Section 18C change appears doomed in Senate
Malcolm Turnbull has announced a watering down of the controversial Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act. Bolt has offered no analysis or any informed comment on what has happened or is likely to happen only his opinion that what has never occurred anywhere before in history 'free speech' is a must here why? For his sake that lies, fake news and comment a justifiable in a civilized society for the most powerful to maintain their status.
GREEN BIGOT: HANSON-YOUNG ATTACKS "MIDDLE-AGED WHITE GUY"
Watch Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young
demonstrate the bigotry and hate-speech of the Left, denouncing the
right of Senator David Leyonhjelm to protest against taxpayers
subsidising the child care of the rich.
WHY THIS SILENCE OVER SOUTH AFRICA'S LETHAL RACISM?
With just one change, this racist
murder would become a cause of the Left: "The couple ... were tied up,
stabbed, and tortured with a blowtorch for several hours. The masked men
stuffed a plastic bag down [the woman]’s throat... [She] had multiple
skull fractures, gunshot wounds and “horrific” burns to her breasts." So
why no fuss?
Who says this kind of action is "not racist" Bolt is suggesting South Africans are silent and within Soth Africa today the laws are Racist as the once were. Andrew Bolt is beyond ingnorant. One Nation I'm sure exists in South Africa as much as it exists here and some of it's members incite violence. Is Bolt suggesting all black South Africans are Racist simply because they are black? Yes that's the implication he presents.
However history and context suggests there are other reasons for this violence not justified in South African law or it's institutions today. Bolt isn't talking about South Africa as a Nation he's simply pleasuring himself wanting to point out crimes and brutality and providing his interpretation of them being black. The laws and Institutions in South Africa once were Racist those laws were changed. The current events occurring in South Africa might be deemed racist by Bolt however they are criminal and no longer justified in by a current racist South African Nation it's laws or it's Institutions. Bolt error is ignorance to suggest otherwise. Bolt is a racist it doesn't mean Australia is. I'm sure there are racists in South Africa black and white but they don't define the country the way apartheid once did.
IMAM IN CANADA: KILL THE JEWS
Canada under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
has stepped up immigration from the Middle East. Now: "A Montreal mosque
is facing a police complaint ... after a video of an imam delivering a
sermon in which he asks for Jews to be killed surfaced online."
TOTALITARIAN ALERT: PETITION TO BAN AYAAN HIRSI ALI
Ayaan Hirsi Ali speaks against
totalitarian Islam. But rather than simply argue against her, her
critics here respond in the way of today's totalitarian Left- she must
not speak: "A group of Muslim women in Australia are petitioning her
upcoming speaking tour to the country." Others threaten her with death
because free speech now is the enemy.
Why is it Andrew Bolt turns to and defend radicals when trying to get his soap box of quaint ideas across. Milo the public supporter of pedophilia and once editor of Breitbart fake news was one. Ayaan Hirsi a Muslim who makes a living out of condemning a religion she obviously no belongs to is hardly an unbiased debator but a show woman. Bolt is prepared to believe in the ISIS media reports before any others. The FBI were wrong about Orlando because IS said so. Often the others speaking up against Bolt's heroes are government agencies or representatives like in this case of the Australian Islamic Community. Here we have Bolt reversing free speech by saying that the representative bodies of Australian Muslims haven't the right to tell to tell Hirsi Ali to fuck off because she's not a Muslim and she doesn't in any way represent Islam. She is on other than being a cultural terrorist and not talking about the faith at all. Andrew Bolt is a singular Australian media man putting wind in her sails bravoing her misrepresentations.
More posts
1 - 50KIM IL ANDREWS, LOVED BY CHILDREN
I haven't seen propaganda like this since
the days of Kim-Il Sung. Compare the pictures, side by side, of the
Socialist Left Premier of Victoria and the North Korean dictator, and
wonder how they both got the same idea.
WHAT DID WALEED MEAN BY 'WEAK'?
On a rare occasion that Islam apologist
Waleed Aly even mentioned the Islamic State he brushed it aside as
"weak", so stop this "hate speech" against Islam. A year and a half
later, this "weak" group is still creating bloody mayhem, but where's
Waleed? UPDATE: Aly attacks the free speech reforms with more
misrepresentations.
No comments:
Post a Comment