbott Mr Bolt

" Were these genuine targets - ones France had been checking out for some time - or marginal ones selected in a hurry just to send to signal?" 

Political posturing by France  won't win the hearts and minds of Syrians now being driven out of Syria because of the support being given to the minority Assad regime. The majority of Syrians want a change of government. So no matter what targets France hits it wont be the heart of the majority of Syrians. This is not the religious war Bolt claims it is. Here we have a more Bolt like view from the Russians who are backing Assad our new team mates    France attacks: The boomerang effect

 The West should let the Middle East settle its own differences

France attacks: The boomerang effect

France attacks: The boomerang effect

France attacks: The boomerang effect

 

 

 

This is the price of turning immigration into colonisation

The truth is clear Bolt supports changes to the immigration act that will take us back to pre WW2 White Christians only allowed or if you have enough money we might let you buy your way in. However conversion ought to be a requirement.

" Mass immigration from the Middle East will radically change a country over time. It will not gently blend two cultures into a homogenous whole. It will instead set two societies, side by side, on the same patch of land - two societies with rival beliefs and rival claims. Think Israel and Palestine. And some of those claims will, as we see, be prosecuted by force. " 

So Andrew Bolt actually admits that Israel has and is continuing to colonise Palestine with force. The problem however it's not the case of Muslims in Europe. Nor is it a problem here in Australia.Australia is a home to us all and you just happen to be a very loud voice that doesn't like that. Like the Republicans in the US Bolt wants to politicize Paris here by turning life in Australia into an immigration problem when it's not. All social indicator show we are very much a success as is Canada.

Muslim immigrants tend to vote Labour why because wealthy Muslims back home tend to be part of the ruling elite and see no advantage in leaving. Muslim migrants are brought in and they fill first entry entry positions. They see they have more in common with working Australians than the conservative rich. By the time they become citizens they become Labour voters. It's simple keep them out they can't vote Labour. All the other bullshit Bolt overlays  it with is distortion. That they  can't ever be true Australians is Conservative distortion. Ask Ed Husic.

 Republicans demand US lead a new war to 'eradicate Isis' after Paris attacks

 

Don’t offend by disagreeing

No Bolt it's not about disagreeing it's about publishing and vilifying didn't you understand what Tony Abbott a Catholic had to say on the Bolt Report yesterday. Section 18C is necessary and the RAD are necessary to curb the likes of you.

 

  

Turnbull and Abbott: competing approaches in tackling the Islamic State

On the Bolt Report yesterday Tony Abbott slapped Andrew Bolt down. Abbott clearly said he was 100% behind the Turnbull government and he wasn't going to say otherwise. So now either Andrew Bolt is calling him a liar and qizzling or Bolt because he was made to look stupid is making this blog up to suit himself. When Bolt didn't get the satisfaction he wanted from Abbott he's rushed to News Corp and Murdoch media for his proof and none other than Murdoch's UK Sunday Telegraph. former prime minister Tony Abbott had rushed to his old stomping ground, The Sunday Telegraph, to cite Paris as vindication of his recent speech in London that terrorists were infiltrating the flood of refugees fleeing Syria. "Why didn't Abbott  repeat any of this on the Bolt Report ? Because he didn't say it in the first place probably and it was simply lifted out of context.

So according to Bolt it's ok to be a screaming right wing hate monger a second generation immigrant like Bolt but not if you are the child of Muslims. Bolt actually like Ed Husic MP believes he's an Australian. Well he's unlike any Australian I've come across and he gives us a bad name.

"A note about Turnbull’s assurance about screening refugees to make sure we don’t admit terrorists. How can that possibly reassure us when as Turnbull himself adds, the real problem will be with their children or grandchildren? Screening won’t save us from them."

What we have here is simply a long cut and paste attempt to show Turnbull and Abbott are Gillard and Rudd. If  you had watched the Bolt Report it was clear that Tony Abbott wasn't having a bar of what Andrew Bolt was suggesting. He even made it clear why the Racial Discrimination Act was needed to stay along with Section 18C. It's needed to keep Bolt in line.Responding to Paris: How a different PM changed the tone

 

 

 

Column - That they want to kill us is more important than why

" Why matters less than what. Figuring out why so many Muslim terrorists are trying kill us — ASIO is investigating at least 475 plots here — matters less than that they are."

