Andrew bolt's Blog, 4/4/17; Fundamentalism Bolt leads by example; Fundamentalism Islamophobic, Conservative Fundamentalism of the 5%; Bolt bull using Hirsi Ali; Catholic Church is the victim; Abbott the Martyr; Looking for a center;

 

TERRORIST ATTACK IN RUSSIA - 10 DEAD

Another suspected terrorist attack: two trains in Moscow bombed, killed 10 people. And the picture of the wanted man suggests the usual suspects.

 Bolt seems to be incapable of distinguishing the difference between the personal, politics and religion. Russia didn't invade Chechnya because they were Muslim but for political reasons however Chechens retaliated because they were Muslim and Russia was Christian, The Serbs didn't kill Bosnians because they were Muslim but for political reasons. However the Bosnians killed Serbs because they were Christian and the Bosnians Muslim. Blair Howard and Bush didn't invade Iraq because they were Muslim but Iraqi hate and Sunni retaliation is because they are Muslim and the US  are Christian. 

 Andrew Bolt is the  religious fanatic the fundamentalist because unlike Muslims fighting for a variety of reasons. Andrew Bolt is a commentator who reduces every fight or act of violence in today's world into it's religious foundations. That's what makes Andrew Bolt the Religious Fundamentalist and why he's little more than the mirror opposite of ISIS. When  the actions can in fact have a political, personal,and social dimension  explanation that  provide  more clarity Andrew Bolt reduces them to a single explanation religion and refuses to invite any other.

 

 

 

CAPTURED BY THE LEFT; THE ORGANISATIONS THAT ENFORCE PC

NSW Solicitor General Michael Sexton says it's not surprising that the Liberals find so few people willing to support their reforms, from free speech to border controls.  Check the list of powerful organisations captured by the politically correct class- and he hasn't even singled out the most powerful.

  Reversing the very notion of organizations their structures and purpose in Australia is Bolt using his simplistic template called flipping. Our education institutions are anti- education, Our LNP government is anti government, Our media anti- media and so forth apparently Australia has been taken over by an amorphous group of Marxists running the country and the tail is wagging the dog according to Bolt. Hello isn't that what's happened to the Liberal Party where a handful of extreme right wing conservatives are preventing the LNP from running the country. They don't appear to be left wing to me but the extreme opposite.

Bolt turns away from the fact that the whole of Australia is left of Putin to his old cherry the biased ABC. The fact that 85% of Australians trust and support the ABC just proves how captured by the left this country is. How ignorant we are for not recognizing Bolt and his 5% on right wing religious fundamentalists there in the corner wanting so desperately to shine the ever loving light on us. One problem however they are all so depressed and constantly whinging that none of us are interested in what they have to say. Try walking into a room with shake hands and then count your fingers. As for political correctness Bolt the free speech advocate insists manners  and suitswill protect us all.

" When Sexton says "many media organisations" he glosses over the fact that they included the massive, state-funded ABC, which seems totally captured by activists. The ABC really does need a shout-out of its own."Bolt

 

WHY SHOULD AUSTRALIA FRIGHTEN A HIRSI ALI?

My editorial from The Bolt Report - Ayaan Hirsi Ali's decision to call of her tour here must surely be the last straw. Why is having a debate here so dangerous?

 Quite simple Andrew Bolt she just might accrue an economic and commercial loss. There is no law that would have prevented her saying what she has to say nor is there a law preventing others from opposing what she has to say. In the case of Hirsi Ali her projected profit was it seems a loss and so the event was cancelled. For Bolt to ignore this and simply reduce the situation to s debate between the free speech or the debate between Islam and Christian values shows Bolt for what he is a Fanatic and extreme Fundamentalist. However why is he because it's a decision that brings him the attention needed for a successful commercial outcome just like Ali's unsuccessful one. The bull about not having Ali on his show is just that crap. Bolt could have arranged an online interview at the drop of a hat. However there's greater mileage in saying he missed out.
 

WHY NO QUESTIONS OF ISLAM FROM ROYAL COMMISSION?

I think we deserve an answer from royal commission into child sex abuse: "Lawyer Peter Kelso, who has represented 15 survivors of Christian institutions, recently wrote to the commission asking if it had looked at abuse from within Islam, particularly relating to forced child marriage, female genital mutilation and child sex." He got no reply.    

