Andrew Bolt's Blog 10/12/16; Avoiding facts by playing the man on his own team; Hustlers and con men;

 

McCrann on the end of the great climate madness

Terry McCrann: "the only course forward to sanity and reality is for the government to abandon the 26-28 per cent and renounce Paris."  Too true. 

 This about as great a blogger as Andrew Bolt is. He links you to seemingly recommended articles he deems important no he links you  to a News Corp Paywall. That in it self shows you who he is a barely qualified paperboy but a fully qualified  pimp for Murdoch. 

McCrann is bait telling us to turn our backs on the world and surrender our futures and our childrens futures  for short term  greed and self interest. Rational decision isn't required. Science is a sham  give ourselves over to men like Tony Abbott. Whose intellect alone has  lead him to say "Climate Science is a load of crap"  Donald Trump  swears it is a "Chinese Plot". These are the men of wisdom Andrew Bolt advocates to be followed, the real leaders of the free world whose wealth is currently concentrated and largely controlled by some 50 families. If these aren't the words of a snake oil salesman what else is?

McCrann is calling for Australia to turn it's  back on the world for what? A quick fix for a few wealthy investors in in fossil fuel. A quick sheckle which he deems more important than the planet and the better being of 95% of Australians. His message is obviously not important or urgent enough to be given away freely it needs to be paid for like all the other promises offered by the likes of Peter Foster and Andrew Bolt.  Don't kind hearted men in suits like Andrew Bolt give their philanthropic advice away for free?

 Buy, buy his books, buy his articles printed in mates magazines   which he advertizes himself  because no one else will. Get freebies as extras if you are stupid enough. It's sell sell sell everything he stands for, nothing is free. Even though  it's sold as as a message  from god a matter of  life or death. Who could possibly believe him? . I can tell you now buyers don't!!

 

Tim Blair and Andrew Bolt  you pick

The third reason Photios should quit Libs: his wife

There is now a third reason to wonder why on earth the Liberals let professional lobbyist Michael Photios dominate the pre-selection of Liberal candidates in NSW. Now his wife has noisily quit the party, claiming it isn't doing enough to "stop" global warming.

Andrew Bolt's such a family man  isn't he? He hates the husband and is  ready to kick the wife heaven help the kids and the dog.  That's the 6'+ Dutchman for you a bovver boy who doesn't often show his face in public. He endangers his own family by working from home but he stays well in the shadows. Bolt has made no mention of  Mike Baird NSW Premier who  also recently said not enough was being done to combat Climate Change. In fact Baird suggested that the idea of a Carbon Intensity Scheme might be worth looking at for NSW. However Canberra should lead the way. Bolt left Baird alone only to put the boot into Julia Baird his sister who is rumoured to have Cancer. That's Andrew Bolt for you a role model for being Australian.

So that would make 4 premiers suggesting that  the experts ought to be listened to and what they have said  is worth examination.  Andrew Bolt certainly never mentions the experts  he prefers taking on  wives.  He's a center stage player is Andrew Bolt so backed into his right wing corner everybody and anybody in front of him must be left. 

Paul Kelly's confused admission: Turnbull did have a secret carbon tax

Paul Kelly, clearly briefed by Malcolm Turnbull, winds up deeply confused. Kelly says we wicked people of the "far Right" have spread a "fantasy" that Turnbull tried to secretly bring in a kind of carbon tax. But in the next breath he says the mistake that Josh Frydenberg made was to expose that plan and kill it off. Which is it, Paul? Malcolm?

 Kelly, Savva and Albrectsen all work or worked for Murdoch. All have said Turnbull is ok. However Andrew Bolt has fits of hatred for Kelly and Savva and praises Janet. It make no sense and explains why Bolt's  all rhetoric and no substance.

For Bolt this all about rhetoric and trying to avoid the real issue by simply playing with vacuous fantasy. Turnbull needs to ask how are we to achieve the the Carbon emission targets we promised and agreed to internationally by 2030 and 2050. The question is are we up to our word and what is the best possible way to achieve these targets? Do you listen to experts or just make it up as you go along to ensure self interest is satisfied. All the experts both scientists and economists have pointed to the Carbon Intensity scheme. Politicians have pointed  against the best option without logical explanation. 

 

Politicians are confronted by Multinational Corporate Donors , Lobbyists , and media all with a history of  a narrow set of interests that don't focus on what's best for 95% of the nation. Bolt simply focuses on the personalities involved rather than the facts and opinionates accordingly ignoring expert advice.

Unlike his approval of Janet Albrechetsen the other day who said Turnbull was doing a great job here he is telling us Paul Kelly a highly respected journalist doesn't know what he's talking about. "  Paul Kelly, clearly briefed by Malcolm Turnbull, winds up deeply confused."Bolt. Bolt on the other hand not briefed whatsoever knows the "real stuff" What Bolt is basicly saying forget the expert advice the decision is a political one which will be the most irrational one whatever Turnbull says because Carbon isn't the issue "getting Turnbull is". Anyone concerned otherwise has missed the point. Fiction and fantasy takes precedence over facts.  Downward pressure on energy isn't of any concern here.

" I'm a person who cannot be allowed to spread "poison" and belittle his hero and fellow warmist." Bolt No Bolt you don't have the nous to spread poison just misdirection from the the real concern at hand and that's how to achieve clean energy targets already agreed to. There isn't a single word  here about expert opinion it's all about rhetoric and who said what. We know Abbott's Direct Action has been a total failure again not a mention of that here either. Why does Bolt hate Kelly but love Janet . They all play for the same team of the three only two are journalists and one never made the grade. The one who generally has the least respect and a low reach when it comes to being believed.

 

 

Murdoch conceals Coalition’s disastrous economic woes with #fakenews

This has the  substance Andrew Bolt avoids