What drives this fanatic Andrew Bolt to cry kill first ask questions later? What drives him to simply lie about ISIS in the Middle East about young uneducated farmers who have never heard about Australia who know very little about their own religion, Sharia Law or Caliphates let alone Paris. Their world changed in 2003 when as kids they remember Saddam was killed their parents disappeared the Shiia Malaki government was put in Saddam's place and Iraq disappeared into a hell of persecution. Their average age now is 27 and they to have families and kids. Syrians on the other hand are fighting a colonial revolution that had the French put the Assad family into power.

Andrew Bolt is an educated man they are not. Bolt has  access to information but he  lies why?. He has the  ability to control the narrative and tell us what's really happening. But like a mad man he is yelling that that is unimportant and the reasons to kill unnecessary. He is Abbott's Death Cult as much as the leaders of ISIS are.What I Discovered From Interviewing Imprisoned ISIS Fighters |What Andrew Bolt and Janet Albrechtsen don’t report

ASIO isn't investigating 475 plots to kill us here. What drives Bolt to bullshit so much? ASIO chooses to investigate yes  it's their job but how many investigations do they walk away from? 95%  have proved to lead nowhere and people when held let go. Yet it's Bolt whose screaming like Chicken Little that the sky is falling in. It's not. Bolt wants a major event to occur here for his own self aggrandizement. Yesterday Tony Abbott actually slapped the man down publicly and made him look like the fool he really is.

 
"THIS debate is pointless in one critical way. Does it really matter why eight Muslim men just murdered more than 120 French civilians?" Bolt

Bolt is  ISIS he's yelling as if it doesn't matter why just kill them before kill  us who? Yesterday it was the death of 120 French Christians that needed avenging. He  realized he got that wrong as there were too many French Muslims among the dead  so now they are just anonymous civilians.  It hasn't got in the way of Bolt being the screaming banshee. As a vigilante he wants the anger to stay and he wants it to spill out onto the streets here in Melbourne so he can say I told you so. It's what fanatics do it's madness Bolt is just like ISIS . Australians are better than Bolt. He is Abbott's hate monger and Tony Abbott put him down for it.  Syria’s Assad: Paris attacks result of French policy – Your Middle East

 Fox News Pundits Rush To Politicize Paris Terror Attacks

 

Column - So late to the Islamic debate

So here we have Andrew Bolt leading the charge wanting to drop more bombs and put troops on the ground why?  Because a Syrian passport was found near a suicide bomber? Even the CIA said there was something sus about that. It's enough for the extremist leader of Australia's right wing press Andrew Bolt to publicly yell 'kill'. Why did 8 Europeans choose Paris to create this reign of terror? Why blow up a Russian jet and bomb Beirut? Retaliation is why!

After 5 years the war in Syria had changed direction.  The Russians started to bomb anyone that was against Assad. Hezbolla sent troops and arms to help the Shiia Government . The French who for 5 years supported the rebels also  changed direction and were now helping Assad by bombing ISIS. When ISIS found itself losing ground in Syria an old French colony and that France was supporting Assad they called on the sympathizers for Syrian Liberation  to retaliate with terror. Hezbolla in Beirut, the Russians and France were hit because the policies and actions of all three had changed. Germany wasn't attacked with it's 800,000 Syrians France was the old Syrian colonial power. Belgium and Holland weren't hit France was. History was repeating itself as it did with the fight for Algerian Independance.

Terror is not new to France It's part of French history and unlike Australia it does have a large and alienated population of French Nth African Muslims. But Bolt doesn't want us to know that it's why he's raising hell saying the reasons don't matter. Of course they do. Today in his columns Bolt is the reincarnation of Goebbels who lead the Germans to believe the Jews were to blame for anything and everything they disliked in Germany and here we have Bolt crying it's the Muslims that need to be blamed here..Nightmare in Paris: Democracy is under attack, and the right makes common cause with ISIS

 Our terrorism double standard: After Paris, let’s stop blaming Muslims and take a hard look at ourselves 

 Watch The Moment British Soldiers Throw War Medals To Floor With These Powerful Words