 The investigation of the Catholic Church arose because of the multiple complaints by persons who were victims of sexual abuse. Bolt it seems is calling for an investigation into Islam when there have been no such series of complaints about Islam. However the fundamentalist he is he seems to regard any act of sexual abuse by a Muslim is proof that Islam should be investigated. However any acts by a Catholics are not  seen as representative of the Catholic Church which Bolt actually sees as the victim here. What Bolt reveals here is his  ignorance another quality of an extreme fundamentalists. Genital mutilation is not a part of Islam it's a cultural practice performed by Christians as well as Muslims and it's not in the Koran. "Forced" Child marriage is not an exclusive practice to Islam either it also has cultural roots in many religions and is still practiced. Bolt's ignorance is born on his single minded fundamentalist focus his need to reduce the world and it's explanations into the most simplistic and base levels of faith, colour and ethnicity to prove his anti- immigration, racist and Islamophobic stance.

 

 

WILL INSIDERS APOLOGISE TO ABBOTT?

Insiders last Sunday smeared Tony Abbott, accusing him of lying to the Chinese - a claim apparently picked up from the secret briefings of Foreign Minister Julie Bishop. But now that Dennis Shanahan has exposed that false claim, will the ABC correct the record?

 This isn't Bolt defending himself but his Troll Peter BH whose work Bolt declared his own with little more than a thank to "reader" Peter BH . Basically Bolt often uses other peoples work with minimal recognition  later saying " When  I said this".

 What falls short and fails in this intricate focus on  the fine detail of who said what and when is we don't know what's been conveniently left out of the Abbott defense. But when we turn to the history of the characters involved in this defense  of Abbott's martyrdom  it isn't so obvious that he's being defended at all.

 Bolt's a convicted liar. Abbott has been caught out lying so many times it no longer bears counting. Shanahan works for Murdoch and when Sheridan was used the other day we already knew he was Abbott's mate since uni days and believes his shit doesn't stink. On the other side we have a group of professional journalists whose integrity has only been attacked by Abbott and Bolt one a sponsored by Rupert Murdoch  as we saw at the embarrassing Alfalfa Club debacle and the other an employee. Murdoch well we saw how prone he was to take the Alan Bond defense when seriously questioned himself about facts in the UK he didn't want to answer. It's a laydown mizzaire as to who is the most believable not just the most trusted and it's not these three.Tony Abbott's 'private dinner' with Barack Obama actually a lunch ...

 

Setting the record straight on one of Tony Abbott's phantasies in 2016 ...

 

 

TURNBULL SHOULDN'T BE A WHATEVERIST

Malcolm Turnbull has told the Liberals they must be in the "centre".  Wrong: they should fight for their principles, and not simply opt to be in the centre of battlegrounds defined by others. They should be a party of conviction, not mere managerialism. Tony Abbott put it better last night.

What a joke there is no center just a fight over principles there is no team just an argument about how and why the game should be played. The crowd is secondary to all but this battle royal about winning.

In one breathe Bolt declares there is no center "
"But the centre always shifts, depending on who is challenging the status quo."
Then he defines the center as left of Abbott if anyone who needs convincing

" In fact, the Liberals should fight not to be in the centre but should fight for their principles, and convince the centre of the rightness of them." Bolt

In other words there is "no team" just a fight for control that being the case what hope is there for Liberal party with a minority within it brigands lead by Abbott. It's not an outward looking Party with any intent on solving the nations problems. It's only a party playing politics with itself. Paul Kelly defined it accurately on Q&A 

 "In a veiled criticism of Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, Mr Abbott also hit out at the Coalition for focusing on the “sensible centre” rather than having issues to ‘fight for’."Bolt

Why the need for being "veiled"  if there are principles are involved? Is a Abbott in need of  Burka trying not to be recognized?  We know Abbott changes at whim the things he claims to fight for principles are easily set aside depending who he declares as the enemy at the time. Even Bernardi said he'd been double crossed by Abbott. The man is on a road of broken promises strewn behind him and many are principles crossed.

 Sensible center indeed the only reason Abbott is in the Liberal Party is he knows he can't become PM again without them it has nothing to do with either a sensible center or principles because alone  Abbott would poll no more or less than Hanson taking some of her votes but not adding many of his own. He needs to KO the Liberal Party as it is and the ALP are happy to see him doing it. But as Kelly points out where is Australia in all of this