Andrew bolt's Blog,7/4/17; Andrew Bolt scum bucket golem in action; Fat Cats and their expectations; Polishing the turd; Bolt spends so much time defining "them" and none really clarifying himself; The Hirsi Ali Industry is a search for ratings;

HOW THE AGE ASKS QUESTIONS WHEN GUNNING FOR HIRSI ALI

I have received the most astonishing questions from an Age reporter in that paper's continuing jihad against Ayaan Hirsi Ali. They are the sort only a logic-challenged witch hunter could dream up.

7 Ap

Andrew Bolt actually admits he's not provide a forum for debate but a platform for single minded propaganda  and PR . He's obliged for legal reasons to make statements in order not to find The Bolt Report legally challenged "I am not obliged to say whether I agree or not with what people say to me. But as it happens, twice on the show last night I said I did not believe Waleed Aly supported the Muslim Brotherhood." Why would Bolt entertain Hirsi Ali if he already knew she had a distorted view of reality, anti-Islam Industry PR of course. Bolt couldn't be seen to agree with Ali in any sort of clubby way could he however we seen the obsession has with the man and he'd be happy to let others say these things with little more than a tsk tsk from him."Where did I assume responsibility for what Hirsi Ali had said, under what possible circumstances should I take responsibility for what anyone chooses to say to me?" So what does Bolt do he repeats Hirsi Ali's words like the golem he is in order to run his dirt file on Aly quoting him out of context  so many times as to make Hirsi -Ali's words ring true. Bolt accepts Hirsi Ali totally she says she's not a Muslim she's not a Muslim. Aly who refers to extremists like Boko Harum as non Muslim but criminals who does Bolt stand up for Boko Harum of course Bolt has a habit of defending ISIS, Boko Harum and all extremists who claim to be dedicated Muslims whether or not they have ever read the Koran before he'd defend 1.6 billion followers of Islam. Bolt will generalize about Australian Sudanese on the basis of the bad behaviour of a dozen kids. If a single Sudanese stood up and said the hated Australia that's sufficient to have them as representative of all Sudanese in the country.
So Waleed Aly who Bolt is obsessed with is not a true blue Australian he's an apologist for Islamists. Bolt who believes Islamists and hates Australia and Australian media for being blind to his truths is a real Aussie the others are dangerous and fake.
Bolt is a scum bucket devious and slimy in the way he operates and he's so not Australian.   Proof:

"Hirsi Ali is right to be troubled by what Aly has said, and worried by how such apologetics might inadvertently influence others. But all that is her opinion, and I look forward to Carmody explaining why her fears are unjustified, given the examples above."
But I think we all know what he's real agenda is, don't we? And it doesn't strike me as journalism."

 

 

COUNTER-TERRORISM POLICE CALLED IN OVER MURDER

Disturbing, but sadly not surprising: "Counter-terrorism police have been brought in to investigate the murder of a Queanbeyan service station worker after what appears to be the letters “IS” were written in blood on the store’s window."  

 Unnamed source, " No conclusions" however that doesn't prevent Bolt does it "sadly not surprising." The innuendo will suffice if wrong no apology will be forthcoming if right you'll hear it shouted from the roof tops. Either way the anti- Islam industry will have been served.

 

 

 

TRUMP HASN'T SENT A SIGNAL JUST TO SYRIA

Donald Trump bombing Syria  after it's horrific gas attacks sends a message to many more than the Assad regime. It's a warning to North Korea, furiously testing nuclear weapons, and to China, aggressively expanding its territory. It it a warning to all countries - including Russia - who thought America weak, thanks to Barack Obama.

 Bolt just can't wait to have his sons called up for National Service for them to put their boots on the ground for Trump an opportunity Andrew Bolt always missed out on killing Gooks, Rag heads or Communists. His sons can do it for him. Simply by pure luck my number wasn't drawn from the barrel in the first call up to Vietnam. I did fight but against that war in Waterdale road. It's easy killing people from 30,000 feet up because all your doing is dropping a load you don't have to see the whites of children's eyes

 

MARK LATHAM VS ADAM GOODES: A STUDY IN HYPOCRISY

Mark Latham was so bemused by pro-feminism video in which a Year 12 school captain spoke as if he was woman that he joked that he first thought the boy was gay. Adam Goodes singled out a 13-year-old girl from a broken home as the "face" of Australian "racism". Now compare what happened to both men.

  "A tale of two insulters of children: one calls a child gay – supposedly a good thing – and gets fired for it; one gets a child subjected to the trauma of a two-hour police interrogation for uttering a single word, then humiliates her across the whole country, calling her the face of racism. The latter gets Australian of the Year – surely now an utterly worthless award. Of course, the fired one attacked the left, the exalted one praised it. Total abominable hypocrisy." Bolt

What an incredible illogical whinge about two entirely different incidents by Bolt ever so desperately trying to show thay are equivalent, why? Bolt was hammered for attacking Adam Goodes with a sledge hammer and he's attacked Latham witha feather duster for a starters. The reason for this revival is Bolt still smarts at the hammering he took for abusing Australianof the year Adam Goodes. He even trashes the award because it was given to Goodes. That's how un-Australian Andrew Bolt is.

Firstly Goodes was racially maligned Latham wasn't. Secondly Goodes offered us all a lesson in what it means to be equal Latham taught us a lesson in showing how some of us are different and Bolt claims the incidents are the same.  Goodes responded in a way that only Bolt talks about. Goodes knows he's streaks ahead and not just the equal of Bolt who has to additionally malign our award. Goodes doesn't need or want 2 passports Bolt does. 

Bolt regularly compares things out of context either social or or historical. It allows him to be an idiot and say he's more indigenous than Adam Goodes and think he's out smarted him.  All it shows is that Bolt is dumb un-Australian and lower than a snakes belly.  All reasons why Latham should still have a job on Sky and Bolt not. If Murdoch wants a Hannity or a O'Reilly down under Latham is a far far better clone than Andrew Bolt.

MORRISON BLAMES BUSINESS BOSSES FOR HIS FAILURE

Treasurer Scott Morrison attacks business for not doing more to help him sell his company tax cuts. John Durie:

The IPA and the business community in Australia lobbied for these tax cuts and spent a lot of energy doing it. The government proceeded with the politics and had with negotiations with the opposition the bill passed something Tony Abbott was never able to do. Abbott almost broke the Australian record for the least number of bills passed in the Senate. At present he's critical of this one having been negotiated. That translates to Tony Abbott prefers doing nothing in government rather than something. Bolt appears to agree that as tax payers it's preferable for to pay our government to do nothing rather than something.

As for Morrison's insistense that business do something to sell the tax cuts made it's plain and simple business can't expect the government to prove what business promised that these tax cuts would increase investment along with jobs. That promise that spin that sell was put out by the IPA and the Business Council. Now they need to show there was substance in their promise. Bolt seems to think it's not their responsibility having been given the baton to run with it. Previously cuts like this amounted to nothing just money in the bank for owners and shareholders alike. If business isn't prepared to prove to Australia that their word is their bond they do need to be outed shamed and if need be harassed not Morrison.  No, all whinge and no responsibility is Bolt's approach be Abbott and go for the do nothing record and blame the opposition. 

 

LIBS REVIEW EVERYTHING EXCEPT THE PROBLEM

Will the review exclude the man who nearly cost the election, and the period he did his worst?: "The team reviewing the Turnbull government’s calamitous election campaign ... were advised Turnbull and the parliamentary party’s failings were off-limits... The review had a narrow scope of the eight weeks of the campaign." UPDATE: Abbott blamed.  

  Why the above whinge because rather than try to polish the turd Tony Abbott hide him. Don't mention how he ran a government in opposition. Don't mention he was paid and did nothing the least bills passed since Gorton who was in office 6 months. The fastest division of a party on record so he was dumped. Focus the Abbott way on a glass half empty and grind Turnbull to dust. Ensure the destruction of the Liberal party rather than moving on. No this is a process of yes polishing Abbott the Murdoch media Markson, Benson, Kroger, and Bolt all rbbing as hard and fast as they can.

 

HIRSI ALY VS HER CRITICS AND WALEED ALY

ABC GRILLS HIRSI ALI HATER. HONEST

 

Remember the Muslim women who told Ayaan Hirsi Ali to stay away from Australia, and who smeared her as a "liar" whose words were of the kind used to cause "genocide"? One of the women behind that foul campaign was invited onto the ABC, and got a cross-examination that was as masterly and informed as it was surprising. A must listen.

 

Ayaan Hirsi Ali on The Bolt Report, firing back at the Muslim activists who smeared her - and at Waleed Aly:

 Andrew Bolt offer absolutely nothing to the discourse he just provides a PR platform for  the Muslim hate industry simply by offering a stage to a Hirsi-Ali monologue he's spreading division in an otherwise united country. Why didn't anybody mention that Ali parents and the Dutch government have all called Ali a "liar" in the past. Bolt's a convicted liar and declared a media person of low standing. You won't hear that from Andrew Bolt or the ABCs Andrew West but if you watch these sessions you come to see their similarities. 

Bolt does the same for George Pell, Pauline Hanson et al and in no way assists in offering any clarity or adding anything to the discourse that might. Bolt is no better than Andrew West who ignored the essence of his guest's statement that she wanted to engage with Ali in a debate  on stage as opposed to being just another anonymous  member of the audience on the Hirsi-Ali show where people are invited to ask disconnected questions at a staged commercial performance. That request seemed very clear and reasonable however West simply lead his guest on zig zag of questions that really were quite incoherent. In the main it offered nothing to the subject matter as it paid an over amount of attention to  rhetoric  words said at various times it the past. It seemed he didn't have her on for the purpose of understanding any conversation. It was a disconnected interrogation  as boring as bat shit and typically what Bolt calls his debating style. Any wonder he liked it it was meaning less. How is it that even in Christianity slavery isn't declared a sin among a shit load of other things?

 

 

 

ON THE DOUBLE STANDARDS OF HIRSI ALI HATERS

Ayaan Hirsi Ali has been smeared and told to stay away by Muslim activists for daring to merely criticise Islam. But where are these apologists when Muslims kill Muslims with poison gas? My editorial from The Bolt Report:

 Muslims are killing Muslims as are Buddhists Killing Muslims as are Christians killing Muslims and as are Hindus killing Muslims, Why is little attention being given to the politics and all  attention being given to formulating a united anti- religious narrative when in the majority of these conflicts Muslims are in the main the victims and not the aggressors. When it boils down to the truth Hirsi Ali and the Anti-Islam industry are trying to stereotype 1.6 billion people and over 50 cultures by the acts and words of a minority of political fanatics who have hijacked a religion for the purpose.  Bolt and the minority of extreme Conservatives Christians are trying to do the same hijack the Australian identity with their narrow ideology. Both minorities are totally unrepresentative of Muslims and in Bolt's case Australians.  Ayaan Hirsi Ali thinks Andrew Bolt is up himself as well why don't Christians declare slavery to be a sin?

Andrew Bolt's Blog,6/4/17; Pauline Hanson loves Asians but not the diseased ones; Reverse Racism doesn't exist but White History is Racist and evil; Nutt took a look and quit;

 

 

NUTT IS THE FALL GUY FOR TURNBULL

Terry Barnes says Tony Nutt took the rap for Malcolm Turnbull: 

Who is Terry Barnes Ex -personal advisor to guess who? The clue "Nutt has not only scapegoated himself, but he is being made a scapegoat for the lacklustre and unimpressive election campaign of the prime minister himself." Terry Barnes. Personal advisor to none other than Tony Abbott. How about that Bolt has chosen Barnes for an UNINFORMED COMMENT. But then Bolt maintains he's allowed to be biased because he's part of private media. 

Nutt has resigned because Tony Abbott keeps wearing the Burka  on opposition and not wanting to be recognized as standing with his PM

NIKI SAVVA DISTORTS TRUTH

Obsessive Abbott-hater Niki Savva once admitted she was a liar. Her latest column - yet again attacking Abbott - contains some more astonishing distortions.

" Obsessive Abbott-hater Niki Savva once admitted she was a liar. Her latest column - yet again attacking Abbott - contains some more astonishing distortions."Bolt

 Andrew Bolt the convicted liar who refuses to admit it. The daily hate monger who uses a malevolent tone to make his lies seem larger than Peter Fosters  calls Nikki Savva and "obssesive hater and liar" when she confesses not to what she did as a columnist but what she did as Costello's press secretary Bolt  the pimply faced schoolyard bully jumps on her and starts slinging insults. Bolt throws dirt at the media's finest for no reason other than he's a sewer rat who garners no respect whatsoever from anyone in his profession. The man goes back to 2010 cuts and pastes a  Savva comment out of context taken from his "losers" file to make a point in 2017 . Anybody in the media business who didn't make it  to Andrew Bolt's losers file I should imagine would be disappointed and that's a given.

Unlike Bolt who spends such energy trying to save the unsaveable Abbott, Hirsi-Ali, Hanson etal from verified media facts Savva provides informed comment. All Bolt packs into his blogs and writing tends to be abuse, mockery, unverified heresay and lies.  I suggest one simply look at today's offerings and read my comments and tell me I'm wrong. The only reason olddgothoughts came about Bolt moderated all comments out of his blogs simply because I disagreed with what he was doing and that is distorting the truth

  

 

 

ANZAC DAY TERRORIST ALERT FOR GALLIPOLI

Another terrorist alert: "The federal government has received advice terrorists may target Anzac Day commemorations in Gallipoli this year." But will Muslim activists will go back to telling us what a menace Ayaan Hirsi Ali instead, with her warnings that Islam endorses terrorism?

  Will Bolt explain this sentence "But will Muslim activists will go back to telling us what a menace Ayaan Hirsi Ali instead, with her warnings that Islam endorses terrorism?" Bolt

Muslim activists are everywhere as far as Bolt is concerned so much so he jabbers incoherently.  Bolt who doesn't believe a word Julie Bishop says is quoting her here. Tomorrow he'll call her a liar. Given this why should we believe Andrew Bolt?

 

 

 

HIDING THE SUDANESE

Age reporters again refuse to identify the "youths": "Caroline Springs residents are sleeping with knives and baseball bats and formulating home invasion survival plans as the outer-western suburb becomes gripped by fear over youth crime." A victim, "Debbie", is interviewed, but only when she goes on 3AW do we hear the youths are Sudanese.

In today's blog post below Bolt asks

AREN'T WE ONE PEOPLE? WHY DIVIDE US BY RACE?

  In the same breath and in another post he asks why are we hiding the Sudanese."Yet again they refuse even once to mention that the "youths" terrorising a suburb are Sudanese." Somehow Bolt seems to be contradicting himself."Each time you read "youth" or "youths", The Age actually means Sudanese but censors itself." So much for Bolt's "I'd say more about this absurd attempt to draw crude divisions of race between Australians, but our Racial Discrimination Act makes dangerous a frank debate about the new tribalism:" Isn't Bolt demanding racial division where the Age the police and our courts are ignoring it. Bolt is such a hypocrite.

 

AREN'T WE ONE PEOPLE? WHY DIVIDE US BY RACE?

The Aboriginal industry is dividing us by race: "A group of Bunurong people is seeking native title rights over land stretching across Frankston and the Mornington Peninsula and beyond." They want power over cultural heritage protection, which already enables some groups  to charge $20,000 for protection plans. I'd say more but our laws forbid.

"absurd attempt to draw crude divisions of race between Australians, but our Racial Discrimination Act makes dangerous a frank debate about the new tribalism:"

(No comments. The Racial Discrimination Act makes free discussion of this issue a legal minefield.)Bolt

A Bolt lie it's not the case He's the boy who cried wolf to many times to be believed.

Yes we are meant to be all equal citizens of one nation Australia but we are a multiracial and multicultural mix and we are not all treated equally.  We are not one race nor are we one culture to say we are is to allude to a reality and history that doesn't exist. To pretend to be fearful of what doesn't exist is to feign reverse racism which as far as Andrew Bolt is concerned is non existent. To pretend that he's been shut down, gagged and unable to speak is to admit he's a liar and that's why he was convicted in the first place. Lying with intent is not a strange activity for Andrew Bolt and Mordecai Bromberg told him just that. Bolt has found himself costing News Corp lawyer's fees far in excess of Mark Latham  and Bolt still has his job which is a great disappointment to most Australians because they feel we a far fairer Nation than Bolt advocates we should be.

If Aborigines camped on Bolt's front lawn without permission recognition or acknowledgement of his title of right Bolt would be up in arms demanding his rights be recognized. However he pays no respect recognition or acknowledgement to the first peoples of this land if their ancestors graves a dug up. In fact they are no different from Bolt but only playing at being different for money that should be fine because Bolt does the same. Free Speech  allows all Australians to seek their rights doesn't it Bolt certainly seeks his doesn't he on a daily basis whinging all the time and claiming victim-hood in the process. Why is the man such a whinger when he's wealthy and has cultural capital to boot? Why is he still here if he hates the place so much? We watched the first peoples of Australia welcome Andrew Bolt to their lands on the ABC but have we ever seen Andrew Bolt welcome an Aboriginal Australian to his place? He keeps telling us he once had a bestie who was blackfella but he's never told us what he's doing today has he. He also says some of his best friends are Jews. He sounds like the bullshitter that said to the girls "I promise I'll put it in a little if it hurts I'll take it out" Judge Mordecai Bromberg knew exactly who Andrew Bolt was and still is today. Why has he posted Dan Turnbull's photo one might well ask?

TURNING HIRSI ALI INTO THE ":EXTREMIST"

Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s decision this week to pull out of her Australian tour should shame us. The attacks on her have been so vicious that they make clear that having a debate has become too dangerous for the safety of us all.  

Column 6 A

Who is Andrew Bolt defending?

1) Hirsi Ali 's parents said she was lying her response they were lying Bolt believes her why? Because she fits his anti- Islamic bigotry.

2) The Dutch Government said Hirsi Ali lied on her application for asylum. Bolt fails to mention it why it doesn't suit his portrayal of a heroine

3) Think Inc Have refused to comment on Ali's non appearance there seem to be commercial questions un answered which Bolt ignores but prefers exaggeration instead 5000 demonstrators.

4) In todays instant internet links Bolt cries he was to have her on his show but fear stepped 21rst Century fake news.

5) Hirsi Ali has been publicizing herself for 10 years with the help of Murdoch media. Bolt talks of threats here sponsors hav denied receiving any . 

Who is bullshitting here and who has the reputation for doing just that Andrew Bolt

 

HOW THE BIASED ABC FRAMED HANSON

The ABC tried this week to destroy Pauline Hanson — again — in yet another abuse of its massive power. And it didn’t only advertise its Leftist bias in attacking a party of the Right. The ABC’s Four Corners also may have broken the law, airing a secretly taped phone call between Hanson and a One Nation senator.

The ABC report was not an editorial unlike Andrew Bolt's .

1) The electoral Commission is investigating the financial activities of One Nation. Andrew Bolt believes that should remain a secret as long as they aren't a Union.

2) Who bought the plane for $75,000. Who and for what purpose seems a reasonable question given the electoral rules and the emails revealed.

3) Why was James Ashby printing company have sole rights in a free market? Malcolm Roberts says he was the cheapest without proof typical of a Roberts statement.  The printing was the printing done  illegal unusable and not refundable? It's a fair question but that was biased reporting according to Bolt. Why was it fake Mr Bolt?

4) Hanson was writing what appeared to be franchise contracts wasn't that a legitimate question. It was a secret and private according to Bolt. It may have been except it was being done by a political party.

5) One Nation members of longer standing than even Pauline Hanson were kicked out of the party. According to Bolt their complaints shouldn't have been aired. They had no right to a voice.

The ABC did not print Fake News or Frame Hanson. She is under investigation and not just by the ABC

THE ONE NATION CANDIDATE THE ABC DID NOT WANT TO SHOW

Yesterday I said the ABC’s Four Corners program had twisted the evidence to make One Nation seem it was racist. The reporter went to a pub to find One Nation supporters and seemed only to find people who really didn’t like foreigners. Now meet the One Nation candidate she filmed for two days but then didn't show. You may well guess why not.    

 How pathetic is Bolt he pulls an Asian Australian out of the box to show One Nation isn't Racist. It's quite simple "one sandwich doesn't make a picnic." "One Andrew Bolt doesn't make an Australian." " One kind guard on Manus doesn't make it paradise" However Andrew Bolt believes he is representative of Australians are and Mr Chang is representative of One Nation. History and context have no place in Bolt's disconnected world. It's why he sees himself as an indigenous Australian.
  Just because these two men were on TV and  in suits doesn't make either of them more believable. Pauline Hanson was against our immigration policies 25 years ago and she still is today her examples of what it means to be Australian  may have changed but the underlying prejudice mirrored by  her anti- multiculturalism hasn't. Andrew Bolt remains the same a Hanson doppelganger.
 Hanson's history is best exemplified by her statements today that "Islam is a disease and is in need of vacination". It was Asians 25 years ago their impact and use as a stand out example may have passed her by. Today 35 different nationalities are now encompassed in her statement that Muslims are a disease. No Pauline they are Europeans, Australian converts, Asians  people from the Middle East and elsewhere and they are all encompassed in her definition of a "disease" we proudly call Australia.

 

 

WHY THIS ANTI-WHITE RACISM?

  What institutional privileges has white Australians lost  none. What Institutional privileges have Indigenous Australians gained in 200 years simply look at any social indicators and you will find very few. What privileges have Muslim Australians taken from white Australians like Andrew Bolt? How many Muslims work at Sky? How many Andrew Bolt's are working in underpaid jobs? How many Andrew Bolt's are cleaners in out hospitals? When applying for a job how many does Abdul have to apply for before getting a hearing. How long does Fatima need to wait before she gets an interview. There is no reverse racism in Australia and I'm white and if I could act a racist against Andrew Bolt  I would but all it would amount to is my anger and prejudice at  extremely unlikable Australian a bigot and If I were black or Muslim I'd still be justified in my opinion of him without being a racist. My perjudice isn't systemic Institutional or cultural and doesn't influence Bolt in any substantial way but his attitude towards me an indigenous Australian does because he treats me as an Abo with 200 years of effect. Bolt is just another white prick who hasn't a clue.

 

LIBERAL HQ IN TURMOIL: TONY NUTT QUITS

Malcolm Turnbull and the Liberals have lost their federal director, Tony Nutt, just 18 months after pushing out the great Brian Loughnane, Tony Abbott's ally. It is sold as renewal but looks like chaos.

  I remember when Andrew Bolt kept telling us Tony Nutt was coming Tony Nutt was coming to fix Abbott's PMO and save Tony Abbott. It was like waiting for Godot Tony Nutt never came why? Bolt offered no explanation other than he was busy on the NSW state election. It seemed more like Tony Nutt saw Abbott as a lost cause and stayed away from the turmoil he had created in the party. Nutt didn't surface until Malcolm Turnbull ran for election. 
There was never even an appearance of this backroom superhero to try to save Abbott & Credlin. It appears his time is over now as is the Liberal Party's because simply said. because Tony Abbott hasn't move on and his stench is ingrained. Oh Abbott put on his veil like a burka and has rocked the boat  from behind the curtain as only he knows how. He is in opposition to his own party which he disregards unless it's his team. Nutt wants out to be remembered as a winner not a loser.

Andrew bolt's Blog, 4/4/17; Fundamentalism Bolt leads by example; Fundamentalism Islamophobic, Conservative Fundamentalism of the 5%; Bolt bull using Hirsi Ali; Catholic Church is the victim; Abbott the Martyr; Looking for a center;

 

TERRORIST ATTACK IN RUSSIA - 10 DEAD

Another suspected terrorist attack: two trains in Moscow bombed, killed 10 people. And the picture of the wanted man suggests the usual suspects.

 Bolt seems to be incapable of distinguishing the difference between the personal, politics and religion. Russia didn't invade Chechnya because they were Muslim but for political reasons however Chechens retaliated because they were Muslim and Russia was Christian, The Serbs didn't kill Bosnians because they were Muslim but for political reasons. However the Bosnians killed Serbs because they were Christian and the Bosnians Muslim. Blair Howard and Bush didn't invade Iraq because they were Muslim but Iraqi hate and Sunni retaliation is because they are Muslim and the US  are Christian. 

 Andrew Bolt is the  religious fanatic the fundamentalist because unlike Muslims fighting for a variety of reasons. Andrew Bolt is a commentator who reduces every fight or act of violence in today's world into it's religious foundations. That's what makes Andrew Bolt the Religious Fundamentalist and why he's little more than the mirror opposite of ISIS. When  the actions can in fact have a political, personal,and social dimension  explanation that  provide  more clarity Andrew Bolt reduces them to a single explanation religion and refuses to invite any other.

 

 

 

CAPTURED BY THE LEFT; THE ORGANISATIONS THAT ENFORCE PC

NSW Solicitor General Michael Sexton says it's not surprising that the Liberals find so few people willing to support their reforms, from free speech to border controls.  Check the list of powerful organisations captured by the politically correct class- and he hasn't even singled out the most powerful.

  Reversing the very notion of organizations their structures and purpose in Australia is Bolt using his simplistic template called flipping. Our education institutions are anti- education, Our LNP government is anti government, Our media anti- media and so forth apparently Australia has been taken over by an amorphous group of Marxists running the country and the tail is wagging the dog according to Bolt. Hello isn't that what's happened to the Liberal Party where a handful of extreme right wing conservatives are preventing the LNP from running the country. They don't appear to be left wing to me but the extreme opposite.

Bolt turns away from the fact that the whole of Australia is left of Putin to his old cherry the biased ABC. The fact that 85% of Australians trust and support the ABC just proves how captured by the left this country is. How ignorant we are for not recognizing Bolt and his 5% on right wing religious fundamentalists there in the corner wanting so desperately to shine the ever loving light on us. One problem however they are all so depressed and constantly whinging that none of us are interested in what they have to say. Try walking into a room with shake hands and then count your fingers. As for political correctness Bolt the free speech advocate insists manners  and suitswill protect us all.

" When Sexton says "many media organisations" he glosses over the fact that they included the massive, state-funded ABC, which seems totally captured by activists. The ABC really does need a shout-out of its own."Bolt

 

WHY SHOULD AUSTRALIA FRIGHTEN A HIRSI ALI?

My editorial from The Bolt Report - Ayaan Hirsi Ali's decision to call of her tour here must surely be the last straw. Why is having a debate here so dangerous?

 Quite simple Andrew Bolt she just might accrue an economic and commercial loss. There is no law that would have prevented her saying what she has to say nor is there a law preventing others from opposing what she has to say. In the case of Hirsi Ali her projected profit was it seems a loss and so the event was cancelled. For Bolt to ignore this and simply reduce the situation to s debate between the free speech or the debate between Islam and Christian values shows Bolt for what he is a Fanatic and extreme Fundamentalist. However why is he because it's a decision that brings him the attention needed for a successful commercial outcome just like Ali's unsuccessful one. The bull about not having Ali on his show is just that crap. Bolt could have arranged an online interview at the drop of a hat. However there's greater mileage in saying he missed out.
 

WHY NO QUESTIONS OF ISLAM FROM ROYAL COMMISSION?

I think we deserve an answer from royal commission into child sex abuse: "Lawyer Peter Kelso, who has represented 15 survivors of Christian institutions, recently wrote to the commission asking if it had looked at abuse from within Islam, particularly relating to forced child marriage, female genital mutilation and child sex." He got no reply.    

 The investigation of the Catholic Church arose because of the multiple complaints by persons who were victims of sexual abuse. Bolt it seems is calling for an investigation into Islam when there have been no such series of complaints about Islam. However the fundamentalist he is he seems to regard any act of sexual abuse by a Muslim is proof that Islam should be investigated. However any acts by a Catholics are not  seen as representative of the Catholic Church which Bolt actually sees as the victim here. What Bolt reveals here is his  ignorance another quality of an extreme fundamentalists. Genital mutilation is not a part of Islam it's a cultural practice performed by Christians as well as Muslims and it's not in the Koran. "Forced" Child marriage is not an exclusive practice to Islam either it also has cultural roots in many religions and is still practiced. Bolt's ignorance is born on his single minded fundamentalist focus his need to reduce the world and it's explanations into the most simplistic and base levels of faith, colour and ethnicity to prove his anti- immigration, racist and Islamophobic stance.

 

 

WILL INSIDERS APOLOGISE TO ABBOTT?

Insiders last Sunday smeared Tony Abbott, accusing him of lying to the Chinese - a claim apparently picked up from the secret briefings of Foreign Minister Julie Bishop. But now that Dennis Shanahan has exposed that false claim, will the ABC correct the record?

 This isn't Bolt defending himself but his Troll Peter BH whose work Bolt declared his own with little more than a thank to "reader" Peter BH . Basically Bolt often uses other peoples work with minimal recognition  later saying " When  I said this".

 What falls short and fails in this intricate focus on  the fine detail of who said what and when is we don't know what's been conveniently left out of the Abbott defense. But when we turn to the history of the characters involved in this defense  of Abbott's martyrdom  it isn't so obvious that he's being defended at all.

 Bolt's a convicted liar. Abbott has been caught out lying so many times it no longer bears counting. Shanahan works for Murdoch and when Sheridan was used the other day we already knew he was Abbott's mate since uni days and believes his shit doesn't stink. On the other side we have a group of professional journalists whose integrity has only been attacked by Abbott and Bolt one a sponsored by Rupert Murdoch  as we saw at the embarrassing Alfalfa Club debacle and the other an employee. Murdoch well we saw how prone he was to take the Alan Bond defense when seriously questioned himself about facts in the UK he didn't want to answer. It's a laydown mizzaire as to who is the most believable not just the most trusted and it's not these three.Tony Abbott's 'private dinner' with Barack Obama actually a lunch ...

 

Setting the record straight on one of Tony Abbott's phantasies in 2016 ...

 

 

TURNBULL SHOULDN'T BE A WHATEVERIST

Malcolm Turnbull has told the Liberals they must be in the "centre".  Wrong: they should fight for their principles, and not simply opt to be in the centre of battlegrounds defined by others. They should be a party of conviction, not mere managerialism. Tony Abbott put it better last night.

What a joke there is no center just a fight over principles there is no team just an argument about how and why the game should be played. The crowd is secondary to all but this battle royal about winning.

In one breathe Bolt declares there is no center "
"But the centre always shifts, depending on who is challenging the status quo."
Then he defines the center as left of Abbott if anyone who needs convincing

" In fact, the Liberals should fight not to be in the centre but should fight for their principles, and convince the centre of the rightness of them." Bolt

In other words there is "no team" just a fight for control that being the case what hope is there for Liberal party with a minority within it brigands lead by Abbott. It's not an outward looking Party with any intent on solving the nations problems. It's only a party playing politics with itself. Paul Kelly defined it accurately on Q&A 

 "In a veiled criticism of Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, Mr Abbott also hit out at the Coalition for focusing on the “sensible centre” rather than having issues to ‘fight for’."Bolt

Why the need for being "veiled"  if there are principles are involved? Is a Abbott in need of  Burka trying not to be recognized?  We know Abbott changes at whim the things he claims to fight for principles are easily set aside depending who he declares as the enemy at the time. Even Bernardi said he'd been double crossed by Abbott. The man is on a road of broken promises strewn behind him and many are principles crossed.

 Sensible center indeed the only reason Abbott is in the Liberal Party is he knows he can't become PM again without them it has nothing to do with either a sensible center or principles because alone  Abbott would poll no more or less than Hanson taking some of her votes but not adding many of his own. He needs to KO the Liberal Party as it is and the ALP are happy to see him doing it. But as Kelly points out where is Australia in all of this

 

Andrew bolt's Blog; 3/4/17; Bolt's false claim he can't interview Hirsi Ali is bullshit; Bolt sounds depressed about the Murdoch Poll; Backwards is Bolt's forwards; Bolt doesn't wear Chesty Bonds; When half a story is Bolt's full one; ABC bias ofcourse; Judicial Bias Of course; Royal Commission bias of course;

 

HIRSI ALI CANCEL'S TOUR, CITING MORE THREATS

My guest on tonight's The Bolt Report was to be Ayaan Hirsi Ali. She has now cancelled her Australian tour for security reasons, among other factors. And, indeed, the threats and abuse to the tour organisers have been astonishing - at least, to those who haven't noticed the increasing intolerance of the Left and Islamic Right.

 Bolt has a funny way of advertising who was to be on his show but couldn't make it." Watch my coulda been great show" Milo and Hirsi Ali won't be there along with...... 

Hirsi Ali has cancelled for "security reasons" among other excuses according to Bolt. Firstly Bolt does interviews online all the time so lets count that excuse as bullshit that threats have prevented him from talking to her. Further his statement "And, indeed, the threats and abuse to the tour organisers have been astonishing " knowing Bolt sounds very much like hyperbole shoveling even more bullshit on given no specifics are mentioned and Bolt has a history of bull. The likelihood of Ms Ali's non attendance is the lack of bums on seats, ticket sales.

 She has been a product of profit for Think Inc on too many occasions previously here in Australia. It simply  suggests this one is particularly different and has revealed she has bee over milked. Bolt an Ali publicist is doing for her and himself what he used to do for Milo. Remember  Milo just went too far and Bolt backed off with no explanation of why. Milo was an international event and Bolt was just a fair weather friend. He doesn't mention Milo anymore.

Here is Bolt  with all the hysteria and bull he can muster when the truth is Bolt could pay for Ali to be interviewed tonight if he wanted.  However his product has gone stale and because it wouldn't help his ratings he's dropped her too.

All this abuse and blame poured on everyone left right and center in order to  keep a fire burning that in the case of Hirsi Ali seems to have run out of fuel. It's all so unconvincing as as is Bolt is trying to throw gasoline on it.  Nobody is stopping him from interviewing this woman who he claims is another Salmon Rushdie. Ali is a victim yes of the media and marketing that brought her to our attention in the first place and she has been double crossed by none than Sky. What's interesting   is Bolt's inability to sell product he can only chase it he little more than a camp follower.

The Media becomes the victim those in power become victims Bolt merely seems to  apply a template to all his arguments and has a very limited number of those. In this case the media that is Bolt and his product are the victims  of a much more insidious powerful force the mythical and organized people of the left  bigger than Newscorp bigger than commercial interests all 400 academics who signed a petition.  Bolt really thinks he's the master of the dark arts. When the  Australian majority is in the top ten happiest in the world.

• SKY News 2017: highlights

  
  

  

  Paul Murray Live will extend to two hours each night as part of SKY News 2017. Does Bolt struggle for ratings or just ride on the back of rating news? Bolt tries to rate on the celebs that are a no show when in today's age of technology there is no such thing.
  Read more

NEWSPOLL: LIBS BACK TO 47% TO 53 BEHIND

It's pointless looking back over the last fortnight to explain the latest dip in Newspoll, with the Turnbull Government back to 47 per cent to Labor's 53 after preferences. The inflexions hardly matter. The bottom line is the public seems to have switched off - off Turnbull and off politics, and nothing the government does seems to matter.

The celebration that was there last week seems to have faded from Bolt's tone when the polls showed  a 10 pt spread. From celebration and excitement Bolt's sunk to  a round shouldered expression of  "It's pointless looking back"" it's the public's fault" they have switched off. The only person who sounds "switched off" no "pissed off" is Andrew Bolt

THE LEFT TURNS AFL INTO ITS SOAPBOX

THE Left are such bullies that there’s now even a push to hijack the AFL to nag us into accepting same-sex marriage.  This time, Caroline Wilson, chief football writer of The Age, has urged the AFL to take “a strong public position on same-sex marriage”. Wilson is far from alone in treating the AFL like a megaphone for the Left.

Bolt's  ultra conservative panic is little more than a "gormless hoax" did any of the Conservatives walk out or complain at the game. Is what appears to be the the empty seats in his picture empty due to protest? I don't think so! Bolt's ultra conservatism is  the sound of the whinging man the sound of an emperor with no clothes, bleating lost soul looking for a home not knowing where to go. Bolt's neither Australian nor Dutch  Paraguay might offer him solace because Israel certainly wouldn't have a bar of him. He'd make them look worse than he does us.

The Dutch are far too green and warming attuned, too socially aware to have Bolt welcomed as the prodigal son.
  Bolt not only rejects the future but he stridently rejects the present as well hoping for a return to some bygone days  when Fonzie  once lived.

Yearning the past has become a political force according to Mark Triffit. Rapid change brought on by Globalization and Technology has brought on uncertainty "  Everywhere, to their eyes, there is "fake" news, "fake" climate science, "fake" behaviour and opinion (aka political correctness) and even "fake" citizens (read non-white minorities).

Ultra -conservatives like Bolt ,Abbott,Abetz et al" Hanson and Bernardi have built their political power around amplifying and legitimating this groundswell of disorientation and angst with the 21st century and an intense desire to retreat deep into the past." Their denial of  Marriage Equality, Safe Schools is representative of their desperation to hold on to the past.

" The radical right imagines it can conjure up 1970s manufacturing jobs in an AI age. They obsess about isolating foreign cultures with walls in a digital age where isolation is impossible " "Ultimately the next 20 years promises far more hope, innovation and inclusion than the distorted prism of the past through which the radical right wants us to view it." Triffit

TRASHING AUSTRALIA MAKES ISLAM STRONGER

Pauline Hanson now claims Islam is a “disease”. But even if it was, our real problem is that Australia’s resistance is low. Islam wouldn’t be half the danger the One Nation leader believes if our elites hadn’t trashed our culture and driven us into tribes. Here are the latest two telling examples.

Column 3 Apr 0 comments

There was a time when the Labor Party of Australia was in the turmoil conservatives find themselves today. When the DLP broke from the ALP, to stand against the Atheist disease that the Communists were spreading. Menzies and the Liberals took opportunity of that division. The same is occurring now and is being engineered by Tony Abbott once a stalwart of DLP thought and he's fractured  the conservative party.
 Instead of "reds under beds" Bolt and Hanson are running with "Islam is the disease". Bolt seems to portray Indigenous Australia alongside them given his pictorial. This is the attitude allowed the Menzies Government to standby and watch 1 million Indonesians get slaughtered when Liberals were very pro the Islam to save our bacon. Bolt and Hanson hate them now. This division took us to Vietnam and it seems today Atheists compared to Muslims are back in favor if a choice were made. "Better red with a head their catch phrase".

Bolt uses this to segues into his ridiculous persistence that Reverse Racism and anti- Christianity exist. This hatred is disguised as affirmative action any help offered to those considered lower on Bolt's social ladder is a form of a reversal of white privilege and therefore dangerous. Bolt never defines what his Australian flag actually represents however he is clear on what it doesn't.  I do believe Bolt actually sees Australian heaven and the flag representing a time even before he was born a myth. The 50s early 60s he was 6-7 a time when he was actually Dutch a migrant kid in transition more Muslim than Australian more indigenous than the conservative myth he dreams of. It only goes to show that the dream sold and unreal lives on in the minds of ultra- conservative fools like Bolt. He's never experienced what it is he's talking about. However that 6 year old boy wasn't an Australian then didn't know or understand what it meant and it's been his thought bubble since which has amplified his own bias against immigrants. How can he know then what it is to be Australian today when he doesn't hang out with any not even his workmates. His wife Sally Morel is never seen with him it's as if she's wearing a Burka and doesn't want to be recognized.  Very different from Waleed Aly's wife. Who is the more Australian couple?

 

 

TWO DETAINED MEN PROVE BISHOP WRONG ON CHINA

Foreign Minister Julie Bishop is still pushing for an extradition treaty with China, claiming families of Australians detained in China are scared what will happen if it stays blocked. But a Sydney academic just freed by China says ratifying the treaty would be dangerous. And a Swedish human rights worker just freed is another warning why.

 I won't comment on Bolt's stolen Blog it wasn't written by him. It's the work of his Troll Peter BH who he falsely claims is just a "reader". I prefer to call it plagiarism.

The biggest problem with Peter BH's argument is that the extradition treaty has no qualifications attached. Qualifications that on a case by case basis allows both governments to reject any order. The great lie is that currently no request for extradition can be made. The Treaty allows  for such requests Now Bolt the great advocate of "free speach" wants that dialogue to remain firmly shut why? Extradition orders can always be refused. Something Bolt and Peter BH seem to remain silent on 

ISN'T THE ANSWER TO THE ABC'S QUESTION OBVIOUS?

Four Corners wails that reporter Caro Meldrum-Hanna wasn't allowed near Pauline Hanson: "Why didn't James Ashby want us filming @PaulineHansonOz?" May I refer Four Corners' to Meldrum-Hanna's record?

 Self- serving post if ever there was one links  simply to a Bolt rant on ABC bias it has no relevance to James Ashby  unless of course you want to be reminded of the Abbott petulant ban on the ABC. You see neither like being questioned which is the nature of journalism and the essence of what Bolt calls bias.  Bolt's link is all about Bolt how he has been employed as George Pell's PR manager calling that journalistic integrity.

As for the truth about ABC bias that was clearly answered last week by the newly appointed Chairman of the ABC who makes Andrew Bolt seem like a spoilt child.

 

WALKED FREE? AFTER ARMED ROBBERIES?

I'm not surprised many Sudanese criminals think they're untouchable: "An Apex-linked teen who terrorised staff in a series of armed robberies targeting jewellery stores is likely to get off scot-free if he behaves himself in the next year. Judge Liz Gaynor has deferred sentencing of Akon Mawien for 12 months."

 Apparently we are all meant to be equal under British law except if your Sudanese says Andrew Bolt or Indigenous, Muslim, and whoever else Bolt takes exception to. Notice how Bolt generalizes without reference to the basis on which the court made it's decision. Only his judgement counts no separation between his opinion and the judiciary is allowed in Bolt's KKK land

 

RIGGED ROYAL COMMISSION MAKES THE CONCLUSIONS I PREDICTED ON DAY ONE

What was the point of spending $50 million on a royal commission into juvenile detention in the Northern Territory? When  Mick Gooda was appointed royal commissioner he'd already declared the NT Government guilty and said Aboriginal children shouldn't be locked up so often. I predicted then exactly what his report has now recommended. It's a fix.

Has anyone taken the time to follow the Royal Commission and the evidence presented. Andrew Bolt hasn't he hasn't taken into account any of the evidence especially the evidence presented by his "victims" at Don Dale . That evidence certainly revealed the bias that existed in the system the system and so strongly defended by Andrew Bolt. It's the Andrew Bolt's of the world whose defense of state sponsored crime in the media that requires these commissions to occur. They spread mistrust which results in the need of $50 million dollar hearings to take place. All Bolt has to offer is a factless "I told you so response". As if guards were just joking when asking kids to "suck my cock".